Sciencemadness Discussion Board

Write-up on synthesis of K3CrO8, a very energetic peroxochromate

woelen - 11-3-2008 at 13:12

I again made some K3CrO8, now carefully controlling and writing down the experimental conditions, amounts used, etc. This results in a recipe (ideal for nodrugs cooks :P), which can be followed by other home chemists, in the hope that the compound K3CrO8 becomes more widespread among home chemists. It is a very interesting compound, which keeps well (I already have a sample, 17 years old, and now I have a new sample as well).

http://woelen.homescience.net/science/chem/exps/K3CrO8_synth...


The compound looks like very dark brown crystals:



Its aqueous solution is red/brown. It is very energetic. It detonates (yes! detonation) with powdered red P when heated, and it even explodes on itself, when it is heated in the dry state above a flame.

Edit(woelen): Made links work again.

[Edited on 6-4-15 by woelen]

vulture - 11-3-2008 at 13:24

I'm not such a fan of washing this with organic solvents, especially ethanol, which could be readily oxidized.

Other than that, nice experiment!

woelen - 11-3-2008 at 13:41

The idea of washing with ethanol, and then ether, comes from a book 'Chemische preparaten, derde druk', written by Edel. This is a Dutch book from just after WW II and it contains a procedure for making K3CrO8 (with a procedure more involved than the one I propose in my webpage). The book suggests rinsing with ethanol and optionally with ether.

If Edel does such a suggestion, then one can fairly safely assume that it is OK ;)

Jor - 11-3-2008 at 14:43

I want to make some as well, but I only have sodium dichomate and sodium hydroxide. Does this synthesis also work for the sodium salt? I dont think I want to buy KOH and K2CrO7 just for making one compound. Potassium dichromate is nastier than sodium dichromate as well,a s it more easily forms dust in the air.
I could try making the sodium-salt ofcourse, but I first wanted to ask if you have experience with that, because otherwise it would be quite a waste of dichromate and hydrogen peroxide.

You should also try making the barium-salt (I see on your website you have bariumhydroxide.) Test the interaction of the barium-salt with red phosphorus. Maybe that mix has other properties, and besides I expect the flame produced to be green.

Nerro - 11-3-2008 at 15:15

Are you sure it's not some polymer? Otherwise where does the electron come from?

not_important - 11-3-2008 at 18:07

Quote:
Originally posted by Jor
I want to make some as well, but I only have sodium dichomate and sodium hydroxide. Does this synthesis also work for the sodium salt...


There might be a problem with the sodium salt being too soluble, just as sodium dichromate and permanganate are much more soluble that the potassium salts.

woelen - 11-3-2008 at 23:38

@Jor: I agree with not_important, I am afraid it won't work with the sodium salts. You certainly will get such a very dark brown solution, but I have severe doubts whether a crystalline solid settles at the bottom. And if you have such a solid, then cleaning it may be another difficult issue. The first two rinses with cold water might redissolve a lot of the solid.
But you could give it a try on a smaller scale. Dissolve a big spatula of sodium dichromate and a big spatula full of sodium hydroxide in just a few drops of water. You'll get a very concentrated yellow solution of sodium chromate with excess NaOH. Now you have some volume V of yellow solution. Take a volume approximately equal to 2V of 30% H2O2. Chill both test tubes in a refrigerator and make them as cold as possible. Even better would be a really cold ice-bath, made of pre-frozen salt, crushed ice from the refrigerator at -15 C or so and a bit of pre-chilled ether (or acetone if you don't have ether). The colder you can get the better. With this ice-bath you should be able to go well below -20 C. In this ice bath you stick the test tube with yellow solution (also pre-chilled) and you carefully drop the pre-chilled H2O2 in it. At such a small scale you have one thing working at your advance. The smaller amount results in a much lower heat production to surface area ratio. You more easily can keep the mix ice-cold. It REALLY is important to keep the stuff ice-cold, otherwise all H2O2 will decompose.

@Nerro: This is not some polymer. According to literature, K3CrO8 is a peroxo compound. It has chromium in the +5 oxidation state and four peroxo ligands. So, a better formula would be K3Cr(O2)4. The ion is [Cr(O2)4](3-).
A similar type of anion exists for acidic peroxochromates. At low pH, an anion Cr2O12(2-) can be formed, which is very dark blue. Its structure is [(O2)2OCrOOCrO(O2)2](2-). This is a mixed peroxo/oxo anion, with a bridging peroxo-group between the two Cr's, both Cr's being in oxidation state +6. I did not try to make this yet, this is a project for the (near) future. The acidic variation is less stable though.

Jor - 12-3-2008 at 00:22

Ok, Im gonna try the experiment you just told me soon. I will post results when Im done. Are you going to try make the barium-salt or not? I dont have Ba(OH)2, but it would be an interesting compound just like the potassium-salt and you could compair their ' eigenschappen' (Dutch word, I dont remember the English word, woelen do you know?).

not_important - 12-3-2008 at 00:42

If you perform the experiment with sodium, and don't get crystals, try adding a cold saturated solution of a barium salt - nitrate would be best - and see if that gives a precipitate. I am just guessing, but the alkaline earth chromates are much less soluble than those of the alkalies, so the barium peroxochromate might drop out of solution.

The barium, and silver, peroxochromates appear to exist; there are terse references to them to be found:

Quote:
Silver peroxochromate and sulfuric acid: In attempts to prepare
"perchromic acid," a mixture of silver (or barium) peroxochromate and 50%
sulfuric acid prepared at -80 deg C reacted explosively on slow warming to
about -30 deg C. [Bretherick, L. Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards.
4th ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., 1990 15]


The sodium salt is mentioned in several patents as a peroxide source for etching copper surfaces. It is possible that it could be forced from solution by the slow addition of cold alcohol or acetone; if that worked washing would have to be done with cold alcohol and acetone or ether used to dry the solid. Try it on a very small scale to start with.

woelen - 12-3-2008 at 00:42

eigenschappen = properties
'compair' must be 'compare'

I don't think that experiment with Ba(OH)2 will work. As soon as a barium salt is added to either a chromate, or a dichromate, the highly insoluble BaCrO4 is precipitated. Even in an acidic solution of a dichromate, a precipitate of BaCrO4 is formed. Even the tiny amount of chromate, present in a dichromate solution (by means of equilibrium) is sufficient to precipitate BaCrO4. The solution becomes even more acidic in this way.

Btw, the K3CrO8/P mix does not show a flame. If this mix is ignited, then there hardly is any light output, just an increadibly powerful BANG.

[Edited on 12-3-08 by woelen]

PHILOU Zrealone - 12-3-2008 at 03:07

I'm more than eager to see what happens with (NH4)3CrO8...

(NH4)2Cr2O7 is already famous for its green volcano experiment...

Ammonium peroxochromate might be a high initiating explosive on itself...:cool:
2 (NH4)3CrO8(s) --> 3N2(g) + Cr2O3(s) + 12H2O(g) +1/2 O2(g)

Almost perfect OB :D
Slight oxygen excess, a lot of gases.

woelen - 12-3-2008 at 04:18

Of course I tried this as well, but this compound is not made from ammonia, ammonium dichromate and hydrogen peroxide. If these compounds are mixed, then another complex is formed: Cr(NH3)3(O2)2. This complex contains chromium in the +4 oxidation state and it is said to be quite unstable. Not something you want to have around in gram-quantities.

Just for fun at test tube scale: dissolve some ammonium dichromate in concentrated ammonia solution and add some 10% H2O2. After some time, very small black crystals are formed, which stick to the glass en settle at the bottom. Use pre-chilled reagents. I think that this also works with sodium dichromate or potassium dichromate. The complex is a neutral complex and does not contain any ionic species. It is not an ammonium-salt, but an ammine complex. If you decide to do this experiment, don't make more than 100 mg or so!

I don't know of a way of making (NH4)3CrO8. This compound requires very high pH for its formation, but at such a high pH, ammonium ion hardly exists (virtually all is NH3 at that pH). At lower pH, where ammonium ion is present, the formation of the CrO8(3-) ion is inhibited, and other peroxo compounds are formed (such as the one mentioned above, or even Cr2O12(2-)).

[Edited on 12-3-08 by woelen]

PHILOU Zrealone - 13-3-2008 at 07:29

Another brainstorming thing, the structure of K3CrO8 :)...
and the structure of the free acid that turns spontaneously in CrO5 :) a complete apart world (aparte wereld :))

Does K3CrO8 display a strong alkalinity when dissolved in cold water?

For the (NH4)3CrO8 maybe via methatesis from Ba3(CrO8)2 or a soluble salt from wich the metal could be precipitated by the counter anion joined to the ammonium.
Ba3(CrO8)2 (aq) + 3(NH4)2SO4(aq) --> 3BaSO4(s) + 2(NH4)3CrO8(aq)
It is possible that the sulfate anion would be oxydised to peroxosulfate or peroxodisulfate...

NH2-CO-NH2 could also be tested, there is an adduct of NH2-CO-NH2 and H2O2 that is crystaline NH2-CO-NH2.H2O2 ; urea might dus witdraw the oxydative power of the peroxochromate.

[Edited on 13-3-2008 by PHILOU Zrealone]

Jor - 13-3-2008 at 07:54

EDIT: stupid post

[Edited on 13-3-2008 by Jor]

YT2095 - 13-3-2008 at 08:01

the last time I made this a year or so ago, the yield was quite low, but seeing the Exact instructions now (and still faced with the same problem of only having 9% H2O2) I see that you made the Chromate and Hydroxide soln up to 30ml, if I were to leave it at the 20ml, would that make up for the extra water in the dilute H2O2 that I have?

Logically is seems to be a Sound idea, but in Chem, sometimes Logic is not the case!

woelen - 13-3-2008 at 08:20

With your 9% H2O2 I expect that you will have a reasonably good yield. Try to make a solution in only 15 ml of water and if not all k2Cr2O7 dissolves, then add 1 ml more. Increment in steps of 1 ml and really do your best to dissolve it in as little as possible of water. Then you can add 60 ml of your 9% H2O2. It is a little bit less than 40 ml of 15% H2O2, but if your solution is chilled VERY well and kept this way, then the lower amount of H2O2 does not need to be a problem. My recipe already has a built in 50% excess of hydrogen peroxide. I expect you to get a nice crop of K3CrO8, maybe even 5 grams or better.

YT2095 - 13-3-2008 at 08:37

Excellent thank you :)

I`m actually making some more now, and yes I had to do the watter addition in increments, now I have a very strong soln and just hope it doesn`t decide to form crystals in the fridge as it seems pretty saturated and it`s quite hot from the KOH dissolving.


just out of Curiosity, have you tried an Impact test on this stuff, like a hammer drop?
I only did the RP reaction, and never tried just direct heat, I`m wondering now if it maybe Impact sensitive :o

YT2095 - 14-3-2008 at 04:39

Done:



it`s not as Good a yield as your 5g but I`m quite pleased with it, and the Purity is Very good, I lost quite a bit washing it (used 50ml washes rather than 7ml, and the same amount for the Alc washes too).
it`s worked MUCH better than my prior attempt and I`m very happy with 3.5g as I have no Real use for it, but it makes a great sample size for future ref.

