Sciencemadness Discussion Board

How Did You get Started in Chemistry?

Sauron - 4-1-2007 at 19:48

In my case I caught the bug early. Gilbert set at about 10. The real epiphany was when I was maybe 12. A great-uncle of mine was a professor at LSU Medical School (I'm originally from New Orleans), he died and left me a pair of 1940s organic chemistry texts. You might have thought that was a bit heavy for a pre-adolescent. But I was fascinated. They were clearly written and I was enthralled by the scope and complexity of carbon chemistry. I read them cover to cover. Re-read them. Outlined them. An aunt who was a med tech gave me a lab manual. So by the time I was 13 I had a rudimentary lab in my dad's garage. More books acquired and absorbed. Experimentation! I did some preps that looking back were not necessarily so wise. Nitrobenzene from benzene and mixed acids. A few drops of glycerin on finely powdered glycerin. I obtained some phthalic anhydride and resorcinol from a schoolmaye whose dad has been a pharmacist. Tried to make fluorscein. But didn't know what the book meant by "condensing" the two solids, so this did not get very far. (I had conc sulfuric acid but didn't know a drop or two would have catalyzed that reaction.)

H2S no problem (no one told me it was toxic.) Chlorine from Chlorox and Sani-Flush. I had simple glassware, an alcohol burner, a couple ringstands. Test tubes.

I was hooked.

So high school chemistry was a snap and by the time I entered college and took my first organic class I'd been studying the subject for about 7 years. While physica put me to sleep and biology bored me, chemistry was a cakewalk. I had a friend on the faculty and became his research assistant. So there I was an an undergraduate rubbing shoulders with Ph.D. candidates and postdoctoral fellows, using a NMR, a GC, and a IR, and with my own bench space.

Not quite 19 yet. Within a couple years had a peper published in J.Org.Chem. and did a presentation on it to the local ACS chapter. Ah, immortality! There I was in Chemical Abstracts. The paper concerned a partially stereoselective pinacol reaction with acetophenone using McMurray's reagent (LAH/TiCl4) in THF rather than the much more usual Al-Hg in ethanol. The reagent generates Ti(0) in situ, which is black. I'd spotted the chante in enantiomeric ratio in the NMR and showed it to my boss.

So how did you get started?

[Edited on 5-1-2007 by Sauron]

Ozone - 4-1-2007 at 20:24

Sauron,

From new Orleans? Ever shop at Dorignac's?

I drew a benzene ring on my etch-a-sketch (or so my father says, in that parking lot across from the Fun Arcade).

School generally was lacking, so my parents (Dad is a zoologist-cum-chemist and my Godfather is a PhD. Chemical Engineer) saw fit to help with lessons in Biology, Botany and Chemistry (with a tad of the Physics).

They brought home great Chemicals to play with including AgNO3 (and copper wire), K2CrO7, and later Cd metal sticks. In the meanwhile I was gifted for Christmas with a *fabulous* Gilbert/Chemcraft set (the big one) with which a proceeded to: eat the paint off of the walls and the carpet off of the floor, etc. I could also get KNO3, S8, NH4Cl, I2 and cans of diethyl ether at the *pharmacy* (Ah, the good-old-days).

Dad taught me how to make gunpowder (and did not go totally berserk when it was noted that there was a 4 foot hole in the backyard-with neighbors maybe 4 meters away...).

I hated high-school where (on the basis of performance in non-relevant classes) it was determined that I could not have possibly done my Science fair project (I was not-counted abd the winner had a crappy electromagnet). I went to another school and was awarded a trip to nationals in Tokyo (Too bad I already had tickets to Mexico City...).

Farted around in college long enough to have to work--started as a "glassware maintanence engineer" and went forward from there. ICP, AA then extractions and pesticides then semivolatiles by GC/MS-Oh my (somewhere in here I was hired as an "Organic Lab Director" which seemed to entail the preparation of "drug of abuse"--I left that day and never returned. Then it was on to method develoment and, finally, research with minimal funding.

I decided it might not be a bad idea to take 5 years getting into graduate school (affirmative action, bureaucracy, and all that). This is where I wake up and find myself today.

Love the Chemistry, always have.

Livin' Lovin'..She's just a woman!

Take care all,

O3

Aqua_Fortis_100% - 4-1-2007 at 20:54

i still need of a lot of chem. infos... i just joined in this forum because is really a democratic thing to discussion of ALL of chemistry, including some things which are often forbiden by law as explosives,etc..

" how did you get started?"
well, i'm still a tennager... i'm tempted to chemistry world because some extraordinary and weirds reactions,mainly from "energetic materials" starting with 8 years old..
now i have 17 and still in polytechnique ensine(minning course) ,but still wait hopefully for my chemical engineering or industrial chemistry diploma..then much after,some more education (and PhD !!), i wish will work with researches of explosives, or similar..
unfortunately my country does not stimulate the education of peoples(as you can see from my primitive language :P), so the major part of people is keep in ignorance ... i think which maybe the war still comes here... (amazonia, "biotreasure" ,large area, WATER, etc..)...

Ozone - 4-1-2007 at 21:03

Vivir en Amazonia? (Espanol) Es tudo bem! I have been trying to learn both languages for some time; this is all good until you try it in Italy (Italian is very different, molto bene). I love trying to integrate into other cultures. I think that this is quite relevant when considering how one got started in Chemistry.

For example, some cultures push one toward science and others push one towards *cough* the new US regime--painting, drawing and dancing (these are great, but I am too busy in the lab to persue them).

Gracias, Gracie, Obrigado, Thanks,

O3

The_Davster - 4-1-2007 at 21:36

When very young(grade3?), I got obsessed with caps(the things for capguns) I would love just sitting there popping one at a time listening for the bang. Tried to build a rocket out of caps, the ducttape just smoldered and the caps popped one by one. Got model rocket engines, putting them in anything with wheels.

I remember is reading a kids book on nitrogen, around grade 5 or so. This book gave the ratios for gunpowder, and after that I reread that book at least a dozen times. I was hooked. No idea why I read that book in the first place though. From there I proceeded to read every chemistry book in the public library over the next year. Only a few shelves of them, and most were intended for kids except a few uni level texts which I absolutly loved. I even stole one from the library. Now my parents were kind of supportive at the time, but they would push me towards the novels instead of textbooks when at the library. They let me purchase a chemistry set at some point in grade 6, I got the biggest, most expensive one possible. It was a chemcraft or skillcraft brand set. Once I got it and read the experiments and looked at the chemicals, I cried, seriously. I remember the adrenaline going through me while reading each label, hoping each time for KNO3, KNO3 which never came. It was all slime, colour changes, and a bunch of white precipitates. I did a few experiments to please my parents, and promply forgot about the horrid set.

My father at some point hereafter told me of his exploits of making gunpowder as a child, and how he could buy everything needed at the drugstore, but now they no longer carried such things. I believe I cursed the government for the first time at the tender age of 12.:D

And again a few years later I was majorly setback when I recieved a scientific supply catalog, but they would not sell to me. I read the chemistry section many a time as bedtime reading, which in a way ws depressing as they would not sell to me.
I got my parents to take me to every antique store in town, and I scoured each one looking for a can of saltpeter and sulfur. I eventualy found a antique store with both(and another very old chemistry set, which to this day I regret not buying) I paid around 20$ for~50g of KNO3 and ~10g of sulfur.
Around grade 7 or 8 I finally got around to making some horrible gunpowder, by volume, and with very coarse chemicals. It just smouldered a little. I stopped experimenting for a while, but kept reading. Around grade 9 or 10 I was linked to a website by a friend, which I am too ashamed of to disclose, that discussed OTC sources, however only for making explosives. I tried a few explosive compounds, finally made good gunpowder, and wanted more than bangs, so I used the meagre OTC chemicals I had collected to do what little I could in the textbooks. I enjoyed the electrolysis of water and the 'pop test' to no end. I played around with general chemistry experiments for a while, most which did not work as the reactions in texts rarely give conditions. So I turned to energetics once again as there was so much info on the internet(on the god-awful TO...er...website), and this way my experiments would work! Usually made and then destroyed without detonation though, as I liked the chemistry procedure more than the end product's uses.

