| Pages:
1
2 |
Cou
National Hazard
Posts: 958
Registered: 16-5-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mad Scientist
|
|
Bromine.
Are there any online stores that ship elemental bromine? United nuclear and elemental scientific don't have it. I can get all the other halogens
though; I can buy fluorine and chlorine from the Airgas store next to me, and iodine from elemental scientific, but no bromine. What is the easiest
way to make it?
|
|
|
elementcollector1
International Hazard
Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline
Mood: Molten
|
|
There's a thread on bromine over in the "Chemistry in General" section - check that for a good prep.
Also, what kind of Airgas sells fluorine (and just how expensive is it?)
Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
|
|
|
Dr.Bob
International Hazard
Posts: 2753
Registered: 26-1-2011
Location: USA - NC
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mildly disgruntled scientist
|
|
Any Airgas, Linde, or Praxair location would be able to provide fluorine, provided that you can afford the cylinder deposit, and that they trust you
not to be a terrorist or likely kill yourself with it. They also can get HF.
But neither of those would be ideal to have around your house. Even at the old fluorochemical company I worked at 30 years ago, they kept the
fluorine outside in a cabinet with piping to bring it into the building. I just heard yet another story about someone trying to do some chemistry
with F2 who nearly killed themselves even outside on a porch, and he had worked with it for years, but was trying to moonlight making some compounds
after the main company closed. He ended up in the hospital with pneumonia when his system leaked a little. I could see doing small scale F work i
the proper fume hood, but a cylinder of F2 or HF could take out a good part of a neighborhood.
|
|
|
neptunium
National Hazard
Posts: 990
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline
|
|
also fluorine will explode or burst into flame with a lot of compound....leaving toxic fluoride behind...yeah always small amount of it!
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8027
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Yeah, buying fluorine at the store at the next corner....
If you can get fluorine, then you certainly can get bromine.
This question is comparable to saying: "Where can I buy a toy gun? I can buy AK47's and Kalashnikovs, but I cannot find toy guns anywhere.".
|
|
|
Cou
National Hazard
Posts: 958
Registered: 16-5-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mad Scientist
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by woelen  | Yeah, buying fluorine at the store at the next corner....
If you can get fluorine, then you certainly can get bromine.
This question is comparable to saying: "Where can I buy a toy gun? I can buy AK47's and Kalashnikovs, but I cannot find toy guns anywhere.".
|
The problem is that you can get fluorine and chlorine from the gas store because they can be stored in canisters, iodine is a solid so you can just
buy it in a bottle, but bromine is a liquid and they don't have that
|
|
|
Pyro
International Hazard
Posts: 1305
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Gent, Belgium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
so? Br2 can be stored in both bottles and canisters if they are made of the appropriate material. how about making it? NaBr+KMnO4+H2SO4, NaBr+H2SO4,
NaBr+Cl2, ...
2kg NaBr will give you 400ml Br2 at 80% yield (realistic yield for NaBr+KMnO4+H2SO4, Ive had higher but 80% is average)
Ps:Woelen, an AK-47 is a Kalashnikov  one of the many weapons designed by Antonin
Kalashnikov
all above information is intellectual property of Pyro.  |
|
|
radagast
Hazard to Self
Posts: 79
Registered: 28-6-2012
Location: NYC
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Not that I was exactly the model of safety at your age, but nobody is going to sell bromine or fluorine to anyone under the age of 18, and for good
reason, too 
I'm not a safety nut but if you're interested in working with bromine, I would highly advise you to reach out to your chemistry instructor so
he can supervise the process. When working with such a volatile and dangerous reagent, even small errors can injure/maim/kill you!
|
|
|
Cou
National Hazard
Posts: 958
Registered: 16-5-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mad Scientist
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by radagast | Not that I was exactly the model of safety at your age, but nobody is going to sell bromine or fluorine to anyone under the age of 18, and for good
reason, too
I'm not a safety nut but if you're interested in working with bromine, I would highly advise you to reach out to your chemistry instructor so
he can supervise the process. When working with such a volatile and dangerous reagent, even small errors can injure/maim/kill you!
|
That's why my parents are buying it.
Also i've worked with chlorine before, isn't chlorine more dangerous?
|
|
|
Finnnicus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 342
Registered: 22-3-2013
Member Is Offline
|
|
May I ask how much flourine is? Not that I'm thinking of buying any...
[Edited on 21-5-2013 by Finnnicus]
|
|
|
Cou
National Hazard
Posts: 958
Registered: 16-5-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mad Scientist
|
|
I don't know, probably very expensive, if they even have it. I looked on their website, i don't know if it's in the retail store
|
|
|
Finnnicus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 342
Registered: 22-3-2013
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Cou |
I don't know, probably very expensive, if they even have it. I looked on their website, i don't know if it's in the retail store
|
Well, if you buy bromine, could you check for us?
BTW, I really think making your own would be more... economical.
|
|
|
Cou
National Hazard
Posts: 958
Registered: 16-5-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mad Scientist
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Finnnicus | | Quote: Originally posted by Cou |
I don't know, probably very expensive, if they even have it. I looked on their website, i don't know if it's in the retail store
|
Well, if you buy bromine, could you check for us?
