Pages:
1
2 |
woelen
Super Administrator
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 7990
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Iridium (IV) chloride
One of my sources for chemicals recently added a compound, called iridium (IV) chloride, formula IrCl4, to its list of chemicals. It can be purchased
at a very good price of appr. $20 per gram, which is really cheap for iridium compounds (e.g. compare with Alfa Aesar or Chemetal). I intend to buy a
few grams of this, but I have some questions about this.
Two different books (Chemistry of the elements, second edition by Greenwood and Earnshaw, 1999) and an old 1960 book about inorganic chemistry both
tell me that no iridium (IV) chloride was characterized, it only is characterized in its +4 oxidation state in compounds like K2IrCl6 and H2IrCl6.
These are two independent sources of information, which I think are quite reliable.
Now, to my surprise I see IrCl4 on the list of a few suppliers (e.g. Alfa Aesar, Chemetal). I asked my supplier about the material and how it looks
like. He tells me that it is a very dark (almost black) glassy amorphous solid, soluble in water with an Ir-content of at least 56.5%, the rest being
the chlorine and some minor impurities. Theoretical pure anhydrous IrCl4 has an Ir-content of 57.5% by weight. I also looked at the MSDS of Alfa Aesar
and indeed its description matches that of my supplier quite well.
Now my question is, what can be the source of such contradicting information? I strongly doubt that this "IrCl4" really is iridium (IV) chloride, but
I have no clue what it really is. If any one of you has experience with iridium or happens to know something more about this, I would be very pleased.
A Google search did not clarify anything, I really need more information from good textbooks, but I unfortunately do not have access to more info on
this (at least not what I know of).
|
|
garage chemist
chemical wizard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1803
Registered: 16-8-2004
Location: Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I would assume that this is the product of heating of hexachloroiridic acid, H2IrCl6*6H2O (there's a procedure for this in Brauer!), until a constant
weight is reached, hence the glassy (fused?) structure. Maybe this has a more definite iridium content that the hydrated H2IrCl6 (hydrates not always
have the exact stochiometric water content).
H2IrCl6*6H2O should give IrCl4 on heating.
If the supplier sells this as IrCl4, then I am sure it is. No chemical supplier is going to sell something that doesn't exist!
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 5109
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
"No chemical supplier is going to sell something that doesn't exist! "
Ammonium hydroxide anyone?
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 7990
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by garage chemist
I would assume that this is the product of heating of hexachloroiridic acid, H2IrCl6*6H2O (there's a procedure for this in Brauer!), until a constant
weight is reached, hence the glassy (fused?) structure. Maybe this has a more definite iridium content that the hydrated H2IrCl6 (hydrates not always
have the exact stochiometric water content).
H2IrCl6*6H2O should give IrCl4 on heating.
If the supplier sells this as IrCl4, then I am sure it is. No chemical supplier is going to sell something that doesn't exist!
|
But still I think this is a strange situation. I looked up a third book and it tells that iridum (IV) is stable, but only in complexes, such as
IrCl6(2-). Is this "IrCl4" then some special, ill-defined compound? I know of other such ill-defined compounds, e.g. "ferric ammonium citrate" which
exists in brown and green variations. The structure of that is very variable and only empirical formulas can be given without exactly knowing the
structure of these compounds. Is a similar thing true for "iridium (IV) chloride"?
Anyway, I ordered 3 grams of the stuff . I'm eager to experiment with iridium
compounds, one of the metal, with which I do not have any experience up to now.
|
|
IrC
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2710
Registered: 7-3-2005
Location: Eureka
Member Is Offline
Mood: Discovering
|
|
Can you give me the supplier so I can order some? I find it hard to locate Ir compounds, and Ir is my favorite element to play with.
|
|
Fleaker
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1252
Registered: 19-6-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: nucleophilic
|
|
You can order it from a variety of companies if you have some affiliation with an institution. As a private individual it will prove difficult. I know
Fisher, Sigma, and Alfa sell it. I can not think of a single "cheap" source for iridium chloride.
I know that Sigma Aldrich sells lrCl4 · xH2O (which does exist, Woelen, much like auric (III) chloride as a hygroscopic compound that is difficult
to dehydrate). I think I might have seen a bottle of it somewhere; next time I'm in the lab I'll look around for it. IrCl3 also exists, and has a
melting point of about 763*C whereup it decomposes to the elements. That decomposition temperature is twice that of the IrCl4. Note that tri- and
tetravalent iridum cations exist as ionic solids, and in solution (typically complexed).
