I temporarily lost this thread.
Meanwhile, travel demands are currently the worst in my working lifetime. Company grows, US workforce doesn't ==> work more hours every damned
month. I feel like I'm stuck in amber.
I went back and reviewed all the posts for info that I may have missed. There were some fine points, details that need clarification.
Fleaker, I must not have explained myself very well. If I gave the impression that I was going to attempt this in borosilicate, sorry. That is not my
intention. It couldn't work, Quartz is absolutely needed.
Fleaker, you also made several other statements that caught my eye...
1) "Similarly, if he doesn't have ultra high purity red phosphorus, he will also fail."
I noticed that the syntheses used 99.999+ % red P. Since the products were intended for electronic investigations, it wasn't clear if the UHP was used
for this reason or if it was required for a successful reaction. Is your finding that UHP red P is needed for a good synthesis? If so, I'm out of the
game before it even begins. I'm finding it difficult to find any red P, let alone UHP.
2) " It is blinding work with quartz, but aside from the heat, it's more forgiving than borosilicate. "
More forgiving in what way?
3) Reading between the lines, I get the impression that you feel that a very good vacuum level, better than a two-stage mechanical pump can provide,
is a key to success? Am I correct in this feeling? Again, this is a crucial point to me. I won't have anything but a two-stage pump. This is
confusing. It isn't as though we need a vacuum for the vapor transport, because the tubes are actually pressurized.
Other statements that caught my eye...the idea of a refractory metal tube...
This has several hidden implications. How would it be sealed under vacuum? What seal would remain vacuum-tight at the prevailing conditions? How best
to deal with the oxidation of the tube exterior? Mo won't be good at these temperatures in air for days in a row. The gold-free variant at least
addresses the alloying issue.
Ultimately, I believe Fleaker is right about quartz being the best alternative.
Another statement backs up my pre-existing belief that oxyhydrogen is needed. The failure of the two tubes that were sealed with a C-containing fuel
gas in Fleaker's work seems more than coincidental. I read (somewhere) that normal fuel gasses leave surface contaminants and make weaker seals.
The thing that is boggling my mind is the size of the RGBCO and Smart-Element samples. How?? They suggest this was made similarly to the quartz tube
procedure (near atmospheric pressure). But the rest of the world makes this stuff by the gram or smaller. And these guys make samples up to 15 grams??
I will tell you some things you won't find in the literature....
a)My friends at Chapel Hill are interested in the electronic applications.
b) They initially bought black P from Smart-Elements when they were selling 1 g and smaller samples years back.
c) When Smart-Elements started advertising these big 10 and 15 g samples, Chapel hill found the material unsuitable for use. They never set out to
make their own black P, it was done out of necessity.
So, there is SOMETHING different about these larger pieces. But they clearly ARE NOT amorphous black P, they're highly crystalline. So, ??? I just
don't understand....
And finally...I see WHY I lost this thread. It's in "Reagents and Apparatus Acquisition" ??! This thread may peripherally touch on these points, but
isn't this a SYNTHESIS topic? If not, I'm posting in the wrong place. Please consider moving this to a more appropriate spot. If this thread isn't
meant to be about making black P, only about obtaining materials, I could start "The preparation of black phosphorous" as a new topic in the
appropriate spot so that it gets a good volume of creatively useful traffic.
[Edited on 29-12-2016 by Dan Vizine] |