Cheerz Woelen! ;)

woelen - 14-3-2008 at 05:42

Nice that you also have some of this material now. A few nice experiments:
1) Heat a small amount in a test tube, as dry crystals
2) Crunch a small amount (a really small amount, something like at the tip of a small screw driver) and mix this carefully with half the amount of finely powdered red P and ignite. You WILL be impressed!
3) Dissolve some in water, and add a small amount of dilute HCl or H2SO4. Very nice change of color! Extract with ether.
4) Do the same as (2), but replace part of the red P with fine Al-powder, preferrably german dark en throw a small amount of this mix in a strong test tube, filled with Cl2. Again, you WILL be impressed.

With exps (2) and (4), be very careful not to apply friction on the mix. I once burnt one of my fingers with this (you may remember, well over 1 year ago now, I posted that on sciencemadness as well).

Next weekend I will try the hammer test and a friction test.


PS: Why did you use 50 ml washes? Isn't that a waste of chems (esp. the alcohol and ether)? 5 rinses of 10 ml clean better than 1 rinse of 50 ml and in this case, the losses also most likely are somewhat less.

Just some math: Suppose you have a glass, filled with 1 ml of dirty liquid and you rinse this with 10 ml by good mixing and swirling. After rinsing and decanting, 1 ml of liquid is left. This left-over liquid has 1/11 the impurity as the original one. If you do the same rinse again, then the liquid has 1/121 of the impurity left. For 5 rinses, the liquid only has appr. 1/150000 of impurity left. (assuming that no impurity sticks in holes, cracks etc.).
If you take 50 ml in a single rinse, then you dilute 51 times.
So, with 50 ml you can cleanup much better than simply appr. 50 times. That is why I always use small rinses, repeated. Only if a compound is VERY soluble, then you may want to use a single large (and quick) rinse in order to avoid excessive losses.

YT2095 - 15-3-2008 at 05:02

Quite simple I was using a 400ml beaker to do it all in (I don`t have any smaller) and 7ml would have been totaly lost in the bottom of it, so 50ml washes with ice water and done quickly worked nicely.

I just tested for impact sensitivity and I could get it do anything, it was in Thin paper (in case metal had an effect) and then well and truly smashed hard, nothing...

interesting to note though, the Crushed crystals are actually Yellow/Orange in color and not the brown looking as the larger crystals appear.

I lit the paper after to make sure it Hadn`t "gone off" quietly, and got a purplish flash, so I`m satisfied that it`s in no may dangerous with any impact I can provide.
I can`t do a proper friction test (I don`t know how it`s done correctly) but grinding it up on frosted glass with a frosted glass bobby had no effect (also makes a yellow/orange powder).

Additional:
since we Know RP with a good many Oxidisers is never a good idea as it`s too harsh, I tried with Sulpher this time, it doesn`t explode in the way that it does with RP, but closer to a Flash powder, and Potassium benzoate as the reductor isn`t really anything great at all.

Edit 2:
I did the HCl and got a green color with bubbles (I assume O2)
but then I tried GAA, I figured not only is it an Acid, but Also a Fuel (reductor to a degree) and That was VERY nice change, to a beautiful Purple color, the bubble release is Much slower however.

Edit 3: interestingly if you add water to the now purple GAA (ass I did while washing the test tube out), it totally destroys the color towards a gray and then Plenty of bubbles are given off.






[Edited on 15-3-2008 by YT2095]

[Edited on 15-3-2008 by YT2095]

[Edited on 15-3-2008 by YT2095]

These compounds are NASTY!

Taoiseach - 16-3-2008 at 13:29

Well I have made K3CrO8, (NH4)3CrO8 and [Cr(NH3)3(O2)4] as well. I obtained decent yields (>70%) and was rewarded with 3 very intriguing compounds. Yet I DON'T recommend making this stuff! Peroxychromates are about the most evil compounds I have ever made. They are corrosive and cause a stinging paing on the skin, like sodium or hydrogen peroxid. They are EXPLOSIVE! They burn when ignited, even without fuel. They explode when ignited under confinement - again, even without fuel! They are impact and friction sensitive. Plus they have been shown to induce DNA cleavage. Making them requires thorough temperature control and one needs to work very quickly, because these compounds have to be made in aequous solution yet water quickly decomposes them. The synthesis I will describe hereby requires to add ice-cold H2O2 to a pre-chilled chromate solution in an ice-salt bath, while stirring vigorously and monitoring temperature all the time so that you can pause the reaction whenever temperature goes above -5°C. The reaction will release O2 and thus cause considerable bubbling, producing ultra-fine droplets. Knowing that the beaker your looking at produces an invisible aerosole of a substance that has been shown to cut human DNA into pieces doesn't make this synthesis a very enjoyable one. Subsequent cleaning of glassware and anything else that came into contact with the peroxychromate was grueling and produced a huge amount of contaminated water.
So in retrospect, I regret making this nasty stuff. Anyways I want to share my findings. Especially because they are quite different from woelen's. The first time I made K3CrO8 I closely followed woelens instructions, and I obtained black glistering crystals that closely resembled KMnO4. However the "red perchromates" are said to be red or brown, not black. I don't know if woelens compound is just a modification or an entirely different compound. But I found a way to make peroxychromates that look exactly like the chemistry book description!

SYNTHESIS OF K3CrO8 AND (NH4)3CrO8
============================

It is absolutely essential to keep the temperature well below 0°C throughout the whole reaction! In my case I made sure it never climbed above -5°C. It is absolutely NO PROBLEM AT ALL to have a partially frozen solution. The reaction will take place even in a completely frozen solution. I could observe red-brown perchromate crystals growing on the sides of the beaker altough everything was frozen rock-hard. It just takes a long time. I kept the mixture in the refrigator for 24 hours and obtained >70% yield. It was striking that the solution NEVER TURNED BLACK, unlike woelens one. First the solution becomes red-brown and then it darkens a little, but at no point it was black. I found it impossible to keep the temperature at -5°C without an ice-salt bath, so that might be the reason why woelens compound looks so different.

Temperature control is even more important with the ammonium salt! Ammonium tetraperoxychromate easily turns into [Cr(NH3)3(O2)4] ("Weide's compound") if
-temperature is allowed to get close to 0°C
or
-insufficient H2O2 is used
In these cases, some of the O-O ligands are replaced by NH3, forming the yellow-brown "chromium tetroxide triammine", which is also explosive.
Ammonium peroxychromate decomposes considerably faster in aequous solution than the potassium salt. However, the dry compound is actually much more stable!

So here's the recipe:

K3CrO8: Dissolve 10g K2CrO4 and 6g KOH in minimum amount of water. Chill it until most of it is frozen but make sure that nothing crystallizes again! I had to add small amounts of water several times to make sure all stays in solution even when freezing cold. Prepare an ice-salt (ice+NaCl) bath. Also chill 32ml H2O2 (30%) to 0°C.
Put the (mostly frozen) chromate solution into the ice bath and immediately start adding the H2O2 in small portions with vigorous stirring. Never allow the temperature to go above -5°C. I had to pause the additions several times because each addition causes a significant warming. Once all H2O2 is added, leave the solution in the ice bath until it is frozen. Then put it into the refrigator and keep it for 24 hours. Remove from refrigator and let it warm up. As soon as all ice is melted, quickly decant the liquid and wash the red-brown precipate with ice-cold water and cold ethanol. Press dry between filter paper. Let it dry in warm air. Yield: 11g.

(NH4)3CrO8: Disspolve 8g (NH4)2Cr2O7 in 15ml ammonia (25%). Add just enough water to make sure everything dissolves and stays in solution even if the liquid is ice cold. Chill it until most of it is frozen. Also chill 42ml of H2O2 (30%). Follow the instructions above. Yield: 12g.

[Cr(NH3)3(O2)4]: I have not yet developed a good recipe with stochiometric amounts. I simply added H2O2 to an ammoniacal solution of (NH4)2Cr2O7 at room temperature. Upon cooling I obtained a yellow-brown powder. This compound theoretically can also be obtained by dissolving ammonium peroxychromate in a strong NH3-solution and heating it to 60°C. When I tried this the solution started bubbling (O2!) above 50°C, indicating that some of the O-O ligands were displaced by NH3. However nothing precipated upon cooling. It could be that the solution was too dilute, and I was too lazy to put it in the freezer so it was disposed of. The compound is stable in very alkaline solutions. It can be kept under conc. ammonia for weeks without decomposition.

PROPERTIES
=========
K3CrO8: Red-brown powder. Burns violently with a white flame and yellow smoke (chromate vapour) when ignited in the open. It doesnt need fuel to burn! However when mixed with sulfur, it forms a flash-powder like mixture. Even if its lazily mixed and only coarsely ground, it burns instantaneously with a whoosh! sound and a very bright flash. Quite fascinating! I dont know of any other oxidizer that can turn such a lously fuel into a flash-type composition, especially without proper grinding & mixing!
I wrapped some perchromate into several layers of aluminium foil and heated it (no sulfur added!) and it deflagrated violently. It requires quite some confinement to really detonate. Even when mixed with sulfur it doesnt DDT easily - unlike NHN for example. So most of the time I only got violent deflagrations, but one time it did explode from just heating it under confinement.
When struck with a hammer, it explodes. Again, no fuel needs to be added to accomplish this! Hitting it with a pestle in a mortar also causes small explosions, however it requires quite a lot of force to make it go boom. I mixed a small amount with sulfur and hit it with a hammer - and that gave a very very powerful detonation!

(NH4)3CrO8: Brown powder. Definetely brighter than the potassium salt. When mixed with KOH and wetted with warm water, a distinct smell of ammonia is observed. I dont know if this is a definite proof, but it indicates that this really is an ammonium salt and not an ammine!!! When ignited in the open, it burns much like ammonium bichromate. It is fascinating that the ammonium salt decomposes so much more calmly than the potassium salt! It rather smoulders than burns, producing a lot of sparks but without the bright flame that can be observed when K3CrO8 burns.
When hit with a hammer, it detonates with a loud report. Just like the potassium salt, it needs strong confinement to detonate from heat. I wrapped several miligram quantities in aluminium foil and heated it with a bunsen burner. I never got a real detonation, just very violent deflagrations and a dull report from the bursting foil.
HOWEVER I was curious how it would react with a fine metal powder. I only have Fe powder (need to buy some Al real soon!), so I tried that. I mixed some peroxychromate with a small amount of ultrafine Fe powder (no measurements were made), wrapped it into aluminium foil and hit it with a hammer. Boy THAT was impressive! The report was deafening. The aluminium foil completely disappeard. Plus, there were small sprinkles of molten aluminium burnt into the anvil.
I did no precise measurements, but I had the impression that the ammonium salt requires a stronger impact to be initiated than the potassium salt.

[Cr(NH3)3(O2)4]: Yellow-brown powder. Unlike ammonium peroxychromate, it burns instantaneously (like flash powder) when ignited in the open. This might be an easy way to distinguish the two, because they look quite similar! When struck with a hammer, it also explodes.
I only made a very small amount of it, and I did no further experiments yet.

