Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Economically Modify Liquid Crystals Displays to Increase Flexibility and Durability
numos
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 269
Registered: 22-2-2014
Location: Pasadena
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-6-2014 at 21:42
Economically Modify Liquid Crystals Displays to Increase Flexibility and Durability


Hello,

This was a year long research project I did for a science fair, already submitted and all done. Since I am almost positive of errors I am not publishing this.

Still, have a look and tell me what you think, criticism is welcome.
Due to the length I am only posting the abstract here, and linking the document.

Abstract:
The purpose of this project was to redesign a passive matrix liquid crystal display, using a flexible polymer as a substrate as opposed to glass used in commercial displays. This would offer many advantages including lighter, cheaper, shatter-resistant properties, as well as creating flexibility, but would still have to maintain the image quality of a glass display.
The core design of the screen included having N-(4-Methoxybenzylidene)-4-butylaniline (liquid crystal) with silica beads between two Indium tin oxide coated substrates: glass as a control, and polymer (PET) as the test screen. Two perpendicular polarizers are then added outside and the edges sealed. Once the screens are built voltage comparisons, qualitative image tests and price comparisons were done to compare the built screens to a commercial screen as well as to each other.
Results indicate that both screens respond similarly to current, changing from a clear yellow to an opaque white, or black to an opaque white, depending on polarizer orientation. The polymer screen was flexible, however bending it greatly affected image quality as resistance heavily dropped. Prices indicate that a polymer screen saves less than 1% than a glass screen.
My hypothesis was correct in that the polymer screen was lighter, flexible, and shatter-resistant, however this still is not enough to make it practical, due to its being more difficult to build, having delayed transition time, and having such a low price difference that it is simply not worth using unless a more suitable polymer or building method is used. However this is a proof of concept that flexible LCDs are a definite possibility.


The rest:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IPPgIjvD5olyqQfx-GW_b0u4...




View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top