| Pages:
1
2 |
jack-sparrow
Hazard to Others
Posts: 130
Registered: 30-11-2005
Location: Ask Big Brother
Member Is Offline
Mood: ahoy!
|
|
Nitrogen inflated tires !
Here is a funny article from CBC news in canada :
source : http://www.cbc.ca/story/news/national/2006/08/22/nitro-tires...
| Quote: |
Nitrogen-filled tires appeal to Winnipeg drivers
Last Updated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:18:50 EDT
CBC News
A growing number of Winnipeg drivers who used to inflate their tires with regular air are now paying up to $8 apiece to fill them with nitrogen
instead.
Unlike oxygen molecules, which are so small they leak through tires over time, nitrogen molecules are much larger, so the tires will stay fully
inflated three to four times longer.
The result is a better drive, increased gas mileage and longer tire life for motorists who make the switch.
"Because the oxygen is no longer leaking through the walls, that tire isn't aging as it used to," said Jose Ferreira, who manages a Fountain Tire
location that started offering nitrogen for tires last week.
Fully inflated tires also give cars better handling, making them safer to drive. CAA Manitoba spokeswoman Jeanie Dalman said they can also save
drivers money on gasoline.
"If your tire pressure decreases by 15 PSI from the recommended tire pressure, that's going to increase fuel consumption by two per cent," Dalman
said.
Nitrogen has long been used to inflate tires for jet airplanes and race cars. One convert to its use for street vehicles is Johann Leitgeb, who said
he saw the practice on television.
"They showed a film about these heavy trucks, what they use in the oil sands, and they mentioned they are inflated with nitrogen," he said.
|
What a hoax
nitrogen molecule is 0.31 nm and oxygen molecule is 0.29 nm. Where is the big difference ? Race cars and jet planes are not suitable for a comparison
with my hyundai crap.
|
|
|
turd
National Hazard
Posts: 800
Registered: 5-3-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: | | nitrogen molecule is 0.31 nm and oxygen molecule is 0.29 nm. Where is the big difference ? Race cars and jet planes are not suitable for a comparison
with my hyundai crap. |
The difference between N2 and O2 is not so much about size, as it is about polarity. I vaguely remember something about membranes which would let one
of the two pass more easily. Of course, considering that air is 70% N2, it does sound like a hoax indeed.
|
|
|
guy
National Hazard
Posts: 982
Registered: 14-4-2004
Location: California, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Catalytic!
|
|
I remember my chem teacher called the place that did this but I forgot what the answer was. She was wondering beccause of Grahm's law, and nitrogen
is lighter than oxygen.
I guess the small size difference makes it last a LITTLE longer, and you know people these days will do anything to save a little.
[Edited on 8/24/2006 by guy]
|
|
|
YT2095
International Hazard
Posts: 1091
Registered: 31-5-2003
Location: Just left of Europe and down a bit.
Member Is Offline
Mood: within Nominal Parameters
|
|
IIRC the reason is something to do with expansion / contraction over temperature ranges, apparently that`s why it`s use in aircraft tires, they can go
from -40c at high alt and then up to 200+ upon touchdown, it doesn`t support combustion either.
\"In a world full of wonders mankind has managed to invent boredom\" - Death
Twinkies don\'t have a shelf life. They have a half-life! -Caine (a friend of mine)
|
|
|
Nerro
National Hazard
Posts: 596
Registered: 29-9-2004
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Whatever...
|
|
Could oxidation of the inside of the tyre be a problem when the usual 21% oxygen is present? Maybe it makes the rubber crack which enhances seepage of
the gas inside.
#261501 +(11351)- [X]
the \"bishop\" came to our church today
he was a fucken impostor
never once moved diagonally
courtesy of bash
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5128
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
"IIRC the reason is something to do with expansion / contraction over temperature ranges, apparently that`s why it`s use in aircraft tires"
All gases expand by practicallly the same extent on heating.
I seem to remember having heard that big tyres on planes are filled with He to save weight.
The only benefit I can see to using N2 rather than air is that it's less reactive. There is also the fact that N2 will be dry whereas air might not
be.
|
|
|
jimmyboy
Hazard to Others
Posts: 235
Registered: 1-3-2004
Location: Texas
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
thats ridiculous - someone is making money at dumb people's expense.. heh
|
|
|
YT2095
International Hazard
Posts: 1091
Registered: 31-5-2003
Location: Just left of Europe and down a bit.
