| Pages:
1
2 |
Cou
National Hazard
Posts: 958
Registered: 16-5-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mad Scientist
|
|
Those of you who have been raided, do you know how the cops found you?
Everyone is worried about the NSA monitoring internet activity, but it seems like most raids are caused by nosy neighbors calling the police or
something like that. But has anyone actually been raided unexpectedly, because of the DEA monitoring their credit card purchases?
Everyone is freaking out about "OMIGOSH THE NSA CAN READ OUR TEXT MESSAGES, THEY ARE WATCHING ALL OF US, THEY CAN LISTEN TO OUR PHONE CONVERSATIONS"
but I've never heard of anyone getting arrested out of the blue, because some nerd at an NSA office was looking through PRISM flagged messages and
summoned a SWAT team. It's usually because of old-school someone telling the cops orally. There was someone who got arrested for google searching
"pressure cooker" but that's because someone looked at their search history and called the cops.
You might say "Well if you're not making meth, you're not doing any thing illegal, so they won't arrest you" but it doesn't take much to get arrested
for intent of making meth. I live in texas, and all you need to have in your house is nail polish (acetone) drain cleaner (sodium hydroxide) and HCl,
H2SO4, or nitric acid. They WILL find a way to arrest you, convict you in court, and put you in jail for 4 years.
[Edited on 3-10-2014 by Cou]
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3253
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
Never been raided, but...
I used to order from a pyro company called Skylighter, their offices were raided. My name was on the list of people that ordered from them. They
used that list to go after people for potential illegal activities. In my case I had ordered perchlorates and aluminum powder. I received a letter
from them saying that they had reason to believe I was making flash powder and that if I were doing that it would be against the law. Some people
received more than a strongly worded letter. Not an example of the government agencies tracking your credit card but companies keep your records for
years and years, essentially if you order the right combination of chemicals over time, and that company gets it's books examined then you could be
put in the cross hairs years later.
Another time I had a meter reader notice an odd smell from my back yard. They called the cops. The cops never came into the back yard, they just
talked to my grandmother at the door and left. It was after that I heard plenty of stories about meter readers getting bonuses for finding illegal
activities.
Even though I don't do chemistry at home any more, I still worry since the system seems to be able to put one and zero together and still get two
sometimes. Last week I had a note on my door saying that the quality of my wires for my cable service was poor and I needed to schedule an
appointment immediately for a technician to come out. Within an hour of getting the notice I got a phone call pushing for me to get a technician out
to my house and offering basically any time. I set something up for the next day (Sunday). On the surface it could be just an appointment but that
thought is always in the back of my head that this is someone sent into my house who is able to look at everything around without a warrant. I spent
about a half-hour making sure there was nothing even remotely interesting in my house. Because you honestly never know. Even though I don't practice
chemistry at home I still have books on perchlorates, hydrazine, nitrocarbons, etc. And even though I don't think twice about them because they are
just books some people are experts at making mountains out of mole hills so the books and other odds and ends were put up out of sight.
Basically, you never know who really might be keeping an eye on you.
|
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1379
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
The proverbial 'they' can't legally do much based solely on your internet search history and intelligence agencies will have bigger fish to catch than
small hobbyists. If your internet history only raises a few flags indicating an interest in chemistry and other unusual hobbies/interests, they'll
know about it but not care much. Order certain chemicals, especially in larger amounts, you become much more interesting. Be involved with a group
that supports certain ideologies, you become the focus of their attention.
It isn't odd for someone who is a professional chemist to own books on chemistry. Most students will keep books from their education for occasional
reference.
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
Polverone
Now celebrating 21 years of madness
Posts: 3186
Registered: 19-5-2002
Location: The Sunny Pacific Northwest
Member Is Offline
Mood: Waiting for spring
|
|
I am passing along a "knock at the door" experience that one of our members had a few years ago, one that caused him to suspend his experimentation
even though he didn't get in any trouble.
He had ordered mercury from someone who didn't know how to pack it very well. Nearly 10 kg were in the package and it leaked all over a UPS facility,
causing a good deal of grief with the DOT and EPA. Since the package was addressed to him, he got a visit from a couple of special agents (he didn't
say what agency), trying to figure out why he wanted a bunch of mercury in the first place. He had a well-equipped laboratory and a good explanation
for the mercury order. There was no further trouble. I suspect that things were worse for the incompetent shipper.
