| Pages:
1
2
3 |
Nitrojet
Hazard to Self
Posts: 56
Registered: 21-10-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I observed the same phenomenon when I tried to fuse a mixture of PETN-Dinitrodimethyloxamide 70/30 in a water bath. A 10gr sample of
mechanically-mixed PETN-Dinitrodimethyloxamide was put in a test tube while the tube was externally heated by means of a water bath assembly. A
sufficient quantity of Ammonium Nitrate then was added to water to increase its boiling point to 110’C. Constant stirring (10 RPM) was held
throughout the test in water bath to insure a uniform heat flow to the sample. The mixture began to melt at 103’C and when the temperature reached
108’C the salted-water medium was boiling. Melting of the mixture continued and after an approximate time of 20 minutes (since the start of
melting), no more change was observed in solid-liquid phases both quantitatively and qualitatively. In actuality, a considerable portion of PETN
remained unchanged thus making a suspension together with the molten phase. I did not try to stir the suspension for getting more uniformity mostly
because PETN in the liquid form can be extremely sensitive to any kind of mechanical stimuli. I removed the heat source and let the mixture solidify
upon cooling. After 1hr I had a cast charge with a cylindrical geometry which was perfectly white in color. For this charge a density value of
1.41gr/cc was obtained through careful measurements. To overcome the non-uniformity of the resulting suspensions, I tried to have casts from a mixture
previously co-precipitated from Acetone. The results were quite satisfactory. In this regard, I made an acetone solution of
PETN-Dinitrodimethyloxamide in proper weight ratio and then precipitated the binary mixture by adding water to the solution. The crystals being
obtained this way are of uniform distribution and upon casting they form a highly homogenous syrupy suspension which is optically translucent. Unlike
the mechanical mixtures of the two explosives, the molten slurries from acetone-co precipitation contain no bulk of solid PETN crystals and the solid
particles are of uniform distribution all throughout the molten phase. The densities, however, show no drastic change when practicing this technique
while they merely exceed 1.50gr/cc.
|
|
|
Rosco Bodine
Banned
Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: analytical
|
|
I suspect that if you take your translucent melt and add little by little to it twice its weight of crystalline PETN , you may be able to increase
the density of the finished composition . You have to go slowly so as not to cool
the melt and you will probably have to " fold in " the
dry material portionwise to get it evenly wetted by the melt and freeing entrapped air . Keeping the mixture a bit above the melting point where it
is thinner will
help the mixing , but it will still be about like trying to
wet granulated sugar with corn syrup or honey , and
getting the air out of it . Don't overstir it , once it is
fairly well mixed it should be like mixed epoxy which
is very viscous also , but if disturbed only slightly at
intervals the tiny bubbles will rise to the surface and
escape the thick slurry . If you stir it too much or too
vigorously it mixes air into the slurry instead of helping it to coalesce and escape . It is very much the same
as working with concrete where a vertical agitation
with a rod inserted and jiggled up and down a bit will settle the mix and bring any air to the surface , but any stirring which swirls the mixture
only puts more air into it .
You might be able to gain a point or a point and a half on the density by special technique of loading the melt in this manner , unless of course the
added solid PETN
disrupts the eutectic ....only an experiment will tell .
|
|
|
Nitrojet
Hazard to Self
Posts: 56
Registered: 21-10-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
PETN gives an Eutectic with Dinitrodimethyloxamide in 37% Wt. ratio. So you mean i should prepare the eutectic beforehand and after complete fusion i
can go on adding the rest of PETN in small portions to the point that i get my favorite 70/30. occassional stirring is also needed to drive off all
the entraped air bubbles from the PETN crystals.
|
|
|
Rosco Bodine
Banned
Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: analytical
|
|
Yes . And it wouldn't hurt to make the initial Eutectic
a bit poor in PETN , by maybe 10-15% so that it must get the remainder from wetting the surface of the greater amount of PETN which you will be adding
as a filler .
Doing this , and heating the initial melt which is not exactly eutectic above the temperature of the known eutectic enhances the wetability of the
bulk filler PETN ,
and makes it easier to mix , and makes the thermodynamic more favorable for the mixing , because
even if the mixture is cooling a bit as the filler is added ,
the mixture is also forming the eutectic which resides
at a lower temperature than the initial non eutectic
" solvent " melt which is at a mildly higher temperature ,
if you follow the logic . The approach towards the eutectic tends to offset the cooling of the mixture from the added filler . Every little trick
helps .