High school I went through a bit of a pure pyrotechnics phase for a year or two, as there was so much info on the internet. I still read chemistry though, and aced all my science courses without much work(english was another matter:o). My highschool never had a science fair, despite being one of the largest around. That annoyed me to no end. Won a couple of chemistry test-contests. Grade 12 they let me play in the lab. Never did let me use chlorine gas as I very much wanted to make SnCl4. Chemistry labs bored me, despite the fact that I looked forward to them very very much. Lots of Calorimetry and titrations. I had my own desiganted fume hood and could come and go as I pleased. Got a weird reputation, something between uber-nerd, and the energetics stuff just scared them. The chem teachers came to me for info in such areas. I once wrote a poem on nitroglycerin. I am sure higher ups heard about that...

Oh and most importantly....grade 10 or 11...I discovered this site! Dropped pyrotechnics, and lurked for quite some time, because everyone was so advanced and was afraid my lack of knowledge would make me look stupid. (I also had issuses with social skills). Finally joined and just played sponge on all the info here. Slowly put together a proper lab, by the end of grade 12 I was decently well setup. University came, and now I am pursuing an honours chemistry degree, going pretty well so far. I do research in the summer in professor's labs, and during the year in my own;). Really I don't think my interest in chemistry would have progressed much if it hadent have been for this site.

Aqua_Fortis_100% - 4-1-2007 at 21:47

Quote:
Vivir en Amazonia? (Espanol) Es tudo bem!


Está tudo Ótimo , bem mesmo. (something as "is all OK, even good." )
eheheh :) i'm not live in Amazonia,but the most part of these pass through of Brazil north. i live in Brazil inland. (also most of portuguese and spanish words are very alike..)and i also trying speak other languages as dead latim, new esperanto, germany (some chem. documents in germany are also really good!),etc, but only spell horribly some words and i still have problems with english...

Quote:

For example, some cultures push one toward science and others push one towards *cough* the new US regime--painting, drawing and dancing (these are great, but I am too busy in the lab to persue them).


i also love trying to integrate into other cultures because fill my mind with valuables knowledges which i hardly or even NEVER get here...
i have worry about some things: e.g. when i search some chemicals in portuguese on google or yahoo, showns almost always tons of really useless things..(even made accurate searches)..i think which it's maybe can be deliberate by part of government which showns as "democratic"(but this isn't the "absolute" true... many times the authorities are binded with criminals, corruption, among others sad facts), but maybe i wrong about this...

"Libertas quae sera tamen!"
(motto in latinus of mine state where i live)

Obrigado amigo O<sub>3</sub> , thau! (thanks O<sub>3</sub> friend, bye!)

[Editado em 5-1-2007 por Aqua_Fortis_100%]

guy - 4-1-2007 at 22:22

I got started with vinegar and baking soda..oh yeah

Aqua_Fortis_100% - 4-1-2007 at 22:27

Quote:

I got started with vinegar and baking soda..oh yeah


is a very good start... knowleding this acid base foaming reaction i many years ago "sabotaged" the soda lemon which my brother finishes made..ehehe :D

[Editado em 5-1-2007 por Aqua_Fortis_100%]

UnintentionalChaos - 4-1-2007 at 23:19

Ahahahah! I must admit, that is exactly where I started. Making good old sodium acetate solution! At the young age of 10 or so, I also made copper acetate solution without realizing it...was trying to clean pennies in vinegar and NaCl solution and in a week it turned blue :D I then worked my interest up in a backwards sort of way. I am a "craft" addict. I love to know how to do everything to some degree. I learned about dyeing yarn (good old mordants like potassium alum, copper sulfate, iron sulfate, stannous chloride, tannic acid, oxalic acid, and others to make the colors string, bright, and in some cases form at all) i had a small fixation with what is essentially iron-gall ink. Add a tiny amount of tannic acid to a very dilute iron sulfate solution (I was using improvised iron acetate and tannic acid from boiled oak bark and acorns) and the entire mix turns intensely black as ferric tannate ppts and stays fairly well in suspension. Can throw on the potters wheel and learned some crude glaze chemistry. I know wild edible plants and medicinal wild plants and their active compounds backwards and fowards. Then came soapmaking which is much more chemical than anything I'd done before and into which I could blend knowledge from dyeing and "herbalism (I wont say homeopathy because it wasn't that)" Then I met this pyro kid in college (but hes not too chemically inclined) and started by disassembling batteries for MnO2 which I thought at the time would be an interesting experiment to turn it into permanganate. Aside from reading how hard it would be, I found this site and chem became an addiction. :D I had gone into school as a Chem engineer and joined the Chem-E car club which long story short involved me helping with building a wet cell battey with CuS04 electrolyte and a CuSO4/NaOH titration control system for the vehicle.

Sauron - 4-1-2007 at 23:29

I remember Dorignac's by name. Can't place it geographically, I left NOLA in '82. Went to No.Va./DC then to Thailand in '89 so my memories of Nawlins are 25 years old at best. My last residence was in the 900 block of Washington Ave. a block from Magazine Street on the river side. Just down a few blocks from Commander's Palace and the cemetaries. I attended Jesuit then DeLaSalle then UNO - it was LSUNO when I started there in 68. I still have family there in Jefferson mostly. Things are not good in New Orleans since Katrina but hell, you know that. My late brother in law ran for governor a few years ago on the NORML ticket as an independent. You might remember him, he was a real character. Charlie Bellone.

woelen - 5-1-2007 at 02:15

As a young child I was fascinated by science in general. I went to the library and read books about many scientific subjects, mostly astronomy, but also physics, mathematics and chemistry. At one time, I had a book (aimed at kids of 11, 12 years), called "Hoe en Waarom - Scheikunde" (meaning "How and Why - Chemistry") and this book also contained simple experiments, one being electrolysis of salted water with pencil leads, making real chlorine and hydrogen, and other experiments, making CO2 from carbonates and acid. I really loved this book and its explanations were so clear, that even 12 year old kids could grasp the concept of ions (which are explained by means of electrolysis), the concept of acids and redox reactions. Later on I have tried to find this book again, but I never managed to get it again. I think it is regarded a bad book to current safety and environmental concern standards.

With this book, I had started my first chemistry and that expanded. I did electrolysis, using 220 V AC and one time had a real explosion (under water shortcuircuit). When I was 14 I made mixes of KNO3 and sugar. At those times I just could go to the shop and buy sulphur, KNO3 and many other chems. During those years, things expanded more and more and when I was 17 I already had more chems, like K2Cr2O7, KMnO4, CuSO4.5H2O, Na2SO3 and the common acids, including HNO3. In those years I learned a lot about chemistry, and high-school chemistry was nothing new for me at all. At the same time, I also was a real electronics hobbyist and I had my first software experience with a home computer (ZX81+16kB pack). Chemistry and electronics were competing at those times for my career. I decided to study electronics when I went to university in 1984.

At my 18th the chemistry hobby stopped. I put all materials in my parent's house on the attic and I myself left to university, studying electrical engineering, and software engineering. After that I did a PhD in mechatronics and control engineering. During all those years, my interest in chemistry existed, but it was latent, I had no access to the chems, because I had no room for that in my small student's accomodation. I did a lot of reading about chemistry, but I did not do any experiments.

12 years ago, I finished my PhD and moved to a real house and at that time I picked up my hobby again. Having more room and more financial resources, the hobby has extended a lot since those times. And also, I can obtain more chems than I ever could before. The local shops do not exist anymore, but after some time you learn to know your online sources.

Currently, chemistry is one of my greatest hobbies, and I do this besides my work as a software engineer/ICT consultant.