Now Woelen, when he said "with an Ir-content of at least 56.5%" that was more or less a guarantee that he's not selling you lrCl4 · 10H2O, but
rather a less hydrated compound with a closer to theoretical percentage of iridium. More or less, he's clarifying that you will not be getting the
anhydrous compound (if it's anything like its platinum analogue, it would be a feat to dry it). I think the price is quite fair considering the
difficulty of preparation. Woelen, I would, again, be much obliged to you if you could send me the source for this compound.
IrC, if you ever have need of the pure metal, I have a friend who can get the pure metal to you for $16/gram.
|
|
IrC
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2710
Registered: 7-3-2005
Location: Eureka
Member Is Offline
Mood: Discovering
|
|
"As a private individual it will prove difficult."
The story of my life. So many things I have not been able to get due to this, not the least of which is P. Will get back on Ir metal after I get $
back up where it belongs. Been buying a lot of laser rods lately, ruby and yag, no idea why. Some kind of madsci dream I had for something or other.
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 7990
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Iridium -- goddess of the rainbow
I now have done some experimenting with this "iridium chloride" and I must say WOW, what a colorful element this is. It really is great. I made a
webpage about this:
http://woelen.scheikunde.net/science/chem/exps/iridium/index...
All colors from the rainbow can be made with it, and the chemicals (besides the "IrCl4") needed for that are really simple! I'm quite sure, that with
some effort, and throwing in some more fancy ligands, that many more colors can be obtained.
|
|
JohnWW
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
See if you can make any compounds of it in the (VII), (VIII) and (IX) oxidation states, which are theoretically possible but which have so far eluded
synthesis. But for that, you would need powerful fluorinating agents, or access to special electrolytic cells.
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 7990
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
I do not think that would be possible in a simple home lab. If powerful fluorinating oxidizing agents are needed for that, then most likely the
solvent also must be special. I'm quite sure, that water is not OK for this purpose and probably a solvent of HF or some other high-oxidation state
fluoride is needed. Not something you would do in the average home lab.
|
|
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: crystalline
|
|
Very nice, woelen.
All colours of the spectrum - incredible! I am not aware of any other element that can do that.
Quote: | Complex formation with ammonia, and subsequent oxidation
When the green solution of "IrCl4", mentioned above, is mixed with dilute ammonia (5% NH3), then a bluish/green/gray solution is formed. This is shown
in the left picture. When some sodium persulfate is added to this bluish/green/gray solution, then the liquid becomes bright purple. On gentle
heating, without boiling, the purple liquid becomes beautifully golden yellow. That is shown in the rightmost picture. |
This one I can't quite follow chemically. What's going on? Is your starting material IrCl6(2-), or "IrCl4"? Why the quotation marks?
Never Stop to Begin, and Never Begin to Stop...
Tolerance is good. But not with the intolerant! (Wilhelm Busch)
|
|
Jdurg
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 220
Registered: 10-6-2006
Location: Connecticut, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by chemoleo
Very nice, woelen.
All colours of the spectrum - incredible! I am not aware of any other element that can do that.
Quote: | Complex formation with ammonia, and subsequent oxidation
When the green solution of "IrCl4", mentioned above, is mixed with dilute ammonia (5% NH3), then a bluish/green/gray solution is formed. This is shown
in the left picture. When some sodium persulfate is added to this bluish/green/gray solution, then the liquid becomes bright purple. On gentle
heating, without boiling, the purple liquid becomes beautifully golden yellow. That is shown in the rightmost picture. |
This one I can't quite follow chemically. What's going on? Is your starting material IrCl6(2-), or "IrCl4"? Why the quotation marks?
|
I'm pretty certain that plutonium can also form a great deal of colored compounds, but that's not something a home chemist would really want to work
worth. ![;)](./images/smilies/wink.gif)
\"A real fart is beefy, has a density greater than or equal to the air surrounding it, consists of the unmistakable scent of broccoli, and usually
requires wiping afterwards.\"
http://maddox.xmission.com.
|
|
praseodym
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 137
Registered: 25-7-2005
Location: Schwarzschild Radius
Member Is Offline
Mood: crazy
|
|
if coloured compounds are what you are looking for, there is a whole lot of elements which you can choose from
Alles sollte so einfach wie möglich gemacht werden aber nicht einfacher.
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 7990
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Quote: | if coloured compounds are what you are looking for, there is a whole lot of elements which you can choose from |
Praseodym, I agree with you that colors can be found with many other elements, and also with many organic compounds. What is striking me, however, is
the fact that a SINGLE element can produce so many colors, using only the very simple reagents dilute ammonia, dilute hydrochloric acid and sodium
sulfite.