BTW, I really think making your own would be more... economical. |
They don't have bromine. And I might not get to go to Airgas because they they are only open on weekdays, and close at ****ing 5:00 PM, and my parents
are too lazy to drive me there, and they probably won't let me ride my bicycle for 17 miles just to check what they have
|
|
|
Mixell
Hazard to Others
Posts: 449
Registered: 27-12-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
A quick suggestion:
Don't buy chlorine and especially fluorine by the cylinder. Better not to buy fluorine at all...
Be careful with bromine as well, it has a relatively high vapor pressure.
|
|
|
Cou
National Hazard
Posts: 958
Registered: 16-5-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mad Scientist
|
|
I just make chlorine with HCl and bleach anyway
|
|
|
Pyro
International Hazard
Posts: 1305
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Gent, Belgium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
F2 is a LOT more toxic than Cl2. halogens get worse going up the periodic table. I2 is least toxic/irritating, then Br2 then Cl2 then F2. I believe
it's got to do with electronegativity. F2 is 4, Cl is 3,16 ,Br2 is 2,96, I2 is 2,66.
all above information is intellectual property of Pyro. |
|
|
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Bromine may be less toxic/reactive than chlorine, but it is extremely dangerous for different reasons. The fact that it is a liquid means that
accidents can be quite a bit worse than with chlorine. There are very few materials that can stand up to liquid bromine, so it will wreak havoc on
gloves if spilled. Spilling some on your skin leaves very painful, deep wounds that take a very long time to heal. Think of it like bromine is
inherently extremely concentrated, so it's always a strong oxidizer and carries a lot of risk if you aren't extremely careful.
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8027
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Bromine is quite toxic and one certainly has to be careful with this, but its toxicity and danger is somewhat exaggerated. I have personal experience
with Br2 running over my skin. I blew on my skin to have it evaporated quickly and after that, I used a solution of Na2S2O3 to reduce remains of
bromine on my skin. I had no adverse effects at all, except that I had yellow stains on the area of skin which was covered by bromine.
You certainly must not allow bromine to act on your skin for prolonged time. Have a bottle of solution of Na2S2O3 or Na2SO3 at hand when you
experiment with bromine.
Bromine vapor is less acutely toxic than chlorine gas at the same molar concentration. But again, try to avoid as much as possible to inhale bromine
vapor. It is highly irritating and leads to damage of the respiratory tract. Systemic toxicity of bromine is somewhat higher than systemic toxicity of
chlorine and iodine, but overall I think that bromine is of comparable toxicity as chlorine.
I would say that toxicity of halogen can be ordered as follows:
F ≫ Cl ≈ Br > I
Toxicity of halide can be ordered as follows:
F(-) ≫ Br(-) ≈ I(-) > Cl(-)
All of bromide, iodide and chloride are only marginally toxic and in practical situations they can be considered non-toxic as long as you do not
ingest the compounds. Fluoride on the other hand is very toxic and can lead to really serious wounds and really serious health effects, which also can
have severe long-term effects. I feel more comfortable working with cyanides than with fluorides.
Working with chlorine, bromine and iodine can be done safely in a home setting, provided that you take some reasonable measures to prevent inhalation
of vapor/gas and to prevent prolonged contact with skin. Working with fluorine is out of the question in a home setting. Even many professional labs
do not have the equipment to safely handle fluorine.
[Edited on 21-5-13 by woelen]
|
|
|
radagast
Hazard to Self
Posts: 79
Registered: 28-6-2012
Location: NYC
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by MrHomeScientist | | Bromine may be less toxic/reactive than chlorine, but it is extremely dangerous for different reasons. The fact that it is a liquid means that
accidents can be quite a bit worse than with chlorine. There are very few materials that can stand up to liquid bromine, so it will wreak havoc on
gloves if spilled. Spilling some on your skin leaves very painful, deep wounds that take a very long time to heal. Think of it like bromine is
inherently extremely concentrated, so it's always a strong oxidizer and carries a lot of risk if you aren't extremely careful. |
I think you hit the nail on the head here. Chlorine would be even more hazardous than bromine if you were using it in the liquid phase, but most
amateurs generate small amounts of chlorine gas instead. In fact, I recall reading a J. Chem. Edu. article recently where they brominated a
pyrimidine by bubbling generated chlorine gas through a NaBr solution so the students didn't need to risk working with bromine.
Which is not to discourage the OP from pursuing safer experiments, since he clearly has advanced interests for a 14-year old -- just that this isn't
exactly the sort of thing I'd want my kid doing without some serious supervision
|
|
|
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by woelen | Bromine is quite toxic and one certainly has to be careful with this, but its toxicity and danger is somewhat exaggerated. I have personal experience
with Br2 running over my skin. I blew on my skin to have it evaporated quickly and after that, I used a solution of Na2S2O3 to reduce remains of
bromine on my skin. I had no adverse effects at all, except that I had yellow stains on the area of skin which was covered by bromine.
|
Wow really? Everything I've ever heard about bromine says it leaves nasty, painful injuries, which I assumed appeared rather quickly. Your story makes
me feel a little more at ease, but doesn't (and shouldn't) change the amount of respect I'll give bromine in the future. I know it's still capable of
nasty things.