Also , disregard the eutectic ratio as applicable to the
total finished composition ....the eutectic is only the melt phase of what is a slurry of the melt liquid , loaded with an aggregate of additional
crystalline PETN , until it is a consistency of a gritty sticky goo like wet concrete .
The eutectic portion is simply the glue that sticks the
solid PETN together .
[Edited on 3-11-2006 by Rosco Bodine]
|
|
|
Sickman
Hazard to Self
Posts: 98
Registered: 9-5-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: Icy and I see!
|
|
Hey Rosco,
I am just sitting here scratching my head trying to understand what exactly determines the final density in a melt.
I use the following example to try to illustrate my question:
Let's suppose you have an explosive with a crystal density of 1.5 and another explosive with a crystal density of 1.6
and what I mean by crystal density is supposing you had a large crystal of each explosive that just happens to measure 1 cubic centimeter each, but
amounts to 1.5 and 1.6 grams respectivly. Now suppose these explosives had a melting point within a few degrees of each other and are in fact melted
together and then solidified. From my basic understanding I would think that in order to estimate what the density will be you add 1.5 + 1.6 = 3.1
then 3.1 / 2 =1.55
Now, am I going in the wrong direction here, as far as my method of estimating what the density of the finished melt will be?
I've read in some literature that usually if a melt is cooled faster it retains a higher density than if it is cooled slowly.
What are the principles that dictate the finished density of a melt? Are ther non explosive materials that can be added to increase the density in a
good way?
Is the best way to increase density in a melt to perhaps add materials that will modify the resulting crystals in a way that makes them more dense?
|
|
|
Rosco Bodine
Banned
Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: analytical
|
|
I never really thought much about such matters ,
I suppose the same effects of volume compression
of melted mixtures are possible in some cases
as for when liquid solutions are mixed . Barium nitrate
has been used as a densifier for TNT mixtures ,
and I think lead nitrate also . I don't know of any
particular rules or principles in regards to such mixtures
other than to just make 'em and measure the density
to see what you have .
|
|
|
Boomer
Hazard to Others
Posts: 190
Registered: 11-11-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The volume compression Rosco mentioned, if it does happen, will have a small effect on the final density, especially if you add over 50% crystals that
don't dissolve. So as a first aproximation you can probably use the average of the TMDs as the TMD of the mix.
Note the "T", as in theoretical? Ever had a look at PETN, RDX etc under a 500x microscope? What we think are single crystals are often *agglomerates*
of crystals with trapped air between. Due to the fine structures involved this air gets stirred into the melt, and does *not* rise to the surface like
the air stirred in mechanically does. Hence the low density, which can be 25% under the theoretical. 
Plus, for non-perfect HEs with either impurities, or low thermal stability, very small gas bubbles are generated on heating the melt. These don't
escape either, lowering the density of the cast. As an example, if there is HDN in the melt/cast AN mix I described elsewhere, density goes from the
theoretical 1.75+ to 1.50 and below. Before solidification, the cast was spongy, I could press it further into the casing and it 'sprang' back (read:
expanded outwards slowly).
This property does not have to be a disadvantage. If the effect is not too pronounced, it can make initiation much easier, plus lower the critical dia
quite a lot. 25% below TMD is too much though, that's also why I will stop adding HDN for future melt/cast-AN tests.
[Edited on 4-11-2006 by Boomer]
|
|
|
Nitrojet
Hazard to Self
Posts: 56
Registered: 21-10-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
It is so much better if we restrict ourselves within the realm of practicalities. In actuality the very primary purpose of casting an explosive
compound or a mixture of explosives is to reach the highest possible density in favor of more brisance. Crystal density of a given explosive is the
upper limit to which we can reach under ordinary conditions. In many applications, however, the charge needs not to be necessarily compressed to its
crystal density to have effective functioning. A review of most military cast explosives reveals that the densities fluctuate between 1.55 to
1.75gr/cc depending on the nature of the explosive ingredients and their percentage. In other words manufacture of cast explosives essentially means
not to drive off all the entrapped air bubbles and the micro-cavities inside. The left micro bubbles within the lattice can greatly facilitate the
ease of detonation through their adiabatic compression. So as long as we can go on making cast charges within the mentioned density interval, our
products will be brisant enough to be serviceable in many practices. Focusing on PETN itself as the base explosive for a pourable mixture, if the cast
density exceeds 1.65gr/cc, the pertinent VOD will go beyond 8000m/s which makes the explosive highly brisant. I think such a density is attainable
with ETN and Dinitrodimethyloxamide as the second ingredient for a binary mixture.
