D4RR3N
Hazard to Others
Posts: 271
Registered: 9-1-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Water resonating in cylinder
This in more a physics question rather then a chemistry question.
I want to calculate the resonant frequency of a closed ended cylinder. I found this online calculate below which will do this for air but I want to
use water not air ie a jet of water passing over the top of the cylinder whilst submerged. Can I use the same calculator by altering the speed of
sound value?
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/waves/clocol.html
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by D4RR3N | I want to calculate the resonant frequency of a closed ended cylinder. I found this online calculate below which will do this for air but I want to
use water not air ie a jet of water passing over the top of the cylinder whilst submerged. Can I use the same calculator by altering the speed of
sound value? | Maybe. The math is the same insofar as the math goes, but that may not be all that's going on.
Whether the math applies correctly to the physical setup you have is a different question.
|
|
D4RR3N
Hazard to Others
Posts: 271
Registered: 9-1-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by watson.fawkes | Maybe. The math is the same insofar as the math goes, but that may not be all that's going on. Whether the math applies correctly to the physical
setup you have is a different question. |
The problem is I cant find any info on this in regards to an equation for a water filled cylinder. I feel that a water filled cylinder will resonate
at a lower frequency to the same cylinder filled with air.
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1379
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
The resonant frequency of the tube will be higher, not lower. The frequency is proportional to the speed of sound in the medium, in this case water.
For a tube closed at one end:
f= n*v / (2*L)
where n = the resonance node (1,2,3,etc.)
L=length of tube
v= speed of sound
However, I have no idea if the principle of generating an oscillation by blowing a jet of water across the open end will work. In air, this works but
why is a mystery to me. Possibly, it may involve certain aspects of turbulent flow, viscosity, ? that work differently in water.
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer
|
|
Twospoons
International Hazard
Posts: 1324
Registered: 26-7-2004
Location: Middle Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: A trace of hope...
|
|
It may not work at all due to water being essentially incompressible.
Helicopter: "helico" -> spiral, "pter" -> with wings
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by D4RR3N | I feel that a water filled cylinder will resonate at a lower frequency to the same cylinder filled with air. | Good thing there's math then. See phlogiston's answer. Quote: Originally posted by phlogiston | However, I have no idea if the principle of generating an oscillation by blowing a jet of water across the open end will work. In air, this works but
why is a mystery to me. Possibly, it may involve certain aspects of turbulent flow | It's a combination of
turbulent flow, which has a wide range of frequency components, and the tube acting as a resonant filter, which preferentially oscillates at certain
frequencies. The "Q" of the tube as an oscillatory cavity is frequency dependent and determines the timbre of the sound in the tube. It's not the case
that the only motions in a driven oscillator system are at the resonant frequencies, but these frequencies do have the highest amplitudes. There will still be a resonant
frequency for the combination of the cavity and the medium. I agree with your implicit point that this may not be relevant at all.
|
|