--------

So to recap, these are very very dangerous yet intriguing compounds. The ammonium salt when mixed with Al powder will most certainly give an excellent primary. The Al powder would be able to reduce the Cr2O3 from decomposing perchromate, unlike the Fe I used. And even tough I only used Fe powder, I got an incredibly powerfull explosion.


BE CAREFUL!:o

[Edited on 16-3-2008 by Taoiseach]

[Edited on 16-3-2008 by Taoiseach]

[Edited on 16-3-2008 by Taoiseach]

[Edited on 16-3-2008 by Taoiseach]

Taoiseach - 16-3-2008 at 13:32

Edit: shrunk image slightly (no attachments > 800 pixels wide, please)

[Edited on 3-16-2008 by Polverone]

o.jpg - 19kB

Some photos...

Taoiseach - 16-3-2008 at 13:36

A closer look at (NH4)3CrO8

NH43CrO8.JPG - 7kB

Some photos...

Taoiseach - 16-3-2008 at 13:39

This is the frozen reaction mass after removed from the refrigator for melting. The whole reaction took place at -5°C, and the mixture was only allowed to reach 0°C just before decanting the liquid and washing the crystals with ice-cold water and ethanol.

crystform.JPG - 37kB

Some photos...

Taoiseach - 16-3-2008 at 13:42

A small sample of the potassium salt. It is definetely darker than the ammonium salt and more reddish. However, unlike the compound that is formed by woelens synthesis, it is not black.

Is the black version a different compound or just a modification?

K3CrO8.JPG - 2kB

Jor - 16-3-2008 at 14:55

Very, very nice. You should try the barium-salt as well. not_important gave a good idea on how to prepare it.

woelen - 16-3-2008 at 15:23

I still think that I have K3CrO8, but the crystals are larger. If the material is crushed, then it becomes brown. This also is what YT2095 has noticed already. I have another sample, with smaller crystals and that indeed is somewhat more brown:

The compound, from a previous batch:


The last batch:


I also noticed the difference between my two samples, but on further testing I can only conclude that they are the same compound. Both give a red/brown solution, both give a blue solution on acidification, and both violently explode on heating, giving exactly the same kind of yellow smoke. When mixed with S it behaves like flash, with red P it detonates.

So, I am quite confident that they are the same compound, but either in a different crystal shape, or a different purity. Actually, I have the impression that the black material is more pure. These crystals really are nice and glittering, while the brown material has more dust-like stuff around the crystals. Actually, the crystals are not really black, I already wrote in my first post in this thread that they are very dark brown.

A similar thing I know from anhydrous copper(II) chloride. This stuff always is described as yellow/brown. I once made this, and I obtained dark chocolate brown crystals. On adding them to water they nicely gave a clear green/blue solution and on crushing them, I obtained a yellow/brown powder. So, again I think that the situation here is similar. Large crystals look darker.

The experiment with ammonium peroxochromate looks very interesting. I knew of the ammine complex and never dared making more than a few mg of that, but the ammonium salt of the peroxo chromate ion sound very good. I'll definitely try that one myself.

I do not regret that I made this compound. It actually adds a nice chemical to my set of chemicals. And yes, you have to be careful. I also mentioned it on my web page, you really have to be careful for the spraying droplets of solution. Chromates, and also perchromates are toxic carcinogens. But there are nastier chems.


EDIT: There is one difference between both of my samples and the sample of Taoiseach. My samples explode on heating, even when not confined and not mixed with any other chemical. I never could get it to burn, it explodes, as shown on my website.
YT2095, could you put a tiny(!!) amount in a test tube and heat that above a flame? Does it burn, or does it explode with a POP sound? Don't do this test in open air, use a wide test tube. It still is unconfined in that case, but no K2CrO4-smoke is spread in the air.

This is another page on K3CrO8 I have written some time ago.
http://woelen.scheikunde.net/science/chem/exps/raw_material/...
It also contains a synth method, much like the one, presented here. I have done that synth two times, but one time I had a runaway, even from ice cold material. Hence my new method which uses much more dilute H2O2 (it is based a method from Edel, who uses even more dilute H2O2).

As you see, interesting material! I certainly will go more into it and the contrinution of Taoiseach is appreciated very much :). Good to see that this stuff raises so much interest!



[Edited on 17-3-08 by woelen]

[Edited on 17-3-08 by woelen]

Potassium tetraperoxochromate (V)

UnintentionalChaos - 16-3-2008 at 22:05

Woelen, this is an excellent synthesis of a very interesting compound. I'm at college or I'd perform the experiment. Problems I do see are with your page explaining it though, mostly problems with redox. As you said yourself, it would probably be wiser to write the formula as K3Cr(O2)4

Now I call attention to your reaction formula:
2CrO4(2–) + 7H2O2 + 2OH(1)– → 2CrO8(3–) + 8H2O
You are making 2 equivalents of an anion containing 4 peroxo ligands. Those 8 peroxo groups have to come from somewhere, but you've only added 7 equivalents of H2O2 (The source of peroxo ligands)

The other thing that worries me is the oxidation state of the chromium. In chromate/dichromate, you have hexavalent chromium. In Potassium tetraperoxochromate, the chromium is pentavalent. The only available reductant is H2O2. A quick google search yields quite a few hits on the reduction of Cr(VI) by H2O2, ultimately leading to Cr(III). The low temperatures in the synthesis likely slow the reaction down so the product can crystallize out before being reduced or rather, that further reduction is extremely slow or negligible at the reaction temps. The half reactions are as follows:

Cr (VI) ---> Cr(V) - e-
2OH(1-) + H2O2 ---> O2 + 2H2O +2e-

Either 2 Cr(VI) ions are reduced by each molecule of hydrogen peroxide or this half reaction might (probably) occur:

OH(1-) + H2O2 ---> HO2 +H2O + e-

The hydroperoxide radical could then go on to react with either more Cr(VI) and be oxidized to oxygen gas or probably with more hydrogen peroxide...

DISCLAIMER: I have no formal or even informal knowledge of radical chemistry so forgive any gross errors. I'm just going with what I know about redox chemistry. I have requested some reading material on the reactions of Cr(VI) with H2O2 and will report back once I've read them.

There will always be some bubbling as some H2O2 must eventually be oxidized to oxygen gas in order to reduce the Cr(VI). Your reaction equation also lacks O2 in the products.

Assuming what I just said is correct, you then need to use up another 4 equivalents of H2O2 to get from CrO4(3-) to Cr(O2)4(3-) The lost oxide ligands match up with the hydrogen lost from H2O2 so you get 4 H2O out of the deal.

So overall, if you assume each H2O2 converts 2 Cr(VI)

2CrO4(2-) + 9H2O2 + 2OH(1-) ---> 2Cr(O2)4(3-) + 10H2O +O2

That would be the simplest possible reaction equation. Now, I move on to combustion.

I requested a paper in Wanted references and needed translations (3):
Burning in potassium tetraperoxochromate mixtures
A. I. Lesnikovich, S. V. Levchik and K. K. Kovalenko
Journal Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves Volume 24, Number 4, Pages 458-460, 1988

It can be downloaded from page 18 if anyone is interested.
After the image of the test tube with post explosion products in it, the page reads "After the explosion, the test tube is filled with a yellow smoke, which mostly is K2CrO4, and K2O." According to the above paper and my own redox calculations, it should be potassium superoxide (KO2), not potassium oxide (K2O). Half reactions are as follows.

Cr(V) ---> Cr(VI) + e-
O2(2-) ---> 2O(2-) - 2e-
O2(2-) ---> O2(1-) + e-
O2(2-) ---> O2 + 2e-

If the products contain CrO4(2-) the first half reaction has occured once and the second twice. We are left needing 3 more electrons on the right to balance, and have used up 2 of 4 peroxo ligands per chromium and 2 of 3 potassium cations have gone to the chromate. Thus, the third and fourth half reactions must occur once each, giving the 3 needed electrons and keeping the charge neutral by using up the remaining potassium cation. Granted, it is possible that the KO2 has decomposed in whole or part due to the heat generated by the explosion. Have you tried adding water to the products, converting any superoxide to hydrogen peroxide which then will reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III)?

Taoiseach may have quite a point when he voices how dangerous these compounds are.

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=156738...

This research as well as quite a few papers that I don't have access to seem to suggest that the reason hexavalent chromium is carcinogenic is that is is reduced to pentavalent chromium in the body, which is what does the real damage. You are possibly holding a jar of pre-prepped carcinogen which would make inhalation an extreme hazard. Of course the peroxo ligands would be freed in an acid environment, converting it to Cr(III) rapidly. I am unsure if I would call it more dangerous than hexavalent chromium, but I'd advise treating it with a great deal of respect like all other chemicals.

One last observation. The frozen reaction mix of Taoiseach probably results in extremely small crystals due to intrusion of the ice crystals, whereas Woelen's liquid reaction mix allows large crystals to grow and appear a different color, sort of like how copper acetate hydrate looks almost black as bulk crystals but is bright blue green when ground. Is it possible that Woelen's crystals explode when heated simply due to their size? The decomposition products include a gas...could the crystal size be essentially self-confining?

Anyway, excellent topic Woelen, excellent prep, and excellent site.

[Edited on 3-17-08 by UnintentionalChaos]

UnintentionalChaos, very good and deep correction!

woelen - 17-3-2008 at 00:36

UnintentionalChaos, you are absolutely right

I have regarded the bubbling of oxygen throughout the reaction simply as a side reaction of decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. During the entire reaction, bubbling continued and I simply was thinking it was decomposition of hydrogen peroxide, nothing more. Stupid me .
I already was wondering why this happended, even at -15 C in the refirigerator.

I certainly will change this in my webpage. The nasty thing about peroxide reactions is that stoichiometry of these reactions cannot simply uniquely be determined by balancing elements and charges, left and right. A similar problem occurs when one is writing down the equations for reduction of permanganate by hydrogen peroxide.

This indeed is the correct equation: 2CrO4(2-) + 9H2O2 + 2OH(-) ---> 2[Cr(O2)4](3-) + 10H2O +O2

The nasty thing of this equation is that it is the addition of the following:

2CrO4(2-) + 7H2O2 + 2OH(-) ---> 2[Cr(O2)4](3-) + 8H2O
2H2O2 --> 2H2O + O2

The latter is simple decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. And that is where I made a mistake.

The problem can be resolved by assuming preservation of ligands for part of the H2O2:

H2L, L = [OO], L is preserved and we write CrL4(3-) for the peroxochromate ion and H2L for the part of the hydrogen peroxide which goes into ligand transfer.

The other assumption needed is pure reduction and no decomposition of H2O2. Another preservation of groups needs to be introduced:

H2Ox, Ox = [O2], Ox is preserved in reduction of hydrogen peroxide: H2Ox --> 2H(+) + Ox + 2e. We write H2Ox for the part of hydrogen peroxide, which is reduced.

Now we have to solve the equation

CrO4(2-) + H2L + H2Ox + OH(-) --> CrL4(3-) + H2O + Ox

Now, using preservation of L and Ox, the equation can be uniquely determined and this is exactly your equation:

2CrO4(2-) + 8H2L + H2Ox + 2OH(-) --> CrL4(3-) + Ox + 10H2O

So, the trick is group preservation of L and Ox.