Member Is Offline
Mood: within Nominal Parameters
|
|
@unionised,
The space shuttle tires are filled with nitrogen (as are most aircraft tires) due to its stability at different altitudes and temperatures. Due to the
extremely heavy loads these bias ply tires are inflated to 340 psi (main gear) and 300 psi (nose gear).
taken from: http://www.airmichelin.com/space.html
I guess these guys know what they`re on about if the Space Shuttle uses it too.
\"In a world full of wonders mankind has managed to invent boredom\" - Death
Twinkies don\'t have a shelf life. They have a half-life! -Caine (a friend of mine)
|
|
|
Chris The Great
Hazard to Others
Posts: 463
Registered: 29-10-2004
Location: Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Well, sure, it might be worth it for your space shuttle, but methinks a Toyota's tires will not be experiencing the same kind of conditions the space
shuttle does as it descends from orbit and then hits the ground at 200mph!
Still, if I had a gas station, I'd take advantage of the stupids for some extra $$$.
|
|
|
jellysplat
Harmless
Posts: 1
Registered: 5-9-2006
Location: on the edge of sanity
Member Is Offline
Mood: exothermic
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by jimmyboy
thats ridiculous - someone is making money at dumb people's expense.. heh |
i agree
|
|
|
hodges
National Hazard
Posts: 525
Registered: 17-12-2003
Location: Midwest
Member Is Offline
|
|
The only thing I can see filling tires with nitrogen would do (assuming normal driving temperatues, not outer space or something) would be possibly to
cause the tires to last longer due to the rubber not oxidizing as quickly. But as far as performance, I really don't see how it would matter.
I remember once reading (in some sort of revenge article, of questionable validity) that if you filled someone's tires with pure oxygen they would
eventually catch fire and blow out when the car was driven. Whether that would actually happen under any reasonable driving conditions is highly
doubtful, but at least the theory would seem to make more sense than the theory of why tires should be inflated with nitrogen.
Hodges
|
|
|
Nicodem
Super Moderator
Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
To me it also looks like bullshit, especially with the idiotic official explanation. I agree with Hodges about the reduced oxidation, but perhaps the
consumers wouldn’t buy such an explanation as easily as the one about not needing to inflate the tires anymore.
However, I was wandering what influence would the osmotic effect have? I assume osmosis in gasses doesn’t nearly give as high pressures as in
liquids, but could there be a measurable effect? (putting the naivety of the consumers aside, for a moment)
Diffusion is driven by the pressure difference and is thus oriented from the inside to the outside of the tire. Osmotic diffusion is driven by the
difference in O2 concentration from the higher concentration to the lower and is thus oriented from the outside to the inside of the tire. The gas
diffusion currents are thus counteracting. Of what significance could such an effect be?
I have forgotten how the osmotic pressure is calculated, but I remember it is based on the ideal gas equation. I would assume in gases it simply
amounts to the difference in partial pressures, thus it would amount to 0.2 atm at the initial partial pressure of 0 atm for O2 in the tire. Assuming
the speed of diffusion of O2 does not differ much from that of N2, this not be a very important factor considering the pressure difference is of about
1.2-1.5 atm in normal car tires (at least 6 times more). However, if the speed of diffusion between O2 and N2 differ a bit more it could become
important, or no?
[Edited on 6-9-2006 by Nicodem]
|
|
|
jack-sparrow
Hazard to Others
Posts: 130
Registered: 30-11-2005
Location: Ask Big Brother
Member Is Offline
Mood: ahoy!
|
|
I dont think it is an oxidation issue. Partial pressure of oxygen in air is 0.2 atm. Assume a tire contains 10 liters. At 30 PSI, you should have
about 30 liters. Divide by 5 (O2 is 20% of air). 6 liters of oxygen. Divided by 25 l/mol at 300K. So you have 240 mmol of oxygen. You will not oxidize
a lot of things with such a small amount.
|
|
|
12AX7
Post Harlot
Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline
Mood: informative
|
|
Besides that, there will be little loss of pressure (a fifth, not insignificant), but then, most of the pressure gained back as CO and CO2, assuming
full oxidation (and not, say, crosslinking and such types of oxidation).
Tim
|
|
|
S.C. Wack
bibliomaster
Posts: 2419
Registered: 7-5-2004
Location: Cornworld, Central USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enhanced
|
|
Local tire dealers have been doing this for some time.