PGP Key and corresponding e-mail address
|
|
|
Chemosynthesis
International Hazard
Posts: 1071
Registered: 26-9-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Most of the law enforcement contact posted on this forum does appear to be coincidental happenstance, however, there is a tactic called "parallel
construction" that is known to be used by the DEA to obscure the source of their signals intelligence. Even federal judges and prosecutors have been
lied to about the sources of data, in some instances. There is essentially no way to be sure of how many investigations, raids, etc. were truly
initiated due to human intelligence, and no way to to be confident that only the DEA is doing this, as members here have known of BATFE raids on
companies as well. Look into it.
edit: oh, and I do not mean this as a political statement, but I recommend looking into the substantial increase in "sneak and peaks" for drug related
offenses under our current administration. Local law enforcement has had a general trend of decreased live fire exercises, and has shut down
county/Sheriff task forces here on methamphetamine manufacture. Assuming there is no decrease in actual crime, this may place pressure on someone to
prosecute, even if just for statistical politics.
[Edited on 5-10-2014 by Chemosynthesis]
|
|
|
roXefeller
Hazard to Others
Posts: 463
Registered: 9-9-2013
Location: 13 Colonies
Member Is Offline
Mood: 220 221 whatever it takes
|
|
The ATF told me I would have to contact the department of homeland security if I was needing to buy 400lbs of RDX with my license. I thought, WTF
shouldn't DHS get concerned sooner than 400?
|
|
|
Chemosynthesis
International Hazard
Posts: 1071
Registered: 26-9-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by roXefeller  | | The ATF told me I would have to contact the department of homeland security if I was needing to buy 400lbs of RDX with my license. I thought, WTF
shouldn't DHS get concerned sooner than 400? |
Might have been the result of a bureaucratic compromise. I doubt the DOJ wants to hand over any funding justifications they can keep to themselves. If
400lbs an order, or during a time period, is a small enough market share, it might have been deemed worthwhile to give up, since there is only so much
funding from Congress to go around between them, in theory.
|
|
|
franklyn
International Hazard
Posts: 3026
Registered: 30-5-2006
Location: Da Big Apple
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Cou | | Everyone is worried about the NSA monitoring internet activity , freaking out about " OMIGOSH THE NSA CAN READ OUR TEXT MESSAGES, THEY ARE WATCHING
ALL OF US, THEY CAN LISTEN TO OUR PHONE CONVERSATIONS " but I've never heard of anyone getting arrested out of the blue , because some nerd at an NSA
office was looking through PRISM flagged messages and summoned a SWAT team. |
It's entirely posssible and can be any federal or state or local government agent even for hire private companies.
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/09/19/us-navy-spying-on-priv...
http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2014/09/15/court-challenges...
The lesson here is that excessive zeal and disregard for legal process derailed a criminal prosecution.
http://www.inquisitr.com/1483968/the-navy-illegally-searched...
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2014/09/12/13-30077.pdf
| Quote: Originally posted by Cou | | You might say you're not doing any thing illegal , so they won't arrest you. They WILL find a way to arrest you , convict you in court , and put you
in jail for 4 years. |
You're more useful as a source of revenue to them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kEpZWGgJks
Civil Forfeiture
http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/forfeiture
Assorted links
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/search.php?token=&src...
.
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
| Quote: |
You might say you're not doing any thing illegal , so they won't arrest you. They WILL find a way to arrest you , convict you in court , and put you
in jail for 4 years. |
These data are quite interesting . . . ?
From the BBC:
Incarceration rates in democracies (per 100,000)
United States - 707
Russia - 474
Ukraine - 209
Turkey - 188
Hungary - 186
Czech Republic - 157
United Kingdom - 148
Spain - 145
Portugal - 137
Australia - 133
Canada - 118
(Source: International Centre for Prison Studies, 2011-2013)
|
|
|
NOV:5
Harmless
Posts: 24
Registered: 5-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: Moodless
|
|
The general trend is startling. The 1033 program is turning police into quasi-military gangs out to try out all their new gear. law enforcement in the
United States in a larger threat to individual liberty than any meth cook or cocaine cartel could ever be. They will throw you in jail, take
everything you own and destroy your life on a lie.
Drive to the auto auction in the next state with cash? Get pulled over, they'll just take it and you have to sue them to get it back
Remember, Remember...