UnintentionalChaos, thanks for your deep correction. Without this it would have remained erroneous forever! Tonight I'll change this and I'll also change some other webpages, which deal with the K3CrO8 compound.




[Edited on 17-3-08 by woelen]

woelen - 17-3-2008 at 01:07

The other remark, made by UnintentionalChaos about the reaction products of the explosion of K3CrO8 also most likely is correct. I write on this webpage http://woelen.homescience.net/science/chem/exps/raw_material... , that bubbles of oxygen are produced, when the smoke is mixed with water. This can nicely be explained when one assumes production of superoxide (or peroxide) of potassium in the explosion. Only a small amount of oxygen is produced, but it was clearly visible. I'll also change that bit of text.

Edit(woelen): Made link work again.

[Edited on 30-7-16 by woelen]

YT2095 - 17-3-2008 at 02:17

Quote:
Originally posted by woelen

YT2095, could you put a tiny(!!) amount in a test tube and heat that above a flame? Does it burn, or does it explode with a POP sound? Don't do this test in open air, use a wide test tube. It



I get a sharp Pop and the same yellow "gas" condensate, it will even do that in the open when a small amount is put onto a hotplate, and if Sprinkles you get a series or tiny crackle like pops.

I must admit though, when I was making mine I didn`t get much in the way of bubbles or foam or Anything in the beaker that was in the fridge, there was some small activity the next morning when I took it out, I found the reaction to be quite well behaved.

woelen - 17-3-2008 at 04:35

@YT2095: Thanks for your trial. Good to read that you also have the sharp pop and explosion. As UnintentionalChaos mentioned, it must have to do with crystal size. I'll try crushing some of the crystals and heating that in a test tube. The larger size of the particles most likely both explains the darker color of our product, compared to Taoiseach' product, and the fact that he gets a fire, while ours explodes.

Quote:
I must admit though, when I was making mine I didn`t get much in the way of bubbles or foam or Anything in the beaker that was in the fridge, there was some small activity the next morning when I took it out, I found the reaction to be quite well behaved.
The reaction also was quite well behaved for me, but it sure did bubble. I had many tiny bubbles during the entire period that the reaction was running. So, for anybody doing the reaction, PLEASE COVER UP THE BEAKER by filter paper, a piece of glass or use a loosely capped bottle. I used filter paper, and the paper was brown at the entire circle, where it covered the beaker.
Twenty years ago, I did the same reaction, but at that time I simply dumped 40ml of 30% H2O2 in the mix. A dark red/brown fountain of hot foam was spewn out of the beaker, almost 1 meter high :o and there was a lot of steam. Wooo that was frightening. Hence my modification to use dilute H2O2.

YT2095 - 17-3-2008 at 04:45

the bit I don`t understand is that he said it`s Impact sensitive, and yet despite Several attempts on my part it failed to do Anything at all?

my tests consisted of ~1mg of crystals in very thin paper, then placed on a Very heavy MOT, then a 6 inch nail placed over the paper packet and then the pointy end of the nail struck repeatedly with a hammer.

I even tested the now VERY flat packet after and it burned up quickly with a purpleish flame, just to make 100% sure it Didn`t "Go off" silently.

also, Try that GAA experiment, it`s quite strange, a great Purple color and very little in way of Fizzing, but Rapidly decomposes when you add water to it.

woelen - 17-3-2008 at 05:01

The impact test requires Al-foil instead of paper. Paper is fairly soft and dampens the impact strength quite a lot. I'll use a metal block on a concrete tile. I put 50 mg of material in Al-foil on the metal block and then hit it with a heavy flat metal hammer.

Tonight I'll try the GAA experiment. I sounds like some complex is formed. On addition of water, chromium(III) is formed and this certainly forms a complex with acetate. Grey color actually is quite common for chromium(III) and I have encountered that before in other reactions, e.g. reduction of a solution of K2CrO7 in dilute HCl with ethanol or methanol. Also try reduction of potassium dichromate with a warm solution of oxalic acid. That also gives a deep purple color. Chromium is known for formation of many complexes, especially the metal in the +3 oxidation state, and to a lesser extent the metal in the +6 oxidation state.

YT2095 - 17-3-2008 at 05:12

the reason I didn`t use Alu is that a "thermit" type reaction could take place doing that.
and that could give a false reading of sensitivity.

the paper I used was the VERY thin cigarette rolling papers (Rizla Silver pack).

edit: I think the bad burn you had on your finger some time back is testamony to it`s reactivity with alu :P

[Edited on 17-3-2008 by YT2095]

Again a few hours in the lab

woelen - 17-3-2008 at 12:41

I have tried to repeat some of the results of Taoiseach. First, I made some Cr(NH3)3(O2)2 (it is not Cr(NH3)3(O2)4, but Cr(NH3)3(O2)2). This worked well at the test tube scale. A webpage on this will follow in due time, but in short, I did the following:
- take a spatula full of ammonium chromate (250 mg or so)
- dissolve in as little as possible of ammonia (20 .. 25%)
- chill to a temperature between 5 and 10 C.
- take 3 ml of 30% H2O2 and chill between 5 and 10 C
- add the hydrogen peroxide in small amounts, assuring that the liquid does not warm up, by swirling the test tube in cold water.
- when all hydrogen peroxide is added, let stand in cold water of appr. 10 C.

After half an hour, quite some red/brown solid was obtained. This is washed once with some distilled water, twice with ethanol and twice with diethyl ether.
No effort was made to get a good yield, only goal was around 100 mg of material and that succeeded. Final yield was approximately 150 mg of a very fine crystalline powder. Pictures and webpage will follow.

This material is close to what Taoiseach describes. It is very easily ignited and burns very fast, almost like flash powder. No reductor or other chemicals added, just the dry compound.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also tried finely crushing the K3CrO8 and igniting that. I did not succeed in getting it to burn. Moderately crushed powder, fine powder, very fine powder, it always explodes when heated, even when in the open.
Finally, I tried mixing with 25% K2CrO4 and making a fine powder of this mix. And yes, that burns! It burns fast, giving a purplish/white flame. The mix with K2CrO4 still is very energetic, exploding with red P and flashing with sulphur.

I have the impression that the material of Taoiseach is a mix of K3CrO8 and K2CrO4. This also may attribute to the lighter color he reports. But, when the black crystals are crushed, it also becomes much lighter.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also tried the (NH4)3CrO8. I have severe doubts after several tests. My material does not differ that much from my Cr(NH3)3(O2)2. I noticed that ammonium chromate is not really soluble very well in ammonia 25%. My spatula full of solid (appr. 250 mg) did not even dissolve in 4 ml of ammonia. I have the strong impression that at lower temperature no (NH4)3CrO8 is formed, but that a mix of ammonium chromate and the triammine diperoxo complex is separated from the liquid. My material is quite tame, and this corresponds to the properties of ammonium chromate. Ammonium chromate is more tame than ammonium dichromate, but a mix of ammonium chromate and the triammine diperoxo complex of course is more energetic again.
So, I think that the lower the temperature, the more ammonium chromate in the mix and the less energetic the compound. This also perfectly well explains the smell of ammonia when NaOH or KOH is added.


-------------------------

Summarizing:
1) The triammine peroxo complex can be reproduced.
2) The lighter K3CrO8 could well be a mix of pure K3CrO8 and K2CrO4
3) I don't believe that (NH4)3CrO8 is made. I think I and Taoiseach obtained a mix of Cr(NH3)3(O2)2 and (NH4)2CrO4.


-----------------------------------

I did not yet do a hammer test. The weather is rainy and windy, not the type of weather, suitable for working with energetic materials outside.

-------------------------------------

@UnintentionalChaos: The webpage is modified, and your comments are used for improving the page.

[Edited on 17-3-08 by woelen]

len1 - 18-3-2008 at 15:31

I was reading yesterday several studies. A study of 322 workers at a chromium plating plant reveal a 24% death rate from cancer, with 65% being lung cancer. This is a huge statistical variation from the mean, which I think proves beyond doubt that Cr6+ is carcinogenic. This is not a study, such as done to prove the carcinogenicity of benzene, at huge doses and with cancer prone mice. This is much more real.

So I wonder what effects burning Cr6+ compounds are likely to have on your health. Even working with dichromates you are likely to inhale some particles of dust.

I did this reading preliminary to doing some chrome plating, after I noticed that even opening a container of CrO3 you could detect a definite acidic smell. I have put the plating idea aside now.

I guess the school days demonstration of an ammonium dichromate volcano was really an exercise in cancer innoculation. And I remember many dichrromate oxidations we did at high school as well. I wonder if anyone can sue the school?

[Edited on 19-3-2008 by len1]

chemoleo - 18-3-2008 at 18:15

Come on these are workers do their job at least 8 hours every day, being exposed to Cr6+ aerosols, dusts and so on, for probably dozens of years! This is no way comparable to a single or quadruple exposure to Cr6+ from school experiments, nor the occasional exposure of Cr6+ in home experiments. Did you look up, by the way, the normal death rate of cancer in un-contaminated individuals?
Please check this http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/mortality/age/?...
Quote:
In 2005 cancer was responsible for more than one in three (37%) deaths in people aged under 65 years in the UK. In females under the age of 65 cancer causes 47% of deaths, while in males it is only 31%.

In people under the age of 75 years, deaths from cancer outnumber deaths from diseases of the circulatory system a, including heart disease and stroke, and the respiratory systemb combined.


So in the UK, people exposed to the normal environment die at 37% (1/3rd) from cancer, whilst only 24% of [Cr6+] -exposed die from cancer?
Does this mean Cr6+ is an anti-cancer drug, saving an estimated 13 % of potential cancer patients? ;)

Let's not get too excited about Cr6+!

Also let's not forget the benzene we happily fuel every few days, straight into our cars! Noone bats an eyelid there!

<back on topic>

len1 - 18-3-2008 at 18:53

I realised I should have clarified after I posted - its not the 24% figure thats outstanding - its the 65% incidence of lung cancer thats well beyond statistical doubt.

In comparing the 24% cancer rate with the 37% overall death rate from cancer for age<75 we are not comparing like with like, because only something like 50% of the sample had died.

About benzene, I agree, I indeed stated the data for chromium is a lot more compulsive. Benzene is about 2% of petrol - it would cost a lot to remove this residual due to the chemistry of cracking, benzene is just a very stable molecule so it has a propensity to be formed. Be that as it may, its in the lighter boiling fraction - so you get a good doze of it at the bauzer. Yet its sale in pure form is highly restricted due to our legislators 'care' for our health. So its OK to care while it costs them nothing, but the 'care' stops where the money begins. Typical human nature.

See the Carcinogenic effects section

Read section 4.2.1


The reassurance that all these chromium plater deaths are due to people working years in obnoxious conditions is good, however we dont know this for certain. Its possible they didnt even know they were breathing CrO3 dust. If you look at the CrO3 data measured at the works its of the order of 50ug/m3 which is very small.