Quote: | This one I can't quite follow chemically. What's going on? Is your starting material IrCl6(2-), or "IrCl4"? Why the quotation marks?
|
My starting material is "IrCl4" in this experiment. Just a solution of "IrCl4", which was allowed to stand for some time.
I use "IrCl4", instead of IrCl4, because I do not think that IrCl4 exists. It is sold to me as IrCl4, but the seller only knows that this compound
contains Ir and Cl in a 1 : 4 molar ratio and no other elements are involved. I have read multiple textbooks and they all write that IrCl4 does not
exist or at best exists as an ill-defined, very elusive, badly specified compound, whose existence is doubtful. I think that my "IrCl4" is some
complicated mix of IrCl6(2-), IrCl3, Cl2, and positively charged Ir(3+) complexes. It has a smell of Cl2. So, one only can say that its average
empirical formula is close to IrCl4, but the compound definitely is not a well-defined iridium (IV) chloride, otherwise the textbooks would not state
that IrCl4 does not exist or is very doubtful.
|
|
I am a fish
undersea enforcer
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 600
Registered: 16-1-2003
Location: Bath, United Kingdom
Member Is Offline
Mood: Ichthyoidal
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by woelen
$20 per gram, which is really cheap for iridium compounds |
Unfortunately, it's still far more than it should cost. At the time of posting, iridium was trading for $384 per troy ounce (i.e. $12.35 per gram).
Therefore, a gram of pure IrCl4 will contain $7.10 worth of iridium.
Of course synthesis will add to the cost, but I very much doubt that it justifies a $12.90 per gram markup. I don't know how IrCl4 is prepared, but
IrCl3 is prepared by passing chlorine over the metal at 300°C to 400°C – a very simple process in industrial terms.
Unfortunately, this goes for all precious-metal salts. Most suppliers sell silver nitrate for over twice the price it should be.
1f `/0u (4|\\| |234d 7|-|15, `/0u |234||`/ |\\|33d 70 937 0u7 /\\/\\0|23.
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 7990
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
I know that this still is a high price, but it is MUCH lower than the price, asked by the real chemical supply houses (which do not sell to
individuals anyways).
The same supplier sells AgNO3 for $160 or something like that per pound. Seems a fair price to me, and that also is MUCH cheaper than the price asked
by chemical supply houses.
Of course, such a seller also needs to have a living, so he also may have some $$$ per gram . Otherwise this seller will be no-more after a few months.
[Edited on 12-7-06 by woelen]
|
|
ethan_c
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 104
Registered: 5-6-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by Jdurg
I'm pretty certain that plutonium can also form a great deal of colored compounds, but that's not something a home chemist would really want to work
worth. ![;)](./images/smilies/wink.gif)
|
My impression was that plutonium can form a number of compounds and complexes that are blues, greens, and purples in very nice, pastel shades.
Come now, with a very dilute solution, how harmful could it be, eh? ![:P](./images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Now the problem is acquiring the principal reagent…
|
|
pantone159
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 588
Registered: 27-6-2006
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: desperate for shade
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by ethan_c
My impression was that plutonium can form a number of compounds and complexes that are blues, greens, and purples in very nice, pastel shades.
|
I don't know about blue, but I found some purty pictures of Pu solutions in red, green, purple, pink, yellow.
See
http://gotexassoccer.com/elements/094Pu/Pu.htm
Unfortunately (well, maybe not ) these aren't from my home lab.
|
|
Nerro
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 596
Registered: 29-9-2004
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Whatever...
|
|
Just as a word of warning I've read about Ir salts that they should be considered extremely toxic Woelen. Your site doesn't mention it do I thought it
might be usefull info.
Could you explain a little more about the chemistry of Ir perhaps? Is it chemically comparable to any other element?
#261501 +(11351)- [X]
the \"bishop\" came to our church today
he was a fucken impostor
never once moved diagonally
courtesy of bash
|
|
ethan_c
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 104
Registered: 5-6-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by pantone159
Quote: | Originally posted by ethan_c
My impression was that plutonium can form a number of compounds and complexes that are blues, greens, and purples in very nice, pastel shades.
|
I don't know about blue, but I found some purty pictures of Pu solutions in red, green, purple, pink, yellow.
See
http://gotexassoccer.com/elements/094Pu/Pu.htm
Unfortunately (well, maybe not ) these aren't from my home lab.
|
Oh wow, those are some beautiful solutions! I would pay iridium prices to pick up some of that.
