Cyrus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 397
Registered: 24-4-2004
Location: Ancient Persia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Converting thermal energy into kinetic energy... DIRECTLY!
We all know how at high temps, all the atoms in a substance bounce around a lot.
What if there was a way to make them all bounce in the same direction.
Maybe this has already been thought of, I would assume it has, but here's my vague idea.
If anyone has read popular mechanics recently, they will remember some article about getting near absolute zero by using lasers to affect the
particles; the lasers are tuned to a certain frequency so that they affect only those atoms that are moving towards them, causing them to stop. When
you surround your sample with a sphere of these lasers, any particle moving any direction will be stopped. Almost.
Anyways, what if I took a bunch of these lasers, and aimed them at one side of the mass only, and then suddenly turned them on. Any particles moving
towards the lasers would stop, but the other particles would be unaffected. Thus, the average direction of the particles in the mass would be away
from the lasers. Now either the mass goes flying through the lab (we will assume it is at a high temperature) or put another bank of lasers on the
other side, and when the mass starts flying towards these, turn these lasers on, getting the mass to oscillate back and forth between the lasers.
Which could be used somehow. Now that's mad science. Ok, if it was really mad science I would have to try it. But I don't have fine-tuned
lasers or a beryllium crystal ( I think that is what they used.)
Problems I can foresee-
-this would be VERY inefficient probably
-maybe it only works at low temperatures
-atoms bouncing to the sides instead of back and forth might be a problem, but a ring of lasers around the crystal might help.
Any comments/suggestions/flames for my stupidity?
|
|
|
The_Davster
A pnictogen
Posts: 2861
Registered: 18-11-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: .
|
|
An intersting idea but the precision of the lasers would have to be very high to keep particle motion in exactly the right direction that you would
want. Any gaps in the laser beams would cause loss of effeciency because the particles that are unaffected by the lasers would move in any direction
thus lowering the effeciency. The number of specialized lasers needed to even try this even on a very small scale would be high.
Not exactly the type of experiment suited for the amateur mad scientist, more for the university labs with massive government funding.
I would be cool to see a piece of beryllium oscillating in mid air though .
|
|
|
Cyrus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 397
Registered: 24-4-2004
Location: Ancient Persia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
But wouldn't one large laser beam spread over the whole crystal work-for one side?
Admittedly, the laser would have to be pretty precise.
|
|
|
JustMe
Hazard to Others
Posts: 111
Registered: 7-8-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Ah, a variant on Maxwell's Demon:
http://www.chem.uci.edu/education/undergrad_pgm/applets/boun...
also:
http://ajs.net/maxwell.htm
Also mentioned in the "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" in the form of the finite improbability generator.
|
|
|
The_Davster
A pnictogen
Posts: 2861
Registered: 18-11-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: .
|
|
One large beam on an entire side would probally not work(I might be wrong...) because as you said the beam only stops particles motion when they are
moving directly towards them, not if the particles are moving diagonally towards them. The beam would most likely let them continue on their diagonal
path( or deflect them slightly, not stop them). Thus you need an array of lasers aiming at the crystall from almost all possible angles. It may very
well work with 1 laser per side but it most likely would not work very well, there would be huge losses of effeciency due to particles whose motion is
not controlled.
[Edited on 15-6-2004 by rogue chemist]
|
|
|
Cyrus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 397
Registered: 24-4-2004
Location: Ancient Persia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Hmm, I didn't think I was an exorcist.
Seriously, though, I was not trying to achieve perpetual motion, just wondering if the idea would work at all, let alone 100% efficiently.
I don't care how many kilowatts it takes, it would be cool! 
I wonder what uses it would have- could you use this technology to get something oscillating back and forth and then release it as a bullet, or use it
to power a very inefficient and dangerous spacecraft -
the kind that Tacho would build. Think of how much energy there is in a red-hot lump of iron...
|
|
|
Tacho
National Hazard
Posts: 582
Registered: 5-12-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by JustMe
(snip)
Also mentioned in the "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" in the form of the finite improbability generator.
|
Excuse me. Just for the sake of scientific precision, wouldn’t that be the “INfinite improbability generator”?
We must know the equipment we work with .
|
|
|
Blind Angel
National Hazard
Posts: 845
Registered: 24-11-2002
Location: Québec
Member Is Offline
Mood: Meh!
|
|
No, i read it too and it's the finite impossibility generator, the kind that allow all the clothes of all girls in a party to get moved one meter
away, i want that
/}/_//|//) /-\\/|//¬/=/_
My PGP Key Fingerprint: D4EA A609 55E4 7ADD 8529 359D D6E2 33F6 4C76 78ED |
|
|
JustMe
Hazard to Others
Posts: 111
Registered: 7-8-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
As explained in the a lesser version of the Encyclopedia Galactica:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heart_of_Gold
|
|
|
Marvin
National Hazard
Posts: 995
Registered: 13-10-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The most obvios obstruction to the idea working is that if all the atoms moving in one direction stop, and the other continue - giving the block a net
velocity, the mass has violated conservation of momentum.
