Gooferking Science
Hazard to Self
Posts: 97
Registered: 17-7-2013
Location: Somewhere in Kansas, USA...
Member Is Offline
Mood: Halogenated
|
|
Breaking the Speed of Sound Underwater
I was sitting underwater in a pool recently listening to different muffled sounds. Suddenly I wondered what it would be like to break the speed sound
underwater. Now the principle is quite simple, but actually doing this would be difficult. You would have to propel whatever device is breaking the
speed of sound underwater through a medium that is much more dense than air. Also, the speed of sound underwater is substantially faster than that in
air. At these speeds the water might just form some sort of a vacuum cavity around the device moving at extreme speeds. This is similar to shooting a
gun underwater. Do you think a sonic boom would be created underwater? If the device was surrounded by a vacuum cavity then it would not be heard. Any
ideas or thoughts in this subject?
|
|
|
Tdep
National Hazard
Posts: 519
Registered: 31-1-2013
Location: Laser broken since Feb 2020 lol
Member Is Offline
Mood: PhD is done! It isn't good but it's over lol
|
|
It would be possible.
You can break the light barrier in water, and this results in a sort of sonic boom but with light called Cherenkov radiation (pictured) so my guess is
that once you break the sound barrier in water, you should get a sonic boom too.
|
|
|
Gooferking Science
Hazard to Self
Posts: 97
Registered: 17-7-2013
Location: Somewhere in Kansas, USA...
Member Is Offline
Mood: Halogenated
|
|
But if the object breaking the speed of sound was surrounded by a vacuum, you wouldn't be able to hear a sonic boom because sound can't travel in a
vacuum. I also was wondering if it would form Mach cones like when a jet plane breaks the sound barrier, or is that just characteristic of breaking
the speed of sound in air?
|
|
|
Zyklon-A
International Hazard
Posts: 1547
Registered: 26-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fluorine radical
|
|
Sound travels at about 1497 m/s at 25 °C.
A very powerful gun can propel a bullet at over 1500 m/s.
So, it's very likely that this has already been done. (Although the bullet would slow down very fast). Maybe not with actual scientific researchers
studying it though.
Are you talking about propelling a human though water at that speed? Cause that seems like suicide.
[Edited on 12-7-2014 by Zyklon-A]
|
|
|
Metacelsus
International Hazard
Posts: 2539
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble
|
|
You'd probably get large-scale cavitation before you broke the sound barrier, so you wouldn't really be traveling in water anymore--just low-pressure
water vapor.
|
|
|
IrC
International Hazard
Posts: 2710
Registered: 7-3-2005
Location: Eureka
Member Is Offline
Mood: Discovering
|
|
Am I the only one that wonders if shrimpoluminescence is caused by the claws snapping exceeding the local sound speed in water?
http://stilton.tnw.utwente.nl/shrimp/shrimpoluminescence.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonoluminescence
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" Richard Feynman
|
|
|
Burner
Hazard to Others
Posts: 100
Registered: 28-3-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
^^^ Could this really just be sonoluminescence (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonoluminescence)?
“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding
its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your
knowledge.”
- Isaac Asimov
|
|
|
Gooferking Science
Hazard to Self
Posts: 97
Registered: 17-7-2013
Location: Somewhere in Kansas, USA...
Member Is Offline
Mood: Halogenated
|
|
I wasn't necessarily talking about propelling a human underwater. That probably would mean suicide, although I can't think of a more glorious way to
die  I was just wondering about an object traveling underwater faster than the
speed of sound for a prolonged period of time. Slow motion footage of this would be awesome, and so would the cavitation. I think that bullets
probably decelerate before they even leave the barrel of a gun, since the barrel is filled with water. I doubt that the bullet would be traveling
faster than the speed of sound after it leaves the barrel.
What kind of shape would the device be, and what system of propulsion would it use? It obviously couldn't be a conventional form of combustion
propulsion, because combustion and water don't mix. Would it be some sort of a high pressure air propulsion system? Or a strong jet of water?
|
|
|
Sedit
International Hazard
Posts: 1939
Registered: 23-11-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: Manic Expressive
|
|
Can pressurization prevent cavitation in anyway?
Such as with the case of the claws of the shrimp, the supersonic movement would not really have to be sustained and a short rapid burst may be
possible under a pressurized environment in order to observe the effects of supersonic movement underwater.
Knowledge is useless to useless people...
