Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1    3
Author: Subject: Lime green solution...
woelen
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 8012
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline

Mood: interested

[*] posted on 3-12-2010 at 02:16


Do not get surprised if you need very long exposure times. I have done quite a lot of old-fashioned photography and for me, an exposure of 1 minute is nothing special when using standard 100 ASA films. At twilight, exposure times already go up to half a minute with aperture settings of f/8 or so and when it is dark, required exposure times may well be multiple minutes.



The art of wondering makes life worth living...
Want to wonder? Look at https://woelen.homescience.net
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 3-12-2010 at 08:49


Thanks Woelen, but I'll try and improve things 'the digital way'!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
not_important
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3873
Registered: 21-7-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 3-12-2010 at 11:11


Quote: Originally posted by watson.fawkes  
...
Lastly: Traditional spectroscopy was always done in very dark rooms.


And because of that not uncommonly used for courses in advanced snogging....

More seriously it can take quite long exposures, doing a series with big increases in exposure time can be used to bracket the needed time, followed by a series with lesser steps in increasing times to get the needed time, is usually needed when first using a particular setup.

The difficulties with using lower end digital cameras is when some folks have gone with cobbling together a system with the CCD and support chips, but their own controller and software. May digital cameras switch to lower resolution modes, including ones that enable adjacent pixel summing, for low light levels or fast exposures; this can really drop the resolution. Doing your own controller means you can do long exposures at full resolution, some even add TEC cooling to reduce dark current and noise.


For elemental analysis, an arc/spark between iron electrodes was a common source of reference lines, Fe having a a large number of lines in the visible and UV makes it useful for identifying lines in a sample.

View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-12-2010 at 07:51


not_important: Yes, I’m aware that there are people messing about with the optical part of digicams and using their own controller software but that’s not for simpletons like me. I’m just gonna plow on to my Bunsen-Kirchoff – grating/swivel instrument for best identification of single lines… Thanks for the tip on Fe arcing: makes a lot of sense!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1    3

  Go To Top