There is only one catch to the scenario you present.
O. + 2 H(+) + Cu + 4 Cl(-) --> H2O + CuCl4(2-)
In order for the gibbs free energy of the above reaction to be negative, the dissolved oxygen concentration must be well above the saturation limit of
oxygen in water. Further, the following reaction has a much more negative free energy than that of the above reaction, meaning that it will take place
preferentially.
O. + 2H(+) + Cu --> H2O +Cu(2+).
I've attached the Pourbaix diagram for the Cu - H2O - Cl system for your reference. Note that CuCl4(2-) is not present as a stable specie. (Reference:
D. Tromans & R. Sun, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Vol. 138, pg. 3235 (1991)). Note that the area notated by the "*" in the diagram
represents the area of stability for CuCl2-3Cu(OH)2. |