Pages:
1
2
3 |
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
There was a person in Alaska? I recall who made several large batches of ETN, then melted them under hot water to produce a LARGE single cast charge.
He had pictures of the process, which he posted to roguesci.org along with video of detonating that big block...
He claimed to purify his ETN by melting it in hot water and agitating the mass while adding baking soda to the water in a fashion similar to the way
nitroglycerin has been neutralized by some, rather than dissolving in solvent and re-crystallizing. For the quantities he made, the solvent required
would have run to many gallons and he didn't think it was worth the cost.
I don't know what became of him. Alaska is big enough so no one may have noticed the crater yet.
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
Turner
Hazard to Others
Posts: 197
Registered: 2-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Yes melting ETN under water was also a possibility that crossed my mind. You can purify/stabilize TNT by melting it under water w/ some sodium sulfite
and agitating it which makes the water turn reddish/brown, this removes unwanted TNT isomers I think.
[Edited on 12-2-2014 by Turner]
|
|
Turner
Hazard to Others
Posts: 197
Registered: 2-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by roXefeller | The trouble with ETN is it starts acting like a primary when its molten. Not instant detonation, but more sensitive. Would you be willing to stir
20-100 grams of primary? When you get larger amounts you might get more casual/complacent with it (for whatever reason) or not be able to give it the
respect you can with 2g, and the negative side of accidental detonation gets worse than lost digits. |
ETN acts like a primary when it isn't molten, SA*DS is less impact sensitive (as far as I can tell) than ETN but it is classified as a primary. I have
done hammer and friction tests w/ ETN in molten state and noticed nothing interesting as far as change in impact sensitivity, but I should do a few
more tests. If you ever heat ETN w/ a soft flame you'll notice it quickly melts, and then some time goes by before it heats enough to burn.
[Edited on 12-2-2014 by Turner]
|
|
Zyklon-A
International Hazard
Posts: 1547
Registered: 26-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fluorine radical
|
|
Quote: |
What do you mean leave outside? |
To test the decomposition, my mom wont let me store any explosive in the house (Except maybe TNT, or other very stable material). I have a
few places outside where conditions wont cause accidental detonation.
|
|
Turner
Hazard to Others
Posts: 197
Registered: 2-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Will not decompose just because it is "left outside" do you mean left in a warm environment? Recrystalized and stabilized/nuetral ETN will not
decompose in storage
|
|
Zyklon-A
International Hazard
Posts: 1547
Registered: 26-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fluorine radical
|
|
I just wanted to try it to see how long it will last. I heard that even good ETN will decompose slowly, maybe a warm environment, it's not warm night
now.
I guess it may not be worth the waist, it was just going to be a test.
|
|
valmaramine
Harmless
Posts: 12
Registered: 10-2-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Friends, etn What is your view about the press?(Higher density) ?
|
|
Fantasma4500
International Hazard
Posts: 1681
Registered: 12-12-2012
Location: Dysrope (aka europe)
Member Is Offline
Mood: dangerously practical
|
|
it seems that people are not just lucky, but actually have been capable of doing even LARGE amounts decently well controlled
i think its sad to see that people keeps having these bias'es but then again... energetics accidents are often quite .. energetic
in fact a person on this forum melted a legit primary: TATP under water to then let it crystallize, im quite sure he used exactly this massive crystal
to crush.. it was filmed when he crushed it, and even tho i was quite sure it was gonna blow up, it didnt act much differently than a big sugar
crystal
i think Turner might have something to say with that the ETN will usually go bang when in contact with aluminium or glass, could this mean the
detonation of this energetic is favored by presence of potential fuels??
i have an actual idea for testing this out...
sugar could be cast into a can of some sort, then have a pen or similar small stick like object inserted into it then let cool
the hole could then be filled up with ETN, which would then when inserted into a fire or similar get the ETN molten, and it would then be in full
contact and fully sorrounded with sugar, perhaps they would melt together??
the idea of this is to see whether ETN can and or will undergo detonation if its molten and a potential fuel is present.
note: the hole should not go down to the bottom of the can
i think if this was done, it could give some pretty interesting results, perhaps smaller experiments done later on testing molten ETN with and without
fuels present
i know for a fact that ETN powder mixed with P4 has a lower DDT unconfined as it slightly crackles, i did not see any video but i trust my source, not
to mention i recall other members discussing ETN used as primary with aluminium powder mixed approx 95 5 ratio by weight to make the chances of it
going HE to increase
|
|
packetforger
Harmless
Posts: 48
Registered: 21-2-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: Condensing
|
|
Bert: The chap in Alaska had an accident which nearly killed him (I can remember some of the details that I was told, can always elaborate if needed)
and took down all his materials. The authorities got involved with the situation, I remember finding a couple of articles online about it. If anyone
happened to mirror his videos I would love to get at them.