Tsjerk - 5-1-2007 at 05:33

I always wanted to make "bombs" and after finding how to on the internet I made some, I was 16 then. Making them made my interest for other chemistry grow, so I started doing some experiments like making acetamide and things like that. When I was going to some guy to buy some glass, he asked me if I wanted to buy most of his chemicals for a very resonable price I was hooked. My dad and I build a fume hood, and because my dad has it's own company I can by chemicals from large company's. Now at the ages of 18 I'm doing grignards;) And I have been guest on the organic-lab of the group "Biosyn" from the university of Leiden for about 40 hours now.

Sauron - 5-1-2007 at 05:51

Outstanding, @Tsjerk! The good sense to have a fume hood and the resources to build your own. My hat is off to you.

I cringe whenever I read posts wherein someone here is doing something pretty hazardous and skipping the most fundamental safety precautions.

There are old chemists,
and there are bold chemists,
but there are no old, bld chemists...

evil_lurker - 5-1-2007 at 08:16

It was actually the quest to get rich making meth that turned me onto chemistry in the first place.

I didn't know any damn thing about chemistry. Zip, zilch zero. I thought meth came from recipes (mix ingredient A with ingredient B, and presto, your rich). Hell law enforcement propaganda made it look like a cakewalk.

Boy was I freaking wrong, and nearly 3 years later still haven't made a batch. (Thats mainly due to lack the personal refusal of using pseudoephedrine as a starting material, lack of $$$$ to get equipment and precursors for P2P production). It always seems like there is always some precursor or bit of glassware or apparatus you need to get the job done. :mad:

But anyways, if I don't succeed in my quest I will have learned a whole heck of a lot and managed to aquire a very nice chemistry set that would leave any law enforcement officer's jaw sitting on the floor if they saw it.

It might also lead to me getting a degree in organic chemistry or chemical engineering because of what I've learned. Just on a whim, a month or so ago I looked at a friends first year college chemistry book and all I could do is laugh to myself thinking, "this stuff is a freaking joke". I bet I've pulled off reactions in my garage that would give most college professors nightmares.

This year hopefully things will get better... I'm going to try to complete my vacuum source and add an inline reef chiller for working with low boiling solvents and branch out into some other legit forms of the art such as perfumary, agricultural chemicals, and biofuels.

Sauron - 5-1-2007 at 08:27

Hi @evil_lurker

Aesthetic reason for being happy you didn't make any: phenyl acetone (phenyl-2-propanone) stinks like ferret piss and phenylacetic acid is a fixative for fragrances (good or bad) so one who delves into going that route ends up smelling like the proverbial polecat no matter how many times he bathes and how many times he gets his laundry done. The cops find more clandestine labs by following their noses, or getting tipped by neighbors complaining about the stench, than they do from suppliers ratting labs out.

[Edited on 5-1-2007 by Sauron]

Maja - 5-1-2007 at 09:19

Mmmm I think trying to fire KMnO4 + Al mixture with friends. I was five or six years old... Then my father teached me how to melt Sugar and then mix with KNO3. I was really fascinated. Then chemistry set... Then explosives ... Then I forgot explosives...

Sauron - 5-1-2007 at 09:56

Most of us go through that phase, some of us never outgrow it. Some chemists even make their living at it. I know a German Ph.D. organiker who used to work for Dynamit Nobel.

(BTW some of you may already know this but DN sold off their propellants and explosives business to an Australian company a few years ago and are completely uninvolved in that sector anymore, or so my friend tells me. Not to say completely out of energetics. He was telling me about quadricyclane, Anyone here know about it? There's a valence isomerism...reversible catalytically...allowing UV (hence solar energy) to be stored in this strained cage and then released relatively slowly at will. Interesting?

It's also an advanced aerospace propellant (for which read rocket fuel.) The precursor is facily made by a Diels-Alder rxn.

Anyway I am wandering OT here...

[Edited on 5-1-2007 by Sauron]

turd - 5-1-2007 at 10:05

Quote:
phenyl acetone (phenyl-2-propanone) stinks like ferret piss

IMHO phenylacetone has a very pleasing smell unlike any animal piss. Phenylacetic acid on the other hand I would say has a pissy flavour. But, as opposed to what the rumors say, it doesn't smell very strongly. If you work on large scale, the smell of the solvents is probably a bigger problem.

Sauron - 5-1-2007 at 10:43

I was speaking from personal experience. I had occasion in the 70s to prepare a Kg of phenylacetyl chloride from phenylacetic acid via thionyl chloride, Preparation of a series of ring-substituted acetophenones, for bimolecular reduction to acetophenone pinacols. For NMR studies to elucidate the impact of electron donating or electron withdrawing substituents on the enantiomeric excess of the bimolecular coupling with Ti(0) (McMurry's reagent) in THF. Also had occasion to prepare phenylacetone by a couple different routes. Not a big deal 30 years ago. You could still buy it then, too.

Magpie - 5-1-2007 at 11:11

My interest in chemistry started when I was 10 or 12 years old. After much pleading my parents bought me a Gilbert chemistry set which I treasured. It seems the things I liked best were burning powdered magnesium and burning sulfur. My lab was in our unfinished basement, equipped with a laundry sink and a window I could open.

Later as a teenager I fooled around with making rockets with matchheads, making stink bombs with blackpowder made with home ground charcoal and rich in sulfur. We could buy gunpowder then so made pipe bombs which we took down to isolated areas by the river even though in the middle of town. They made a deafening noise!

I originally wanted to be a chemist when I grew up. But when on trips when we drove by an oil refinery I was very interested in all the large columns. So about age 15 I changed my goal to chemical engineering.

After geting my BS in chemical engineering I spent my worklife employed in synthetic rubber, pulp & paper, and finally nuclear (design & waste treatment). I also married, raised 2 sons, and did all the regular family stuff. Occaisionally I would dream of having my own home lab.

I was able to retire a few years before normal retirement so that's when I had the time and inclination to build my own lab. I also took a complete year of organic chemistry at a local college as a refresher. About that time I also joined this forum which has greatly augmented my interest, capablities, and enjoyment of my hobby.

Sauron - 5-1-2007 at 11:36

Very nice, @magpie. We had abd have a lot of refineries around my home (Nawlins) though I left there in 82. Were you in the same part of the country? PM me if you don't want to post the answer.

Magpie - 5-1-2007 at 12:01

No, nowhere near New Orleans. Actually in my part of the country refineries and chemical plants are relatively rare.

As you are from New Orelans I was wondering if you happened to know C. W. Ammen, author of several hands-on books on metallurgy. He was originally from NO but lives in Colorado now.

kaviaari - 5-1-2007 at 12:22

I have been interested in science ever since I was born. When I was about six I told my mother to read science related books for bedtime stories. I also saw the movie "Back to the future" and that totally blew my mind. I started drawing all kind of mechaincal and electical stuff. Other movie that has had a great impact on my life was The Nutty Professor. When I saw those colored liquids and mysterous fumes I thought that that is my thing for good.

The time I was seven I had mixed my first baking soda-vinegar cocatail. I managed to get some test tubes and the whole thing got bigger. The time I was eight I had bought some very basic chemicals from pharmacy with my parents. Limestone, Citric acid, Cupric sulphate etc. The time I was nine I started to become more interested in computers. Programming was my thing and I could sit in front of the computer writing simple GWBasic programs for hours. I forgot chemistry for some time. At the time I also red a lots of math and basic physics.

When my first chemistry lessons started in junior high (grades 7-9 here in Finland) I was very exited. Seeing all those beakers, tripods, ring stands and fume hoods was something whole new for me. It opened my eyes again for chemistry and after that I really got into it. I started gathering more chemicals, glassware and hardware. It has been quite a long way but I have managed to gather quite formal lab for different kinds of experiments.

