Grizli7
Harmless
Posts: 41
Registered: 1-9-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
Liquid-phase nitration of n-butane
Hello everyone. We are talking about Konovalov's reaction. I'm going to set up an experiment, but with a number of significant differences.
Unfortunately, there is very little information about the detailed description of the experiment. The author used a glass sealed tube inside which
there was a 13.5% solution of nitric acid and hydrocarbon. The reaction took place for 4-5 hours at a temperature of 140-150 C.
I understand that this excluded the toxic effect on the reaction mass. But in my case, a stainless steel pipe will be used. Brand unknown. But in the
"past life" the pipe was used to fuel rockets - so I assume that the alloying content is high. I will also passivate first with hydrochloric acid and
then with nitric acid.
As you know, the main problem of liquid-phase nitration is that the hydrocarbon does not dissolve in nitric acid, but nitration products are perfectly
soluble in it, undergoing further nitration and oxidation. And that worries me the most. I could not find information anywhere about which products
are formed and in what quantity. And what the quantity during process after 1 hour, 2 hour etc. I can only assume that all nitro products:
nitroethane, nitromethane, 1-nitropropane, 1-nitrobutane, 2-nitrobutane - all of them will undergo further nitration. All I found sounds like an
increase in polynitro compounds is facilitated by the concentration of nitric acid, temperature and an increase in pressure. There is also very little
information on the explosive properties, sensitivity of di and polynitro compounds. For example, Urbansky, 1,2-dinitroethane is described in more
detail than 1,1-dinitroethane. Maybe someone has worked with substances such as trinitroethane, dinitromethane, trinitromethane, tetranitromethane,
dinitrobutane, etc. Dinitromethane worries me most of all, but its properties indicate that at temperatures above 40C it decomposes with the release
of dioxide. If I understand correctly, then it should not form at all during the reaction, but preassure about 24 bar.. I also plan to use a 10: 1
molar ratio of butane to nitric acid to increase process safety. I suppose that the more nitric acid is consumed for nitration, the less it will
remain for nitration of nitro products. But here, too, everything is not so simple - the easiest to replace is the tertiary atom, the second is more
difficult, and the first is even more difficult, i.e. the formation of 1-nitrobutane will occur very quickly, and as soon as it is formed, its further
nitration and oxidation will begin. To prepare the solution, high-purity nitric acid and butane of technical qualification from a gas filling station
will be used. This means that ethyl mercaptan and possibly gas condensate, which is gasoline kerosene fractions, will also get into the reaction.
Those who conducted the experiment said that a liquid with a large amount of dioxide is obtained at the exit, and here another question is it safe to
use sodium bicarbonate or urea to remove it, like nitroethane and nitromethane react with carbonates? And so I will briefly summarize the questions:
1.) Will passivated stainless steel be toxic?
2.) What di and polynitro compounds are formed and in what quantity?
3.) What is the most dangerous?
4.) Which molar ratio is best?
5.) How to remove the dioxide before overclocking?
6.) Is it possible to add boric acid before overclocking if there are polynitro compounds?
Thank you.
|
|
|
Swinfi2
Hazard to Others
Posts: 131
Registered: 19-2-2018
Location: England
Member Is Offline
Mood: Catalytic
|
|
Not sure if this goes without saying, but it sounds like you're making explosives, inside an apparatus that already constitutes a pipe bomb.
I could be wrong but do you like being in one piece?
Also I'd be pretty particular about the grade of steel with nitric acid, I think you need ceramic or Teflon liners or it will corrode rapidly...
before you add the heat and pressure...
|
|
|
karlos³
International Hazard
Posts: 1520
Registered: 10-1-2011
Location: yes!
Member Is Offline
Mood: oxazolidinic 8)
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Swinfi2  | Not sure if this goes without saying, but it sounds like you're making explosives, inside an apparatus that already constitutes a pipe bomb.
I could be wrong but do you like being in one piece? |
Well, one of our members actually build successfully a functioning apparatus for the direct nitration of even shorter alkanes, C1-C3.
Scary, too scary for me personally.
But he was skilled enough to realize that project, despite the level of danger coming with it.
I can't find it right now, but I'm sure somebody else knows which project I'm talking about?
Nope, can't find the thread.
verrückt und wissenschaftlich
|
|
|
Swinfi2
Hazard to Others
Posts: 131
Registered: 19-2-2018
Location: England
Member Is Offline
Mood: Catalytic
|
|
I do agree you can do anything if you're mindful of the risks and are careful enough to survive the process.