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
Indeed, law enforcement in America looks increasingly like a huge criminal money-racket ─ successful and growing . . .
|
|
|
jock88
National Hazard
Posts: 505
Registered: 13-12-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
A bit like the foreign wars that have been going on for a generation or so.
|
|
|
Thanatops1s
Hazard to Self
Posts: 54
Registered: 24-6-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I haven't been able to have a lab or keep chemicals at home in years because I live in a big apartment building. However it really bothers me that
people need to worry about dealing with things like this when they're doing nothing illegal and putting nobody in any danger.
|
|
|
Chemosynthesis
International Hazard
Posts: 1071
Registered: 26-9-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quite a bit of the problem is just ignorance of how many chemicals are scrutinized due to the relative simplicity of many old school synthetic
reactions. Just like the retired chemist (then self employed working on patent work in his home) who had his life upheaved for what was eventually
dropped to a zoning law violation as determined by a woman with an associates in theater (qualified for chemical safety?). I can't find the actual
victim/suspect's post where he clarified the matter, seeming to correct both the lead investigator and code enforcement person commenting in the
thread on multiple statements, but here is a link to the code enforcement person talking about him "crossing a line somewhere" due to her
interpretation of his "home occupation [as uncostomary.]" Uncustomary is a far cry from unsafe, or even illegal.
http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/08/11/disharmonic-con...
This type of statement from someone who is likely far less capable of determining chemical safety or utility (not an insult, but just factual
inference based on job duties and requirements) is particularly annoying:
"My advice is to stop watching Breaking Bad and get another hobby. Either that or pick different experiments to conduct at a different location. If
you've got equipment and substances/precursors commonly used in making illegal drugs - plan on going to jail and, Later, arguing your case in front of
a judge. Period."
http://www.realpolice.net/forums/archive/t-101560.html
I wish all law enforcement kept in mind that neither officer safety nor protecting and serving the public requires automatically jailing individuals
based on "equipment and substances/precursors." There are things such as subpoenas for financial records, admittedly boring and expensive surveillance
of activity at suspected drug dealers', forensic testing, limited investigative detention, (plain sight) knock&talk, etc. Of course, that kind of
good police work costs money and is harder than, say sending a SWAT team to a house based on an anonymous tip, as a parallel example. It also doesn't
allow you to boast of good arrest numbers (and as long as prosecution is dropped or conviction of some kind is had, doesn't hurt your DA's office on
paper.)
Obviously we know that such circumstances quoted are not necessarily indicative of crime, though possibly quite suspicious depending on exact
circumstances. It is possible to actually investigate suspects who don't have clear violations of the law prior to arresting them. Then again (and I
know I am getting loose on my reading here),I suppose some of the synthetic and medicinal chemists, neuroscientists, lab technicians, as well as
pharmacologists I have had the privilege of working with... people paid by various government resources to develop, produce and test drugs including
scheduled narcotics, shouldn't be able to derive pleasure from an acclaimed fictional television show like Breaking Bad, according to some logic. Best
not to have a an unapproved hobby in the United States either.
Sad how the disconnect shows when I speak with a very accomplished academic turned educational/research administrator and he laments the lack of
chemical acumen and synthetic ability in much of the biomedical/translational research recruits he teaches and hires.
My speculation is that if we fail to hold people to high standards in school (such as 'hard' coursework in science), they won't be trained to hold
high standards in much anything else... but back to the topic at hand, I did have two pertinent links on labs getting investigated. Maybe that counts
for something.
[Edited on 7-12-2014 by Chemosynthesis]
|
|
|
Fantasma4500
International Hazard
Posts: 1681
Registered: 12-12-2012
Location: Dysrope (aka europe)
Member Is Offline
Mood: dangerously practical
|
|
Yes.
first time they decided to bet that i had something illegal, and thus send me into a spiral of government in which they ended up profitting from, as
in with credit
second time i managed to buy something that nearly broke their key word machine or whatever its called
slightly irrelevant: ive heard a guy in my country got away with driving in a car with 1kg amphetamine
it was done as simply as that he didnt own the car, and he said it wasnt his
the carowner neither recognized it and they had nothing on them
others than that i know one who just recently got busted, before i explained him to keep his hobby 100% to himself he managed to talk to someone
living close to him which ended up snitching him and calling the cops for some reason as the fact that he made fireworks worried him
|
|
|
MrBlank1
Hazard to Self
Posts: 96
Registered: 5-2-2013
Location: Oz
Member Is Offline
Mood: Inadvertantly aloof?
|
|
+1 parallel construction in my case I THINK ( It seems obvious to me, however I do have issues with perception ), source likely to be informant
statement or net related. 4 and a half years of chemistry with no drama would imply the latter more likely, being the only change in said time frame.
AAAAA = Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse
|
|
|
NitratedKittens
Hazard to Others
Posts: 131
Registered: 13-4-2015
Location: In the basket with all the other kittens
Member Is Offline
Mood: Carbonated
|
|
What almost managed to break their keyword machine
Basket of kittens for you ........BOOM
|
|
|
Loptr
International Hazard
Posts: 1348
Registered: 20-5-2014
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Grateful
|
|
I think a good follow on to this thread would be what sorts of reagents, or combinations of reagents, would be what get you in trouble if you were
raided. The reason I ask is there are many ways to any given substance of interest, so having more than one reagent around the house increases the
chances you have something that is part of an illicit synthesis.