Science has always been and I hope that it will always be close to my heart :)

Sauron - 5-1-2007 at 13:17

Sorry @magpie. Don't know the chap. I knew quite a few writers in New Orleas though. Science fiction professionals mostly. Daniell F.Galouye, Rosel George Brown, George Alec Effinger, Roger Lovin, James Sallis, Norman Spinrad. The vampire novelist Anne Rice lives there but she arrived after I left. There are a few famous mainstream writers in the area: Shirley Ann Grau, Walker Percy. But I did not know them personally.

Sauron - 5-1-2007 at 13:24

@kaviaari, look up an old Doris Day and Rock Hudson comedy called "Lover Come Back" They have an ad campaign for a product that does not exist...so they pay a wacked out chemist to create it. What he comes up with (after a series of smokey funny colored lab explosions) is a chocolate mint with the wallop of a triple martini.'

Hilarious.

Bromine - 5-1-2007 at 13:24

I started to get interest for chemistry when I was 13 years old. My first experiment was electrolyse of NaCl solution and electrolyse of water, I made some black powder and KNO3+sugar. Then my parents bought me chemistey set in I started to do experiments in basement. The I bought myself some basic glassweare and chemicals, internet was great help to me, because there I found most of instructions and books for chemistry. The halogen elements interest me the most, but I do not work with them very much at home, because they and their organic compounds are toxic.

Sorry my english is not very good.

[Edited on 5-1-2007 by Bromine]

10 Cent Sugar rockets

FloridaAlchemist - 5-1-2007 at 13:56

I got started in the 70's making the 10 cent sugar rocket.
Potassium Nitrate and powdered sugar.;)

Fireworks

MadHatter - 6-1-2007 at 00:00

Along with roll caps, flares, and rockets. My parents gave me a couple of those Gilbert
chemistry sets. The_Davster, ever tape an Estes rocket motor to a matchbox car ? :D
That's what I did to my younger brother's matchbox collection when his hyperactive
ass would piss me off ! Funny as shit watching those things do loops in the air ! :D:D:D

BromicAcid - 6-1-2007 at 00:37

My interest in chemistry comes from acids. Specifically when I was growing up there were two movies that I watched over and over again as a little kid. Aliens and Short Circuit 2 the latter of which had a scene involving battery acid and the first, for those who have not seen it the aliens have acid for blood. Just the idea that something could dissolve metal was mind blowing. Later on some of my first experiments were in fact baking soda and water and there was a small chemistry set in there somewhere but I was too eager and not entertained by its bright colors.

I started acquiring chemicals though even though I had no chemistry books, no internet, and no training in the subject and stated mixing things pretty much at random. I did this for a few years increasing my inventory. I never had much of anything interesting, my dad got me some different acids from work, he never had any clue what he brought me but he would bring it home in pop bottles and there were different kinds. I know I got nitric at least once because he brought it to me one day and a few days later the bottle was all opaque and the liquid had leaked out killing the grass.

It wasn't until middle school, roughly 14 years of age that I started to get into the midst of real chemistry though. I had my first chemistry class. I was familiar with all of the names of the compounds but not much of anything else. Still it was enough to give me and advantage and make me excel and I never gave up that lead throughout high school and college.

It's strange to think that I experimented so heavily before visiting this site. I've been here over three years now and most of my big-time experiments were done during that time. But looking at my early posts let me differentiate between what I did pre-sciencemadness. Some of the first reactions that I vividly remember in my backyard involve trying to make bromine. I purchase 5 kg of KBr on eBay 7 or so years ago and it has lasted me ever since. And of course all the crazy experiments gone wrong really stick out in my mind.

Now though I am in a period of dormancy, living in an apartment is restricting as I have found out (and many members of our forum already know) but I think that I will soon make room for some small scale electrolysis experiments since they do not take up much room and providing I keep the amps low enough shouldn't heat up to much and as long as I refrain from chlorine gas should be relatively safe, hopefully, kind of...

bereal511 - 6-1-2007 at 11:52

I spent much of my childhood trying to figure out why the heck freezing water in a jar caused it to shatter. I was always astounded by the simple fact that water expands rather than contracts when frozen. Of course, I made up extraordinary claims as to why this happened, such as the freezer had magical powers that caused the water to expand, a boogy monster would come and accidently drop the jar while looking for food or night time caused the water to change form, similar to a werewolf transformation. It was all fun and games when I remember I tried to debunk my own claims by leaving a jar of water outside of the refridgerator to prove that night time didn't in fact cause the water to expand or staying up all night with a flashlight (I was scared out of my wits, I was only four!) to look for the boogy monster. The only claim I was unable to prove or disprove was that the freezer was magical, so one time, when I was a bit older, I took out all of the stuff in the freezer and climbed into it...
Those doors are really hard to get open!

So after all that, my mom yelled at me for breaking all the jars with my experiments. I spent much of my elementary and middle school years in ignorance as to why exactly water expands when frozen. My teachers couldn onlygive me unsatisfactory explanations. They usually told me, "Don't worry about it, you wouldn't understand it anyway" or "It's just the way the world works", which for me, was like telling me I was too retarded to know. When I entered high school as a freshman, I finally decided that I would pick up one of those *huge* books about chemistry and look for the answer. From there, I learned about hydrogen bonding, crystallization, and all the good stuff. And I was definitely hooked.

Although later on I went down the trail of making bombs and explosives, I just felt it was too much trouble to worry about having only four fingers on each hand later on in life. I took my first real chemistry course in my sophomore year and continued on into my junior year. Then I found SMDB, and that's where I am today as a senior.

joeflsts - 7-1-2007 at 07:20

When I was about 7 I got my first chemistry set from my mother and father. I was fascinated by it. I set up lab in my brothers abandoned bedroom (he was in the Navy) and performed every experiment.

About a year later my dad died and I didn't experiment much for the next 6 or 7 years. He was always the one that would encourage me to go the next step.

One day at the age of 16 or 17 I stumbled across a collection of interesting pyrex glassware. The set contained beakers, flasks, a ring stand, and other items. I was immediately drawn in by the mystery of experimenting again. I honestly don't remember where I found this glassware but it was beautiful.

A good friend of mine was very good with wood working so I asked him to help me construct a lab bench in my basement. The house that I lived in was well over a 100 years old and the basement reminded me of something out of a horror movie. It was the perfect setting.

Mom was an english teacher at my high school and I was friends with my chemistry teacher. He would provide me with interesting chems to play with after school. Never anything too dangerous. I obtained HCl at a supply store and my chemistry teacher have me a bottle of Zinc. I bet over the course of the next year or so I created enough hydrogen to float the hindenberg.

My lab was also a great place to smoke cigarettes without my mother knowing about it. ;)

About this time I also found a great like for fermented solutions. I also had the most basic distilling setup and would "purify" some of the mother's hooch for further research. I remember that my condenser was broken but it worked for simple stuff.

When I was 18 my mom died. I was active duty Amry and when I came home after Basic Training it was obvious that she wasn't going to live much longer... Sure enough within 4 months she passed away. I was stationed in Germany and came home for emergency leave to spend her last days with her. During this time I packed my lab (it had gotten rather impressive) only to never see it again.

It's 23 years later and I'm building a lab to enjoy for myself and with my son now.

Thanks,
Joe

[Edited on 7-1-2007 by joeflsts]

Zinc - 18-1-2007 at 10:04

I started to get interest in chemistry when I was 4. I started with mixing paints to get new collors pretending they were chemicals (sodium was blue, ammonia was yellow...)

[Edited on 18-1-2007 by Zinc]

YT2095 - 18-1-2007 at 10:32

well my Mother was good for this, I had access to Microscopes, encyclopedias, minerals, and plants.
my Grandfather (mothers side) was into fixing things, Electrical, mechanical and was also in the War.

I learned plenty from these, and also got into plenty of trouble when left in my own time and bored.
I`de built my 1`st radio at the age of 6, and assumed others kids were the same when I went to school, I was wrong :(
I Used to spend plenty of time After school in the library reading up on All parts of science that I could get my hands on, it also was a great way of escaping being beaten up outside after school (the grunts couldn`t spell library never mind think about entering there).

then I had my 1`st official Science lesson, I fell in love with it from the start, I`de see the teacher after school many times with different stones and minerals I`de find, take in my electronic projects etc...
I walked away with plenty wins at science fairs too.
the Periodic table was a total mystery to me, something I needed to solve and crack, WHAT did it all mean?

