gopal
Harmless
Posts: 1
Registered: 31-8-2018
Member Is Offline
|
|
benzyl chloride
Dear sir,
how to prepare benzyl chloride from benzene
From
Gopal indrara
|
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
Supposedly, Blanc chloromethylation works. Formaldehyde and hydrogen chloride in excess benzene with a Lewis acid catalyst (e.g. zinc chloride) in
anhydrous conditions at 25 C.
Edit: Note: This supposedly produces some really serious carcinogens as a byproduct. A fume hood is required.
[Edited on 5-9-2018 by JJay]
|
|
|
Metacelsus
International Hazard
Posts: 2539
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble
|
|
Why not prepare it by the chlorination of toluene? That's how it's done industrially.
|
|
|
NeonPulse
Hazard to Others
Posts: 417
Registered: 29-6-2013
Location: The other end of the internet.
Member Is Offline
Mood: Isolated from Reality! For Real this time....
|
|
Pretty sure it’s done with toluene and chlorine in the vapour phase. The two chemicals are pumped steadily as gaseous form into a glass reactor
where they react and if you designed the apparatus well you should have a collection flask or something similar to get the product. But this just
makes it sound much simpler than it actually is. The device design is probably the biggest hurdle here since chlorine will destroy most materials
except glass. If you pull it off it would be very interesting to know how you did so and how the apparatus design went.
|
|
|
Loptr
International Hazard
Posts: 1348
Registered: 20-5-2014
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Grateful
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by JJay  | Supposedly, Blanc chloromethylation works. Formaldehyde and hydrogen chloride in excess benzene with a Lewis acid catalyst (e.g. zinc chloride) in
anhydrous conditions at 25 C.
Edit: Note: This supposedly produces some really serious carcinogens as a byproduct. A fume hood is required.
[Edited on 5-9-2018 by JJay] |
IIRC, this requires a concentrated solution of HCl at 0C, so a lot more HCl than first glance. Bromomethylation might be easier to handle.
Also, whats wrong with benzyl bromide? Toluene and bromine, using toluene in excess as solvent, and a radical catalyst (hv, etc.)
[Edited on 6-9-2018 by Loptr]
"Question everything generally thought to be obvious." - Dieter Rams
|
|
|
Dan Vizine
National Hazard
Posts: 628
Registered: 4-4-2014
Location: Tonawanda, New York
Member Is Offline
Mood: High Resistance
|
|
I've done this photochemically catalyzed chlorination reaction numerous times with m-xylene. Toluene should react in the same way. Chlorine is
generated by adding HCl to stirred liquid NaOCl bleach. The tube from the generator leads to an anti-suck back trap and from there to a tube well
below the surface of stirred, refluxing substrate. The reaction mixture is illuminated (sunlight would be much better). Trapping of evolved HCl is
done by a base trap (another anti-suck back trap!). You follow the reaction by the reflux temperature. After the desired temperature (approximately
equal to the bp of your desired product) is reached, the crude product is distilled through a Vigreaux column under reduced pressure.
For your desired target, chloromethylation of benzene should be avoided! You risk forming highly carcinogenic O(CH2Cl)2. NEVER heat HCl with
HCOH.
[Edited on 9/6/2018 by Dan Vizine]
"All Your Children Are Poor Unfortunate Victims of Lies You Believe, a Plague Upon Your Ignorance that Keeps the Youth from the Truth They
Deserve"...F. Zappa
|
|
|
Loptr
International Hazard
Posts: 1348
Registered: 20-5-2014
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Grateful
|
|
I have always been curious about this. Is it volatile? Can it be hydrolyzed? Any way for it to easily be separated from the mixture?
It does scare me though.