[Edited on 19-3-2008 by len1]

woelen - 19-3-2008 at 02:33

I have to agree with chemoleo. Even if the CrO3 concentration in such a work place is low, if you are working with the stuff in large quantities every day, year after year, then you WILL get contaminated, no matter how much you do your best to stay clean.

In my experiments with the chromate and peroxochromate, I tried to be as careful as possible (such as using tissue paper over beakers with the bubbling solution, and only burning/exploding small quantities of the stuff inside test tubes). Of course, I might have inhaled a few ug of dust-like hexavalent chromium, but even if this has a similar impact on health as smoking a few cigarettes (which I doubt, given the very small amounts), I still do not worry. This is only a single set of experiments with a few hours of labwork with hexavalent chromium and now it might be that I don't touch the dichromates for weeks anymore. I may be exposed to them for a few hours per year, the workers in the plating factories have a similar exposure every day!

len1 - 19-3-2008 at 04:40

Thanks for the reassurance Woelen. I guess I can rest easy about smelling that CrO3 for a second, if youre prepared to work with the stuff for a few days. Still chemistry for me is something to make life worth while not to end it early. So its no chromium plating, and if I do any oxidations it will be in a fume hood with a gas mask (for you still have to open the hood when pouring the stuff). I suggest people burning Cr6+ wear gas masks. The reasoning is simple - all cancers are the posterity of one initial cancer cell. It only takes one ruined DNA molecule to make a rogue cell. And you dont require a carcinogen day after day to make a rogue molecule - it takes one chance event. One piece of bad luck amongst the billions of cell your body contains. Cr6+ gives you lung cancer. The 5yr survival rate for that is 5% (eg see chemoleo's link). Its a death sentence, one that generally takes 3-6 mnths to pass. You constantly sweat and feel like youre suffocating. Some argue there is no safe limit for a strong carcinogen (multi-ring anthracenes, b-naphthalamine are such). Its not a case of you need such-and-such a dose of carcinogen before you can get cancer. One small exposure can do it. Continual exposure just ups the probability.

[Edited on 19-3-2008 by len1]

woelen - 19-3-2008 at 05:30

Indeed, one small exposure can do it. But isn't that true for all things. It remains a matter of probability. If I increase the chance of getting cancer within the next 1 year from 0.01 to 0.01001, then I do not really care. E.g. I am strongly against smoking cigarettes. Each cigarette may increase the chance by 0.00001 or so. But if you smoke 5 cigarettes each day, then the chance increases to considerable levels after some years of smoking. But with New Years eve I usually smoke a few cigarettes in order to be able to light fireworks more easily. These few cigarettes increase the chance and I could indeed have the bad luck that one of these triggers a starting cancer. But if you reason like that, then you hardly can live anymore. Everything around us increases cancer risks, even the oxygen we breathe by means of radical formation. I look at these things in a relative fashion. If a certain one-time behavior increases risk by 0.000...% then I don't care, as long as it remains one-time behavior. And this peroxochromate experiment for me is such a one-time thing. Fun to play with for a few hours (spread over a few days) and then we move on to something else. Most of the time I am not in my lab, and then most of the times, when I am in my lab, I am not working with carcinogens.

len1 - 19-3-2008 at 05:50

Yes I agree with all that. The big problem is that it depends on the numbers being what you say. Even a 1:1000 increase in that chance event, i.e. going from 0.01 to 0.011 a 10% increase for instance is not acceptable for me. Especially as its entirely avoided with a gas mask. A gas mask adds some certainty to the picture that what Im doing is not harming me - and that adds to the enjoyment. After all the idea is to have a good time right?

As regards everything having some carcigenicity - I think its a spectrum. Some things (vitamin C E) contribute negatively to the total probability of cancer, some things (salt) have almost no effect, others (b-naphthelamine, benzylidene) have a huge positive contribution. Of what we know for chromium is thst Cr6+ per day has a much greater positive contribution to cancer than the average number of cigaretes smoked per day by those plating workers.

[Edited on 19-3-2008 by len1]

Fleaker - 19-3-2008 at 11:22

While len has valid concerns, I am with Woelen and Chemoleo: small time exposures really don't add up worth a hill of beans. If one chance event to cause a mutation is all that's needed, then why ever go outside into the sun, or drink chlorinated water or eat fried fish and chips? Also I wonder about some individuals' genetic susceptibility to cancer: I've known people that smoked 60 cigarettes per diem for 50 years and didn't die from cancer, or heart disease or an old (87) organic chemist who used to wash his hands with benzene and chlorinated hydrocarbons back in the 1950s. With risk factors like that, you'd think they would be getting cancer, no?

I don't think a mild, one time exposure will have much effect, especially with Cr(VI), a comparatively mild carcinogen. At least so I'd like to believe: I've used CrO3 on many occasions, and I've been working with dimethyl sulfate for the past couple weeks and I can tell you all what it smells like :-/

I think I need a cigarette now :p

[Edited on 19-3-2008 by Fleaker]

Peroxochromates

Taoiseach - 21-3-2008 at 07:27

I'm still quite positive I do have the right stuff, simply because I have found a lot of references in literature which describe peroxychromates as red-brown, yet not a single one describes them as black.

Nevertheless woelens hypothesis of a chromate-peroxychromate double salt sounds very plausible. I will test my compounds with BaCl2. I figure the hypothetical double salt would dissociate into CrO8(3-) and CrO4(2-) in aequous solution, the latter would precipate as light yellow insoluble barium chromate on addition of Ba(2+).

I'm very curious about the outcome because it could as well be the other way around! It is not unusual that mixed-valency compounds look black, so woelens stuff might actually contain Cr(V) and Cr(VI). Possibly due to decomposition of the peroxychromate at temperatures close to 0°C, according to the reaction

2[Cr(O2)4] (3-) + H2O ===> 2CrO4(2-) + 2OH(-) + 3,5O2

The difference between woelens and my synthesis is that I used much lower temperatures and (I think) less alkaline solutions.

There's a very interesting paper "EPR Spectroscopic Studies on the Formation of Chromium(V) Peroxo Complexes in the Reaction of Chromium(VI) with Hydrogen Peroxide" which proves that there at least 2 more species are formed upon the addition of H2O2 to alkaline chromate solutions:

[Cr(O)(O2)2(OH2)] (-)
[Cr(O2)3(OH)] (2-)

The formation of [Cr(O2)4] (3-) is favored by excess of H2O2. It is actually proven to be formed over a wide range of pH if excess H2O2 is present.

So could it be that woelens and my compounds differ by the number of peroxo-ligands, because they get partially replaced by oxo- and hydroxo-ligands depending on temperature & pH?

Anyways we can already conclude from that paper that a strong excess of H2O2 is more important than high pH. A final writeup on the synthesis should pay attention to that. I would rather use a huge excess of H2O2 and hamper decomposition of peroxychromate by very low temperatures rather than highly alkaline solution.

Btw I have found a much better photo from my perchromate synthesis which shows the half-frozen mass just after the H2O2 has been added. You can see the thermo isulation box (I made from styrofoam pieces) which was filled with 3 parts ice + 1 part table salt. This made sure the whole mix never completely melted and temperature was well below 0°C all the time. Of course this could have been just the wrong decision and cause chromate to be included in the crystal lattice... we will see!

synthpic1.JPG - 42kB

Peroxychromate impact test

Taoiseach - 21-3-2008 at 07:39

A word about the impact test: It is actually not trivial to hit a sample of a very mobile powder with a hammer such that the bottom of the head smacks flat against the anvil. If it does not hit flat, most of the energy will be directed to a single spot and dissipate. I remeber I hit my sample of peroxychromate very hard with a medium-sized hammer and it did not react at all! It took me some time to realize that with such high momentum it was almost impossible to let the hammer hit flat against the anvil. I finally succeded in blowing it up by wrapping the sample into aluminium foil and hitting it with much less force, making sure the hammer hits flat and drives all the energy into the sample.

diperoxotriamminechromium(IV)

Taoiseach - 21-3-2008 at 07:44

woelen was right about diperoxotriamminechromium(IV); its forumla is [Cr(NH3)3(O2)2] and not [Cr(NH3)3(O2)4].

There is a synthesis for this compound in Brauer's Handbook of Preparative Inorganic Chemistry, vol 3.:

Cool a mixture of 25 ml 10% ammonia and 5ml 50% solution of CrO3 to 0°C, then add 5ml 30% H2O2. Let is stand in an ice bath for 1h. Then warm to 50°C until almost all has redissolved and the vigorous bubbling has ceased. Filter to remove precipated (NH4)2Cr2O7 and cool the clear liquid to 0°C. Yield: 0,3g.

(Can anyone compute the right amount of ammonium chromate from these details? I have no clue how much CrO3 there is in 5ml of a 50% solution)

Properties: Light-brown needles, soluble in dilute ammonia, slightly soluble in water under decomposition, insoluble in other solvents. Explodes on heating.

I start to believe that my putative [Cr(NH3)3(O2)2] is actually not a pure compound but a mixture of perchromate and the ammine complex. It does contain light-brown needles, but also some other stuff more dark in color. I did not warm the solution to 50°C when I made it, so that might be the reason not all perchromate was converted.

To add to the confusion, there's a paper "Some Decomposition Reactions of diperoxotriamminechromium(IV)" by R.G. HUGHES, E.A.V. EBSWORTH and C.S.GARNER. It describes the compound as lustrous black needles. I once obtained such black needles from K2Cr2O7 and H2O2 in ammoniacal solution at room temperature. However, when I tried the experiment again, I obtaind a mixture of black needles and fine red crystals. It might have been a change in temperature and/or concentration of ammonia which caused the different outcome. The red stuff is said to decompose in ammonia water in the K. A. Hofmann und H. Hiendlmaier paper. In their diperoxotriamminechromium(IV) syntheses, they always produce a mixture of peroxychromate and the ammine complex, and then wash away the peroxychromate with ammonia water at room temperature. At least, this is consistent with Brauer's synthesis.

The original paper on peroxychromates by K. A. Hofmann und H. Hiendlmaier says that the reaction depends on both temperature and concentration of NH3 and either yields ammonium perchromate or the triammine complex. However, that paper dates back to 1905. There is another statement from ERNSTH . RIESENFELD, WILLIAAM. KUTSCH and HERMAN OHL which is of great interest: "Contrary to Hofmann and Hiendlmaier’s statement (Abstr., 1905,ii, 716), the action of hydrogen peroxide on ammonium chromate, whether
containing 2.5 per cent. of free ammonia or saturated with ammonia,leads to the formation of ammonium perchroinnte, (NH,),CrOs, unless insufficient peroxide is used or the temperature is allowed to rise above 0°C, when a mixture of ammonium perchromate and Weide’s triaminine chromium tetroxide. Cr04 3NH3 (Abstr., 1898, ii, as), or the latter alone, is obtained. When treated with 10 per cent. ammonia, ammonium perchromate changes immediately at 40°, but
only slowly at the laboratory temperature, into Weide’s compound, which separates in needles and rectangular and rhombic plates. The three forms have the sp. gr. 1.964 at 1 5-S0, and when examined crystallographically appear probably to be identical, and do not constitute two isomeric substances as stated by Hofmann and Hiendlmaier (Zoc.
c i t . ) . The action of dilute sulphuric acid on Weide’s cornponnd leads to the formation of chromium sulphate and hydrogen peroxide, but not of chromic acid ; the amount of oxygen evolved varies from 3.54 equivalents with 1 per cent. to 2.24 equivalents with 20 per cent.
acid."