There are so many pathways that I feel you could unintentionally have the "ingredients" for something they might recognize, and try to construct a
case around that, even if there wasn't intention or prior knowledge of the potential.
EDIT: For example, I attempted the TCCA route to chlorobenzene. I then wanted to attempt an Oxone/NaBr bromination of benzene to bromobenzene. While
doing some research, I came across a PowerPoint for first responders, which clearly and boldly stated that bromobenzene is a PCP precursor. I was
shocked and it freaked me out because I have no intention of making or using PCP. What are definite areas of OC at home to avoid?
[Edited on 15-4-2015 by Loptr]
|
|
|
Hawkguy
Hazard to Others
Posts: 326
Registered: 10-10-2014
Location: British Columbia (Canada eh!)
Member Is Offline
Mood: Body is Ready
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Loptr | I think a good follow on to this thread would be what sorts of reagents, or combinations of reagents, would be what get you in trouble if you were
raided. The reason I ask is there are many ways to any given substance of interest, so having more than one reagent around the house increases the
chances you have something that is part of an illicit synthesis.
There are so many pathways that I feel you could unintentionally have the "ingredients" for something they might recognize, and try to construct a
case around that, even if there wasn't intention or prior knowledge of the potential.
EDIT: For example, I attempted the TCCA route to chlorobenzene. I then wanted to attempt an Oxone/NaBr bromination of benzene to bromobenzene. While
doing some research, I came across a PowerPoint for first responders, which clearly and boldly stated that bromobenzene is a PCP precursor. I was
shocked and it freaked me out because I have no intention of making or using PCP. What are definite areas of OC at home to avoid?
[Edited on 15-4-2015 by Loptr] |
Well as per precursor reagents, I think its not just WHAT you have, but what combinations. For example, if you have 10g 1, 4 Benzoquinone, I can't
imagine anyone caring. But if you also have a smidge of Safrole laying around, I would assume the consequences would be baaad. Anyhow, just for input,
here a few things I might recommend avoiding, or at least retaining caution to. (This is all opinion, some of these could potentially be totally
fine.)
- Acetic Anhydride
- 1, 4 - Benzoquinone
- Pseudophedrin (Its fine if you have it in med cabinet, just not in lab bottle or whatnot.)
- Palladium (II) Chloride (People near me have gotten into doo doo over that.)
- Safrole
- Eugenol
- Barium Hypophosphite or related salts/ acid.
- Pure Nitromethane
- Certain compounds involving Methyl, Fluorine, and Phosphorous.
- Ass loads of Ammonium or Potassium Nitrate
Other things I might be sketchy around if I was an officer:
- Isobutyl Alcohol
- Hydrazine compounds
|
|
|
Loptr
International Hazard
Posts: 1348
Registered: 20-5-2014
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Grateful
|
|
That is a good start.
I think we need sticky or even a "Guide to Science Madness" that covers various topics such as safety, storage, reagents, etc., with special interest
given to staying within the confines of the law, and what should and shouldn't be done at home, in general.
It's also a catch-22, because in order to know about what not to buy, you must be up on topics within clandestine synthesis, which could look bad if
they checked out your search history. lol.
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3721
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
Since joining this forum my search history has become 'questionable'
but I consider it purely as an intellectual persuit so i'm not worried
(too lazy to do the required experiments and far too inexperienced)
but
putting up a list of 'what chemicals to avoid to look innocent' is a bad idea,
it may assist semi-literate 'bad' people
it would probably contain many chemicals that have 'legitimate' uses, thus demonising them
if the list became popular, possessing chemicals on the list would be a kind of admission of guilt for members.
|
|
|
Loptr
International Hazard
Posts: 1348
Registered: 20-5-2014
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Grateful
|
|
I am not talking very general reagents here, but things that would lead to trouble or conviction given a trial based on "intent". (In your case, does
intent mean a search history? It's just so foggy.)
I am sure most of this information is already out there.
[Edited on 16-4-2015 by Loptr]
|
|
|
Morkva
Harmless
Posts: 17
Registered: 6-11-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I remember on an occasion I was going to board a airplane a woman... A woman with curly brown hair, perhaps in her forties and somewhat plump - not
grotesquely, but if it's skinny (as an aside, if "skinny" seems inappropriate, the lesson of dinosaurs and microbes is that volume is x cubed; surface
area is only x squared, so small indeed is skinny) versus plump, yes, it was noticeable... swabbed me with a pad of cotton. Now, I found it
obvious why and what for, and, so unthinkingly, asked "what are you testing for?". Presumably nitro aromatics, right? I was wondering, I remember, if
they had accounted for organic peroxides too, well... it's what all the kids... She answered with such gravity, that she could have been looking
THROUGH my eyes, and I wouldn't have known it because of the voice.