P.S I think a good account of ETN is available in “Nitroglycerin and Nitroglycerine explosives” by Naoum. Does anybody have any kind of access to
this book??
|
|
|
Rosco Bodine
Banned
Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: analytical
|
|
The same special crystallization techniques which have
been worked out as industrial methods for producing
clean well formed high density crystals of complementary
mesh sizes for having a high volumetric density as aggregates , are equally applicable to casts as to plastiques for which such methods were developed
.
If the process starts with low volumetric density material , then that is what you end up with , unless
is exhaustively milled , extruded , rollered repetitiously
to squeeze all of the entrapped air out , which will be done anyway . But if the starting materials are optimum
then it greatly reduces the manipulation , particularly for a melt . At a certain particle size , the occluded air will
coalesce and rise to the surface , and the density of the
composition will approach more closely the theoretical
maximum .
|
|
|
Boomer
Hazard to Others
Posts: 190
Registered: 11-11-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Just noting, the max density for most HEs is achieved by pressing, not by casting.
And FYI, it is a common misconception that *adiabatic compression* plays a role in detonation transfer. It may play a role in starting a LVD in liquid
explosives, but detonation transfer works through *voids* not necessarily gas bubbles. Quoting Jerry once again:
"LE uses interstitial space (which is usually filled with air on earth)
as room in which to spurt hot gases to neighboring surfaces. HE, on
the other hand, uses these voids as volumes through which pressure
can be readily exerted such that PV work can be expended and turned
into heat (hot spots). Some people like to think of this process as
the adiabatic compression of entrained gas because they know that
gases get hot when compressed.
In reality, the HE does not care if there is gas present to compress
or not. Even an empty void acts as a place where heat can be generated
by impact with the same end effect as if gas had been present.
Insensitive HE tends to benefit most from dispersed void. Your ANFO (...)
TNT is another example of an explosive that needs a teeny bit of space.
The cast material will not shoot with a 50 gram primer, but the ground
and pressed material shoots fine with a cap even if it is pressed to
*near* its crystal density (...)
Nearly all commercial explosives rely heavily on entrained gas (void)
for sensitivity and will not shoot without its presence. It sometimes
happens that hydrostatic pressure in boreholes is great enough to
compress the voids to the point where the material loses its primer
or cap sensitivity. For such situations there are many formulations
which rely on microballoons of glass or plastic to preserve void volume.
At least in the case of the glass material the void is a pretty good vacuum."/ end quote
Note the last sentence about micro balloons! And:
"Void volume is the operative phrase. Solids
and liquids are not very compressible and therefore do not readily
allow the conversion of PV energy into heat under the influence of
even very high pressures. Add some well distributed void and the
pressure can now do work on the porous mass and reappear as heat
energy within that mass. This enabling of compression explains
the sensitization of detonating explosives by voids. Note however
that this has nothing to do with the adiabatic compression of
any gas in those voids. If there is gas in the voids, it can reach
astronomical temperatures, but in condensed explosives it makes
relatively little difference.
Please be aware that many books refer to the "adiabatic
compression of air" or "gas" in dealing with bubbles in high
explosives such as NG. I base my statements on this matter on my
own experiments in sensitizing both solid and liquid explosive
formulations. I first used the term "void volume" in a patent I
wrote 25 years ago." / end quote
He's advertising kinepack again..... but seriously, I have thought about this myself too, and came to the same conclusion: If it was adiabatic
compression of gas, it would start a *burn* reaction at the bubble wall. This then had to make DDT. A material that has to make DDT layer-wise, again
and again for every sub-millimeter, will not shoot even near it's normal VoD. Convinced?
|
|
|
pdb
Hazard to Self
Posts: 81
Registered: 8-4-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by Nitrojet
P.S I think a good account of ETN is available in “Nitroglycerin and Nitroglycerine explosives” by Naoum. Does anybody have any kind of access to
this book?? |
Unfortunately, you r belief is wrong: ETN accounts for a mere half a page in Naoùm's work, and teaches nothing you don't know yet...
|
|
|
quicksilver
International Hazard
Posts: 1820
Registered: 7-9-2005
Location: Inches from the keyboard....