Before making bromine for the first time, I made up a 1M solution of sodium thiosulfate just like you suggest. It came in handy when I very stupidly
opened the stopcock more instead of closing it, and some bromine spilled out onto my table :/
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8027
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
You must respect the chemical bromine (like most other chemicals), but you should not be afraid of it. Bromine can produce very nasty wounds, but not
in a few seconds. Most dangerous situation is that you do not notice having your skin covered by bromine and just work on. Then it has time to do its
nasty thing. But if you notice as soon as it happens and take counter measures immediately (sodium thiosulfate or sodium sulfite on the affected skin)
then the effects are not that bad. It is as with many chemicals. The amount of time of exposure determines the seriousness of the injury.
There are very few chemicals which give nasty wounds at once (within a second). Some examples are
- oleum (solution of SO3 in H2SO4)
- anhydrous perchloric acid
- high concentration hydrofluoric acid (not immediately visible, but after some time becomes extremely painful and 'rots' underlying tissue)
Bromine is not one of them.
[Edited on 21-5-13 by woelen]
|
|
|
Dr.Bob
International Hazard
Posts: 2753
Registered: 26-1-2011
Location: USA - NC
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mildly disgruntled scientist
|
|
And to think that nowadays (when I can get most chemicals) I go out of my way to avoid certain reagents due to their hazards...
Once you work in industry or even most good academic or gov. labs, you are taught, trained, and badgered to do everything in the safest way possible.
All it takes is one fire, spill, or other incident to have OSHA, etc inspecting you and fining you for every extension cord, ladder, or other trivial
thing not properly documented, labelled, or used. So we make a reasonable effort to avoid t-butyl lithium, metallic sodium or potassium, cylinders
of hazardous gases, etc. I try to generate HCl from acetyl chloride and methanol, brominate with NBS, and use milder sources of "HF" like
pyridine-HF or tetrabutylammonium fluoride for silyl group removal. Not to say that I can't or don't work with hazardous chemicals, but it is just
to costly to do it when you can avoid it.
This is not as relevant for most home scientists, I know, but I do hope that people will be careful not to create situations that only make it harder
for people to do home science, as fires, poisonings, and other home lab emergencies will only make things worse for all involved.
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8027
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Professional labs can do such things, but home scientists don't have such options. E.g. bromine can be made fairly easily by home chemists, but NBS is
unavailable. Making HCl from acetyl chloride and some alcohol sounds ridiculous to me. Acetyl chloride is a very valuable reagent in a home lab, while
HCl is nothing special at all. Use of "milder" sources of HF sounds interesting, it would make experimenting with fluorides more accessible for home
chemists. I have 48% HF but I hardly did any experiment with this, due to the very high risk and I do not feel comfortable using that chemical.
|
|
|
LanthanumK
Hazard to Others
Posts: 298
Registered: 20-5-2011
Location: New Jersey
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Bromine is often more dangerous to materials than flesh. Just a solution of bromine water is capable of eating away plastic over time, as I
experienced. Bromine dissolves many plastics, rubber seals, and many other substances. Storage must be in all glass apparatus, or leakage of fumes
will result, causing corrosion on metal surfaces.
hibernating...
|
|
|
Dr.Bob
International Hazard
Posts: 2753
Registered: 26-1-2011
Location: USA - NC
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mildly disgruntled scientist
|
|
Another source of HF that might be more accessible would be ammonium bifluoride, which is the salt of ammonia and 2 mols of HF, thus acidic, but still
a crystalline solid. It is used as a glass etchant as well as by some people to wash wheels in car washes, as it cleans aluminum well. So it may
well be more readily available. I did try it once, and it will slowly etch glass, so it is used by the glass industry when they want to make custom
etched glass.
And using a small amount of acetyl chloride to generate HCl in situ is a classic way to run Fischer esterifications, for example, as you want
anhydrous HCl, and it is a real pain to set up a HCl cylinder and bubbler to get a few grams of HCl into a reaction. It usually only takes a few ml
of acetyl chloride, verses the cost of a cylinder rental for HCl, which can be quite a bit per month. So costs are all relative. A 1L bottle of
AcCl is only a few dollars, since it is a commodity chemical. Thionyl Chloride works about the same, but likely also generates dimethyl sulfate in
situ also, but that would not hurt an esterification at all.
I would certainly agree that some reagents, like NBS, are not readily available, but being aware of them is certainly useful, as there are some
reactions that it works better for. I have found that N-hydroxysuccinimide is a very useful reagent, in general, for making activated esters,
buffering halogens, and other unique uses, much like HOBT is useful in some peptide chemistry (but sometimes used when not needed as well, like in
achiral amide forming reactions).
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