"I see a lot of patterns in our behavior as a nation that parallel a lot of other historical processes. The fall of Rome, the fall of Germany — the
fall of the ruling country, the people who think they can do whatever they want without anybody else's consent. I've seen this story
before."~Maynard James Keenan
|
|
|
Oscilllator
National Hazard
Posts: 659
Registered: 8-10-2012
Location: The aqueous layer
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Breaking the sound barrier underwater with a bullet is no doubt possible, however somewhat meaningless because there is so much cavitation.
However I would have thought it would be pretty easy to do by using a piston to create an extremely high-pressure jet of water (or perhaps another
liquid for that matter). Measuring the speed of this jet should be fairly easy if you use some kind of dye and view the footage with a slow-motion
camera for extra awesomeness.
Since the claws of the shrimp do cause a high-pressure jet of water anyway, I feel this is definitely worth investigating. It could even be plausibly
be done by the amateur, so long as they have access to some heavy-duty pipe, a welder and some gunpowder/nitrocellulose.
|
|
|
froot
Hazard to Others
Posts: 347
Registered: 23-10-2003
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline
Mood: refluxed
|
|
I'not sure what the term is but I speculate that the result depends on how much the volume of water reduces as the pressure applied to it increases -
sort of compressive elasticity. For air that property is more than noticeable easily giving way to a projectile moving through it.
While for water I presume that property is less than noticeable making it much more difficult for a projectile to propegate through it.
This means that at any given instant a projectile needs to displace far less volume of air thanks to its 'compressive elasticity' than that of water
and thereby requiring exponentially higher amounts of energy to propel it through water. I would expect the force needed to propel a bullet size
projectile even close to the speed of sound under water to be in the order of tons because due to it's low 'compressive elasticity' it would basically
need to displace all the water ahead of it to a certain extent which would amount to a mass in the order of tons. That is if the molecular structure
of the projectile itself can withstand the frictional abrasion with the water it's displacing, which is in my opinion highly improbable.
Basically the projectile would probably disintegrate before it gets near the speed of sound under water regardless of its composition.
We salute the improvement of the human genome by honoring those who remove themselves from it.
Of necessity, this honor is generally bestowed posthumously. - www.darwinawards.com |
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1379
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
It has been done actually:
| Quote: | | he Advanced High Speed Underwater Munition (AHSUM) program has already demonstrated the effectiveness of such high-speed underwater bullets. Fired
from an underwater gun, <b> these projectiles have successfully broken the speed of sound in water (1,500 meters per second)</b>, bringing
their future application much closer to reality. |
Source: http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87/usw/issue_14/torpedoes....
Also: Warp drive underwater
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
Nicodem
Super Moderator
Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
There are electro-motors that can easily exceed 30,000 rpm at some torque. To beat the sound barrier underwater with an impeller of 1 m diameter you
would need >28,605 rpm. The motor must have enough power to keep up with the huge torque (I suspect you would need at least 3 kW even with the most
hydrodynamic impeller design). The impeller should be thin and flat enough to provide minimum resistance (perhaps a disc with an indenting at the
edge), and the experiment should be done in a large enough pool to dissipate the vortex. This way, you should be able to break the sound barrier at
the impeller's tip and even film what happens. I suspect that the tip of the impeller would start "flying" trough water vapors substantially before
reaching the speed of sound. The cavitation might mess up things, depending on the impeller design.
…there is a human touch of the cultist “believer” in every theorist that he must struggle against as being
unworthy of the scientist. Some of the greatest men of science have publicly repudiated a theory which earlier they hotly defended. In this lies their
scientific temper, not in the scientific defense of the theory. - Weston La Barre (Ghost Dance, 1972)
Read the The ScienceMadness Guidelines!
|
|
|
franklyn
International Hazard
Posts: 3026
Registered: 30-5-2006
Location: Da Big Apple
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cp5gdUHFGIQ
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cp5gdUHFGIQ
|
|
|
macckone
Dispenser of practical lab wisdom
Posts: 2168
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrical
|
|
Excellent video of a gun being fired underwater in slow motion
with moderately good scientific explanation.
|
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
Ultra mega Shkval, anyone?
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
|
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
When an explosion occurs underwater, a powerful/deadly shock wave is formed. A commonly used tool by 'fisherman'.
Would expanding gases constitute a particle with respect to breaking the sound barrier under water?
Would an additional shock wave be discernible?
Beyond my pay grade.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
