fusso
International Hazard
Posts: 1922
Registered: 23-6-2017
Location: 4 ∥ universes ahead of you
Member Is Offline
|
|
Which number you like more: 1.99 vs 2.01?
Assume you're doing scientific calculations, which one do you like it to appear more, 1.99 or 2.01? Does it depend on situations?
|
|
wg48temp9
National Hazard
Posts: 786
Registered: 30-12-2018
Location: not so United Kingdom
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by fusso | Assume you're doing scientific calculations, which one do you like it to appear more, 1.99 or 2.01? Does it depend on situations?
|
Wow what an unusual brain you have
I am wg48 but not on my usual pc hence the temp handle.
Thank goodness for Fleming and the fungi.
Old codger' lives matters, wear a mask and help save them.
Be aware of demagoguery, keep your frontal lobes fully engaged.
I don't know who invented mRNA vaccines but they should get a fancy medal and I hope they made a shed load of money from it.
|
|
happyfooddance
National Hazard
Posts: 530
Registered: 9-11-2017
Location: Los Angeles, Ca.
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
If 2 was my target (if I had one) then I would prefer 2.01.
In most other cases I prefer a .99
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3720
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
'unusual' is a very kind word
1.99 usually means I get change rather than have to search my pocket for some
some digital electronic displays have 2000 as full scale,
so 2.01 would cause a range change giving less precision
both are trivial but I'm not busy at the moment so gave an answer
CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
|
|
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
Posts: 2799
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Big
|
|
2.001, because you can just blame the one-loop correction.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomalous_magnetic_dipole_mome...
|
|
SWIM
National Hazard
Posts: 970
Registered: 3-9-2017
Member Is Offline
|
|
I really prefer 127/64ths.
Decimals bum me out.
(For you non-Americans out there: That means they depress me, not that they have some effect on my ass. It comes from the mid 20th century term;
bummer, which I don't think is related to the mid-19th century term bummer, but then again I suppose it was a bit of a bummer (20th century) when the
bummers (19th century) burned Atlanta.)
|
|
fusso
International Hazard
Posts: 1922
Registered: 23-6-2017
Location: 4 ∥ universes ahead of you
Member Is Offline
|
|
Would you rather have 4.00-2.01=1.99 or 4.00-1.99=2.01?
|
|
happyfooddance
National Hazard
Posts: 530
Registered: 9-11-2017
Location: Los Angeles, Ca.
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The latter.
|
|
CharlieA
National Hazard
Posts: 646
Registered: 11-8-2015
Location: Missouri, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
If you are doing scientific calculations, it does not matter which you would prefer to occur. It only matters which number occurs, whether it is your
preferred number or not. Do you fudge your calculations to get the number you want? This used to be called "dry-labbing" when I was a student and TA.
|
|
Twospoons
International Hazard
Posts: 1326
Registered: 26-7-2004
Location: Middle Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: A trace of hope...
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by SWIM | I really prefer 127/64ths.
Decimals bum me out.
(For you non-Americans out there: That means they depress me, not that they have some effect on my ass. It comes from the mid 20th century term;
bummer, which I don't think is related to the mid-19th century term bummer, but then again I suppose it was a bit of a bummer (20th century) when the
bummers (19th century) burned Atlanta.) |
Fear not. Those of us who speak the Queens English do understand what you mean.
*quietly removes haemorrhoid cream from package addressed to 'SWIM'*
Helicopter: "helico" -> spiral, "pter" -> with wings
|
|
morganbw
National Hazard
Posts: 561
Registered: 23-11-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
edited:
poor attempt at humor
[Edited on 7/25/2019 by morganbw]
|
|