"Question everything generally thought to be obvious." - Dieter Rams
|
|
|
TGSpecialist1
Hazard to Self
Posts: 53
Registered: 24-12-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: always tired
|
|
It would be easier to make it using toluene and TCCA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_4kfY0dR2A
But personally I would just distill off the unreacted toluene.
|
|
|
zed
International Hazard
Posts: 2284
Registered: 6-9-2008
Location: Great State of Jefferson, City of Portland
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-repentant Sith Lord
|
|
Gopal, here, terminology may be confusing. Benzyl Chloride is not naturally derived from Benzene, AND Chlorobenzene and Benzyl Chloride, are not the
same material.
If you actually want to produce Benzyl Chloride , the easiest method is probably via Benzyl Alcohol.
It is pretty easy to make. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzyl_chloride
Benzyl Alcohol, at least in the U.S.A., is probably more easily to obtain than Benzene. https://www.ebay.com/itm/Benzyl-Alcohol-Gallon-HDPE-Bottle/1... LoAAOSwsZJaWwGh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mK9_MDn2dN0
[Edited on 6-9-2018 by zed]
|
|
|
Dan Vizine
National Hazard
Posts: 628
Registered: 4-4-2014
Location: Tonawanda, New York
Member Is Offline
Mood: High Resistance
|
|
Loptr,
The chemical is bis(chloromethyl) ether.
It is volatile, dangerous in almost any amount ( A gc with a Ni-63 detector is required to measure the concentration at its lowest dangerous level in
air), and it is hydrolyzable. In fact, the window for this hydrolysis is just right to give you cancer. It survives the transport into your body but
the nitrogen bases in DNA are readily cross-linked right across the two strands. The "bite" is just right for this. I have always refused to do any
reaction involving BCME.
[Edited on 9/6/2018 by Dan Vizine]
"All Your Children Are Poor Unfortunate Victims of Lies You Believe, a Plague Upon Your Ignorance that Keeps the Youth from the Truth They
Deserve"...F. Zappa
|
|
|
Loptr
International Hazard
Posts: 1348
Registered: 20-5-2014
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Grateful
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Dan Vizine | Loptr,
The chemical is bis(chloromethyl) ether.
It is volatile, dangerous in almost any amount ( A gc with a Ni-63 detector is required to measure the concentration at its lowest dangerous level in
air), and it is hydrolyzable. In fact, the window for this hydrolysis is just right to give you cancer. It survives the transport into your body but
the nitrogen bases in DNA are readily cross-linked right across the two strands. The "bite" is just right for this. I have always refused to do any
reaction involving BCME.
[Edited on 9/6/2018 by Dan Vizine] |
Thanks, Dan Vizine. I knew it was bis(choromethyl) ether. There is another reagent that might be possible to be used here, but I don't know much about
it.
Chloromethyl chlorosulfate
Apparently it eliminates the risk of producing bis(chloromethyl) ether as a by-product.
| Quote: |
The reaction of liquid (gamma-) SO3 with CH2Cl2 at room temperature leads to SO3 insertion into the C-Cl bonds, giving the useful chloromethylating
agent chloromethyl chlorosulfate (CMCS). The process is very slow but becomes rapid on addition of catalytic quantities of trimethyl borate. The
product mixture consists almost entirely of CMCS and the product of further sulfation, methylene bis(chlorosulfate)(MBCS), in a ratio of ca. 2 : 1,
but typical yields of CMCS, isolated by distillation, are only 30-35%. The catalysed reaction in the homogeneous liquid phase at -45 degrees C has
been followed as a function of time and of reactant concentration by 1H nmr spectroscopy. It is observed that, besides CMCS and MBCS, three
additional, transient products (designated A, B and C) are formed. Products A, B and C decompose slowly at -45 degrees C but much more rapidly if the
reaction mixture is raised to room temperature, giving additional CMCS and MBCS. From an analysis of the SO3 balance, it is inferred that products A,