I recall some melt methods being discussed over at roguesci.org as a possible purification scheme (most memorable was the over-complicated bit of
glassware a member designed for it, until recently I had that image on a USB key until I lost it), some of which seemed similar to purification of
silicon via melting. The melting in hot water seemed somewhat practical also.
A method I have heard of involves dissolving the ETN in hot basified (i.e. bicarb or similar added to) methanol, and actually using a food processor
or similar to mix it. This was done by someone over on roguesci with MHN with a decent degree of success, they were of the belief that the mechanical
mixing helped a lot with neutralizing the ester, followed by crashing into cold water to crystallize and another recrystallization to get the desired
crystal form you wanted.
It has been a long time since I as much as touched an energetic material, but IIRC methanol produced easier handled crystals than acetone when
recrystallizing MHN. Acetone would produce a powdery mess that was almost impossible to load easily, wheras methanol produced a more free flowing
crystals with a "feel" similar to granulated sugar.
Probably entirely off topic, I apologise...
|
|
zeroberts
Harmless
Posts: 16
Registered: 6-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
ETN, proposal of procedure
Before proposing this process:
I apologize if I am posting flagrantly by some etiquettes, I have searched and found nothing specifically relating to this proposal and it's hard for
me to tell (being new to contributing) how to tastefully amend my thoughts to existing topics. So. Here we are.
Much of my short work with ETN has mostly been in-lab versus a "synthesize, blow something up, repeat" approach. By dating my only other topic you
know my tenure here and the relative brevity of my handling experience, but it has assuredly been quite involved. Based on my experiments with re
crystallization I come seeking input on a process.
The objective of this process is to derive a highly purified product which is reliably very stable; existing in a clean form that is easy to handle
and store, as well as convenient to work with.
The other night I had a dream... Only joking. I won't do that dream crap haha. Based on actual activities In the lab, the proposed process is as
follows:
Rinse the filtered off crude ETN-- alternating between a solution of sodium bicarbonate in distilled water, then distilled water only. This is done
thoroughly,and repeatedly until all foaming has apparently stopped; then once more with a long final rinse with distilled water.
The filter paper is laid out on paper towels and a second filter paper placed over the product. Another layer of paper towels is placed on top and the
product is gently pressed to drive out excess moisture.
A hot water bath is prepared. The cake of crude ETN is gently broken up by hand and stirred into alcohol, deliberately over saturating the solution so
as to have undissolved ETN swirling around as stirred. A vessel is prepared, containing very cold water (no ice), the volume of which is to be any
excess of 10x the total volume of the ETN/alcohol mixture.
The beaker containing this mixture is then clamped and placed in the hot water bath and very gently stirred. The milky appearance of the mixture will
give way to clarity as the temperature increases, at which point (proportionally dependent quantity of) sodium bicarbonate is added and stirred in.
When the temperature has reached 61c the mixture is removed from the hot water bath and gently poured into the previously prepared cold water. The
vessel is then refrigerated.
Due to the alcohol, the temperature is able to fall below 0 without freezing which (by my understanding anyway) will make any unprecipitated ETN less
readily soluble. But even above 0 a white disk forms at the bottom of the vessel. This disk is comprised of small hard beads and the disk itself is
rigid enough to be retrieved whole from the liquid.
A hot water bath is prepared again and the disk is dried gently by hand (it is mild in composition and will break or crumble if handled too
aggressively) then broken up gently by hand. The pieces are placed in a beaker then melted via hot water bath.
The molten ETN is poured out on a sheet and allowed to cool. Residual moisture from the disk will separate readily from the molten ETN and therefore
remain beaded up on the cooled sheet of ETN, and can be gently dabbed away with a paper towel.
The solidified sheet of ETN has an ivory color in my experience, and is patterned with overlapping starburst shapes comprised of long needles
(apparently the natural crystal structure of ETN). The sheet is then gently broken up by hand into small "rocks"' which seems an appropriate term as
at this point it certainly resembles crack. the rocks are laid out on paper until the slight alcohol smell is gone.
