| Pages:
1
2 |
franklyn
International Hazard
Posts: 3026
Registered: 30-5-2006
Location: Da Big Apple
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
If you don't look you can't find
A rare account of an original pursuit discarded by conventional thinking
Inertial Propulsion - Eric Laithwaite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dy6hLZ02naM
This attempts an explanation
Anti-Gravity Wheel ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeyDf4ooPdo
Anti-Gravity Wheel Explained
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLMpdBjA2SU
The chief enemy of creativity is ' good ' sense.
— Pablo Picasso
Isaac Newton had the good sense to practice alchemy in secret.
A grounded overview of various proposals
Exotic Propulsion
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vk8SrDVhNnU
Techniques to Disrupt, Deviate and Seize Control of
an Internet Forum In case you wonder W T F ! is going on here
?
www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2012-10-28/cointelpro-techniques-dilution-misdirection-and-control-internet-forum https://web.archive.org/web/20120814124000/www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/08/the-15-rules-of-internet-disinformation.html
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
It’s come to the point where when a scientist/inventor is called (or calls himself) a ‘heretic/maverick/crank/etc’ franklyn then naturally
assumes that person must be ‘right’ or ‘onto something’.
But of course it ain’t necessarily so at all. Some ‘inventors’ do come up with crackpot ideas that demonstrably don’t work. And all
invention/discovery benefits from scepticism/scrutiny, lest we just blindly accept any wild claim.
The videos perceived by franklyn as attempts to explain Eric Laithwaite’s claimed discovery are nothing of the sort: that rotating masses show
counter-intuitive behaviour (that doesn’t ‘break’ any laws of physics) is well known to anyone who has played around with a toy gyroscope. An
‘antigravity device’ this does not constitute, of course.
Paranoid and conspiratorial minds like franklyn probably see great significance in the simple fact that nearly 20 years after Eric’s demise his
‘discovery’ still hasn’t made it into any significant propulsion system yet but the simpler explanation that it simply doesn’t work should not
be dismissed out of hand.
York Dobyn’s interesting presentation does in my view also not support that Eric was onto something.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