B and C arise from the reaction of one molecule of CH2Cl2 with respectively two, three and four molecules of SO3; they are suggested to be
chloromethyl chloropolysulfates. By measuring initial rates of CMCS formation or total CH2Cl2 consumption, it is shown that the reaction is first
order in the catalyst and roughly third order in SO3. A mechanistic scheme is proposed in which SO3 forms equilibrating zwitterionic molecular
complexes with CH2Cl2. of 1 : 1, 2 : 1 and higher stoichiometries. The boron-containing catalyst can activate these complexes towards nucleophilic
attack at carbon by the negatively charged oxygen of another zwitterion. An analogous mechanism can be written for the conversion of CMCS into MBCS by
SO3 in the presence of trimethyl borate. CMCS reacts rapidly with anionic nucleophiles, such as halide or acetate ions (X-), in homogeneous solution
of their tetrabutylammonium salts in CD3CN, or in a two-phase system (CDCl3/H2O) using alkali-metal salts in conjunction with a phase-transfer
catalyst. In both situations the products (ClCH2X) arise by rapid nucleophilic displacement of the chlorosulfate moiety; this then more slowly
liberates chloride ion, which converts further CMCS into CH2Cl2. The reactivity of CMCS has been compared with that of MBCS and methyl chlorosulfate
(MCS) in competitive experiments; the reactivity order is MCS > MBCS > CMCS >> CH2Cl2. Evidence is also presented suggesting that, in
contrast to the halide nucleophiles, reaction of CMCS with sodium phenoxide in tetrahydrofuran solution leads to nucleophilic displacement of the
sulfur-bound chloride.
|
[Edited on 6-9-2018 by Loptr]
"Question everything generally thought to be obvious." - Dieter Rams
|
|
|
Dan Vizine
National Hazard
Posts: 628
Registered: 4-4-2014
Location: Tonawanda, New York
Member Is Offline
Mood: High Resistance
|
|
Hi Loptr,
Well, CMCS is certainly far safer than HCl/HCOH mixtures. Thanks for the reference.
A general note to all those people who may use alkylating chemicals of any kind....BEWARE! They are more dangerous than they may appear on the
surface.
While not as obviously harmful as things like SO3, Cl2, HCN and other laboratory-based boogiemen, alkylating agents (especially volatile ones) are
very detrimental to long-term health. Nitrogen bases are the building blocks of your genetic blueprint. Once you alkylate these you have introduced a
"mutation" of sorts and cancer is a common result.
Avoid and/or minimize exposure to things like Me2SO4, labile halides like MeI, EtI, BzCl etc. Always think ahead, the offending agent can always form
in situ as does BCME. Some dangerous alkylating agents are "hidden". All chloroacetyl chloride, for example, should be viewed as
containing traces of BCME.
[Edited on 9/7/2018 by Dan Vizine]
"All Your Children Are Poor Unfortunate Victims of Lies You Believe, a Plague Upon Your Ignorance that Keeps the Youth from the Truth They
Deserve"...F. Zappa
|
|
|
S.C. Wack
bibliomaster
Posts: 2419
Registered: 7-5-2004
Location: Cornworld, Central USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enhanced
|
|
Is bromomethylation less tragic?
|
|
|
Loptr
International Hazard
Posts: 1348
Registered: 20-5-2014
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Grateful
|
|
My thought was that bis(bromomethyl) ether would be less volatile. I don't know that as a fact.
"Question everything generally thought to be obvious." - Dieter Rams
|
|
|
Dan Vizine
National Hazard
Posts: 628
Registered: 4-4-2014
Location: Tonawanda, New York
Member Is Offline
Mood: High Resistance
|
|
You're correct, Loptr. The bp of the bromo analog is almost 50 C higher.
The more labile bromines would be hydrolyzed faster by the body and so it wouldn't be quite as optimized to do biological damage as BCME is, but it
would certainly be a potent carcinogen. It hard to quantify the relative risks, and so it's best to avoid these compounds if at all possible.
"All Your Children Are Poor Unfortunate Victims of Lies You Believe, a Plague Upon Your Ignorance that Keeps the Youth from the Truth They
Deserve"...F. Zappa
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
