DDTea
National Hazard
Posts: 940
Registered: 25-2-2003
Location: Freedomland
Member Is Offline
Mood: Degenerate
|
|
Smoke blowing in the wind
Close your eyes and set your minds eye onto a fire, a distant fire, and the subtle, suggestive movements it makes. Notice the smoke rising up,
expanding, playing in the wind. If your concentration wanes, imagine the sound of one hand clapping...
Although this is a peaceful thought, I don't mean to open a thread about pyromancing. I'd like to talk about the physical behavior of smoke. There
are numerous descriptions of it depending on the angle you're approaching from: environmental chemists might be interested in the enrichment of metal
particles carried in smoke, toxicologists might be concerned about the harmful effects of smoke, while a stoner might simply want to the immediate
area of he and his friends with smoke.
One thing that I have always enjoyed doing when smoking (bad habit, trying to quit) is observing the behavior of the smoke coming off of the cigarette
and trying to use that to gauge the weather (with limited success). In calm, windless weather though, my understanding is that smoke rises
adiabatically from its origin/heat source. As it cools, it expands. The intensity of the original heat source determines how high the smoke will
rise (which I'm sure can be described using the zeroth law or the second law of Thermodynamics).
I've noticed that some particles carry in the air for long distances, while others rise and fall somewhat, before "playing in the wind" a bit more.
Is this simply due to particle size? What role does Brownian motion play? Is there a way to describe the smoke using the Boltzmann Equation?
I can't be the only smoking chemist who thinks this way... I'd like to have a conversation about smoke movements, and perhaps what they can tell us
about local meteorological conditions.
"In the end the proud scientist or philosopher who cannot be bothered to make his thought accessible has no choice but to retire to the heights in
which dwell the Great Misunderstood and the Great Ignored, there to rail in Olympic superiority at the folly of mankind." - Reginald Kapp.
|
|
|
psychokinetic
National Hazard
Posts: 558
Registered: 30-8-2009
Location: Nouveau Sheepelande.
Member Is Offline
Mood: Constantly missing equilibrium
|
|
I find smoke amazing too, and I don't smoke!
I too find it amazing how far things travel, and I'm inclined to agree with you on the size of the particles, but maybe also the concentration has a
part to play.
It's solidy and gassy, and considering it often has water in it - wet too 
“If Edison had a needle to find in a haystack, he would proceed at once with the diligence of the bee to examine straw after straw until he found
the object of his search.
I was a sorry witness of such doings, knowing that a little theory and calculation would have saved him ninety per cent of his labor.”
-Tesla
|
|
|
JohnWW
International Hazard
Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Being a finely-divided product (soot, composed of carbon, aromatic polyenes, and buckminsterfullerene) of incomplete combustion (or of complete
combustion of an inflammable substance containing non-combustible ashy substances), smoke rises because it is entrained by hot CO2 and CO formed by
combustion, and heated N2/Ar and any O2 left over from combustion, which have (because of their temperature) a lower density than the surrounding air.
|
|
|
DDTea
National Hazard
Posts: 940
Registered: 25-2-2003
Location: Freedomland
Member Is Offline
Mood: Degenerate
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by JohnWW  | | ...smoke rises because it is entrained by hot CO2 and CO formed by combustion, and heated N2/Ar and any O2 left over from combustion, which have
(because of their temperature) a lower density than the surrounding air. |
So the initial movement of the smoke has to do with adiabatic expansion of the gasses the particles are entrained in...that's a bit of
important clarification.
I don't remember the derivation of adiabatic expansion off hand, but the gist is that as the gas expands, it cools down and in turn, its density
increases relative to that of air, and the particles rise at an ever-decreasing rate. Now if I recall correctly, particles of about 10 microns stay
in the air "indefinitely"--at least until some outside force brings them down (e.g. rain). Larger particles, then, should eventually fall out due to
gravity. However, more important forces like the wind initially prevent them from falling straight down...
So then: using the zeroth law (specifically, the rate of heating is proportional to the difference in internal energy...kind of like Newton's Law of
Cooling--which can, in fact, be derived from the zeroth law), the rate of cooling of the carrier gasses should be slower in warm weather and faster in
cool weather. Smoke then, should rise to a higher altitude in warm weather than in cool weather because the rate of cooling (proportional to
difference in temperature between the carrier gas and the atmosphere) is slower. I feel like I'm on to something...like a new way to use a cigarette:
as a thermometer!
"In the end the proud scientist or philosopher who cannot be bothered to make his thought accessible has no choice but to retire to the heights in
which dwell the Great Misunderstood and the Great Ignored, there to rail in Olympic superiority at the folly of mankind." - Reginald Kapp.
|
|
|
hodges
National Hazard
Posts: 525
Registered: 17-12-2003
Location: Midwest
Member Is Offline
|
|
Yes a bit off topic, but related to smoke. Here is an interesting story about how someone's smoking habit lead to a major discovery in physics.
http://www.chem.harvard.edu/herschbach/How_a_bad_cigar.pdf
Hodges
|
|
|
psychokinetic
National Hazard
Posts: 558
Registered: 30-8-2009
Location: Nouveau Sheepelande.
Member Is Offline
Mood: Constantly missing equilibrium
|
|
Chemists aren't meant to be healthy anyway
“If Edison had a needle to find in a haystack, he would proceed at once with the diligence of the bee to examine straw after straw until he found
the object of his search.
I was a sorry witness of such doings, knowing that a little theory and calculation would have saved him ninety per cent of his labor.”
-Tesla
|
|
|
E-tech
Harmless
Posts: 36
Registered: 30-5-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Observing larger amounts of smoke can help you to read atmospheric conditions, such as inversion layers- which turned out to have a big influence in
chemical weapons usage.
|
|
|
Aurus
Harmless
Posts: 43
Registered: 31-12-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: Oxidative
|
|
Smoking and meteorology, interesting conjunction. I think the differences in height, although quantitative, must be too small to be noticeable,
particularly as the smoke is not visible after some distance.
Let those who seek, find, and those who find, seek ever more
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
