Quote: Originally posted by KonkreteRocketry | Can we possibly try to make it ? There are some oxygen - flourine compounds like HFO and CF3OF and i also saw a report arguing CH3COOF exists, how can
we overcome the problems of flourine's eletronegative problem ? |
You can try, but I'll happily put money on you not succeeding. You see, to make fluorine have more than one bond, you are forcing fluorine to share
its electrons with a less electronegative element. But fluorine doesn't share its electrons- it shares the electrons of other atoms (it's kinda like
a banker that way- it will share your money, but not his own).
When chlorine forms HClO2, the chlorine has two lone pairs and two bonds to oxygen; this means that chlorine either has a formal positive charge (low
electron density), or a double bond to one of the oxygens (depending on which bonding model you are using). Either one is fine, since chlorine has
available d orbitals for the multiple bonding, as well as being less electronegative than oxygen (so it can deal with a positive formal charge).
Fluorine, on the other hand, has neither- it has no d orbitals in valence shells, and it is much more electronegative than oxygen. So HFO2 isn't
going to exist. HFO3 is even less likely. HFO4 is right out.
There are some compounds of oxygen and fluorine- as you mention, CF3OF, HOF, and F2O. All of these have fluorine atoms with only one bond to oxygen.
You will not find an example of a fluorine with two bonds to oxygen. |