Ritter
Hazard to Others
Posts: 370
Registered: 20-6-2008
Location: Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: Curious
|
|
Chlorine trifluoride & other hypervalent fluorohalogen compounds
Chlorine trifluoride is an obscure compound that was industrialized as an incendiary war gas ("N-Stoff") for the SS in Germany during WWII. It is said
to ignite flesh, wood, asphalt, etc., on contact.
I've found very little on ClF3 but it is prepared by direct fluorination of chlorine in this U.S. Patent: US6929784 (see http://tinyurl.com/6pqmve). They use it to etch electronic components as it is formed & do not isolate or store it.
Other so-called hypervalent fluoro derivatives of halogens are also very energetic. If I recall correctly what was said during a paper that was read
at one of the annual fluorine conferences at USC, NaIF6 will ignite diesel fuel.
[Edited on 27-6-2008 by Ritter]
Ritter
=============================
\"The production of too many useful things results in too many useless people.\"
Karl Marx
|
|
garage chemist
chemical wizard
Posts: 1803
Registered: 16-8-2004
Location: Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
There are detailed instructions for preparing ClF3 and many other interhalogen compounds in Brauer.
Apparati made of nickel, copper or alloys of these two metals are used for handling the fluorine and the halogen fluorides.
|
|
Ritter
Hazard to Others
Posts: 370
Registered: 20-6-2008
Location: Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: Curious
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by garage chemist
There are detailed instructions for preparing ClF3 and many other interhalogen compounds in Brauer.
Apparati made of nickel, copper or alloys of these two metals are used for handling the fluorine and the halogen fluorides. |
Danke sehr!
I am interested in obtaining a copy of the Allied Field Intelligence report that would cover 'N-Stoff.'
While not an energetic compound in itself, I have learned from official (yet unofficial) soirces that a major concern is involved with shipment of
liquid oxygen. This, too, will make anything in its path burst into flame given a source of ignition.
Ritter
=============================
\"The production of too many useful things results in too many useless people.\"
Karl Marx
|
|
ducksan
Harmless
Posts: 2
Registered: 30-6-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2008/02/26/sand_wont_sa...
Plenty of information about ClF3.
Don't mess around with this stuff, if any of you guys might seem interested in it. It apparently makes F2 look tame.
|
|
PyroRA
Harmless
Posts: 18
Registered: 23-6-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
ok wtf
People like you are the reason smart people like you keep becoming a smaller % of the population, HEHE let`s mess with some gas that can melt flesh
and shit off your bones!!!!!!!!!11111
Just joking, but still, If I had the equipment,supplies and instructions, coupled with a college degree and the licensing to do this, I still would
have no motivation to have that crap within a square mile of me
sounds DAMN USEFUL for chemical warfare though, funny story, my dad served in the military for 3 years or so, he had bad asthma since childhood, one
of their training procedures involved exposure to CS gas, after that he didn't have an asthma attack for 15 years
[Edited on 30-6-2008 by PyroRA]
|
|
Sauron
International Hazard
Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline
Mood: metastable
|
|
As Germany made no use at all of its CW capabilities in WWII apparently due to Hitler's loathing of CW, having been a mustard victim himself in the
previous war, I would be surprised is ClF3 was ever actually industrialized. Of the newer developments only tabun was in production. Sarin's plant was
unfinished at end of the war. Soman was only discovered in 1944.
I'd check Sartori re CF3. The BIOS reports also if you can get them. Saroti's THE WAR GASES is in the forum library for free and his supplemental
monograph is in Chemical Reviews.
But note that CWC does not cover this compound, and CWC purports to include every CW agent ever actually weaponized at least in Schedule 3 if they
have significant nonmilitary use. I think this one never made the list.
I checked and Sartori's book has no mention of CF2 and for that matter F2 is omitted. I will see the supplement.
No mention of CF3 in the supplement either.
