nimbus8
Hazard to Self
Posts: 55
Registered: 14-4-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Most accurate volume measurement
Hey everyone, before i buy a bunch of beakers and burets for my home lab would you guys recommend any way to measure volume that doesn't involve just
eyeballing it. I know there are volume to weight conversion so you could like measure out a given number of grams of a substance to get a given
volume.
I just want to be very precise when reacting come chemicals.
|
|
|
Crowfjord
Hazard to Others
Posts: 390
Registered: 20-1-2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Member Is Offline
Mood: Ever so slowly crystallizing...
|
|
I think most volumetric flasks, graduated cylinders and burets are accurate enough for hobby chemistry purposes, but if you have (or have access to)
an analytical balance and an accurate thermometer, you can calibrate your volumetric glassware. Beakers and erlenmeyer flasks have marks for
estimation only and shouldn't be used for volume measurement.
For example, I work for a lab that does quantitative analysis of elements in metals, and accuracy is a must. Before using new volumetric flasks, we
need to verify their accuracy; some flasks are dead on, some need a new mark to show the actual level of the given volume. Assuming we want to
calibrate a (clean and dry!) 100 ml volumetric flask, we tare it on the balance, then add deionized water (distilled is probably okay, too) whose
temperature has been measured to one place past the decimal. Assuming the water is 20.0 degrees C, it had a density of 0.9982 g/mL*, so 100 mL has a
mass of 99.82 g. This mass of water is added to the flask and a new mark is made at the bottom of the meniscus, or if the meniscus lies on the factory
made mark, a scratch is made through the mark to indicate that it is correct.
*I got this value from a chart at work. Similar ones can probably be easily found online.
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Agreed, Crowfjord. For homelab work, even quantitative, most burettes and volumetric flasks should be accurate enough.
But:
The marks on decent beakers and conical flasks are generally accurate enough for use in preparative recipes for instance.
|
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
International Hazard
Posts: 1863
Registered: 18-6-2008
Location: Brittany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dogs are pets but cats are little furry humans with four feet and self determination! 
|
|
I have a few Volac grade A 100ml pipettes and I have checked them against a scale accurate to 0.01g.
For the calibration of my hydrometers, this is accurate enough and I have convinced my local Customs of this.
I am allowed a bit of grace as the beers are bottle and barrel conditioned, so a little fermentation goes on in the final container providing
condition.
I will mark a beer at 4.5% ABV when it goes out but it will be a bit sweet in the bottle so it will be about 4.6% if you store it away and allow the
condition and flavours to develop.
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by ScienceSquirrel  | I have a few Volac grade A 100ml pipettes and I have checked them against a scale accurate to 0.01g.
For the calibration of my hydrometers, this is accurate enough and I have convinced my local Customs of this.
I am allowed a bit of grace as the beers are bottle and barrel conditioned, so a little fermentation goes on in the final container providing
condition.
I will mark a beer at 4.5% ABV when it goes out but it will be a bit sweet in the bottle so it will be about 4.6% if you store it away and allow the
condition and flavours to develop. |
You mean that using the verified pipettes you create water/alcohol mixtures of known alcohol ABV and use these standards to calibrate the hygrometers?
|
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
International Hazard
Posts: 1863
Registered: 18-6-2008
Location: Brittany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dogs are pets but cats are little furry humans with four feet and self determination!
|
|
I test the pipettes against pure water and then against a sucrose solution of known gravity above the starting gravity of my beers, made up using
sucrose and deionised water.
I do not need analytical results. Good enough is OK.
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by ScienceSquirrel | I test the pipettes against pure water and then against a sucrose solution of known gravity above the starting gravity of my beers, made up using
sucrose and deionised water.
I do not need analytical results. Good enough is OK.
|
Got it. You assume conversion of sugars is complete. That's what I do to (and everyone else I assume). Will have to check my hydrometer once, that
way.
There is no real easy analytical way to determine ABV.
Have you ever tried refractometry or is it inaccurate at about 5 % ABV?
|
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
International Hazard
Posts: 1863
Registered: 18-6-2008
Location: Brittany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dogs are pets but cats are little furry humans with four feet and self determination!
|
|
Attenuation is about 70% with the final gravity being usually about 1.010 - 1.014 in a normal ale, although this can be as high as 1.016 - 1.020 in a
barley wine.
http://www.fermentis.com/brewing/homebrewing/product-range/
Calculation of percentage alcohol by volume;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcohol_by_volume#Beer
Calibration of your hydrometer;
http://www.byo.com/stories/item/411-calibrate-your-hydromete...
[Edited on 14-6-2013 by ScienceSquirrel]
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thanks for that.
Have you got a site dedicated to your microbrewery?
[Edited on 14-6-2013 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