Perfect confusion then... :(

To make things even worse, the R.G. HUGHES, E.A.V. EBSWORTH and C.S.GARNER paper indicates that the ammine-complex forms NH3 upon addition of NaOH and warming, so that might not be a good way to distunguish it from ammonium perchromate. Damn :(

[Edited on 21-3-2008 by Taoiseach]

Taoiseach - 21-3-2008 at 08:08

Btw check this out:

CALCIUM PERCHROMATE. A NEW TYPE OF RED
PERCHROMATE

Its the first google hit that turns up. Full pdf can be downloaded FOR FREE.

It describes that addition of H2O2 to freezing cold chromium hydroxide leads to formation of what they call "red perchromic acid". Addition of calcium chromate or acetate leads to the formation of calcium peroxychromate. I think they are wrong about structural formula and valency tough. The paper is from the early 30s so at that time they might not have fully understand the complex coordinative chemistry behind peroxo-chromium compounds.

Anyways this compound might be useful to prepare other perchromates by double displacement reaction with metal sulfates. Also, barium peroxychromate could be prepared conveniently from this "red perchromic acid" as well.

One might even dream about nickel hydrazine peroxychromate - a compound right out of devil's kitchen ;)

I have papers on Rb and Cs peroxychromates (including synthesis), but they are worthless for practical experiments. The Cs compound explodes upon seperation from the solution and the Rb compound is unstable at room temperature.

[Edited on 21-3-2008 by Taoiseach]

woelen - 23-3-2008 at 07:48

I made a webpage about the triammine peroxo complex of chromium(IV):

http://woelen.homescience.net/science/chem/exps/Cr_ammine_pe...


This compound has properties, close to those, described by Taoiseach. It burns very fast, when heated.

Next project will be the making of the "red perchromic acid". Just making Cr(OH)3, filtering/rinsing and adding H2O2 does not sound very difficult. The element chromium, combined with peroxide, is good for MANY interesting experiments.

Whoever tries to repeat this experiment: be VERY careful, avoid inhaling of fine droplets of the fizzling solution, and do not scale up. I am not sure about the stability, and if it deflagrates, then the damage from 100 mg can be overcome, but the damage of 10 grams may be a disaster!! You are warned.

The picture below shows my K3CrO8 and the Cr(NH3)3(O2)2:




Edit(woelen): Made links work again

[Edited on 6-4-15 by woelen]

woelen - 23-3-2008 at 11:02

I have done some more reading on the subject as well. I have another book, "Inorganic Chemistry, a text-book for advanced students" by Barry, Barnett and Wilson. This book covers the peroxo chromates. It describes the "red peroxochromates" on page 471. These are dark red/brown compounds. According to this book, the potassium salt is a stable salt, which easily is prepared by adding 30% hydrogen peroxide to an alkaline solution of potassium chromate below 0 C. According to this book, the sodium salt and ammonium salt cannot be prepared in a dry state.
The pure potassium salt is stable, but it explodes at 178 C when it is heated. The wet sodium salt and wet ammonium salt have been prepared, the wet sodium salt explodes above 115 C, the wet ammonium salt explodes above 50 C.

Remarkably, this book assigns another structure to the red peroxo chromates as what I have done up to now. The ion is said to be Cr2O16(6-), it is a chromium(VI) compound, and it has the following structure:

(-OO)3Cr(=O)OOCr(=O)(OO-)3

So, there are 7 peroxo groups in this ion, and two oxo groups.

The book also mentions a neutral triammine complex on page 478, which also is described as a chromium(VI) compound, and its structure is Cr(O2)O2(NH3)3. It contains two oxo ligands, one peroxo ligand and three ammine ligands. This is the compound we have made, we, however, regard it as a chromium(IV) compound with two peroxo ligands.

Another peroxo chromate is mentioned, also a chromium(VI) compound, and this can be made by adding ice cold hydrogen peroxide to a solution of potassium dichromate, without any acid or alkali added. Crystals of a dark blue compound K2Cr2O12 are formed. This is something I'll try next week at a test tube scale.

The descriptions of the physical properties and methods of preparation (or impossibility thereof) are very valuable. The structures, given in this book, however, must be taken with a grain of salt. This is a fairly old book from 1960. But again, more confusion is added.

Taoiseach - 24-3-2008 at 02:36

Nice synthesis. I will try that out ASAP.

Check out the attachments woelen! The first one is from 1993 and has a detailed description on all chromium peroxo species.

The second one covers synthesis & structure of ammonium peroxychromate.

Taoiseach - 24-3-2008 at 02:40

Damn its 7Mb and it wont upload.

Here's the second one, at least. I can send you the other one via mail if you like.

Attachment: ammonium peroxychromate.pdf (265kB)
This file has been downloaded 1088 times


UnintentionalChaos - 24-3-2008 at 06:39

Note that on the second page it states that the ammonium peroxochromate can only be kept for more than a year at freezing temperatures. Simply leaving the crystals at room temperature will cause rapid decomposition (into the triamminediperoxochromium (IV) complex?) Although it is an interesting synthesis, the necessity of working and storing the product at low temperatures makes it an impractical one.

Taoiseach - 24-3-2008 at 16:24

There are papers which say that the potassium salt decomposes at room temperature as well - but it obviously doesn't! woelen has kept his sample for many years already.

There is a dissertation "Preparation, Structure and Vibrational Spectroscopy of Tetraperoxo Complexes of CrV+, VV+, NbV+ and TaV+" which gives a detailed synthesis procedure for the ammonium salt. They stored it at -4°C yes. But they did the same with the potassium salt to "prevent possible oxidation to chromate!". Altought we know that this is unnecessary because the salt IS stable at room temperature (given its completely dry, that is). It also says that "All these compounds are very unstable as they decompose very rapidly at room temperature" - but this is not true, at least not for the potassium salt. In fact the only decomposition at room temperature the author actually observed was that of ammonium tetraperoxovanadate, (NH4)3[V(O2)4]. It seems like he was too lazy to investigate decomposition for all other tetraperoxo-compounds and stated that they would be similarly unstable.

He has also recorded x-ray diffraction patterns which show the ammonium and potassium salt to be of the same structure, so it is very unlikely he has mistaken the triammine complex for the ammonium salt. Thus I'm quite sure the ammonium salt DOES exist and it CAN be prepared - altough it is little known in literature.

Btw in "Ignition of Explosives by radiation" ammonium tetraperoxychromate is mentioned as a "red-brown" powder with a detonation temperature of 90°C. :D

Stability might have to do with water of hydration. Hydrated peroxychromates such as Li3[Cr(O2)4]*10H2O, Na3[Cr(O2)4]*14H2O, and Cs3[Cr(O2)4]*3H2O are known. The hydrated potassium salt is said to loose water of crystalliation if it is washed with ethanol or ether (I'm quite sure that acetone also works). The water stored in the crystal lattice might be detrimental to stability if it is lost easily and then accumulates to take some of the compound into solution where it decomposes. That might be the reason why the "wet peroxychromates" are said to be so unstable.

So to summarize:

-A newer dissertation from 2003 proves that the ammonium salt does exist and is isomorph to K3CrO8 (no ammine!)
-It is not yet proven that the ammonium salt is unstable at room temperature. Overanxious handling of other peroxychromates, such as storing K3CrO8 at freezing temperatures altough its not necessary, is commonly found in literature
-Water of crystallization might be a major factor in decomposition. Thorough washing with ethanol/ether seems to be a very good idea!

Taoiseach - 24-3-2008 at 17:04

I have done some calculations on the [Cr(O2)2(NH3)3] synthesis given in Brauer. It uses 3,75g CrO3, 25ml 10% ammonia and 5ml 30% H2O2. There is a striking shortage of H2O2!

Considering that the reaction should go something like

CrO4(2-) + 3H2O2 + 2OH(-) + 3NH3 ---> [Cr(O2)2(NH3)3] + 2H2O + O2 + 2O(2-)

(the 2O(2-) would be protonated to 2H2O in aequous solution)

there should be 11,6ml of H2O2 - twice as much as used in Brauers synthesis!

Now FINALLY something falls into place :cool: This is consistent with the ERNSTH . RIESENFELD statement I cited earlier, stating that the triammine complex is formed only if

1. the temperature is allowed to rise above 0°C
and/or
2. insufficient peroxide is used (!)

otherwise, ammonium perchromate is said to be formed.

Given that the Brauer synthesis settles for such a shitty yield as 0,3g of the triammine complex from 4g of CrO3 and goes through the hassle of filtering out unreacted (NH4)2CrO4, we now have a strong hint that the peroxide shortage is essential for the formation of [Cr(O2)2(NH3)3]!

This might be due to NH3 and O-O competing for ligand places around the Cr(+IV). A shortage of H2O2 likely prevents formation of peroxychromate. Also, temperatures well above 0°C destroy any peroxychromate and leave the triammine complex only, which is said to be stable in strong ammonia water. In one paper they replaced the NH3 by CN by heating the triammine in ammoniacal solution with KCN for 5 hours, so dont't be shy to turn up the heat! ;)

-----

Summary:

-The triammine complex is much more stable at elevated temperatures than CrO8(3-)
-Formation of the triammine complex is favored by shortage of H2O2
-Any peroxychromate can be turned into the triammine by heating with ammonia water to 50°C

If the above is correct, [Cr(NH3)3(O2)2] can be made conveniently from potassium dichromate and H2O2! No need to use fancy ammonium dichromate which is hard to come by. Reaction with potassium dichromate would certainly go though an peroxychromate intermediate which can be restrained/destroyed by shortage of H2O2 and heating. :)

Will try that soon. Btw Diperoxoaquoethylenediaminechromium(IV) also sounds interesting, but is said to change color within a few days at room temperature. It explodes violently when heated.

Pulverulescent - 26-3-2008 at 13:52

Please refrain from posting off-topic crap.

[Edited on 27-3-2008 by vulture]

woelen - 26-3-2008 at 15:12

Taoiseach, thanks for all the info you have given me, over here, and via private communication. I start to see some pattern in this.

Summarizing it all, I have the impression that there are 4 classes of peroxo chromium compounds:
1) The dark red/brown peroxo chromates, based on the [Cr(O2)4](3-) ion with chromium in +5 oxidation state.
2) The neutral diperoxo species, based on a [Cr(O2)2](2+) core, with other ligands added, with chromium in the +6 oxidation state. Most common is the deep blue Cr(O2)2O(OH2) (a.k.a. hydrated CrO5), but at somewhat higher pH there can also be violet [Cr(O2)O(OH)](-). I have seen them both, but could not isolate them.
3) Another neutral peroxo species, based on a Cr(O2)2 core, with other ligands added, with chromium in the +4 oxidation state. An example is Cr(O2)2(NH3)3, but another example is K3[Cr(O2)2(CN)3]. We made the first example. These are red/brown compounds.
4) Blue dichromate-derived peroxo species, based on a Cr2O12(2-) ion. I have not yet seen these. I'll try to make some of this species also. Whether I can isolate or not is a matter of trial (and error?).