As a 'sanity check' all thermodynamic engines need a heat source and a cold sink to function. The ratio of energy made 'useful'
to energy dumped into the cold sink depends on the temperature of the hot and cold sink and is limited by macroscopically unbreakable laws. Anything
that claims to break these (for example by not having a cold sink) isnt going to work.
|
|
|
Cyrus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 397
Registered: 24-4-2004
Location: Ancient Persia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
But essentially the researchers doing absolute zero got all of the atoms going one direction to stop, but they did it to all sides.
Marvin, what do you think will happen if the lasers are applied to one side only. You say the mass cannot move to one side. What will happen when you
turn on the lasers then? Nothing?
I wish I could find the popular mechanics link, it would be very helpful- If someone has it could you post it?
JustMe, I like the links, especially the one with the bouncing particles.
Simple minds, simple pleasures, I know...
Blind Angel you wouldn't really want that. 
That's just messed up.
Besides, the clothes would end up intersecting someone else's body sometimes- so when you turned your "happiness" generator on, most of
the people would fall into pieces as bloody dribbling messes, because someone else's tee shirt ended up between and bisected their stomach and
their ribs.
Edit- now that I think about it, the shirts, etc. might just get lodged in their body without cutting them in half. Not pretty either way.
[Edited on 16-6-2004 by Cyrus]
|
|
|
Geomancer
Hazard to Others
Posts: 228
Registered: 21-12-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Forgive me for being a bit terse, I just wrote a lengthy and informative post, only to have my browser destroy it because I wasn't logged in.
Laser cooling doe work more or less like Cyrus says: you shine a laser (redshifted with regard to the gas's absorbtion) on a gas, and the light
is preferentially absorbed by atoms moving towards the laser (they see a blueshift). The atoms reemit in random directions, giving a net blueshift
between the light absorbed and that emitted. For practical purposes it's fairly obvious that the energy you spend driving the lasers is enormous
compared to that you can extract. Theoreticly, it's quite interesting; perhaps I'll write more when I'm less tired.
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5126
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
This is a somewhat similar idea that you might be interested in.
http://www.anl.gov/OPA/frontiers96arch/wakefield.html
Not exactly amateur science I think.
|
|
|
Cyrus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 397
Registered: 24-4-2004
Location: Ancient Persia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by rogue chemist
One large beam on an entire side would probally not work(I might be wrong...) because as you said the beam only stops particles motion when they are
moving directly towards them, not if the particles are moving diagonally towards them. The beam would most likely let them continue on their diagonal
path( or deflect them slightly, not stop them). Thus you need an array of lasers aiming at the crystall from almost all possible angles. It may very
well work with 1 laser per side but it most likely would not work very well, there would be huge losses of effeciency due to particles whose motion is
not controlled.
[Edited on 15-6-2004 by rogue chemist] |
Somehow I can't visualize setting up, calibrating, powering, and controlling 5000 lasers being more efficient than one.
Even if you had one laser, and spread its beam out to cover the whole crystal, there would always be some particles moving directly towards the
photons from the laser, so no matter where you aimed from, your laser beam will do its job, and the mass ought to move away.
My latest thought is that this might be useful on the micro or nanoscale, perhaps in some micro-electronic-Cyruslock, or something weird, where it
would be used for the fact that the crystal oscillates, and not worry about the efficiency, not for the fact that we now have some extra kinetic
energy for Joe's Power Supply, where efficiency is more important.
Any other potential applications?- it's cool stuff. Literally.
And unionized, that wave-generator thing looks like the perfect job for Lestat, maybe we can bribe him to build us one if he is "unbanned".
|
|
|
Chemtastic
Harmless
Posts: 31
Registered: 19-6-2004
Location: Connecticut, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Sounds Kinda Like Ordinary Diffusion
A concentration gradient has the same characteristics...a net average movement of particles in one direction. It's direct thermal energy into
kinetic energy. Of course, I'm not sure that 5000 lasers are necessary to
build the gradient...the human body usually sticks with glucose metabolism
|
|
|
JohnWW
International Hazard
Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Re: thermal energy directly into kinetic energy
How about using a hot-air balloon? The heat expended in getting the balloon, and the cargo it can carry, aloft by buoyancy effectively is conversion
to both motion and potential energy.
John W.
|
|
|
Texium
|
Thread Moved
19-11-2023 at 10:11 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