Member Is Offline
Mood: ~-=SWINGS=-~
|
|
On occation I really look for information on specific materials and ETN is a shallow pool. Aside from some patents and short (one page or muich less)
blurbs in some popular older works, the most material is actually in the boards on the internet (kitchen chemisrty mostly). As you can imagine I am
quite familiar with Naoum's work. What's more there is alot more then just "Nitroglycerin & Nitroglycerine Explosives” but he was involved with
nitric esters more than anything else. At least that was what he published. At that time in histrory eurythritol was very tough to get....it was very
exotic. They nitrated everything and it's dog but those things that got the most study were that which had some commercial future are far as the
scientific community was concerned. Exotic materials were mostly left as lab curiosities.
|
|
|
Nitrojet
Hazard to Self
Posts: 56
Registered: 21-10-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I obtained Erythritol in the form of pressed tablets directly from a pharmacy. I’m not sure about the purity or the possible presence of any other
additives in my tablets but I observed that the whole material went into solution when treated with strong Nitric acid. With the temperature being
kept below 2’C, I got a totally colorless solution with no trace of insoluble material. Crystalline ETN after precipitation from acid was dissolved
in 95% Ethanol and then recrystallized in the form of very thin flakes. Before trying to fuse the explosive with Nitropenta, I made some sensitivity
tests to evaluate the possible dangers involved with this particular type of the Nitric esters family. To test the behavior of the material to heat,
small quantities of ETN was dropped onto a hot plate previously heated to 300’C. In all the tests carried out this way, ETN deflagrated as soon as
it came into contact with the plate. But no detonation observed at all. The test continued for the weights as high as 0.4gr but the mere result was a
rapid deflagration with a very luminous flame. Impact sensitivity tests was rendered with wrapping 0.35gr of the material in thin Aluminum foils and
the small packages made so, was glued against the very smooth surface of a piece of marble. The whole assembly was set perpendicular to the floor and
then shot with leaden pellets from a 0.22 air-rifle (Diana 48-52). A distance of 10ft was kept off the target. Of the total 10 tests performed this
way, ETN detonated 8 times with a very loud report causing the Aluminum sheath to be shattered into hundreds of pieces. In the remaining two tests ETN
actually did not detonate but made yellowish flames resembling that of Mercury Fulminate when fired in open. Considering the fact that the mechanical
conditions under which such tests were carried out, were too strong for evaluating the impact sensitivity of a sensitive explosive like ETN, I made
several ball drop tests in a simple apparatus which I made myself. It consists of a steel-made cylindrical anvil with a very smooth top to minimize
the effects of friction on triggering the charges under test. This anvil is of the height of 1 in and a cross-section area of 0.08 square inch. It is
filmy fixed on a heavy steel plate (pin and box connection), steel balls of various sizes so can be let drop on the charges being emplaced on top of
the anvil from different heights. In my tests with such a ramshackle apparatus ETN sensitiveness to impact was found to be comparable to that of
Mercury fulminate, certainly I did not follow the Military standards for testing of explosives, but Fulminate of mercury gives the same account of
impact sensitivity when being tested in the same apparatus. It did not, however, stop me to proceed more and try to make the highly controversial
cast-melt of ETN-PETN. Yet I have not managed to get my favorite results with such mixtures as firstly the highest attainable density was 1.58gr/cc
and I am about to go as far as 1.65+. Secondly the sensitivity of molten ETN is a big difficulty on my way to Adobe Charges. Once I read somewhere
that molten TNT is as sensitive as MF. Based on this piece of fact, what can we say about molten ETN? Anyway, anybody can confirm/Discredit this claim
that molten TNT is about as sensitive as Fulminate of mercury?
|
|
|
nitro-genes
International Hazard
Posts: 1048
Registered: 5-4-2005
Member Is Offline
|
|
Drop test apparatus with 2 kg weight, 50% explosion:
TNT at 22 deg. C. --> 60 cm
TNT at 110 deg. C. --> 6.5 cm
TNT at 130 deg. C. --> 4.5 cm
I think the idea that explosives become more sensitive with higher temperature is without exceptions indeed. Don't know exactly for ETN, since it
would also depend on the purity and size of the sample. All in all, I do think with ETN @ 80 deg. C you have good reason to be VERY carefull
IMHO...
[Edited on 28-11-2006 by nitro-genes]
|
|
|
quicksilver
International Hazard
Posts: 1820
Registered: 7-9-2005
Location: Inches from the keyboard....