Thus concluding the proposed process
This rock form is most suitable for my needs. They store easily and are very convenient to work with. I've done a lot of hammer testing of the rocks
vs crude product and the difference in sensitivity and potency (though admittedly difficult to quantify through just hitting things with hammers)
is surprisingly stark. The rock form requires a much more rigid back surface and notably more force to set off by striking it, and can be nearly
deafening in even minuscule quantities.
Thank you to anybody who has made it this far and please any notes or chemical insights are most welcome in refining technique.
Note: the liquid from which the disk was retrieved still contains ETN, which can be processed out. Waste not.
[Edited on 24-10-2015 by zeroberts]
|
|
OneEyedPyro
Hazard to Others
Posts: 280
Registered: 7-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Allowing an excess of undissolved ETN in the solvent probably isn't the best idea, simply adding the ETN after heating would be safer.
Also, one recrystallization won't remove all impurities so two if not three recrystallizations is best.
I like to do the first one with 91% isopropanol as the solvent then crash into a cold solution of tap water and bicarb followed by a recrystalliztion
with methanol then crash in a cold solution of distilled water and 2% urea.
This gives a product with very good storage stability that melts to a clear color.
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
Quote: | Thank you to anybody who has made it this far and please any notes or chemical insights are most welcome in refining technique.
|
Stop this Darwin Award-chasing practice of melting ETN for a start ─ if you continue, the explosive will detonate in your face at some
point!
|
|
zeroberts
Harmless
Posts: 16
Registered: 6-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by OneEyedPyro | Allowing an excess of undissolved ETN in the solvent probably isn't the best idea, simply adding the ETN after heating would be safer.
Also, one recrystallization won't remove all impurities so two if not three recrystallizations is best.
|
Suggested amendment to process:
"Heat alcohol first then add ETN to the preheated alcohol"?
Also, my own fastidiousness prompts recrystallizing a second time but for the sake of my written procedure I will no longer regard this as a "me"
thing but SOP.
Lastly, to hissingnoise:
Please do not interpret the following as cockiness or argument. I am here to learn; and discussion of data and fact cultivates understanding.
Additionally, melting ETN is a controversial subject with many schools of thought, but little if any recorded data to provide hardline tolerances. So
it is respectfully that I posit these points for review:
•Careful observation of temperature is intended to prevent the exceeding of ETN's melting point. A primary safety measure relying on physical
property.
•Strict use of a hot water bath (and only hot water, ever) for heating is intended to be a safer and more gradual means of applying heat while also
acting as a safeguard against dangerous temperature ranges, as the entire apparatus operates at temperatures well below the known deflagration
temperature of ETN.
While I concede that precaution on principle has merit, there seems to be no definitive data behind an aversion to melting ETN.
Again, not arguing with you. And working with molten ETN feels like the grim reaper is watching me work over my shoulder. But then again my mentor in
building fireworks taught me to feel that way when handling anything that burns faster than a wet rag.
Data data data. I kindly appreciate any data leading to a conclusion on the safety of melting ETN
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
I like Bert.
Pretty sure most of the other members do too.
zeroberts would be Bad choice of username IMHO, seeing as it targets a specific member, also a moderator.
Let me guess ... zephrahim roberts ... zenaide roberts, you Wild Dove !
|
|
zeroberts
Harmless
Posts: 16
Registered: 6-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Woww At first I was worried I had done something to offend and tried to smooth things over somehow. Then I realized what you meant haha.
My name isn't targeting Bert, it's comparing myself to Bert. I am worth zero berts
And no it's just Zach nothing so... Dovey..?
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
Quote: |
I am worth zero berts
|
"berts" are not an SI unit. Not yet, anyhow.
This is probably going to get merged with one of the (many) pre existng ETN threads. OP may want to suggest which one...
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
Hawkguy
Hazard to Others
Posts: 326
Registered: 10-10-2014
Location: British Columbia (Canada eh!)
Member Is Offline
Mood: Body is Ready
|
|
Add the ETN to water, melt it by heating up the water, and cool it. This forms little rocks of ETN. This might be a more effective route, although
usually some water is trapped in the rocks and they have to be broken up.
|
|
zeroberts
Harmless
Posts: 16
Registered: 6-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
This thread has become. Amazing. I'll give the water process a go.
Also has anybody come to offer any definitive quantifiable data regarding ETNs sensitivities and tolerances in a molten state? This is one I would
really like to see put to bed. Some say melt to your hearts content. Some say never melt. I'm starting to see a lot of the Ford-Chevy paradigm.
