Turner
Hazard to Others
Posts: 197
Registered: 2-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Blast caps
What is a suitable witness plate (or heavy piece of steel) for a blasting cap?
I pressed 3 caps earlier today and really pressed the ETN base charge heavy and hoping I did not press the ETN so much to be insensitive to 300mg SADS
which I also pressed heavily, or press the ETN to the point that it now doesn't meet Critical Diameter.
So I want to see if all material in the cap detonates.
|
|
|
Ral123
National Hazard
Posts: 735
Registered: 31-12-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
You could've used progressive loading for the ETN. Now you can't expect good reliability.
Use whatever you have, it must be consistent between tests, may be metal.
|
|
|
roXefeller
Hazard to Others
Posts: 463
Registered: 9-9-2013
Location: 13 Colonies
Member Is Offline
Mood: 220 221 whatever it takes
|
|
Hennig and Rosco just had a discussion about witness plates. (https://www.sciencemadness.org/whisper/viewthread.php?tid=43...) You can see in that thread that he used pretty much anything. Notice he also
adhered the cap perpendicular to the plate so that he could see the end effect on the adhesion point of the plate and the splatter effect across the
rest. If you look at this link (https://www.sciencemadness.org/whisper/viewthread.php?tid=43...) you can see him compare two tests. Like Ral123 said, consistency will allow
this.
|
|
|
markx
National Hazard
Posts: 646
Registered: 7-8-2003
Location: Northern kingdom
Member Is Offline
Mood: Very Jolly
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Turner  | What is a suitable witness plate (or heavy piece of steel) for a blasting cap?
I pressed 3 caps earlier today and really pressed the ETN base charge heavy and hoping I did not press the ETN so much to be insensitive to 300mg SADS
which I also pressed heavily, or press the ETN to the point that it now doesn't meet Critical Diameter.
So I want to see if all material in the cap detonates.
|
Uggh....the barbaric practice of pressing primaries on top the base charge should really not be practiced by amateur experimenters (unless you have a
remotely operated press with really heavy shielding). It is the industry standard because it is the least complicated method for producing a compound
initiator, but industry does that in fully automated machines that have been designed with an accidental explosion in mind. If that should happen on a
makeshift press with <1000mg ETN+300mg SADS in a metal casing...the consequences will be severe.
Hence consider this alternative: the primary compacted separately on a suitable pyrotechnic delay, a few milligrams of loose sensitive secondary (ETN,
PETN, MHN) beneath that and the compacted base charge as the last link.
The pyrotechnic delays with the primary can be constructed and stored separately from the base charges until ready to use.
Something like this:
65/35 KNO3/sugar in a straw with 65mg of SADS sitting on one end+ 3-5mg loose ETN + 600mg compacted ETN 1g/cm3.
Exact science is a figment of imagination.......
|
|
|
Hennig Brand
International Hazard
Posts: 1284
Registered: 7-6-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by markx |
Uggh....the barbaric practice of pressing primaries on top the base charge should really not be practiced by amateur experimenters (unless you have a
remotely operated press with really heavy shielding). It is the industry standard because it is the least complicated method for producing a compound
initiator, but industry does that in fully automated machines that have been designed with an accidental explosion in mind. If that should happen on a
makeshift press with <1000mg ETN+300mg SADS in a metal casing...the consequences will be severe.
|
If you keep a little distance between yourself and the blasting cap you are unlikely to lose body parts with only a 1g base charge. As far as high
velocity particles from the fragmenting cap casing, it really depends on what the casing is made of and of course if shielding is present. The thin
walled aluminum tubes I use normally fragment into very small pieces with poor aerodynamic qualities (velocity drops very quickly with distance
traveled). The big thing is keeping some distance between yourself and the blasting cap. One should always be thinking, "what if this cap detonated
right now?” Of course if you are holding the cap in your hand, when it detonates, you are going to lose fingers.
The big thing I worry about, other than holding a detonating cap, is permanent hearing loss from an accidental explosion. Along with good distance
from cap when pressing, and shielding, very good hearing protection should be used.
"A risk-free world is a very dull world, one from which we are apt to learn little of consequence." -Geerat Vermeij
|
|
|
Ral123
National Hazard
Posts: 735
Registered: 31-12-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Here's what exploding cap would do: http://youtu.be/luj3NdyBisA?t=37s
As can be seen a heavy metal block between you and the cap can suffice as a shield. I use a big hammer, hold a rod with pliers and hit the rod with
something long. No body parts can be exposed to shrapnel Thick safety glasses, paper and earphones in the ears. Yes I invite accident, but I know
exactly what can happen and the kinetic energy the hammer will have if the cap explodes.
Markx, your setup is cute but vulnerable to reliability issues.
|
|
|
markx
National Hazard
Posts: 646
Registered: 7-8-2003
Location: Northern kingdom
Member Is Offline
Mood: Very Jolly
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Ral123 | Here's what exploding cap would do: http://youtu.be/luj3NdyBisA?t=37s
As can be seen a heavy metal block between you and the cap can suffice as a shield. I use a big hammer, hold a rod with pliers and hit the rod with
something long. No body parts can be exposed to shrapnel Thick safety glasses, paper and earphones in the ears. Yes I invite accident, but I know
exactly what can happen and the kinetic energy the hammer will have if the cap explodes.
Markx, your setup is cute but vulnerable to reliability issues. |
If by reliability issues you mean misfires under normal operating conditions, then no, it is not prone to failure. I have used about a hundred of
those with different fillers and charge amounts and have not had even a single misfire yet. And that is proof enough for me to keep doing things this
way.
But if you meant that it will fail after being stepped on with a heavy boot, or soaked in rain for 2 days or being driven over with a car, then
yes....sure it will fail. Then again, I do not intend to expose this device to such tortures. The setup fulfills the task that it was created for with
excellent results and in my opininon exposes the operator to less risks than pressing sensitive primaries or hammering a charge into metal tubes if
you will.
It's just one way of doing it that I have found to give good compromise between risk and functionality....I'm sure there are other and better ways, so
let's hear and see them to gain knowledge and widen our scope...
Exact science is a figment of imagination.......
|
|
|
testimento
Hazard to Others
Posts: 351
Registered: 10-6-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
One can easily construct a blast shield from wood or steel and use cartridge press or hydraulic press with lever. Upon detonation fragments will be
shred around the shield and away from the charger. Even very thin plywood is more than enough to stop blasting cap fragments. Polycarbonate or other
plastic sheet would also be a very good idea since it allows user to observe the pressing but it has a lot higher cost.
I would not want to find out what Al or worse steel casing would do with 1g PETN detonated few feet away. And I'm not the scariest type of guy.
[Edited on 19-2-2014 by testimento]
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
