phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1379
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
SpaceX Starship crash coloured flames
I was watching the video of yesterdays spaceX rocket crash, and I noticed the flame turns a bright green moments before the attempted landing.
You can clearly see it in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLo73YkEvpM&feature=emb_...
Just after the 1:00 mark, the main motor flame goes from an indistinct washed out purple/white to bright green. A few flashed at first, but then the
whole main engine flame turns green.
And then a fraction of a second before the crash the flame suddenly goes bright red again.
Anyone knows why? Do they change propellant chemistry specifically for the landings? Is there boron or copper or barium/halogen in the propellants?
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
Swinfi2
Hazard to Others
Posts: 131
Registered: 19-2-2018
Location: England
Member Is Offline
Mood: Catalytic
|
|
I believe they use a boron based hypergolic starter mix, but I'm not sure why it went off like it did
|
|
|
sciece nerd
Harmless
Posts: 25
Registered: 27-8-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
The raptor engine doesn't use the boron starter mix, and the green flame is from an engine problem that caused copper from the engine bell to be
burnt off.
|
|
|
simply RED
Hazard to Others
Posts: 209
Registered: 18-8-2005
Location: noitacoL
Member Is Offline
Mood: booM
|
|
Shut up physicists. Musk and Bezos know how to build spaceships!
When logic and proportion have fallen sloppy dead...
|
|
|
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
Posts: 1415
Registered: 2-9-2014
Location: Technion Haifa
Member Is Offline
Mood: old jew
|
|
0:56 starting engine 1.
0:57 starting engine 2.
0:58 starting engine 3. Failing.
1:00 Computer increase thrust for 2 running engines on maximum.
1:01 Engine 1 ... overheating of the nozzle neck, melting of the copper part that dissipates heat from a critical point.
1:02 Engine 1: burnt throat diameter is bigger and bigger.
1:03 Engine 1: loss of thrust 50% or more, almost destroyed throat.
1:04 Computer stopped engine 2 (?) Or his failing. (?)
1:04 Computer starting engine 3 again: Unsuccessfuled.
1:04 Engine 2 is still off.
1:04 Into engine 1 is pumping all fuel.
1:05 Engine 1: In combustion chamber burns unbalanced chemical mixture. Total loss of thrust of last (1) engine. The rocket falls in a free fall.
1:12 Elon Musk strangles a programmer.
Development of primarily - secondary substances CHP (2015) Lithex (2022) Brightelite (2023) Nitrocelite and KC primer (2024)
|
|
|
MineMan
International Hazard
Posts: 1014
Registered: 29-3-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Laboratory of Liptakov  | 0:56 starting engine 1.
0:57 starting engine 2.
0:58 starting engine 3. Failing.
1:00 Computer increase thrust for 2 running engines on maximum.
1:01 Engine 1 ... overheating of the nozzle neck, melting of the copper part that dissipates heat from a critical point.
1:02 Engine 1: burnt throat diameter is bigger and bigger.
1:03 Engine 1: loss of thrust 50% or more, almost destroyed throat.
1:04 Computer stopped engine 2 (?) Or his failing. (?)
1:04 Computer starting engine 3 again: Unsuccessfuled.
1:04 Engine 2 is still off.
1:04 Into engine 1 is pumping all fuel.
1:05 Engine 1: In combustion chamber burns unbalanced chemical mixture. Total loss of thrust of last (1) engine. The rocket falls in a free fall.
1:12 Elon Musk strangles a programmer. |
Haha! He’s back!!!
|
|
|
TriiodideFrog
Hazard to Others
Posts: 108
Registered: 27-9-2020
Member Is Offline
|
|
Space X used oxygen and methane. Maybe there was some barium or copper impurity?
|
|
|
Vomaturge
Hazard to Others
Posts: 286
Registered: 21-1-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: thermodynamic
|
|
I agree that it probably cooked off some copper inside the engine. I'm no rocket scientist but I'm thinking there's a part (fuel injector?) that's
cooled and shielded by a stream of fuel or oxidizer. According to wikipedia, the landing engine is powered by gas-phase methane and oxygen. If the
propellant flow drops, the gases wll be burnng closer to that copper injector and it's going to melt. Not that it matters much, since low propellant
flow basically causes the rocket to free fall into the landing pad...
I now have a YouTube channel. So far just electronics and basic High Voltage experimentation, but I'll hopefully have some chemistry videos soon. |
|
|
Morgan
International Hazard
Posts: 1705
Registered: 28-12-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The nozzle looks quite copper clad in these photos.
https://wccftech.com/spacex-starship-prototype-test-key-thin...
[Edited on 13-12-2020 by Morgan]
|
|
|
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
Posts: 1415
Registered: 2-9-2014
Location: Technion Haifa
Member Is Offline
Mood: old jew
|
|
Not that it matters much, since low propellant flow basically causes the rocket to free fall into the landing pad.... ...Anyway, all will destroyed....
Interesting news. I guessed something right, not something. The drop in fuel pressure caused excess oxygen, which burned the combustion chamber and
its throat. Like when steel is cut with a sharp oxygen flame. A very expensive copper alloy was cut here. Resetting the engines was intentional, but
engine 3 (middle in the video) failed to start at all...
Development of primarily - secondary substances CHP (2015) Lithex (2022) Brightelite (2023) Nitrocelite and KC primer (2024)
|
|
|
ordenblitz
Hazard to Others
Posts: 259
Registered: 18-7-2004
Location: Northwest
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bohr'd
|
|
Man that sure looks more like a boron green than a copper green.
|
|
|
Morgan
International Hazard
Posts: 1705
Registered: 28-12-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
That green copper nozzle effect brought to mind this copper coupling reducer used in a jam jar jet.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=GIstWmvSkbA
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