A well pointed search and diligent reading through these boards turns up plenty of well sourced and cited data that lands on the pro-melt side. I'm
not being belligerent here Im just saying raise your hand if you melt this stuff and keep your hand up if you would still melt it once somebody ponied
up the data to show that the physical properties were not conducive to doing so *safely*
|
|
Hawkguy
Hazard to Others
Posts: 326
Registered: 10-10-2014
Location: British Columbia (Canada eh!)
Member Is Offline
Mood: Body is Ready
|
|
It depends how pure your ETN is I guess, otherwise it might decompose on heating.
|
|
Bert
|
Threads Merged 25-10-2015 at 03:45 |
NeonPulse
Hazard to Others
Posts: 417
Registered: 29-6-2013
Location: The other end of the internet.
Member Is Offline
Mood: Isolated from Reality! For Real this time....
|
|
Zeroberts, why exactly is the molten rock form more convenient? A nicely Recrystallized ETN batch can produce a dense compact free flowing crystal
powder which in my opinion would be more user friendly as wel as being easier to fire. Another point is the nitration media, if mixed acid is used the
results will be a more pure product than using a nitrate salt which leaves a sulfate salt as an impurity.
Individual crystals show decomposition more readily too.
is always the possibility it may fire when molten in contact with aluminium especially,but otherwise I have melted it in amounts no more than 15g and
remotely just in case, except for the time I made a 22g melt casting in combination with PETN as outlined in a post by Mr anonymous found in the last
2 or 3 pages of this board. That was a nerve wracking procedure with very good results. These days though if I want a meltable explosive is make TNT
and use it as pentolite or with RDX.
The risk is always present with ANY energetic material and if provoked they may bite back - hard.
|
|
OneEyedPyro
Hazard to Others
Posts: 280
Registered: 7-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
All the accidents involving ETN I've ever heard of are full of bad procedure or just plain stupidity, I alway see people bring up that guy who
foolishly heated ETN in a test tube over an open flame which then detonated as if to imply it's proof that melting ETN is a bad idea...
As long as your ETN is acid free and you use a setup where the ETN can't get too hot I don't see the issue. Many here have a deep rooted superstitious
fear of casting ETN but there comes a time when you need to seperate the overly catious bullshit and speculation from the reality of the matter.
My testing shows ETN at 65C to be noticably less impact sensitive than NG, I used to vigorously shake NG with water in a sep funnel to help purify it
and I still have all my fingers
[Edited on 26-10-2015 by OneEyedPyro]
|
|
Aurium
Harmless
Posts: 46
Registered: 4-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: Energetic
|
|
Quote: |
As long as your ETN is acid free and you use a setup where the ETN can't get too hot I don't see the issue. Many here have a deep rooted superstitious
fear of casting ETN but there comes a time when you need to seperate the overly catious bullshit and speculation from the reality of the matter.
|
That's true. Many times I am overzealous with ETN, maybe with no reason, due to the stories of accidents when melting it.
The thing with ETN is the novelty lack of knowledge about its behavior.
Also something that gets on my nerves is, when I finish my synthesis and go to wash everything at the sink, some leftover ETN gets carried away by the
water into the sink's water exit.
I have the fear of enough ETN accumulating in the pipes and exploding for no reason.
I don't know if there a better way to wash my glassware, or if I should even be concerned.
|
|
Tsjerk
International Hazard
Posts: 3032
Registered: 20-4-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mood
|
|
500mg of ETN molten in a plastic vail using a water bath... OK, I could see that happening using a long stick and a big enough water bath so you don't
blow it up (still you have the problem of boiling water flying everywhere).
But 50 grams? That sounds like asking for a surgeon looking for shrapnel in places you don't want shrapnel to be in the first place or just plain
suicide.
|
|
OneEyedPyro
Hazard to Others
Posts: 280
Registered: 7-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Tsjerk, what makes you so sure melting ETN carries any risk of detonation? It still takes a firm whack with a hammer to set off molten ETN.
Many on here won't touch a gram of molten ETN with a long pole but they have no issues with handling NG, it's ironic because NG is significantly more
sensitive than molten ETN...
|
|
zeroberts
Harmless
Posts: 16
Registered: 6-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Call it a long standing habit from building fireworks I guess. Grains > powder, in the fireworkers mindset.
|
|
Pages:
1
2
3 |