Member Is Offline
Mood: ~-=SWINGS=-~
|
|
ETN is unique in it's sensitivity in that depending upon how it is re-crystalized, one may increase it's sensitivity to impact. IF the crystals are
dense enough the reaction is suprising. The use of methanol for re-crystalization is possible. Acetone is too strong a solvant leaving behind
leaflettes and lessing the solid granular crystals that respond well to impact. testing. Ethanol appears to be best suited for large granular
crystals. (Bring to boiling, desolve at satuaration level, re-crystalize over ice = large multi-facited crystals; hexagonal shapes predominate)
However if the alcohol is not used at temp extremes the leafletts may appear but they can be shaved / crushed to a point wherein the density level
(powder) could be achieved through moderate compression. Quality ETN will yield a marvelous report at 1-1.5 mg level in a small fold of Al foil struck
with a hammer upon a steel surface (eye protection is sufficient at that weight - it's only noise). It may be an interesting experiment to clean out
a primer cap; use ETN-cast and determine if the blow of a firing pin is sufficient for detonation. & if so would this impart a useful train effect
on a cartridge via SBSP or DBSP.
|
|
|
Nitrojet
Hazard to Self
Posts: 56
Registered: 21-10-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Anybody if he is of the slightest idea of the great power of ETN/PETN mixtures, will definitely think twice about it. a 20gr sample of the cast
explosive @ density of 1.58gr/cc shattered a thick conceret block into atoms. The charge was simply put on the concrete block ( 2ft * 1.8ft * 0.4ft)
without any confinement and primed with a blasting cap containing 3gr of pressed Mercury Fulminate. Parts of a wooden box which roomed the charge and
the concerete block were blown off as far as 200 yards away. Shattering power of the test sample was DISTINCTLY more than those of other HEs in my
previous experiments. Now i'm more encouraged towards fining some effective ways of curbing the too downright dangerous sensitiveness of ETN, thus It
becomes feasible to have highly brisnat charges for demolition purposes. I have always kept in my mind that premature detonations of even small
quantities of ETN can be fatal. as reported in "Encyclopedia of explosives" a British pharmacist experienced his divine existance when he tried to
pulverize the material in a mortar! anyway, on my next step I will focus on ETN crystallization for getting crystals of less sensitivity. Methods
recommended by quicksilver look promising and worth considering to be tried out in lab.
|
|
|
Sickman
Hazard to Self
Posts: 98
Registered: 9-5-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: Icy and I see!
|
|
I don't see what the trouble is!
Just add a few percent of a desensitizer. Parrafin wax works well for this purpose and generally has a melting point of around 50-57 degrees celsius.
Davis reports that adding parrafin wax to high explosive, compressed or cast, causes it to become 'distinctly less sensitive to mechanical shock", but
still "responds satisfactory to the impulse of a detonator."
Since ETN is oxygen positive just calculate in the additional fuel to the melt.
A few percent of desensitizer may decrease the density and VoD a bit, but will result in more gas release upon detonation, not to mention a much safer
explosive.
The addition of a few percent wax to military explosives is a well established practice and has many benefits, incuding low cost.
|
|
|
Nitrojet
Hazard to Self
Posts: 56
Registered: 21-10-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Phlegmatization is definitely a widely practiced method for desensitizing high explosives. It renders the explosive suitable for press loading while
here we are not talking about pressing. The potential danger involved with ETN/PETN cast melts, is the prolonged heating of a highly sensitive
explosive which sometimes needs occasional stirring for effective removing of the entrapped air. We can have some crystals of less sensitiveness by
either waxing them or controlled crystallization. It is however true that upon heating, such methods can not satisfactorily eliminate the hazards.
Molten ETN as stated before can be extremely sensitive to any kind of stimuli. Melting ETN/PETN can be safely practiced for making small charges for
detonator fillings but what about a half a pound of a brick demolition charge?! If it was not because of the great power of such mixtures I would
easily put this discussion aside trying to enjoy my waxed PETN which is about as powerful as C-4.
|
|
|
Axt
National Hazard
Posts: 795
Registered: 28-1-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by Nitrojet
I made several ball drop tests in a simple apparatus which I made myself......... |
Posted this before but I too done some drop tests on ETN using the rig in the attachment. It regularly detonated with a drop of 30-35cm, PETN was used
as a standard for comparison which detonated at a drop of 40-45cm. This was for bicarb washed ETN, not recrystalised. Acetone peroxide for example
required only a drop of 0-5cm (it has 5cm increments).
Attachment: droptest.mpg (1.6MB)
This file has been downloaded 1222 times
|
|
|
Boomer
Hazard to Others
Posts: 190
Registered: 11-11-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I can understand his worries. If molten TNT is an order of magnitude more sensitive than solid TNT, molten ETN could end up more sensitive than NG or
MF. Not a nice thought if working with a pound.
