Douchermann
Hazard to Others
Posts: 117
Registered: 11-10-2005
Location: Illinois, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Substitute sodium hydride for potassium hydride?
Hey guys, I've asked this question a few places. In the formation of Indole-4-boronic acid, can sodium hydride be substituted for potassium hydride?
I understand potassium hydride is a much stronger reducing agent, however it is also around 5-6 times the price. Here is the particular procedure in
question:
"
To a suspension of KH (4.57 g of a 30% suspension in mineral oil, 32.9 mmol) was added a solution of 4-bromo-indole (5.88g, 30.0 mmol) in anhydrous
ether (25 ml). The reaction was stirred at r.t. for 30 min under N2 and the reaction was cooled in an acetone-dry ice bath (-78°C) with stirring.
Precooled t-BuLi solution in hexane (33.0 ml, 66.0 mmol) was cannulated into the reaction and the reaction was kept stirring for another 20 min. Neat
B(n-BuO)3 (24.1 ml, 90.0 mmol) was added into the reaction by syringe under vigorous stirring. The reaction mixture became thick when it was allowed
to warm to r.t., and more anhydrous ether (30 ml) was added under N2. The reaction was allowed to stand overnight at r.t. with vigorous stirring. The
thick reaction mixture was diluted with more anhydrous ether and then transferred slowly into 1 M aqueous H3PO4 (300 ml) at 0°C. The mixture was
stirred at r.t. for 40 min, and extracted with ether (100 ml x 30). The combined organic layer was extracted with 1 N NaOH (50 ml x 3). Ether (100 ml)
was added to this aqueous solution and the mixture was acidified to pH = 2 using 1M H3PO4. The organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer was
extracted with ether (100 ml x 2). The combined ether layer was dried over Na2SO4 and evaporation of solvent in vacuo left a beige solid (4.24g,
88.0%).
"
It\'s better to be pissed off than to be pissed on.
|
|
Nicodem
Super Moderator
Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
KH was used there just to protect indole by deprotonation. NaH can do the same, but maybe the sodium salt of 4-bromoindole is less soluble in diethyl
ether.
Neither KH or NaH are considered reducing agents, because the number of literature cases where a reduction of anything else but a proton are limited
to a few anomalies. They are bases, that's why KH is used in the above examples to protect t-BuLi from the indole's NH group.
I must add that for someone that plans to use something as hazardous as t-BuLi and something as expensive as 4-bromoindole, you sound quite irrational
by being stingy about KH. If this is the first time you are doing a lithiation, particularly with something as pyrophoric as t-ButLi, you really
should know learn all the basics of organic chemistry first, read all there is to known about lithiation, read about all the practical aspects of it,
and have someone experienced to guide you during the first experiment. t-BuLi near flammable solvents is not something to take lightly!
…there is a human touch of the cultist “believer” in every theorist that he must struggle against as being
unworthy of the scientist. Some of the greatest men of science have publicly repudiated a theory which earlier they hotly defended. In this lies their
scientific temper, not in the scientific defense of the theory. - Weston La Barre (Ghost Dance, 1972)
Read the The ScienceMadness Guidelines!
|
|
panziandi
Hazard to Others
Posts: 490
Registered: 3-10-2006
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bored
|
|
I have to agree with Nicodem. If you are asking about substituting KH for NaH based on cost, yet you are using t-BuLi and 4-bromoindole and Schlenk
techniques, you should reconsider what you propose to do! There is a reason the author opted to use KH, it likely wasn't because they had an extra few
£'s kicking around so they thought they'd opt for a more expensive base, it's likely that they tried NaH and found the yields were substantially
lower.
|
|
entropy51
Gone, but not forgotten
Posts: 1612
Registered: 30-5-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fissile
|
|
Just to emphasize Nicodem's cautionary note:
Researcher Dies After Lab Fire
January 22, 2009
Lab Safety Researcher Dies After Lab Fire
UCLA research assistant burned in incident with tert-butyl lithium
A research assistant in the department of chemistry and biochemistry died on Jan. 16 from injuries sustained in a laboratory fire that occurred in
December, the university has confirmed. The chemical, which ignites spontaneously in air, splashed onto Sangji's clothes and set them on fire.
Chemical & Engineering News, 87(4), January 26, 2009
|
|
len1
National Hazard
Posts: 595
Registered: 1-3-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: NZ 1 (goal) - Italy 1 (dive)
|
|
Their reactivity goes as
LiH < NaH < KH
They are good metalation agents in org chem
The latter has smaller lattice energy so is more reactive. I assume they do not work so well as reducing agents (though the thermodynamic suggests
they are strongly reducing) due to their lack of solubility and perhaps some kinetic factors.
Many things in the chemistry lab more dangerous than copper sulphate can be placed in the same category is tBuLi, never thought of it as a particular
hazard. As for the accident, i guess its the burning hexane/pentane that killed here - there wasnt enough BuLi
Quote: | Six feet from the fume hood was an emergency shower. When the employee’s gloves and clothing caught fire, she ran from the area away from the
shower. One of the post-docs used his lab coat to smother the flames. 911 was called. UCLA Fire Dept. and emergency medical, Los Angeles City Fire,
and Los Angeles County Haz Mat. The EMTs put the employee in the safety shower for gross decon and then transported her to the ER. She’s currently
in the Grossman burn unit in Sherman Oaks with second degree burns on her arms and third degree burns on her hands, a total of about 40% of her body.
There was very little damage to the lab. Bill has not interviewed the employee.
|
|
|
DJF90
International Hazard
Posts: 2266
Registered: 15-12-2007
Location: At the bench
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I have always been taught that sodium and potassium hydrides are non-nucleophilic/non-reducing - I believe this is due to the kinetic factor; The
hydride ion is so small it can easily abstract a proton from even very hindered positions, and it is the acid-base reaction that is fastest - many
orders of magnitude higher than any nucleophilic process. Hence the nucleophilic property of the hydrides is non-existant - adding excess hydride
still does not invoke nucleophilic attack, only double deprotonation.
|
|
Douchermann
Hazard to Others
Posts: 117
Registered: 11-10-2005
Location: Illinois, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
@Nicodem - Thank you, I was misguided, I was just doing common association with hydrides.
The reason why it might seem that I'm being stingy is because I don't look at reagents at a dollar/gram base. From my supplier, the minimum quantity
of potassium hydride I could get is 100 grams, which is well over $400. Where as with sodium hydride, the same amount is under $100. I could put
that extra $300 towards the bromoindole.
@panziandi - That's what I'm worried about : if there was an actual reason they chose the potassium salt as opposed to the sodium variant.
I will be reading up on this of course, but this sole issue makes the difference between something I'm actively working on, or something sitting on
the back burner.
It\'s better to be pissed off than to be pissed on.
|
|
zed
International Hazard
Posts: 2284
Registered: 6-9-2008
Location: Great State of Jefferson, City of Portland
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-repentant Sith Lord
|
|
I've read papers on the subject. As I recall, just off the top of my head. You should not try to substitute NaH for KH.
Yields are much higher with KH.
Still, I may be confused. For $300.00 Bucks, a quick survey of available references may be in order.
|
|