I`m 40, and I`m still enjoying finding out :)

Levi - 25-1-2007 at 17:51

When I was very young (8 or so) I new about making CO2 from baking soda and vinegar but it never stimulated my imagination or did anything to spark my interest in chemistry. Up until about age 12 I was into wilderness survival--it had more possibilities, I thought. Tree forts, exploration, simple booby traps made with kite string (for intruders) :D And, of course, fire-making! Long hours were spent rubbing sticks together or charing wood with a magnifying glass. Then, I read My Side of the Mountain and became obsessed with flint and steel. That year, for Christmas, my parents bought me one of those firestarter blocks with the flint rod embedded in the magnesium. It was a great tool but I remember being disappointed that it was 95% magnesium with only a small flint insert. After all, it was the flint that captured my imagination and if I wanted to use "high-tech" stuff I would just use matches!
As it turned out, it was the magnesium firestarter that got me into chemistry. While demonstrating my new tool for a family friend he mentioned in passing that if I were to add a shaving of magnesium to some vinegar it would bubble. Of course I figured this was just another way of making CO2 with vinegar. ***boring*** Then he told me that the gas was hydrogen. Suddenly, chemistry became interesting. "Why was it hydrogen?" I asked. To which he replied something about acetic acid and metals blah blah blah. I didn't understand a word of it but it had so aroused my curiousity that I became determined to find out.

The rest is history.

[Edited on 26-1-2007 by Levi]

getting started

chemrox - 27-1-2007 at 23:11

I was always into chemistry although I got my first degree in geology after working as a chemist for three summers making Grignards by the carboy for a chemE and doing TLC workups for him.

As a kid I had a very sophisticated setup in the basement with a lot of glass and reagents a friend of my father gave me. He was a chem prof. In my early years I caught the kitchen on fire trying to make polymers on the stove using wax and plastic toys with acid and kerosene.

I was great for making H2S and ammonia complexes. The other kids thought I was a genius or a magician making solutions change colors by adding NH4OH. Other kids made radios I made rockets and bombs.

In high school I was so far ahead of everyone else I was allowed to play in the lab all day. I made bakelite, aspirin, clock reactions alcohol stills .. all kinds of good stuff.

In college I ran the stockroom and had a research project at a private colleges graduate marine lab. I did original work in DDT metabolism in plankton but that was where things started going sour. I got a harsh lesson there in academic rivalry and jealousy. Post-docs kept sabotaging my experiment by unplugging my plankton tanks. I had limited supplies of radio isotope DDT and these little minded biologists (I hate 'em) kept me from being able to complete more than one good experiment. I got enough data for a paper but it could have been a lot better. I got close to a lot of professors in those years because I was doing work that graduate students weren't able to do. I got insights into the academic life that it would have been better for me not to have had. The backstabbing, the ego, the jealousy .. I hated it and just wanted done.

Nobody at Berkeley was doing any medicinal chemistry, except bug chemistry, and were suspicious of anyone remotely interested in drugs. Shulgin had his own private lab in town but I didn't pursue meeting him until many years later. Instead I follwed his work in my garage and got a lot of experience with a few syns that were lucrative and relatively easy. I avoided LAH and anything with pressure.

Before I even graduated, I got employed as a chemist in a small company making growth hormones from kelp. These guys were so cheap they had me running an ether still three nights a week and making Grignards by the carboy. But I got to work on the hormones and their development into marketable commodities.

I got burned out on being inside all the time and turned to geochemistry. I did a lot of fieldwork that involved geothermal assessments and using equilibrium to determine reservoir temperatures. I learned groundwater hydrology as well as chemistry. I developed ways of measuring NH3 in aqueous samples at concentrations below the linear part of the ion selectivbe electrode curve. Basically biasing techniques. Meanwhile I supplemented my income by manufacturing supplies for other chemists.

I made a lot of brominated alkanes for geologic work and experimented with higher density liquids for getting Tungstun out of ore crushes. I made nitro benzene by the drum for a company making gun cleaning solvents.

The only thing I really liked about inorganic was the symmetry stuff and I sorely missed mechanisms and adjusting reaction conditons. I had neglected the literature and found the internet late in my career.

I got to know Shulgin through a glassblower I grew up with and was fascinated by his work. In him, I found someone who simply liked to cook and taste and was amazed that a career could be had doing just that.

After many dry years I'm doing wet chemistry again and loving it though my techniques are rusty. I have been running through known preparations and starting planned experiments with transesterification of biodiesel components.

I have some LAH questions if anyone has the time and experience. These are not necesaarily part of the biodiesel project but are essential to other work.

womble - 29-1-2007 at 01:02

as a kid I liked chemistry. As an adolescent I found drugs. Unfortunately, I began to combine the two. I was then busted with 1 1/2 oz's of pseudo on one occassion and on another with rp/i and associated chems. I got out of that by ensuring that I also had a shitload of other, non-associated chems. When the local D's got all excited, I simply stated that I was a frustrated 'ameteur' chemist, and that my hobby was growing crystals. Fuck, how am I meant to know that shit can be used to make drugs?

Semi-reformed, off the drugs. Still have a keen, albeit entirely (although I cannot swear to it, I ain't completely certain) intellectual interest in the mechanics of drug synthesis.

This is the facts, take em as you please.

Womble

Beatnik - 29-1-2007 at 03:05

While i started with black powder and all the k-rad k00l shite. Dedicated H/P/A freak. I used to go into the uni and be facinated that i could find enough information in the library to eclipse any shitty text i read. Particulary with obtaining chems for blowing shit up.

Before you knew it i started with acid base extractions from cacti to seeds to acacias. Then onto paper chromatography in an attempt to perfect it those extractions. Found the hive and got hooked. I REALLY wanted to be a part of the community and work out new ideas.... Then that fell to the side when i got a gf. Started a bach sci degree and passing time in the chem section of the library. I really liked the old texts that explained things in practical terms compared to the new textbooks which read like someones phd in math. Starting building gadgets again, electrochem, trying to merge robotics ( Robots are very interesting too ) into the old methods...

and yeah... now i am here.... *waves* You know your all nuts! .... i really dislike certain things about how even chemists view what they do, and i kinda like some of the more engineering side aswell. Ive got friends who are great chemists, but are LOST when it comes time to step into my garage and that just feeds my ego... But i am still just copying alot of what you guys do, if you dont really live and breath chem then alot of the experience and discussion can be a little beyond me. But i can do my own work. Slowly....

=)

Elawr - 13-2-2007 at 20:56

I got a Gilbert chemistry set when I was about 10; I still remember all the neat things in it! CuSO4, CoCl2, NaHSO4, tannic acid, FeSO4, waterglass, KNO3, logwood (I never figured out what the hell anyone uses logwood for!) There was the alcohol burner with blowpipe (my dad kept the wood alcohol locked up and would dole out out just a little bit at a time for my little alcohol flame!).

As the chemicals were used up, I'd look for replacements and just kept ammassing more. I had my lab on an old wooden office desk by the upstairs hallway window, and soon had all the finish eroded and burned off of it.

This went on until middle school when other things became more interesting. High school, college, then grad school, then medical school and residency training. After settling down into practice, buying a house, fathering a couple of kids - for some reason chemistry rekindled and I had to set myself up with my own grown-up version of a chemistry set. Not sure what started me back, seems like one day I found some alum and decided to do crystals!

The the marriage went bad, divorced followed, and I ended up meeting my current wife who shares my passion for chemistry. She too is a grower of crystals! The crystals are beautiful, as is chemistry as a whole with its many mysteries.
Always fascinating!

[Edited on 14-2-2007 by Elawr]

Should have done this sooner...