Actually, I've got a nice Be hemisphere (old missile part, you know the deal), a strong alpha source, and a nice-sized puck of a particular depleted
metal (the latter two safely in lots and lots of lead foil, as has been said). Nothing is actually STOPPING me from making my own…I would first make
a lead pig-type container for the alpha source, and pick up a whole bunch of borated paraffin to make a little enclosure with (and maybe smear all
over myself, couldn't hurt)………it'd be like that radioactive boyscout fiasco all over again! Woohoo!
P.S. I think I'm really tired, its past 3. Word.
|
|
Jdurg
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 220
Registered: 10-6-2006
Location: Connecticut, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The problem is the refining of the produced plutonium. In addition to having to wait for a very long time for it to be made, you then have to
separate it from the other products of the reactions and avoid any problems with doing that. Too much of a pain. It would be neat to have a tiny
little button of Pu metal though.
\"A real fart is beefy, has a density greater than or equal to the air surrounding it, consists of the unmistakable scent of broccoli, and usually
requires wiping afterwards.\"
http://maddox.xmission.com.
|
|
JohnWW
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
For that to be anything like safe to possess, it would have to be Pu-244, the longest-lived isotope (½ life 82 million years), rather than the Pu-239
most commonly obtained from spent enriched U fuel rods, which has a much shorter half-life.
|
|
pantone159
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 588
Registered: 27-6-2006
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: desperate for shade
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by ethan_c
Actually, I've got a nice Be hemisphere (old missile part, you know the deal), a strong alpha source, and a nice-sized puck of a particular depleted
metal (the latter two safely in lots and lots of lead foil, as has been said). Nothing is actually STOPPING me from making my own…
|
I hope you aren't in a hurry ![:)](./images/smilies/smile.gif)
Let's say you wanted to get 0.1 g of Pu, that might be enough to make some purty solutions. That's 2.52e+20 atoms. You didn't describe your alpha
source, so let's say you have 1 kg of Ra-226. Ra-226 emits 3.7e+10
alphas/sec/gram. These alphas may release neutrons when they hit Be, but not all of them do, in fact, just 1.2e-4 of them do, according to one source
I have.
Combine all those factors, and it will take you 1800 years to get your 0.1 g. That is assuming perfect efficiency - ALL the alphas hit Be nuclei, and
ALL the emitted neutrons are absorbed by your U-238 and turn into Pu-239. Since you won't have perfect efficiency, you'll have to wait even longer
than that.
And if you have to settle for something less 'hot' than a kilo of pure radium, even longer still.
So, patience is required.
|
|
pantone159
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 588
Registered: 27-6-2006
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: desperate for shade
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by JohnWW
For that to be anything like safe to possess, it would have to be Pu-244, the longest-lived isotope (½ life 82 million years), rather than the Pu-239
most commonly obtained from spent enriched U fuel rods, which has a much shorter half-life. |
My main concern would be neutron emission. If I had such a button, it would be sealed in a glass ampule, for sure. Pu-239 is an alpha emitter, and
those have such a short range, that none of them would escape the ampule. There would be some gammas, but I don't think Pu-239 is a strong gamma
emitter, so that probably isn't a problem. Most of the neutrons come from spontaneous fission of Pu-240 which is present as an impurity, so the
safest stuff would be Pu with as little Pu-240 present as possible.
That is the description of super-weapons-grade plutonium.
|
|
ethan_c
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 104
Registered: 5-6-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by pantone159
Quote: | Originally posted by JohnWW
For that to be anything like safe to possess, it would have to be Pu-244, the longest-lived isotope (½ life 82 million years), rather than the Pu-239
most commonly obtained from spent enriched U fuel rods, which has a much shorter half-life. |
My main concern would be neutron emission. If I had such a button, it would be sealed in a glass ampule, for sure. Pu-239 is an alpha emitter, and
those have such a short range, that none of them would escape the ampule. There would be some gammas, but I don't think Pu-239 is a strong gamma
emitter, so that probably isn't a problem. Most of the neutrons come from spontaneous fission of Pu-240 which is present as an impurity, so the
safest stuff would be Pu with as little Pu-240 present as possible.
That is the description of super-weapons-grade plutonium.
|
One only really has to be worried about alpha emitters if they are inside you. However, one speck of something like the Pu we're talking about in a
lung, and you might as well start saving up for the chemotherapy you're going to begin in a few years.
EDIT: I apologize to Mr. Oelen. I have catastrophically derailed his relevant and interesting thread. Woops.
[Edited on 15-7-2006 by ethan_c]
|
|
Pages:
1
2 |