nleslie321
Hazard to Self
Posts: 62
Registered: 7-11-2017
Location: krakatoa
Member Is Offline
Mood: just right
|
|
best option for analysing chemicals in home lab
So im looking to spend no more than $5000 on a system to analyse compounds both liquid and solid. Im looking at Raman spectrometers, IR and mass spec.
Which is easiest to learn how to use and affordable? im looking at used items on ebay etc. Im just going into my second year at uni studying
chemistry. Any help would be great thanks.
|
|
|
teodor
National Hazard
Posts: 924
Registered: 28-6-2019
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
|
|
There are possible several options but I doubt your question has an answer. There is no such thing as "best option" just because nobody ever defined
what should be goals for "home lab". Everybody has its own. If you would ask "how you do analyse chemicals" I would say I use methods from old books
like Treadwell and Vogel because they don't require special devices and very educative for hobbyist (like base properties of compounds, interesting
personal notes from authors etc).
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3727
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Online
|
|
My chemistry is low level hobby stuff so I may be completely wrong, but,
I think that you should make use of University facilities for analysis of complex organic structures etc
use wet chemistry, TLC, column chromatography etc. for personal use.
Analysis equipment is developing rapidly (e.g. hand held xrf, Lab on a chip etc.) and dropping in price even more rapidly,
so you could waste a lot of cash if you buy now.
Also, learning 'old school' analysis techniques could prove very educational.
Unless you are staying at home whilst studying you also need to consider transport and security of your expensive equipment.
Using (or at least trying to use) University equipment will also help you get to know proffesors, tutors, ongoing projects, possible euipment
disposals etc.
Remember, more often than not, its who you know ...
CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
|
|
|
Praxichys
International Hazard
Posts: 1063
Registered: 31-7-2013
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Coprecipitated
|
|
Having thought about it, I suggest the following analysis tools in this order by a mix of cost and usefulness:
Beginner lab:
pH paper (pH) $5
Thiele tube, capillary tube, thermometer (melting point) $25
Analytical balance and class A volumetric pipette (density) $400
Porcelain crucible, burner, stand (ash content, hydration state, inorganic analysis) $40
Burette, indicators (titrimetry) $150
Student microscope (crystallography) $400
In the beginning your main tools are qualitative visual analysis, density, melting point, boiling point, ashing to assess volitile/nonvolitile
content, crystallography, and titremetry which is arguably the most powerful tool. You can make indicator papers and solutions to detect certain
things visually, or rely on precipitation, drying, and weighing for quantitative analysis. The analytical balance is key.
Labware here can be inexpensive, requiring only basic stuff like beakers, flasks, a hotplate, some stoppers, and tubing.
Intermediate lab:
Melting point apparatus (melting point) $150
TLC plates, chamber, developer, solvent (organic analysis) $300
Polarimeter (chirality) $200
Refractometer $100 (index of refraction)
Visible light spectrophotometer, cuvettes, indicators (spectrophotometry) $800
Muffle furnace (ash content, hydration state, inorganic analysis) $400
As you build the lab, a major milestone happens when you gain a spectrophotometer which allows you to titrate far more accurately. This combined with
TLC and a matching column opens doors for precise organic synthesis, the efficacy of which may be checked using polarimetry and refractometry in
addition to the TLC. A melting point apparatus and muffle furnace allows the beginner lab techniques to be performed much faster and more accurately,
albeit at higher cost.
This level comes with a huge cost in preparatory tools like heating and stirring mantles, a rotavap, vacuum systems, specialty apparatus, ground glass
apparatus, and a fume hood.
Advanced lab:
FTIR, GC/MS, HPLC, AAS, bomb calorimetry, etc.
If you happen to have tens of thousands of dollars to spend, these tools become a possibility. The FTIR sort of sits in the middle of intermediate and
advanced depending on the model, the age, and the capability you need.
Your labware might include reactors, a shaker hydrogenator, an inert atmosphere glovebox, tools for airless chemistry, etc.
|
|
|
Dr.Bob
International Hazard
Posts: 2757
Registered: 26-1-2011
Location: USA - NC
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mildly disgruntled scientist
|
|
Finding any working Mass Spec for $5000 would be a miracle, but a great deal if so. But without the LC part, it is very limited. And the
maintenence and parts cost for a MS are insane.
A simple HPLC found at a unviersity surplus store or on the web might be easier to cob together and make work. Most UV detectors can be made to work
with modern data collection tools to create a crude plotting tool and integrate peaks. If you can find one with working software. even better, but
not hard to find something for it.
A simple MP apparatus is cheap and easy to find used. And TLC chamber with a UV lamp, and a few chemical stains is fairly cheap and easy. The UV
and Raman systems are good for simple pure compound identification, if you have the right rference books and tables, but very hard to use on mixtures.
A balance and volumetric flasks are handy to determine density, along with other "density" type tools (found for wine, beer making, antifreeze, or
honey testing.)
I can get you a nice home NMR for about $500,000 if you can move it...
|
|
|
Praxichys
International Hazard
Posts: 1063
Registered: 31-7-2013
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Coprecipitated
|
|
For mixtures, use TLC, then scrape off the eluted fractions and extract them for FTIR/UV-vis or other analysis. If you get wide plates and use a line
rather than a point, you can pretty easily get into the 20-30mg range for most fractions.
|
|
|
Steam
Hazard to Others
Posts: 238
Registered: 25-3-2014
Location: Minnesota
Member Is Offline
Mood: Triple Point
|
|
It really depends on what it is you are actually doing in the lab. For synthesis, If I had to pick just one piece of equipment, I would definitely the
FTIR. Mainly because I am most familiar with IR, but it is also very versatile both for solids and liquids and if you get an ATR module, sample prep
is next to nothing. However, if you have mixtures or inorganic samples, IR is pretty poor at resolving them. For mineralogical samples you will be
best served by the raman over the IR.