BeanyBoy - 22-3-2007 at 06:38

I've been lurking for a month and posting a bit here and there without intros. But where to begin? I guess I'll just start and ramble about...

I had two kiddie chemistry sets in the 1960s, one from Skil-Craft, the other a Lionel-Porter Chemcraft. Neither set was the one I wanted; I think I asked for the Ski-Craft based on the photo on the box. But I can't recall just when science hooked me. Maybe in school. Dunno. My main use of chemistry during the 70s was to forget some traumatic bullshit from the 60s (hah-hah). BTW it doesn't work. I remember the pain and forgot a lot of the fun.

The chem sets were accompanied by microscope sets, dissection sets, and so on. Prior to that had been 027 gauge train sets. After Chemistry Phase One came HO trains. Then model rockets. Then I built a solar-viewing telescope in time to catch the March 1970 partial solar eclipse.

Sometime that year, Chemistry Phase Two set in, I think, as a result of science class in junior high school. The school got a 1968 Welch catalog (Sargent-Welch by then), and I asked for the older 1965 Welch catalog, and got it.

As Christmas 1970 approached, I'd started informing all the relations, JUST SEND MONEY this year. Still got hankies from grandma but she did throw in something.

I put together an order, and sent it off to Sargent-Welch. My very first mail-order experience!

My fscking burettes arrived broken! I had no idea as a 14-year-old kid, how to get this corrected. My parents had warned against the evils of mail order precisely due to them having had similiar problems in the past.

I just did without the burettes.

Didn't ever do much beyond building an inventory of reagents, purifying what I couldn't easily obtain pure. But in those days, Walgreens had a shelf FULL of chemicals, mostly from a local firm (maajor chemical industry presence where I live).

In 1972, I fell in love with Rock N' Roll and sold everything to a kid down the street so I could by LPs (music came on these vinyl-pastic things back before CDs). Well, I sold it all except the H-tube electrolyis apparatus and a ring stand to support it. I miss my plastic-jacketed disassemble-able condenser from Welch. But they still have them!

I took Intro Chemistry in high school, and regreted having given up my lab equipment. After that year, I made friends with an older guy, a biker, who worked as a chemist (undergrad degree). He said unless I got into graduate school, I'd never dooe anything other than mix test tubes for paint companies.

So when college beckoned, I decided to major in Choral Music Direction.

Got to college; took one course in Music Theory and among some others, a course in Computer Programming.

Mesmerized by the displays of flashing lights (on some older computers you had to toggle in the code using a panel of switches and lamps/LEDs), I ended up majoring in and got a degree in Computer Science.

As the AARP mailings start to roll in, I find that I am just about totally burned out on computing (exept retrocomputing, another hobby, but even that's a little toasty).

So now I've been hit with Chemistry Phase Three. I have no clear goal in returning to this hobby. I was fascinated by it before, and enjoyed playing around in the lab. I never worked with reagents of the strength I intend on using this time around, though, and therein lies a problem.

My tactile sense supplies my brain with a LOT of data. When I wear gloves, its like somebody stuck a bucket over my head. I have bought some nitrile gloves, but forcing myself to use them when handling Liiquid Fire et. al. is proving difficult. I used to use lye for giving aluminum panels that "anodized" look, and pretty much always did that bare-handed. No big deal in a family where Mom always found a place to buy Lye Soap.

So lab discipine will actually be where I'll focus my efforts for the next year or so. Would like to live long enough for that AARP membership to be worth something...

Anyway, I've had an idea or two, and a search of modern literature reveals there are many avenues of chemical research that have NOT been addressed by the major concerns.

Its been posted elsewhere that those major concerns will not talk to you about any discovery you think you've made.

Well perhaps so, but Asian chemical firms might. And if not them, then the next Emerging Economy will.

I wonder who it will be?

Mumbles - 23-3-2007 at 20:19

I have to admit, reading this thread makes me all warm and fuzzy inside thinking about how I got started.

I got a few of those cheapass chemistry kits as a kid. I, as many others, started with the wonderful sodium acetate preparation. Most specifically I remember mixing the vinegar and baking soda and using the CO2 to put out a candle. I could not get enough of that. Might also where I got my fire fascination. That or my house burning down (of which I had nothing to do with ;)) I always loved math, and math loved me. I demolished everyone in my school with math. Completed those 100 question time tests in about 2 minutes with perfect answers and such. Got on math teams and stuff in middle school. My grades suffered in middle school because I really didn't care and I was bored out of my mind.

Around the age of 11 I got a fascination with fireworks and energetic materials. I will be the first to admit, I started off as a kewl. Reading the ACB amongst other pieces of questionable literature. I read everything I could for 2 or 3 years. I attempted acetone peroxide once in that time, and thankfully it didn't work. Late 2000 or early 2001 I found RogueSci and lurked for a while. I was finally ready to register and the site was down. I eventually figured out it was because I was using AOL. There was some downtime in there too.

Now high school was a totally different story. I was so excited to be there and actually learning stuff I ate it up. Science and math I specifically dominated. English and spanish were my downfall from a 4.0. I did a lot of academic extra curriculars, graduated with more credits than theoretically possible. I competed in a lot of science competitions. State champion of chemistry a few times through various competitions. Qualified for National level Chemistry Olympiad twice, was always a few points from going to the top 20 selection thing at Cheyene Mountain. Through the science competition I accidentally found out where Madscientist was from, and started talking with him a bit.

Somewhere in high school I found a few new forums, such as the hive and this one, registered about 4 years ago after lurking for a year. I also started posting on this site called Xinventions. This is where my science knowledge really took off. It wasn't because I learned a lot, it was just the atmosphere. I came in and was already one of the better posters in terms of knowledge and such. This made me feel great about myself, and made me want to learn more. The more I learned the more I shared, and the more I wanted to learn, and it worked out well I would say. Xinventions became what is now apcforum.net of which I am an administrator of. This is where I have been lately. My interest in chemistry is picking back up though.

College I can unfortunatly say did not go as well as high school. I just lost my edge. I am beginning to think I made a poor decision going to school where I did. The kids are more interested in grades than actually learning which I feel is unfortunate. I could give a shit about my grades, I want to learn as much as I can. Unfortunatly that isn't how it works, and my grades are mediocre. I'd love to go to pharmacy school, but my grades arn't good enough. Said grades prevent me from getting any undergraduate research, despite my brightness. I have a few options I want to explore, but I don't know. I am completely burnt out on school and it has become a signifigant chore for me. Just no drive to do anything anymore, even learning chemistry which used to keep me up for days.

Elawr - 23-3-2007 at 23:44

I remember the first experiment I tried as a young child: tried to make "dry ice" by taking ice cubes from the freezer and rubbing them vigorously with a towel. I thought that if I could just dry them off, the cubes would magically turn into dry ice! :D

Pyridinium - 24-3-2007 at 00:50

For me it was a Skil-craft chemistry set from the 70's, supplemented with as much glassware and additional chems as I could obtain elsewhere.

I also got one of the 1950's Chemcraft manuals from a garage sale. Was able to do a number of those experiments too... though, like the other poster, I had absolutely no idea what "logwood" was at the time. I didn't even have any of this mysterious substance.

I used to carry an old inorganic chem text to school even though I wouldn't "need" such a text for some years to come.

I think it was age 7 this whole thing started, and definitely in full swing by age 9.

Another thing I used to love was my microscope, acquired from a flea market for 5 bucks (seems cheap now, but in the 70's that was still a chunk of change for a young kid to be parting with). The thing supposedly went up to "750x" but I learned pretty quickly, that lens didn't work too well. Also it didn't have a fine adjustment, so I broke a few slides.... but it was all good.

