dapper
Hazard to Self
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 66
Registered: 8-11-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Separation of alkane/bromoalkane
I wasn't sure what forum was most appropriate but I was wondering what everyone thought would be the best logical starting point for finding/using a
method to separate a long-chain (c18-c20) 1-bromoalkane from a mixture of similar non-brominated long chain alkanes. I try never to underestimate the
power of the 'message in a bottle'
Thanks a lot
Dapper
|
|
Klute
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1378
Registered: 18-10-2006
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Could you furnish boiling points? And do you want to keep the bromoalkane as is, or can it be chemically modified?
\"You can battle with a demon, you can embrace a demon; what the hell can you do with a fucking spiritual computer?\"
-Alice Parr
|
|
chemrox
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2961
Registered: 18-1-2007
Location: UTM
Member Is Offline
Mood: LaGrangian
|
|
Could you centrifuge the stuff? What kind of quantities are we talking about? Maybe fractional freezing is a possibility. Without more specific
information it's kind of hard to suggest solutions. Why not tell us what the mixture is, how much of it there is and answer Klute's question?
Cheers,
CRX
[Edited on 4-2-2009 by chemrox]
"When you let the dumbasses vote you end up with populism followed by autocracy and getting back is a bitch." Plato (sort of)
|
|
dapper
Hazard to Self
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 66
Registered: 8-11-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I really appreciate everything so far. Basically the problem is I'm making a synthetic surfactant - It's two-armed, C20 as two arms with a 10C linker.
The smaller than c20 armed varieties were easier to purify but now there isnt much solvent access? or something. It's a nasty waxy amorphous funky
solid.
Gram or a couple gram scale
But really I want to do this on the 100 gram scale, and I'd be totally open to slightly over the top, excellent methods.
Thanks
Dapper
[Edited on 6-2-2009 by dapper]
[Edited on 6-2-2009 by dapper]
|
|
smuv
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 842
Registered: 2-5-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: Jingoistic
|
|
Use the crude alkane/bromoalkane as is for the next step of the reaction, then separate the amine/quat salt from the alkanes. This seperation is of
course much easier.
"Titanium tetrachloride…You sly temptress." --Walter Bishop
|
|
dapper
Hazard to Self
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 66
Registered: 8-11-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
There is no next step, I want to purify this product.
|
|
smuv
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 842
Registered: 2-5-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: Jingoistic
|
|
Quote: | Basically the problem is I'm making a synthetic surfactant - It's two-armed, C20 as two arms with a 10C linker. The smaller than c20 armed varieties
were easier to purify but now there isnt much solvent access? |
Quote: | There is no next step, I want to purify this product. |
In a case like this where the impurity (an alkane) is unreactive there is no shame in passing the synthesis onto the next step and removing the
impurities at that point.
"Titanium tetrachloride…You sly temptress." --Walter Bishop
|
|
dapper
Hazard to Self
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 66
Registered: 8-11-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I appreciate this advice, however I fear due to the particular use of the purified surfactant - templated self-layering material synthesis impurities
might affect aggregation, morphology, etc.
|
|
Sedit
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1939
Registered: 23-11-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: Manic Expressive
|
|
Could you possibly post a molecular picture of your target surfactant buy and chance dapper?
|
|
chemrox
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2961
Registered: 18-1-2007
Location: UTM
Member Is Offline
Mood: LaGrangian
|
|
I have to say I'm lost. Did this stuff come from a landfill, bottle, package, is it a product or an accident?
"When you let the dumbasses vote you end up with populism followed by autocracy and getting back is a bitch." Plato (sort of)
|
|
dapper
Hazard to Self
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 66
Registered: 8-11-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
This is what I'm digging at:
[Edited on 6-2-2009 by dapper]
Attachment: gemini.pdf (252kB) This file has been downloaded 942 times
|
|
dapper
Hazard to Self
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 66
Registered: 8-11-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
another PDF
Attachment: Gemini%20Surfactants.pdf (53kB) This file has been downloaded 1163 times
|
|
not_important
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3873
Registered: 21-7-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Looking at everything you've said, I would say that reduced pressure fractional distillation is your best bet. There's just not enough other
differences that don't relate to reacting the halogen.
|
|
dapper
Hazard to Self
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 66
Registered: 8-11-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I dont mind reacting with that halogen. Perhaps there's some way to 'derivitize' it into a filterable solid or something. I'm going to have to start
mucking around with it some more the only thing is it's a surfactant so it's a foamy mess.
|
|
not_important
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3873
Registered: 21-7-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
There seems to be a discrepancy in your statements. First there is this one
Quote: | There is no next step, I want to purify this product. |
and now this
Quote: | I dont mind reacting with that halogen. Perhaps there's some way to 'derivitize' it into a filterable solid or something. I'm going to have to start
mucking around with it some more the only thing is it's a surfactant so it's a foamy mess. |
If you react something with the halogen it is gone. Some substitutions would give products that could be converted back to the halogen, but they may
not be very practical.
The size of the molecule and that it is a surfactant is going to make clean separations difficult, even after taking it towards the final product.
Taking the halocarbon a step further on to a ionic compound might allow the separation of the 2 products. Use dilute solutions, an alkane solvent
(petroleum ether, ligroin) and water, perhaps run hot. The ionic product goes with the water, the hydrocarbon with the alkane solvent. However the
surface active nature can interfere with such a separation.
If the next stage in the synthesis is ionic you might be able to melt-extract the hydrocarbon out, especially with the addition of a small portion of
a nonpolar solvent to help get the hydrocarbon into the liquid phase.
But vacuum distillation (low to moderate temperature) of the hydrocarbon from an ionic product still seems like the best way, without further physical
data. The ionic nature of the surface active agent will keep its volatility down, milder temperatures are needed to avoid bond breaking around or
within the ionic portion.
The amount you want to process is pushing chromatographic methods, otherwise another possibility.
Tuning the process to minimise alkane production would seem to be helpful,.
|
|