That said I still have the scar from trying molten NaOH electrolysis lol.
I'd pass on direct nitrations.
|
|
|
Grizli7
Harmless
Posts: 41
Registered: 1-9-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Swinfi2 | Not sure if this goes without saying, but it sounds like you're making explosives, inside an apparatus that already constitutes a pipe bomb.
I could be wrong but do you like being in one piece?
Also I'd be pretty particular about the grade of steel with nitric acid, I think you need ceramic or Teflon liners or it will corrode rapidly...
before you add the heat and pressure... |
If I'm not mistaken, the composition of the melange is 24% nitric tetroxide and 72% nitric acid and a little crystalline iodine as a corrosion
inhibitor - something like this was pumped through the pipe. I had an idea to make a PTFE pipe inside, but there was no money.
[Edited on 2-9-2021 by Grizli7]
|
|
|
Grizli7
Harmless
Posts: 41
Registered: 1-9-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by karlos³ | | Quote: Originally posted by Swinfi2 | Not sure if this goes without saying, but it sounds like you're making explosives, inside an apparatus that already constitutes a pipe bomb.
I could be wrong but do you like being in one piece? |
Well, one of our members actually build successfully a functioning apparatus for the direct nitration of even shorter alkanes, C1-C3.
Scary, too scary for me personally.
But he was skilled enough to realize that project, despite the level of danger coming with it.
I can't find it right now, but I'm sure somebody else knows which project I'm talking about?
Nope, can't find the thread. |
Perhaps you will remember a little later. It would be great if the person shared their experience. Successful experience.
|
|
|
Grizli7
Harmless
Posts: 41
Registered: 1-9-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
See what's the matter. At one time, I tried to find as much information as possible on this issue and never once did I come across information that
the reaction ended in an explosion. Although I understand perfectly well that many books on chemistry are written by theorists who simply rewrote from
other books and did not even conduct an experiment.
On the other hand, if you think about it, then all the differences are only in the material of the case, since according to such a characteristic as
the critical detonation diameter, neither Konovalov nor I pass. Yes, a sealed glass ampoule has a negligible amount of substance measured, let it be
10-15 milliliters, but it is not so much the quantity that matters as the molar concentration of the substance per unit volume. Or I'm wrong?
|
|
|
Boffis
International Hazard
Posts: 1879
Registered: 1-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Hi Grizli7, have you looked at the original papers by Konovalov or Markovnikov? The references are Nos 3 and 4 in the attached paper. They are both
available from the French Gallica site for free.
Attachment: Nitration of paraffins with nitronium hexafluorophosphate ProNatAcadSci Olah et al 1997.pdf (173kB)
This file has been downloaded 302 times
|
|
|
karlos³
International Hazard
Posts: 1520
Registered: 10-1-2011
Location: yes!
Member Is Offline
Mood: oxazolidinic 8)
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Grizli7 |
Perhaps you will remember a little later. It would be great if the person shared their experience. Successful experience. |
Could not remember it.... had to search it the hard way, with a twenty year old search engine 
But here it is 
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=13633&...
verrückt und wissenschaftlich
|
|
|
Triflic Acid
Hazard to Others
Posts: 486
Registered: 27-9-2020
Member Is Offline
Mood: Slowly Oxidizing into Oblivion
|
|
Don't do this if you want nitrobutane. Do this instead: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2001/cc/b1023... a bit of catalyst goes a long way. N Hydroxy phalamide.
There wasn't a fire, we just had an uncontrolled rapid oxidation event at the power plant.
|
|
|
Grizli7
Harmless
Posts: 41
Registered: 1-9-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Boffis | Hi Grizli7, have you looked at the original papers by Konovalov or Markovnikov? The references are Nos 3 and 4 in the attached paper. They are both
available from the French Gallica site for free.
|
What an interesting electronic library, but I didn't know. Links checked but there are other substances.
|
|
|
Grizli7
Harmless
Posts: 41
Registered: 1-9-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
The branch is very interesting. But there it is mainly about vapor-phase nitration - this is completely different. In particular, with a competent
approach, it is safer, since according to the 4th rule of Hess di and polynitro compounds are not formed, since they safely fall apart on the way to
the reactor when the temperature reaches 260C. And they are the ones who bother me.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