PlatinumCal99 - 25-3-2007 at 13:25

Wow, I feel so young looking at all these posts about the 60s and 70s. :o I just got interested in chemistry last year (junior year of High School) because of the AP Chem class I was taking. But hey, it was enough to help me decide what my college major is going to be (organic chem). Too bad they didn't have any follow-up classes, like say, maybe AP Organic Chemistry. Had to buy all my books and equipment myself ($2000 is a lot for a high school kid to be spending on science stuff). But hey, next year at school i'll have access to all the lab equipment i'll ever need :)

polymer - 25-3-2007 at 15:53

Ah, i've had that science bug forever. It started when I was in 3rd grade, when I got an electronics kit for christmas. With it, I was able to build simple circuits such as an electromagnet, a generator, and electric motor. That was fun, and I habitually dropped my money on crap such as electric motors, leds, wires, integrated circuits, solar panels, and capacitors at radioshack. With all of the crap I had, I built crazy things such as a hovercraft. I also bought stuff at a local hobby shop (plastic strips) which I used to build stuff. Eventually, in 6th grade, I decided I wanted to be a pharmaceuticals researcher from reading journals such as Scientific American and Nature. So, I bought the DNA explorer set from the same store that started it all. That was enjoyable, doing chemistry experiments.

obsessed_chemist - 31-3-2007 at 18:04

I was always curious about science and the origins of the world and matter, and always asked many questions. I think my facination with chemistry in particular was really sparked when I was about 12 yrs old.

I recall my history teacher talking about how gunpowder was made from three ingredients, and that one of them was saltpeter. He wouldn't tell us the other two (out of fear for our safety - or perhaps his potential liability), so naturally I went straight for the dictionary when I got home (I had a great big illustrated one that was nearly a century old), and looked up gunpowder. Saltpeter, Sulfur, and Charcoal.

So then I wanted to know what saltpeter was, and where it came from, and so on. Also around that same time I became facinated with plantlife and agriculture. I was amazed how nitrate-compounds could be used both in pyrotechnics, and in agriculture. This just made me more curious about chemicals. As a child I was blessed with a very cool best-friend, who was also very eager to experiment with pyrotechnics and the like. I was inspired by his family; they were avid gardeners and survivalists. I learned much from them, and also began a small garden in my mother's backyard. I seemed to have a "green-thumb."

My mom and dad would go book-shopping at various used book stores, and I would naturally gravitate straight for the chemistry and agriculture books. I have a small collection of very old, yet useful chemistry-related books. I have always felt a bit like an "outsider," being a musician, reading technical books, and living on the "fringe".

Unfortunately, I didn't persue a further education right-away, although I would like to return to school if I can find one that offers a chemistry-major and that will accept me. I am for the most part "self-educated," and although I see no problem with it, it obviously has it's limitations in the world of credentials.

[Edited on 3/31/2007 by obsessed_chemist]

Sedit - 13-2-2009 at 12:19

LOL I wish I could tell when I got into chemistry but I can remeber my family telling me to stay away from the chemicals under the sink not because they thought I would poision my self but because they where afraid I was going to blow something up......again.:o

About nine or ten years old my mother brought home some damn near brand new collage organic chem books from an auction and ever since then Its been an addiction.I read all 9 of them over and over and still read them to this day.

If it wasnt for getting kicked out of high school twice I would probly already have my degree in chemistry.

hellfire23 - 14-2-2009 at 12:10

Well when I was young I was one who liked to keep things, I would go to garage sales often and find lots of things. One day our new neighbor had moved in and while I was riding my bike around I saw her throwing out some books. Before she did I stopped her and she had about 5 decent condition chem books. I asked her if I could keep them and she said yes. She was a chemistry teacher for the local high school and worked at the local laboratory for biological research. Later she had a house warming party and I saw her basement and she had a full set up lab :o I was amazed. Naturally I had researched chemistry online and in the books. I recognized a variety of condensers, burettes, flasks, lab stands and TONS of chemicals.

Then I went down the road of EM and the like. I had obtained some ammonium nitrate and hydrogen peroxide from parent's work place. My neighbor wouldn't give me anything like that. I had fun with rockets and such.

Since then I had researched chemistry on my own and sometimes I borrowed from her. Later for high school I went to a Catholic high school who's chemistry program is mostly analytical and physical due to their religious beliefs:mad: I am currently a freshman in high school but I am at the top of my class with 95 and above in every class. I have become friends with the chemistry teacher and learned that he himself enjoys the actual chemistry experiments and such like I do and is not to fond of the chemistry they teach at the school ;) I am still studying chemistry and plan to take AP next year because I have talked with some of the 10th graders who take it and I already know most of what they are doing.

Aristocles - 6-3-2009 at 11:33

Hmm...

Stream of consciousness bs alert!

It's strange, but I have no youthful background of blowing up the garage or ever so slightly poisoning the neighbors from ambient fumes... I was bitten by the bug much later in life.

In college my most dominating interest was in argumentation, thus a degree in Philosophy/Logic. However, I became interested in the hard sciences toward graduation. I ended up taking a couple of low level physics classes, an astronomy class and biology. Yes, that is correct, no chemistry classes :(

About four years ago I became interested in WW2 era military rifles and believe it or not, this interest managed to lead- in an almost linear way- to my present interest (read obsession) with general chemistry.

I have begun to renew my interest in physics, chemistry, and mathematics in a consistent and disciplined way over the last year and a half. (I actually started grad school in mathematics but did complete a semester... )

I have never had any problems with "books", I graduated summa. However! praxis is another thing altogether... But alas, I have begun to educate myself both specifically and generally as to the subject/subjects. Even taking online courses via the MIT OpenCourse website. One has to begin at the beginning and I have decided to follow Aristotle's age old dictum as per such (rough transliteration: "well begun is half done"). Therefore I am using low level college texts, online courses and tutorials, and this website as sources of edification :) Hell, I have even dusted off some old physics texts I have around, e.g. Feyman's lectures...

Considering I spent most of my adult life as a competitive powerlifter, I think it's time to engage in a more cerebral pursuit.

Wish me luck in my endeavor, at my age (I'll be 43 next month) I'll need it.

[Edited on 6-3-2009 by Aristocles]

redox - 11-6-2011 at 08:05

Well let's see....I got my first chemistry set when I was six or so. It was a cool little DNA set. Basically, you dropped a piece of corn or a slice of carrot into a wide test tube, added Solution A and Solution B, then put it all over a magnetic stirrer and dropped in a stir bar. You then added some dye, and within a few minutes, a small strand of DNA materialized.
I then forgot about chemistry for a few years. When I about ten, my dad bought me a cool little micro-set. It came with about 40 different reagents, about 1 gram each. I was fascinated with the fact that on the bottles was an overzealous warning about toxicity. COBALT CHLORIDE--EXTREMELY POISONOUS. Yeah right! The LD50 is 80 mg/kg, thus I would need about five bottles of it to maybe kill me. Anyway, I don't think I ever did a single experiment with this set. I once again forgot about chemistry.
By the way, my father is a Ph.D organic chemist, so he really wanted me to follow in his footsteps. My mother is a Ph.D food scientist, so she wanted me in her field.
At this point, I was 13. I stumbled upon a video on youtube by Nurdrage on how to extract lithium from batteries. I was absolutely enthralled! Lithium! A reactive and fascinating chemical element! I performed simple demonstration I could think of with this lithium. This was the first point that I really cared at all about chemistry. I think I can truly give Nurdrage the credit for interesting me in chemistry.
My father told me that he had an old chemistry set in the basement, so I set out on a fervent search for the fabled set. When I found it, I cried out in excitement. Buried deep in the basement, behind many boxes and cobwebs were two Lionel-Porter ChemCraft sets! I performed many experiments with these sets, but eventually they become boring and monotonous. I bought myself "Chemistry for Dummies," by John Moore and I read that cover to cover several times. From there I learned functional groups, solutions, gas equations, and more. By now, I had set up a rudimentary home lab in my basement. It was nothing special, just a workbench. My father thought I was ready to move on. He gave me his college freshman chemistry book, "Chemical Principles," by Dickinson et al. This book was interesting and incredibly informative. From there, I began moving into organic chemistry. My father once again donated another book, "Organic Chemistry," by Morrison & Boyd. This was his go-to book in college. I read this also. In my lab, I built a fumehood, another desk, storage shelves, I bought glassware, reagents, and a hotplate. I basically spent my life savings on chemistry equipment, but I have no regrets.
At the time of writing this monologue, I am 14, and I am in 8th grade. I enjoy synthesizing esters, alkyl halides, haloforms, alcohols, carboxylic acids, ketones, and aldehydes.

