Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Burning Magnesium in crucible + water = Ammonia gas
ScienceGeek
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 151
Registered: 22-1-2008
Location: Norway
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 12-3-2008 at 11:04
Burning Magnesium in crucible + water = Ammonia gas


Hi guys.

At school today I demonstrated the dangers of trying to extinguish a Magnesium fire with water (safety precautions were taken).

Magnesium filings were placed in a crucible and ignited with magnesium ribbon. After the Magnesium was left to burn for a little while, drops by drops of water was added.
After quite a lot of water was added, the burning stopped and the crucible was filled with bubbling water (boiling and reacting).

Suddenly, strong ammonia odors was smelt, and confirmed by HCl.

Can someone please tell me what happened, as there is no Nitrogen in any reactant?
My personal theory is that the Magnesium burns hot enough to make some sort of compund with atmospheric Nitrogen, being hydrolysed by the addition of water.

Any suggestions are appreciated :)




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
-jeffB
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 185
Registered: 6-12-2007
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 12-3-2008 at 12:00


Magnesium burns quite happily in pure nitrogen. In air, it burns to a mix of oxide and nitride.

Try burning it in CO2. It grabs the oxygen, and produces heavy carbon soot.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
JohnWW
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 12-3-2008 at 12:32


That ammonia must have been produced by reaction with the N2 in air. As well as in O2 and CO2, Mg (and other alkali and alkaline earth metals, aluminium, and lanthanides) burns in N2 as well, producing the ionic nitride,, Mg3N2. This quickly hydrolyses on contact with water to produce firstly amide anion, NH2-, then NH3. However, because of the large amount of energy required to firstly reduce Mg (or Ca etc) to the metal by electrolysis of molten salts, this is a rather costly method of producing NH3, e.g. as salts for use in fertilizers, compared to the Born-Haber process.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
ScienceGeek
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 151
Registered: 22-1-2008
Location: Norway
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 12-3-2008 at 12:43


So my theory was right, then. Quite some reductive power...

Very nice to get it confirmed, thank you guys! :)




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger

  Go To Top