Gargamel
Hazard to Others
Posts: 166
Registered: 9-3-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
What kind of microscope to judge crystals ect.
Hi guys
I often come to the conclusion that my inventory lacks a microscope...
For example to judge crystals size and shape, but also anything else that might come up...
What kind do you use?
I honestly have no clue WHAT to buy.
I'm inclinded to go for an USB device, since my computer is running most time anyway and I also like to share some pictures on the internet. But are
there arguments for an oldscool microscope like those used in schools too?
[Edited on 8-7-2019 by Gargamel]
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3730
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
some usb microscopes have surprisingly good optics,
the main difficulties (with any microscope) are suitable illumination and positioning (X, Y, Z)
P.S. read the specifications carefully,
e.g. a 640x480 pixel sensor (0.3Mpx.) can be advertised as 2Mpx. or even 10 Mpx. (using software interpolation, which gives no extra detail)
You could try gambling that this is not a scam 
https://www.ebay.com/itm/AmScope-40X-2500X-LED-Digital-Binoc...
[Edited on 9-7-2019 by Sulaiman]
CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
|
|
|
Herr Haber
International Hazard
Posts: 1236
Registered: 29-1-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I got myself one of those to cheap to be true USB microscopes from eBay.
Wherever you type USB microscope you always get microscopes (especially the body) that look the same.
That goes for the 200 Euros version from my regular lab supplier to the 15 Euros one on eBay.
That makes me assume that they are all more or less of equal quality unless someone works Q&A and puts them into different bins depending on how
well they pass the tests.
So I concluded they are all crap and decided to get a badass magnifying glass instead.
I might not be able to see as close as a microscope would allow me to but at least I know it'll work !!
The spirit of adventure was upon me. Having nitric acid and copper, I had only to learn what the words 'act upon' meant. - Ira Remsen
|
|
|
Gargamel
Hazard to Others
Posts: 166
Registered: 9-3-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Sorry, I should have posted this in "Reagents and Apparatus Acquisition".
Maybe somebody can push this over there...
In find this very difficult, I cant find anything but china junk and super expensive stuff...
I dont need a screen. I would use my computer anyway. But I would like to have a little more magnification... For things like watching amoeba and
stuff, like back in school 
|
|
|
teodor2
Harmless
Posts: 9
Registered: 10-7-2019
Location: Heerenveen
Member Is Offline
|
|
https://www.euromex.com/en/products/products/stereo-microsco...
This model is really very good one (optically), the trinocular version costs 600 EUR, so, possible it is expensive if you are not mad on optics like
me. Actually you can buy stereomicroscope much cheaper, say 300-400 USD.
If it is your first microscope I recommend to buy exactly this type of build (stereomicroscope, should contain 2 objectives and allow to look both in
transmitted and reflected light. Biological microscopes can be used only with transmitted light - not suitable e.g. for crystals).
[Edited on 11-7-2019 by teodor2]
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3254
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
I bought a USB microscope (brand Pluggable) from Amazon, I use it together with ImageJ software (free) to measure crystal size. Also good for taking
pictures.
|
|
|
Gargamel
Hazard to Others
Posts: 166
Registered: 9-3-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thanks for your answers.
The problem with stereomicroscopes seems to be that they are only available with rather low magnification.
I would prefer to have some 400 or 500...
Is stereo really worth it - especially compared to a really good monocular device?
An is it possible/advisable to use a microscope that has only a light from below with an additional improvised light from above?
|
|
|
teodor
National Hazard
Posts: 927
Registered: 28-6-2019
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Gargamel  |
The problem with stereomicroscopes seems to be that they are only available with rather low magnification.
I would prefer to have some 400 or 500...
Is stereo really worth it - especially compared to a really good monocular device?
An is it possible/advisable to use a microscope that has only a light from below with an additional improvised light from above?
|
I already tried to answer these questions in this thread. So, generally, the resolution is not the same as magnification. I have no idea what kind of crystals you try to look, but for the
most of them the magnification up to 45x is enough. 45x is huge magnification for things like powders. With a good optics you will be able to see
particles with size of 5 microns. What you said is that you prefer to look in a very small area . I am not using microscopes professionally but I know
from my experience that that magnification you mentioned is possible only with flat and specially prepared things under special light. Otherwise you
will not see what you like to see. I don't know how to describe it, just try, possible you will see a lot of rainbows with no idea what is the actual
shape of the crystal. But if you know how to look crystals under such magnification, well, probably I never had a "really good monocular device" .
Just some ideas how to increase magnification over 100x - https://www.euromex.com/en/products/products/polarization-mi...
Also, check this wikipedia article, there are some pictures. But my opinion that it should be not the first device you use for general observation. And it is
already seeing something different than just 3D shapes. For 3D shapes we obviously should use a stereomicroscope.
Sure, it is possible to add some light from above if there is a gap between your objective and the sample. But on high magnifications there is no much
gap and the light from above becomes a light from a side. So, most of the time you will be able to see long shadows or something like color circles
due to different light artifacts.
Check "dark-field microscopes" to get the idea of devices designed for that purpose.
[Edited on 23-7-2019 by teodor]
|
|
|
Gargamel
Hazard to Others
Posts: 166
Registered: 9-3-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thanks again.
So I'm going to look after a 2nd hand stereomicroscope with both top- and bottom light (which seems to be rather unusual...)
|
|
|
teodor
National Hazard
Posts: 927
Registered: 28-6-2019
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
|
|
You are welcome.
Some things worthy to attention when buying a stereo microscope.
1. Maximal available magnification.
Usually it should be possible to raise the magnification either by changing the eyepieces or screwing an additional lens on the objectives side or
both. Check the availability of these additional components - for every vendor or model they are different. Also check in the manual which maximal
magnification you can get with those additional components. For middle-quality stereo microscope the maximal magnification should be around 150-200x
(for example, basic - 45 x, 2x by eyepices and 2x by an additional lens = 180x). But very quality models like Zeiss write the max. magnification up to
600x. Never had a chance to test that but you can probably compare optical quality by this parameter - I think only very precise optic could work with
so powerful additional lenses.
2. Zoom is really useful. The most important in zoom is precise adjustment, you should be able to zoom picture without refocusing. It can be
problematic if your sight is not 100%, for that purpose eyepieces have dioptric correction. Check the range of correction, you can zoom without
refocusing only if the correction is enough for your sight (also it is possible, of course, to look through glasses).
3. Every stereomicroscope head can work with different stands. Basically, the most important think is a head, you can have several stand types to
mount the head. The light and focusing is connected to a stand.
4. Old optics (not sure, possible 20 years +) often very seriously degraded in quality because of mold grows on lenses. If the picture has a yellow
tint it is the case. This is impossible to repair, so some good old microscopes can be very cheap exactly by this reason. Best models of optics have
argon or nitrogen filling inside lens groups which prevents the mold grows but I never saw this in microscope specifications.
[Edited on 24-7-2019 by teodor]
|
|
|
Texium
|
Thread Moved
29-11-2023 at 11:55 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
