Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Superconductors
TriiodideFrog
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 108
Registered: 27-9-2020
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 23-1-2021 at 23:14
Superconductors


Does anyone know a cheap alternative other than YBCO? Hopefully, temperature also doesn't need to be that cold and pressure is not needed. Any advice is helpful.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
itsallgoodjames
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 276
Registered: 31-8-2020
Location: America Lite
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 8-2-2021 at 10:41


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_superconductors



Nuclear physics is neat. It's a shame it's so regulated...

Now that I think about it, that's probably a good thing. Still annoying though.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2786
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: Big

[*] posted on 8-2-2021 at 11:38


In addition to the materials contained within, cuprate superconductors are generally difficult to make because they are formally Cu3+ compounds (hence "cuprate"). No non-cuprate bulk superconductor works above the boiling point of liquid nitrogen without thousands of atmospheres of pressure.

The easiest superconductors to make with the highest transition temperatures seem to be the 122 iron arsenides:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/122_iron_arsenide




Quote: Originally posted by bnull  
you can always buy new equipment but can't buy new fingers.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Texium
Administrator
Thread Moved
29-11-2023 at 19:51

  Go To Top