That being said, raman and IR go hand in hand with analysis. Often times, peaks which are resolvable in the IR will be quite strong under raman.
Mass spec is nice to have but honestly, I have gone years without using it. NMR is also very nice to have- but even the desktop picospins will run you
quite the pretty penny.
If you are doing inorganic chem looking at ligands, a UV/vis spectrometer can go along way.
DISCLAIMER: The information in this post is provided for general informational purposes only and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction.
No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal
counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible
through, this post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer
licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.
|
|
|
RogueRose
International Hazard
Posts: 1596
Registered: 16-6-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by nleslie321  | So im looking to spend no more than $5000 on a system to analyse compounds both liquid and solid. Im looking at Raman spectrometers, IR and mass spec.
Which is easiest to learn how to use and affordable? im looking at used items on ebay etc. Im just going into my second year at uni studying
chemistry. Any help would be great thanks. |
There are a few places you can find working HPLC / GCMS for sometimes REALLY great prices and they are usually industry standard devices like older HP
machines. There are a few auction sites that specialize in this type of stuff especially from old universities and state/federal labs. I've seen
some older, larger setups sell for $300-500 b/c they were 20+ years old.
Message me if you want more info
|
|
|
Praxichys
International Hazard
Posts: 1063
Registered: 31-7-2013
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Coprecipitated
|
|
I kind of wonder if something like this is worth it to the amateur lab:
https://www.vernier.com/products/sensors/gc2-mini/
|
|
|
Ubya
International Hazard
Posts: 1247
Registered: 23-11-2017
Location: Rome-Italy
Member Is Offline
Mood: I'm a maddo scientisto!!!
|
|
well this is interesting, i didn't know something this small existed, but for 2k i think it is quite possible to find an old used CG system (even
though it would need external gas tanks and would be waaay bulkier)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
feel free to correct my grammar, or any mistakes i make
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
tshirtdr1
Harmless
Posts: 31
Registered: 12-12-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The one piece of equipment I use most is our infrared spectrometer. It is mainly useful for organic samples, but you can get a quick, easy, rough
estimate of your success. Additionally, this machine doesn't require a lot of additional gases, etc, to run so there's basically no maintenance cost.
Of course, you will need a computer to run it, so make sure it has a computer or at least comes with the software and license key. The license can be
tricky as it may not be legal if you aren't the original purchaser of the equipment, but on older stuff, you can usually install it at least. The ATR
accessory is nice because you don't need to insert the sample in salt plates or make a pellet. Just throw it on the machine. We use this all day
long.
|
|
|
S.C. Wack
bibliomaster
Posts: 2419
Registered: 7-5-2004
Location: Cornworld, Central USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enhanced
|
|
99% of the time, labs don't include the software and obsolete computer that still-working equipment was on, usually because they are under the
impression that the license is not transferable, even when it explicitly is (e.g. chemstation).
|
|
|
G-Coupled
Hazard to Others
Posts: 287
Registered: 9-3-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: Slightly triturated
|
|
ATR?
|
|
|
Steam
Hazard to Others
Posts: 238
Registered: 25-3-2014
Location: Minnesota
Member Is Offline
Mood: Triple Point
|
|
Attenuated Total Reflection- sure beats nujol mulls and KBr plates!  I would
fathom a guess that like 90% of all labs which causally use FTIR on a regular basis will use ATR. It is just so convenient!
https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=5958
DISCLAIMER: The information in this post is provided for general informational purposes only and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction.
No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal
counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible
through, this post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer
licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.
|
|
|
G-Coupled
Hazard to Others
Posts: 287
Registered: 9-3-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: Slightly triturated
|
|
Looks groovy. Thanks. 
It's a shame that nearly all the older analytic gear needs so much in the way of expensive gases, parts and/or maintenance.
|
|
|
RogueRose
International Hazard
Posts: 1596
Registered: 16-6-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by nleslie321 | So im looking to spend no more than $5000 on a system to analyse compounds both liquid and solid. Im looking at Raman spectrometers, IR and mass spec.
Which is easiest to learn how to use and affordable? im looking at used items on ebay etc. Im just going into my second year at uni studying
chemistry. Any help would be great thanks. |
I found about 10 HPLC and GCMS that are up for auction at a company I've been doing business with for at least 8 years (they are great!) and bids are
starting at $400 for a complete setup. I think the auction ends on Wednesday, so you need to act quick. I'm sending you a message, please respond to
me ASAP and I'll give you the details about the site. You need to register wtih the site to bid at the auction. I have a long relationship with a
private pickup/packing & shipping company that will do all the work to ship it to you, or if you are near Rhode Island, then you can pickup
yourself (woonsocket I beleive - where CVS makes all theri generic products - A VERY big Biotech sector)
|
|
|
G-Coupled
Hazard to Others
Posts: 287
Registered: 9-3-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: Slightly triturated
|
|
That's cool - I envy anyone who manages to aquire one of those.
It's quite amazing what one can buy for oneself these days.
|
|
|
RogueRose
International Hazard
Posts: 1596
Registered: 16-6-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Either way, you guys should check this out, it's pretty interesting. I wasn't sure I beleived it would do what they touted it would do on some TV
shows (customs inspections of various mysterious chemicals) but I think it uses raman spec.
https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/FIRSTDEFE...
https://www.fishersci.com/shop/products/thermo-scientific-fi...
It'd be really nice if someone would happen to leave one behind somewhere while traveling with no return address on it. I'd feel bad for a while but
I'm guessing it'd be insured at $62K!
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