[Edited on 30-6-2008 by Sauron]
Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
|
|
a_bab
Hazard to Others
Posts: 458
Registered: 15-9-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Angry !!!!!111111...2?!
|
|
ClF3 seems to have been produced by Germany in the WW2. From the Wiki article:
"Under the code name N-stoff ("substance N"), chlorine trifluoride was investigated for military applications by the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Nazi
Germany from slightly before the start of World War II. Tests were made against mock-ups of the Maginot Line fortifications, and it was found to be an
effective combined incendiary weapon and poison gas. From 1938 construction commenced on a partly bunkered, partly subterranean 31.76 km² munitions
factory at Falkenhagen which was intended to produce 50 tonnes of N-stoff per month, plus Sarin. However by the time it was captured by the advancing
Red Army in 1944, the factory had produced only about 30 to 50 tonnes, at a cost of over 100 German Reichsmark per kilograma. N-stoff was never used
in war.[7]"
|
|
Sauron
International Hazard
Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline
Mood: metastable
|
|
Anyone care to convery 1944 Reichsmarks 100,000 per MT into 2008 Euros or dollars?
Combination incendiary-poison gas. Hmmm. Incendiaries at that time were WP, napalm and thermite or one of the thermates. Dirt cheap. WP at least
doubled as irritant smoke.
This does not appear to be a cost effective development.
Meanwhile the tabun plant was producing 10,000 MT a month.
Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
International Hazard
Posts: 1863
Registered: 18-6-2008
Location: Brittany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dogs are pets but cats are little furry humans with four feet and self determination!
|
|
ClF3 probabaly escaped from the CWC as it was investigated as a possible rocket fuel. NASA had quite an interest in it in the immediate post war
years.
However it was tricky stuff to work with
"It is, of course, extremely toxic, but that's the least of the problem. It is hypergolic with every known fuel, and so rapidly hypergolic that no
ignition delay has ever been measured. It is also hypergolic with such things as cloth, wood, and test engineers, not to mention asbestos, sand, and
water—with which it reacts explosively."
|
|
Sauron
International Hazard
Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline
Mood: metastable
|
|
Dual use does not exempt anything from CWC, just gets it into Schedule 3 along with ubiquitous industrial feedstocks like phosgene and HCN.
Besides, this isn't 1950, and I doubt NASA is holding in reserve as a potential aerospace fuel.
Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
International Hazard
Posts: 1863
Registered: 18-6-2008
Location: Brittany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dogs are pets but cats are little furry humans with four feet and self determination!
|
|
I am pointing out that the CWC schedules are partly historical and produced by consultation between scientific advisors, definitely the junior
partners, industry heads who basically run the show and fairly venal politicians.
There are things like phosgene on there but plenty of precursors to precursors are ignored.
I would say that a moderately advanced sovereign state would have no difficulty at all in bypassing it completely if they wanted a CW capability.
Currently we are getting excited about the fact that Iran is on the verge of building a few bombs and maybe a possible delivery system.
It is not in doubt that Israel has a nuclear bomb stockpile that matches or exceeds Britain or France and can hit all of the Middle East, eastern and
western Europe.
But under the stupid American policy of 'Don't ask, don't tell' this is ignored.
|
|
Sauron
International Hazard
Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline
Mood: metastable
|
|
I am well familiar with the mechanics of CWC and its shortcomings. The state parties apparently decided that a castrated convention was better than no
convention at all. CWC is just another burgeoning UN bureaucracy and has already been thwarted by at least one major state party (former USSR) which
has 2-3 generations of unscheduled CW agents that can defeat NATO MOPP and detection gear and against which all known prophylaxis and therapeutic
agents are ineffective. I refer to the so called Novichoks.
Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
|
|
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Can we keep politics, foreign policy and other vaguely related stuff out of this please?
One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
|
|
JohnWW
International Hazard
Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I am fairly sure that ClF5 would be more stable, at least kinetically, than ClF3, and preferentially formed, as well as less volatile; but still a
potent fluorinating agent. The ClF6+ cation was synthesized a few years ago as a salt of SbF6-, by the reaction with ClF5 of F+ which was produced by
the decomposition of [KrF]+[SbF6]- (which is the only compound of Kr stable at room temperature); being isoelectronic with SF6, it should be more
kinetically stable still.
|
|