Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Poll: New supernova in M82 - closest in 21 years!
I have a good telescope (150mm aperture or greater) and I'll try to observe it. --- 2 (12.5%)
I'll try to get ahold of a telescope or go to a star party. --- 3 (18.75%)
I can take photos! --- 1 (6.25%)
I'm geographically challenged for this one. --- 2 (12.5%)
Weather looks bad for the next week or so. --- 7 (43.75%)
Not interested. --- 1 (6.25%)

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: New supernova in M82 - closest in 21 years!
Brain&Force
Hazard to Lanthanides
*****




Posts: 1302
Registered: 13-11-2013
Location: UW-Madison
Member Is Offline

Mood: Incommensurately modulated

cool.gif posted on 23-1-2014 at 16:43
New supernova in M82 - closest in 21 years!


SN 2014J, a Type Ia, has exploded in the constellation Ursa Major. (Apologies to everyone in the southern hemisphere.) It's the closest to Earth since SN 1993J in M81.

I'll try to observe it this weekend, if weather permits. M82 is one of the harder galaxies to find, but not hard to see. The supernova is expected to hit magnitude 8, which is easy for binoculars at a dark site. Best time to observe will likely be around midnight. (I have a polar mount, so it's difficult for me to observe things that are high in altitude and very positive in declination.)




At the end of the day, simulating atoms doesn't beat working with the real things...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Pulverulescent
National Hazard
****




Posts: 793
Registered: 31-1-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: Torn between two monikers ─ "hissingnoise" and the present incarnation!

[*] posted on 24-1-2014 at 06:33


Quote:
SN 2014J, a Type Ia, has exploded in the constellation Ursa Major.

The word "has" makes it seem as if it has just occurred . . . ?




"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones"

A Einstein
View user's profile View All Posts By User
neptunium
National Hazard
****




Posts: 989
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 24-1-2014 at 07:05


for us here it does....but we all know its about 12 million years old give or take. fantastic display nonetheless at mag 8 its a very bright one!



View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Praxichys
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1063
Registered: 31-7-2013
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Coprecipitated

[*] posted on 24-1-2014 at 07:48


I can dust off the old telescope. It does 470x with a ~75mm aperture. Single refractor. If the clouds in southern Michigan blow away (It's supposed to be -18C tonight so it will probably be clear) I will try to capture an image.



View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Brain&Force
Hazard to Lanthanides
*****




Posts: 1302
Registered: 13-11-2013
Location: UW-Madison
Member Is Offline

Mood: Incommensurately modulated

[*] posted on 24-1-2014 at 08:02


More links:

General info: http://messier.seds.org/more/m082_sn2014J.html

Finder chart: http://www.universetoday.com/108386/bright-new-supernova-blo...

Light curve: http://www.aavso.org/lcg/plot?auid=000-BLG-310&starname=...

It looks like it's two weeks away from max brightness. Apparently, this is the closest type Ia supernovae in 32 years!

Praxichys - 470x with a 75 mm telescope? That's not possible in any telescope - too much atmospheric distortion - and the aperture of your scope is too small to go beyond 150x (unless it's a dedicated imaging scope and you're taking long exposures). In dark skies it should be possible to see the supernova in your scope, but the galaxy itself won't be too easy to see.

[Edited on 24-1-2014 by Brain&Force]

[Edited on 24-1-2014 by Brain&Force]




At the end of the day, simulating atoms doesn't beat working with the real things...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
neptunium
National Hazard
****




Posts: 989
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 24-1-2014 at 08:15


SN1987 was only visible in the southern hemisphere so this is a real treat for us up here!



View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
*****




Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 24-1-2014 at 09:26


Here's a page that compiles photos of it, for those of us who are "disadvantaged" in one way or another: <a href="http://www.rochesterastronomy.org/sn2014/sn2014j.html" target="_blank">Supernovae 2014J in M82</a> <img src="../scipics/_ext.png" /> (rochesterastronomy.org)

<a href="http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap140124.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/1401/M82SN_ArrowBlock.jpg" width="800" /></a> <img src="../scipics/_ext.png" valign="top" />

[Edited on 24.1.14 by bfesser]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Praxichys
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1063
Registered: 31-7-2013
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Coprecipitated

[*] posted on 24-1-2014 at 11:47


I have this telescope, purchased about 12 years ago:

http://www.amazon.com/Bushnell-Voyager-60mm-Refractor-Telesc...

According to the comments, 470x is a lie. Good thing it was a gift!




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Brain&Force
Hazard to Lanthanides
*****




Posts: 1302
Registered: 13-11-2013
Location: UW-Madison
Member Is Offline

Mood: Incommensurately modulated

[*] posted on 26-1-2014 at 12:38


I saw the supernova last night! It was visible around magnitude 10.8, with a magnification of 75x and a 200mm aperture (I didn't bother bringing out my other eyepieces). It was also the first time I saw M82 (I'm trying to find all of the Messier objects). Even though I live near a pretty big city, the light pollution isn't that bad. I was also able to see M78 and M79 that night. Considering that the supernova will likely be much brighter in a week or two, it's a good idea to wait a week.

The photo that bfesser posted shows the proper contrast between the galaxy and the supernova. Of course, the galaxy is much, much fainter, even in the telescope.




At the end of the day, simulating atoms doesn't beat working with the real things...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Brain&Force
Hazard to Lanthanides
*****




Posts: 1302
Registered: 13-11-2013
Location: UW-Madison
Member Is Offline

Mood: Incommensurately modulated

[*] posted on 1-2-2014 at 20:10


I'm looking at the supernova right now. It has definitely gotten brighter, but nowhere near the mythical mag 8 originally predicted.



At the end of the day, simulating atoms doesn't beat working with the real things...
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top