By definition, if you need to provide something beyond nothing then it is only to your detriment. The question is how much is that cost going to be.
It used to be that Jewish people needed to register before Concentration Camps were set up. And then the murdering started and there was no where to
run. It won't be as severe as this but what do you think the police will do, if there is a terrorist attack using nitrated organics and they had a
list of all the people buying HNO3/H2SO4?
Is possession of HNO3 without a license illegal in these countries (Sweden, Spain, UK, etc.?) Or is just purchase without a license? If you made HNO3
on your own like through the Birkeland-Eyde Process is it illegal?
Politicians want to be seen to do something when terror attacks happen. It doesn't matter whether the reality is that what they do is
ineffective in preventing most future attacks.
It is like jails too. Politicians want to be seen to be tough on crime so they throw people for small things into prisons run by for-profit companies,
so incarceration rates go up. The USA has the highest incarceration rate in the world 655/100k people.
The benefits of home experimentation is not so easy to quantify because their benefits are personal satisfaction (which society cares f- all about),
possible synergies with work and new innovations/discoveries (<- society can't miss what you don't know they don't have)
As for kids doing stupid things, well why should my freedoms be curtailed because of someone else's stupidity? Maybe the reason why there are so many
idiots around these days is because we keep on interfering with Darwinism.
[Edited on 1-8-2020 by Whathappensif] |