Another thing is Tc (critical temperature). Even PETN will self-heat catastrophically below 100C given enough material. ETN's figure will be below
that, possible below 80C (it's melting point). The PETN figure was for a 1m sphere, but still....
Edit:
"... enjoy my waxed PETN which is about as powerful as C-4"
Have you tested both? 
I mean he's right, density has the biggest impact on brisance. Brisance (det pressure): P ~ d*VoD^2, with VoD being roughly proportional to density
*too*, making P~d^3 , i.e brisance goes with the *third* power of the density!
[Edited on 1-12-2006 by Boomer]
|
|
|
nitro-genes
International Hazard
Posts: 1048
Registered: 5-4-2005
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by Nitrojet
Melting ETN/PETN can be safely practiced for making small charges for detonator fillings but what about a half a pound of a brick demolition charge?!
If it was not because of the great power of such mixtures I would easily put this discussion aside trying to enjoy my waxed PETN which is about as
powerful as C-4. |
The original idea of Rosco was use of the PETN/ETN meltcast for detonators and small booster charges IIRC, personally I would never cast more than 25
grams at most...
With properly recrystallized PETN or RDX you can reach densities of 1.7 g/cc with about 5-6% of inert plasticizer. To fill up the same volume with ETN
you would need twice as much. (Even more because rolling the plastique reduces sharp edges on the crystals, further decreasing intercrystalular
space). That is why the PETN/ETN meltcast uses as much as 30% ETN. You should further consider that ETN is not as brisant as PETN. Sure, if it comes
to total poweroutput, the SLIGHTLY better oxygenbalance would be in favor of the PETN/ETN meltcast. But if it comes to shear brisance, I would place
my money on the PETN with 5% inerts...
[Edited on 1-12-2006 by nitro-genes]
|
|
|
AlbertV
Harmless
Posts: 5
Registered: 4-12-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Sorry to come in with a question at this point, but can anyone comment on what is commonly used as inert binder to produce formable PETN putty
mixtures? What about energetic binders that could yield a formable plastique, are there any suitable which exist?
My real question is, are these putty mixtures at a Vod sacrifice in comparison with cast melts such as ETN/PETN where 100% of the mixture is
energetic?
As was said above, PETN with 5% inerts may have comparabe brisance against the ETN/PETN melt, but I would assume a formable putty uses a higher
percentage of inert binder than 5%...maybe I'm wrong however.
[Edited on 5-12-2006 by AlbertV]
|
|
|
Boomer
Hazard to Others
Posts: 190
Registered: 11-11-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
VoD does suffer from inerts, but less than one would think. The 9% inert binder/plasticiser in C-4 do not lower VoD by 9%. Semtex has up to 30% inert
crap (rubber, oil, ...) btw, but is not slowed down 30%. Instead, all materials have a "characteristic velocity" which enters the calculation of the
resulting velocity of the mix. Air (voids, empty space between crystals) has 1.5 km/s, most inerts used as binder are around 4-5 km/s. This does not
mean they speed up slow HEs which are below that speed if pure
Also look here: http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=5469#p...
And no, I won't say what is used. Search for yourself!
|
|
|
nitro-genes
International Hazard
Posts: 1048
Registered: 5-4-2005
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by AlbertV
I would assume a formable putty uses a higher percentage of inert binder than 5%...maybe I'm wrong however.
[Edited on 5-12-2006 by AlbertV] |
With 5% binder it behaves incredibly stiff, but can be kneeded with some force without losing coherency. When kneeded too long the density will
decrease slowly, just like with C4 and it will become more spongy due too entrapped air. The same crystal fraction with 10% binder is much more
mouldable and can be shaped easily, though density is somewhat lower than the theoretically attainable 1.68 g/cc... (usually around 1.6 g/cc instead)
An ordinary crashing in water yields crystals that need about 30% binder to fill all voids, just like the cheaply produced semtex uses...
|
|
|
Microtek
National Hazard
Posts: 871
Registered: 23-9-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Nitrojet, on the first page of this thread you mentioned using hexamine, HCl and oxalic acid to synthesize dimethyloxamide. Could you elaborate on
this please?
I have experimented a bit with the same dinitrodimethyloxamide/PETN compound and ran into the same problems with much lower density than expected, but
due to the difficulty of producing ethyloxalate from esterification of oxalic acid with ethanol, I never got far.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2
3 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