I would hesitate to call bullshit (or pay $8 CAN) without direct comparison. We are talking about tens of thousands of miles, likely over several
years, not the difference between night and day.
The devices are interesting.
http://www.purigen98.com/index.php?page=sysinformation
http://www.irtools.com/IS/product.asp-en-4635
Real comparisons are probably few for free.
http://www.tirelast.com/id5.html
|
|
|
Twospoons
International Hazard
Posts: 1326
Registered: 26-7-2004
Location: Middle Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: A trace of hope...
|
|
I'll happily call 'bullshit'. I do 600km a week in my car, I check the tire pressure about once every 6 months and its usually only down by a couple
of psi - if that! My tires get replaced because the tread is gone - not through deteriorating rubber - and that takes 2-3 years.
Its like the bottled water phenomenon - who would have ever thought you could sell a bottle of water at twice the price of a bottle of Coke 
Helicopter: "helico" -> spiral, "pter" -> with wings
|
|
|
neutrino
International Hazard
Posts: 1583
Registered: 20-8-2004
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: oscillating
|
|
I'm still not convinced. This so-called "research paper" excerpt looks like BS to me. No competent researcher would write things like “about 125 of
these tires wore out” or compose complete sentences in all caps, bold with an exclamation point at the end.
Their explanation for inside out tire rot has already been debunked here as a simple matter of math.
Without materials and methods outlined the numbers are <b>totally</b> worthless.
This whole thing is reading high on my BS-o-meter.
One more thing I forgot to mention: the "research paper" this is excerted from doesn't seem to exist at all. A google substring search yeilds nothing.
[Edited on 7-9-2006 by neutrino]
|
|
|
hodges
National Hazard
Posts: 525
Registered: 17-12-2003
Location: Midwest
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by Twospoons
Its like the bottled water phenomenon - who would have ever thought you could sell a bottle of water at twice the price of a bottle of Coke |
And bottled water is more expensive than gasoline I might add (at least around here). Of course, I recently noticed a store display for a particular
brand of bottled water. It said "No other bottled water brand hydrates faster!" Yeah, I guess they can't be accused of false advertising for that
one....
Hodges
|
|
|
S.C. Wack
bibliomaster
Posts: 2419
Registered: 7-5-2004
Location: Cornworld, Central USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enhanced
|
|
The fact that you are unaware of studies does not mean that they don't exist, it means that they are hidden to those outside rubber.org,
rubbernews.com, and elsewhere "in the loop". What they say is anyone's guess.
|
|
|
tumadre
Hazard to Others
Posts: 172
Registered: 10-5-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
i heard a story from a friend about bottled water BS
they were claiming cyclic water molecule stucture ie ice crystals dissolved in water!
|
|
|
jimmyboy
Hazard to Others
Posts: 235
Registered: 1-3-2004
Location: Texas
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
this is a total crock - i can't believe it even merits a second thought - our atmosphere is 80 percent Nitrogen - what is 20 more gonna do for a small
tire - this may have an application for something larger but not a car...
|
|
|
neutrino
International Hazard
Posts: 1583
Registered: 20-8-2004
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: oscillating
|
|
You're looking at it the wrong way. It's more like the atmosphere is 20% oxygen, what happens when you remove that?
But I agree, this looks like a crock.
|
|
|
Twospoons
International Hazard
Posts: 1326
Registered: 26-7-2004
Location: Middle Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: A trace of hope...
|
|
Or look at it like this: even though you remove the oxygen from inside the tire, its still 20% O2 outside the tire !
Helicopter: "helico" -> spiral, "pter" -> with wings
|
|
|
mick
Hazard to Others
Posts: 338
Registered: 3-10-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Just a thought.
If the original hype admits oxygen leaks though the tyre walls at a significant rate, and oxygen causes the rubber to degrade, then filling the tyre
up with pure nitrogen will cause a higher concentration of oxygen in the rubber tyre due to osmotic pressure.
mick
|
|
|
Ramiel
Vicious like a ferret
Posts: 484
Registered: 19-8-2002
Location: Room at the Back, Australia
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-demented
|
|
Perhaps the increased tyre life-time is due more to people checking the pressure, making sure their tyres are not balding on the outsides or middle
etc. and generally taking better care of them - as opposed to any physical benefit.
Caveat Orator
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