If I bored you, you have my sincerest apologies.

LanthanumK - 11-6-2011 at 08:42

I became interested in chemistry with the purchase of a science kit which only contained two chemicals: calcium hydroxide and sodium bicarbonate. One of my first reactions was the thermal decomposition of sodium bicarbonate in a kitchen pot. (It ruined it because of too much heat.) For almost two years I used the sodium carbonate produced by that project. That boring science set had experiments using copper sulfate, which I did not have. Being the parsimonious person that I am, I made some impure copper sulfate using the procedure on my blog (http://lanthanumkchemistry.over-blog.com/article-how-to-make...). At that time, spending $3 to buy 10g of it was just tooo expensive. I heated that and was amazed at the color change to white and back to blue. Then I purchased ammonia and used it to make hydroxide bases. I was fascinated the first time I saw the copper(II) ammine complex emerge from the light blue copper(II) ion solution. I extracted the KOH from alkaline batteries and conducted the chloralkali process. I made copper(II) oxide and was interested that during the production the green copper compound turned black but no smoke or stink was produced. I learned about flame tests and burned a potassium-rich banana skin to look at the K flame color. After obtaining HCl and an old 3/4-used chemistry set, I went on to make about 150 chemical compounds. I quickly found that interesting chemistry experiments are not free, though. Buying chemicals and equipment costs quite a lot of money. So until I find a job my chemistry experiments have stagnated. I have done more than this, bu I will not bore anyone any further.

The WiZard is In - 11-6-2011 at 09:15

Quote: Originally posted by redox  

I then forgot about chemistry for a few years. When I about ten, my dad bought me a cool little micro-set. It came with about 40 different reagents, about 1 gram each. I was fascinated with the fact that on the bottles was an overzealous warning about toxicity. COBALT CHLORIDE--EXTREMELY POISONOUS. Yeah right! The LD50 is 80 mg/kg, thus I would need about five bottles of it to maybe kill me.




Cobalt poisoning in a 6-year-old
The Lancet Vol. 335 pg. 981
[Sanned - and you know what that means!]

SIR—A 6-year-old boy was admitted to hospital at 1530 h
on April 12, 1989. About 7 hours earlier his mother had
told him to make a drink for his 4-year-old sister. He
added to a blackcurrant cordial ('Ribena') half a
teaspoon (about 2-5 g) of cobalt chloride crystals from
a toy crystal-growing set that is widely available in UK
supermarket chains (figure). His mother, suspecting
that he had added something, such as soap, told him
to drink it himself. He drank two-thirds of a glass at
0850 without saying what he had done and went to
school. During the morning he complained of
abdominal pain and vomited.

The mother suspected that he might have swallowed
some crystals, and the boy was taken to the local
emergency department at 1300, where he was
given an emetic. He vomited three times. He
was transferred to the children's ward at another
hospital at 1530. Physical examination was normal
and cardiac monitoring revealed no abnormalities.
His serum contained cobalt at 7230 nmol/1
(4020 nmol/l in whole blood); the normal range is
2-17 nmol/l for plasma and whole blood. His initial
blood count was Hb 11.9 g/dI, and white cells 4900/0
(granulocytes 35%, lymphocytes 59%, monocytes
6%). Examination of the blood film confirmed
neutropenia. Blood urea and electrolytes
were normal. He was discharged after 48 h.

[Table] Cobalt, in blood and in urine, cleared rapidly
and no specific treatment for cobalt poisoning was needed.

Cobalt is an essential trace element and daily intakes
am 30-60 Pg (0.5-1.0 unol) in children. Cobalt salts
are relatively non-toxic: and daily doses of 25-40 mg
cobalt have been used in blood disorders such as the
anaemia in renal failure and thalassaernia.

However, prolonged treatment may cause depression
of erythropoicsis, flushing, chest pain, dermatitis, tinnitus,
nausea and vomiting, nerve deafness, thyroid hyperplasia,
myxoedema, congestive cardiac failure, and renal damage.
In this boy, who took about 2 g cobalt chloride, toxicity
manifested as gastrointestinal effects and neutropenia.

Jacobziner and Raybin' described a 19-month-old boy
who took about 30 m! of cobalt chloride solution. He
became cyanotic and died 4 h after the ingestion.
Necropsy revealed little about the primary cause
of death. The liver, kidneys, and spleen contained
89-4 mg cobalt. Serum cobalt levels were not
measured. In 1988 Everson et al' described a
14-year-old girl who ingested about 96 mg cobalt
from a chemistry set. A blood sample, 12 h after
ingestion, contained 1320 nmol/I cobalt and
chelation therapy was started; at 22 h her blood
cobalt level was 119 nmol/l.

Beer drinkers' cobalt cardiomyopathy was first
noted in Quebec,[3] where 48 cases with
20 deaths were recognised. Further cases
were reported from the United States
and Belgium. Cobaltous sulphate had been
added to the beer as a defoaming agent,
and this was thought to have been mainly
responsible for the acute myocardial damage,
" though nutritional factors may contribute by
increasing sensitivity to cobalt toxicity. [5]

Crystal-growing sets are potentially hazardous.
This boy's toy also contained copper sulphate,
and half a teaspoon of that would have been fatal.
During preparation of this report one of us
(H. T. D.) was involved in monitoring four
schoolboys who ingested small amounts of
copper sulphate from a chemistry set. Clearly
urgent action is needed to control the use of
these sets. Everson et al [2] investigated
three chemistry sets, containing a total of
51 chemicals. Of 38 chemicals evaluated
66% were present in amounts that would
be toxic (53%) or lethal (13%) to a
2-year-old child. Only one set had child-proof
containers but for 65% of potentially toxic
and all the potentially lethal chemicals first-aid
instructions were provided.


E. S. MUCKLOW
S. J. GRIFFIN
Paediatric Department,
St Mary's Hospital,
Newport Isle of Wight P030 5TG UK

H. TREVOR DFLVES
B. SuatAK

Trace Element Unit
Department of Clinical Biochemistry
Southampton General Hospital


1. Jacobzmer H, Raybin HW. Poison control: accidental cobalt poisoning. Arch
Pediatrics 1961; 7114- 200-05.
2. Everson GW, Norman SA, Casey JP. Chemistry set chemicals: an evalulation of their
potential. Vet Hum Toxicol 1988 30:589-92
3. Morin YL, Foley AR, Martineau G, Rossel J. Quebec beer drinkers' cardiomyopathy:
forty-eight cases Can Med Assoc 1967; 97:881-43.
4. Morin Y, Daniel P. Quebec beer drinkers' cardiomyopathy. etiological considerations.
Can Med Assoc 1967; 97.926-28.
5. Alexander CS. Cobalt-beer cardiomyophy: a clinical and pathological study of twenty
eight cases. Am J Med 1972,53:395-417.

LanthanumK - 11-6-2011 at 11:25

That is a lot of crystals for such a small boy to ingest and although he got severe poisoning, they were able to take care of it easily. Copper sulfate has a higher LD50 (300 mg/kg) than cobalt chloride, so why would it be more toxic?

It is better to teach children that they should not consume chemicals than to phase them out.

Mailinmypocket - 12-6-2011 at 07:24

If the mother had suspicions that the kid may have added something extra to the drink she told him to make, and knew he had crystal growing kits... It might not have been a good idea to tell him to drink it himself. I'm also pretty sure that the kit in question says to be used under adult supervision. Accidents happen yes, but this could have been avoided!