"Explosives."
That gravity very nearly caused me to burst into laughter. The terrible consequences strangely increased the urge to do so. Maybe it's not absurd. I
believe it is. But it is not to these so-called normal people.
They only know of explosives and drugs as the fruits of chemistry. The cream of the crop, which is to say, the majority of folks desiring intellectual
stimulation, prefer the crossword in the Sunday newspaper. I'm being very mean. There are many people who would understand the idea of amateur
chemistry, and many who, to be optimistic, do not, and/or are driven by fear for personal safety, and to protect their fellow man.
The most important message regarding the police that I can convey comes not from my own mouth, because, to my perpetual surprise I have met only
decent ones, but from Al Pacino.
Al Pacino played the role of Frank Serpeco in a movie of that title. It understates the true story. My advice is watch it. (Or buy the real Frank's
book, he's alive.)
Unethical people are drawn, by instinct, to positions of power and little oversight. My experience to the contrary does not, and will not, over rule
that application of logic. The same might perhaps be said of the mythical NSA worker, cloaked as he is in absolute secrecy, and therefor having no
accountability - but the very same secrecy necessitates that there is little mischief he can do, besides jacking off to a photo of your naked wife, or
placing an occasional indecent, but cryptographically secure, phone call to your house... It's a concern.
Oh what penalties I will incur for saying this.
Returning to the subject of chemistry... I think what is required is humble educational films about the importance of chemistry every day in our
lives, in every place. Woelen photographs beautiful demonstrations. But, on I Love Lucy, Lucy said about Ethel bragging
"... to hear her go on, you'd think she invented Penicillin!"
Then, it was a big deal! Who would laugh at that today? Antibiotics in all drugstores. Then, you could die of a scratch on the face! Not aware of
that? That's what did Carnarvon in, and that composer too: shaving.
Polymers. I enjoyed reading Otto Vogl's autobiography. Still, one can only read so many autobiographies, so it would be preferable that YOU read one
that I myself haven't. http://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=12...
Fluorine Chemistry at the Millennium if you can find it, is also enjoyable. Chemists are interesting people.
I am working on a book deal involving to tell the story of synthetic organic chemists. It would be nice if some fraction of the time the population
puts in abstract games like checkers and shooting ZOMBIES, could be spent on the puzzle of putting complex molecules together. I would have them pick
something (Samponione? Phorbol?) and wonder, how to assemble that. Five minutes a day? Ten?
Oh, but I'm idealist. For the youtube quick video loving folks, a demonstration of the kind I mean:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaDJdHPykEA
It's not Oprah.
[Edited on 16-4-2015 by Morkva]
http://www.carrotmuseum.co.uk/falcarinol.html
“Science is the ultimate pornography, analytic activity whose main aim is to isolate objects or events from their contexts in time and space. This
obsession with the specific activity of quantified functions is what science shares with pornography.”
- J.G. Ballard, The Atrocity Exhibition
|
|
|
Chemosynthesis
International Hazard
Posts: 1071
Registered: 26-9-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Morkva | | I was wondering, I remember, if they had accounted for organic peroxides too, well... it's what all the kids... |
I hate to admit this openly online, but I doubt it was that sensitive yet.
http://www.asi-mag.com/detecting-improvised-homemade-explosi...
Only recently have screenings been able to accurately detect organic peroxides, and I doubt the infrastructure is widespread to detect them.
Backscatter radiation scanners somehow got way more press, and likely funding.
|
|
|
Zombie
Forum Hillbilly
Posts: 1700
Registered: 13-1-2015
Location: Florida PanHandle
Member Is Offline
Mood: I just don't know...
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Morkva | Chemists are interesting people.
I am working on a book deal involving to tell the story of synthetic organic chemists. It would be nice if some fraction of the time the population
puts in abstract games like checkers and shooting ZOMBIES, could be spent on the puzzle of putting complex molecules together. I would have them pick
something (Samponione? Phorbol?) and wonder, how to assemble that. Five minutes a day? Ten?
[Edited on 16-4-2015 by Morkva] |
Frankly, I could not agree more!
What we need is an N.A.A.Z.P...
A mind is a terrible thing to waste. (or is that from the UZCF)?
They tried to have me "put to sleep" so I came back to return the favor.
Zom.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