In older literature many other weird species are mentioned, but I think you are right, that it is better to neglect pre-1980 information about the peroxo species. Unfortunately, also in newer times, there are quite some people who do not really investigate the compounds and assign properties to them which are not true. I have a 17 year old sample of K3CrO8 and it is still as explosive and energetic as when I made it.

[Edited on 27-3-08 by woelen]

Taoiseach - 27-3-2008 at 03:55

woelen, I have pyridine and could try to isoate the pyridine-Cr(O2)2O abduct. I have not found any information on the properties other that it is explosive. How toxic do you think it is? I have deep respect for organo-metallic compounds because many are exceedingly toxic, especially those with carcinogenic metals.

It should precipate from a ammonium bichromate solution by adding H2O2 and pyridine, according to Hiendelmaier this even works in dilute solution.

Also there is a synthesis you could try to make blue ammonium perchromate quite easily (I have not tried yet): Add 4ccm saturated ammonium bichromate solution to 3ccm of a saturated ammonium nitrate solution. Cool to 0°C. Filtrate, then add 4ccm 30% H2O2 and cool below 0°C. Dark-blue ammonium peroxochromate will precipate. This is from a 1905 paper by Hofmann and Hiendlmaier , they had given it the formula

NH4CrO5+H2O2

but really it probably is NH4[Cr(O2)2O(OH)]*H2O, i.e. the neutral Cr(VI) species you mentioned with one OH- that gives the negative charge.

Formatik - 28-3-2008 at 15:15

Quote:
Originally posted by Taoiseach
woelen, I have pyridine and could try to isoate the pyridine-Cr(O2)2O abduct. I have not found any information on the properties other that it is explosive.


Gmelin's Handbuch (on p. 415, Chrom, Teil C) describes a bit about CrO5.pyridine: in a very dry condition it is stable for weeks, in a somewhat moist condition it decomposes eventually to CrO3 and a brown resin-like substance. Dry heating under already below 100º causes explosive decomposition. And from time to time, it explodes even without heating, also from friction, or on contact with conc. H2SO4 or concd. alkaline solutions.

woelen - 29-3-2008 at 07:39

Taoiseach, I think that the pyridine-CrO5 adduct is not more toxic than the individual compounds, so I consider it as toxic as the most toxic one of CrO5 and pyridine. I'm not sure about pyridine's toxicity (I don't have any of this).

I tried to make the blue peroxochromate, K2Cr2O12. This miserably failed. I had a very nasty and violent runaway. I mixed a saturated solution of K2Cr2O7 (ice cold, from the fridge at -18 C, frozen) and H2O2 30% (also ice cold from the fridge, but still liquid). When the liquids were mixed, then the ice quickly melted and the liquid became very dark blue/purple. Within a few seconds, suddenly the liquid became much warmer and it seemed that at once all H2O2 decomposed. The dark liquid was spewed out of the test tube. Luckily this did not happen inside the freezer, I just had enough time to dump all of it in the sink.

Bad news :(

Taoiseach - 30-3-2008 at 04:33

My ammonium perchromate has decomposed. I had put a little sample of both the potassium and ammonium salt on a sheet of paper and left it in open air. The potassium salt is unchanged and still explosive. The ammonium salt however turned into yellow junk that doesn't explode anymore. I figure that most of it was oxidized to ammonium chromate.

The bulk of my ammonium perchromate was stored in an airtight PET bottle. I noticed that it was pressurized and had large dents. I was very anxious to open it, not knowing how explosive the decomposition product might be or if it would be set off by pressure. So I wore ear protection, safety googles and thick leather gloves, also not directly touching the bottle but rather unscrewing it with a pipe wrench. The gas escaped with a loud hissss sound and luckily, nothing exploded.

The stuff inside the bottle had not changed much visually (it seems a bit lighter in color), but it now burns MUCH faster. Not as instantaneously as the [Cr(NH3)3(O2)2] does, but like black powder. It seems it was partially converted into the triammine. When mixed with fine iron powder, its explosive properties were lame, giving a big yellow flame but only a low report - nothing compared to the incredibly powerful explosion I got from the fresh perchromate.

I destroyed the rest of it because storing a decomposing explosive would be too dangerous.

So to recap: Ammonium perchromate is not stable at room temperature, probably decomposing into chromate and the triammine complex.

S.C. Wack - 30-3-2008 at 08:08

Quote:
Originally posted by woelen
it is better to neglect pre-1980 information about the peroxo species.


http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/JR9620003948

Neglect away. It is easy for me to neglect this, but this is based on not having electronic RSC access.

sparkgap - 1-4-2008 at 00:24

Here's what S.C. Wack was referring to. They seem to have done quite a lot of redox titrations.

If one isn't too scared of toxicity, the thallium(I) salt is purported by the paper to be especially sensitive.

sparky (~_~)

Attachment: peroxchrom.pdf (633kB)
This file has been downloaded 1191 times


I can only say WOW!

woelen - 6-4-2008 at 08:00

I did a hammer test with the K3CrO8 and with a mix of K3CrO8 and sulphur.

Pure K3CrO8 could easily be decomposed, by simply hitting with a hammer. No hard banging was needed. The decomposition was accompanied with formation of some smoke and some noise. Not really impressive, but it was very instructive to see how easily I could get it decomposed, simply by hitting with a hammer. I did the test with some of the solid, wrapped in a small piece of Al-foil.

Next, I did a test with K3CrO8 + S. No measured amounts, just mixing appr. 2 parts of K3CrO8 (coarsely crushed crystals) with 1 parts of flowers of sulphur, amounts estimated by the eye. Again, wrapped in Al-foil and carefully tapped with a hammer, on a concrete tile. The result was really impressive :o, given the small amount used for this experiment. There was a very loud bang, at first hit!

I can confirm the results of Taoiseach, the material is very energetic, and also impact sensitive, more so, than I expected.

Taoiseach - 6-4-2008 at 13:32

Yes woelen it needs little energy to decompose, even without fuel. I got scared when I realized how easily it goes off - I had made way too much of this stuff, in retrospect.

NHCrO8 + Fe was even more impressive. I'm not impressed easily as I've synthesized a bunch of primaries and tested them before. It was incredibly loud and gave a very long-lasting shockwave. Its a pitty this stuff decomposes.

Anyone dare to try hydrazine perchromate? :o:D

Formatik - 10-4-2008 at 16:56

Quote:
Originally posted by Taoiseach Anyone dare to try hydrazine perchromate? :o:D


Fun for the whole family, right? :)

No mention of the hydrazine but here's a rundown of the idea of explosibility of some other peroxychromates (from Gmelin Cr [B] p. 750-2 and Cr [C] 410-8).

trimethylammonium peroxochromate, black solid, when the apparently very pure substance was on a scale to be analyzed until the very small amount exploded with a deafening bang.

tetramethylammonium peroxochromate. [(CH3)4N].CrO5. brown-violet solid, hisses from strong heating giving off O2 and forming a bright yellow powder, which if heated further burns giving off sparks. Alkali hydroxides, acids, BaCl2- or AgNO3- solution decompose it.

piperidinium peroxochromate (C5H12N)CrO5. in direct light black, and partial light violet solid (from cold dark brown oil). Pretty stable when in the cold. Upon heating creates a bright explosion.

anilinium (C6H8N)CrO5. After its preparation, as it is being dried shortly on clay, and then KOH for 4 hours in the desiccator, it is recommended to surround this with ice, since the compound explodes far more violently than the pyridinium compound. The compound decomposes in 1 to 2 days, decomposes by heating and with conc. H2SO4 or alkalies under explosion. With dilute acids or alkali hydroxides releases O2.

chinolium.CrO5. little crystaline plates, not stable for long. Decomposes from heat with the evolution of light and forming chromium oxide.

guanidinium peroxochromate (CN3H6)3CrO8.H2O. yellow-brown powder. In the dry state can be stored for several weeks. The compound is not explosive, does not ignite when grinded in a porcelain bowl, but hisses when heated giving off white smoke.

1,10-phenanthroline.CrO5: light-blue powder. Stable at room temperature. Non-explosive. Conc. H2SO4 liberates O2 and forms Cr2(SO4)3. With boiling alkali solution liberates O2 and forms chromate.

ammonium peroxochromates: (NH4)2CrO5, (NH4)3CrO8, and (NH4)2Cr2O12.2H2O have been identified.

(NH4)2CrO5 is very unstable and the brown solid will ignite spontaneously a little above room temperature, with H2O it forms a yellow orange solution.
(NH4)3CrO8, small red-brown, octahedral crystals with a reddish glance. This compound must be analyzed in the wet condition, since when completley dry it decomposes. It is storeable for a longer period in an atmosphere saturated with H2O-vapors. At about 40 deg.C. it converts to the chromate, at 50 deg.C. it decomposes explosively forming chromium oxide. Pouring conc. H2SO4 over the salt gives a violent reaction with the evolution of light and forms Cr2O3 which vaporizes in green flakes. The same reaction results when bumped or shocked but here is a strong detonation. It is decomposed noticeably from H2O even at 0 degrees.
(NH4)2Cr2O12.2H2O: violet-black powder. The dry compound is storeable in the dry state for a few days, but in air decomposes within 24 h completley to (NH4)2Cr2O7. Burns with a loud hiss when heated strongly, forming chromium oxide and red-brown nitrogen oxides vapors. The conc. aq. solution decomposes pretty quickly to (NH4)2Cr2O7 and liberating oxygen.

[Edited on 10-4-2008 by Hammerl]

-jeffB - 11-4-2008 at 05:40

Quote:
Originally posted by Hammerl
chinolium.CrO5. little crystaline plates, not stable for long. Decomposes from heat with the evolution of light and forming chromium oxide.


Did you mean cholinium?

Formatik - 13-4-2008 at 18:13

Quote:
Originally posted by -jeffB
Quote:
Originally posted by Hammerl
chinolium.CrO5. little crystaline plates, not stable for long. Decomposes from heat with the evolution of light and forming chromium oxide.


Did you mean cholinium?


I didn't know the Latin name would be much different in German as English, but you would know it as quinolinium (C9H7N), a.k.a. chinoline, quinoline, etc. I did leave out an in it should be "quinolinium", and the given formula for the compound is (C9H8N)CrO5.

[Edited on 13-4-2008 by Hammerl]

woelen - 14-4-2008 at 02:40

I tried to make the barium salt of CrO8(3-), but this does not work.

I have tried the following: Dissolve some K3CrO8 in a solution of NaOH. The reason of doing this is that dissolving in plain water results in visible decomposition (very small bubbles of oxygen appear). In a solution of NaOH this does not occur. Problem I have, is that K3CrO8 is only VERY sparingly soluble. In a test tube, half filled with a solution of NaOH, I only can dissolve a tiny spatula of solid K3CrO8. Heating does not work, if I do that, then I again see bubbles of oxygen.

In another test tube I dissolved Ba(OH)2.8H2O. Next, I mixed the two liquids. This results in formation of a yellow/brown precipitate, which is amazingly hard to separate from the liquid. It is very flocculent and hardly settles.

I used pre-cooked water, in order to get rid of carbon dioxide (otherwise a precipitate of BaCO3 is formed as well) and flooded both test tubes with butane gas (my cheap-ass method of creating an 'inert' atmosphere :P ).

So, I did get some brown precipitate (actually quite light, yellow brown), but the amount was very small, and it was a pain to isolate. Because of the very small amount, I could not separate it from the filter paper, it was just a thin layer on the filter paper, half-way inside the paper.

After a lot of hassle I gave up. Probably, the only method of isolating this stuff is using a centrifuge, but I don't have one.

The main problem is the very poor solubility of K3CrO8. I see no other option for making the barium salt. Direct reaction with barium salts does not work, because of the very low solubility of barium chromate. Working wit Ba(OH)2 and CrO3 or working with a sodium chromate solution and adding barium hydroxide to that do not work.

Taoiseach - 17-4-2008 at 01:41

Check out the pic - this is what I obtained by adding BaCl2 to a solution of ammonium perchromate (which must have been at least partly decomposed already at that time). A slimy flocculent precipate appeared that did not look exactly like the bright-yellow dust-like precipate formed by addition of Ba2+ to a solution containing CrO4(2-). Maybe a mixture of barium chromate and barium perchromate? The stuff was so light and fluffy it could not be filtered.

[Edited on 17-4-2008 by Taoiseach]

bariumperchromate.JPG - 29kB

woelen - 19-7-2008 at 13:52

I now did an experiment with the CrO5-pyridine complex. I did not isolate this complex, it is terrible, due to formation of a foam. But the experiment is very nice on its own with surprising color combinations in a single test tube.

http://woelen.homescience.net/science/chem/exps/cr_peroxo_py...

EDIT(woelen): Modified link, such that it works again

[Edited on 8-7-13 by woelen]

Formatik - 25-7-2008 at 05:14

Those are awesome pictures. But that's strange it is a foam, it is said to be glancing platelets or needles. Could it be decomposition? The references say even while drying it in the dessicator it should be in ice because it deflagrates at low temperatures already. The reports on stability are a lightly conflicting where one says it stable for weeks when totally dry, another notes occasional spontaneous explosion. But the reaction with conc. H2SO4 or conc. alkali is real conflicting, where one says no explosion and another does say interaction causes explosion. Below are the full sources. I've even found a Beilstein entry.

Gmelin I.
Gmelin II.

woelen - 26-7-2008 at 00:55

I indeed think it is due to (slow) decomposition. Probably very small particles are formed, which slowly produce oxygen. This causes the particles to go upwards and stick to the surface of the liquid.

Another thing is that the complex is made in aqueous solution and not extracted into an organic solvent. This experiment was not with the intent to isolate the complex, just to see how it looks like and what its properties are.

Taoiseach - 21-11-2008 at 07:17

Here's by far the most comprehensive treatise on peroxo metallates:

http://ir.lib.sfu.ca/bitstream/1892/5801/1/b13595143.pdf

Interestingly the author reports two tetraperoxo complexes of chromium -a trivalent CrV complex made in alkaline solution upon addition of H2O2 to CrO4(2-), and a divalent CrVI complex made in strongly alkaline solution at low temperature from CrO4(2-) and H2O2. It is only due to variations in temperature and OH- concentration that two entirley different compounds are formed!

It seems quite possible that the black stuff woelen prepared and the red stuff I got are not just crystal modifications but entirely different compounds. The red stuff was precipated at much lower temperatures and could well be K2Cr(O2)4. The brown stuff from one of woelens earlier batches might be a mixture of of the CrVI and CrV complex.

[Edited on 21-11-2008 by Taoiseach]

Check out attachment

Taoiseach - 21-11-2008 at 07:44

This is the most interesting part. Check out the lower left part of the graph, starting from CrO4((2-)

perc.JPG - 57kB

woelen - 22-11-2008 at 03:49

This is a very interesting read. I am halfway the document now, and I enjoy reading this kind of stuff.

I have MeCN, so I'll try some of the experiments in the document. CrO3 dissolves in MeCN moderately well, giving an intensely dark brown solution. At the same concentration in water, the solution is bright orange due to formation of dichromate ion. Probably this difference is due to the fact that CrO3 does not form anionic species in MeCN, it simply dissolves as CrO3.

More will follow on this...

woelen - 23-11-2008 at 07:56

I did the following experiment, and the result is quite unexpected:
- dissolve some CrO3 in MeCN, this gives a very dark brown solution
- add a single drop of 50% H2O2 and swirl

This simple experiment leads to formation of a beautiful dark blue/indigo liquid, which is clear. The liquid, sticking to the glass looks like a beautiful kind of ink. The liquid behaves different from an aqueous solution. In aqueous solution, the deep blue/purple complex immediately decomposes, and within one or two minutes nothing of this complex is left. It really is transient. In MeCN the complex seems to be more stable.

However, several minutes after I prepared the blue liquid, it suddenly starts foaming strongly, and a lot of heat is produced. The liquid becomes hot and is almost blown out of the test tube. After this violent reaction, the liquid is somewhat turbid and it has a yellow/brown color.

So, MeCN seems to stabilize the complex CrO(O2).H2O somewhat, but it is dangerous stuff! It tends to suddenly decompose, apparently without any warning. In my experiment, the liquid was very dilute, but if it were more concentrated, or even pure, then there could well have been an explosion.

Interesting dark coloured solution

blargish - 5-4-2015 at 21:23

Carried out the synthesis of potassium tetraperoxochromate(V) the other day, and it went pretty well. I obtained a nice quantity of very dark red-brown (almost black) crystals. This was my second time performing the synthesis; the first time I got a fine crystalline red-brown powder, which I assume to be the exact same compound, but with smaller particle size. Below is a pic of the solid from the first synthesis: (the second is still drying)

Screen Shot 2015-04-06 at 1.12.00 AM.png - 228kB

I then did some experimentation with the solid in aqueous solution, such as the standard decomposition in acidic environment forming the unstable blue CrO(O2)2·H2O species (CrO5) which promptly decomposes to Cr(III).

However, I also found that adding 30% hydrogen peroxide to a solution of the tetraperoxochromate produced a dark, maroon coloured solution that slowly evolved oxygen gas. This solution seemed stable for quite a length of time, but after I left it for a while I found that it had decomposed back into a solution with the same colour as the original tetraperoxochromate solution. I then added some HCl to the resulting solution and found that it followed the same behaviour as the original tetraperoxochromate solution in the formation of the blue peroxo complex. (yet this did seem to linger around longer before decomposing. Not exactly sure what happened, but I'll be sure to repeat it when I get the time)

Below are pics of the maroon solution generated by the addition of hydrogen peroxide to the tetraperoxochromate and the original tetraperoxochromate solution for comparison

Screen Shot 2015-04-06 at 12.48.28 AM.png - 125kB Screen Shot 2015-04-06 at 12.49.27 AM.png - 134kB

I am just wondering what the nature of this solution could be. Looking at the diagram posted by Taoiseach on pg 3 of this thread, I guess this could be the species [CrO(O2)2OH]- in the middle of the diagram. The hydrogen peroxide might act to oxidize the Cr(V) to the Cr(VI) of the second species (as well as providing the slightly acidic environment needed as per the diagram), which slowly decomposes back to the original tetraperoxochromate solution.

Still, this is all given that some other weird complex is not the explanation for the maroon colour.


Also, I am wondering if anyone has had any luck in the synthesis of the so-called violet perchromates, such as K2Cr2O12, or the explosive tetraperoxochromate(VI) suggested by the aforementioned diagram.

woelen - 6-4-2015 at 10:19

Interesting to see this thread come back alive. These peroxochromates are very interesting compounds. With some care, experimenting with them is very rewarding.

I have never seen such a deep red solution from a chromium peroxo complex. It apparently only exists at very high concentrations of H2O2 and at the right pH. Do you have any Ba-salts? It might be interesting to see whether you can precipitate some Ba-salt of this. The solution must be very dilute if you started from K3CrO8, so it may be quite difficult or time consuming to precipitate the barium salt.

What happens on dilution. Does it keep the red color, or does it turn yellow/brown?

blargish - 7-4-2015 at 20:15

Upon dilution the red colour seems to be maintained.

Below are thee pics; the original tetraperoxochromate solution, the concentrated dark red solution from hydrogen peroxide addition, and the dilute solution.

Screen Shot 2015-04-07 at 11.57.34 PM.png - 201kB Screen Shot 2015-04-08 at 12.02.40 AM.png - 113kB Screen Shot 2015-04-07 at 11.58.02 PM.png - 149kB

The concentrated solution evolved oxygen at a much quicker rate with respect to the more dilute solution.

I also added a solution of barium nitrate to a concentrated solution of the unknown complex and it immediately got lighter and cloudy. Slowly, a precipitate was formed with an off-white coloration.

Screen Shot 2015-04-07 at 11.58.20 PM.png - 168kB Screen Shot 2015-04-07 at 11.58.40 PM.png - 260kB

I have doubts of whether this is actually the barium salt of the complex in question due to the relatively large amount of precipitate in comparison with the concentration of the original tetraperoxochromate solution. I have a feeling that this could just be barium peroxide; however, I had no time to separate the solid from the solution and will be sure to do that soon in order to get a better idea of what it might be.

I will also attempt adding the barium nitrate solution to a dilute solution of the red complex to see if that makes a difference.

Apologies for the wacky picture sizes!

vano - 27-1-2021 at 10:22



A mixture of crystals and powder.
received_785261648865589.jpeg - 72kB
Small crystals
received_473480217000430.jpeg - 40kB

Also mine:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ka/e/e5/%E1%83%99%E1%...

woelen - 1-2-2021 at 05:00

Definitely much more red than mine. Interesting to see the color differences.
Do you still have some outside of your ampoule? Take a small amount and put that in a test tube (really small amount, just the tip of a small screwdriver) and then heat the test tube over a flame. It should decompose with a single POP sound (explosive, not burning).

Last weekend I made a little movie of the explosion with my high speed camera (I have a camera, which can do 1000 frames per second at just over 1000x380 resolution, with shutter times on a per frame basis of 1/12800 second). With this camera I found out that the decomposition reaction of K3CrO8 is really fast. I just have the same image in my video, and then in one frame, you see a gentle haze over the solid material, and in the next frame all is gone and there is a yellow smoke, filling the lower 5 cm of the test tube (yellow color is due to K2CrO4). So, the decomposition takes somewhere around 1 ms. It is accompanied with a loud POP sound. For this reason I tell you to take only a tiny amount of K3CrO8 for this experiment. You don't want shattered glass flying around your ears.

vano - 1-2-2021 at 08:31

Woelen, Unfortunately now I only have crystals in this ampoule. All gifts to friends who can not synthesize at home. I have tested it many times. The crystals explode like popcorn and jump into the air. As you said it takes on a yellow color. I mixed the sulfur a few times and it made a very loud noise. Interesting because I just put the mixture on the air, however if it is not like a hill, then it explodes like gunpowder.