Sciencemadness Discussion Board

Azides

 Pages:  1  ..  3    5

Bert - 7-1-2023 at 07:20

Quote: Originally posted by Hey Buddy  
I've been doing sabanejeff-oxidation derived lead azide (dextrin and cmc). I saw this demonstration set up on Astral Chemistry's video channel. This photo is the first arrangement used. I copied his set up. Sidearm test tube as reaction vessel. HN3 diluted with N2 and NO2 is generated and fed into a broke off pipette tip through a two hole stopper into lead acetate/cmc/dextrin aqueous solution. The other hole in the stopper has a short section of pipette connected to a vinyl output hose feeding into a water trap. Hydrazine sulfate and 50% concentration nitric acid are loaded into the reaction chamber, a gentle heat is applied to the reaction tube, around 30 sec to a min of heating by an electric heat gun initiates the reaction smoothly. Generating a movement of the reaction mixture and a fizzing followed by bubbling then intense bubbling then tapering off. Mixed HN3 gas is fed into the receiver chamber loaded with your solution of choice, inorganic hydroxides, acetates and nitrates are the usual solutions.
I have not attempted this with organic substrates. I have been trying this set up using OTC drain cleaner/ AN in situ nitric acid salt mix, instead of the usual diluted HNO3. It generates HN3 almost as smoothly as using HNO3.

I have had some lessons learned using this set up. Obviously, HN3 is the greatest danger presented by any method using hydrazoic acid, its very poisonous and explosive when concentrated. This method is advantageous in that its risk of detonation is minimized by small amounts of gas produced at a time as the reaction proceeds and the gas then neutralized at end point use creating azide directly. The gas is also diluted by the nitric acid presence which is definitely feeding NO and NO2 and maybe some N2 into the stream.

The gas pressure can become intense depending on the vessel and mass of reactants. Astral recommended 1.5 g N2H6SO4 for 4 cc of 50% HNO3. That ratio works smoothly. In modifying the procedure to use NO3 salt, I tried at first mixing hydrazine salt with nitrate salt in the reactor and adding H2SO4. This results in quite an immediate reaction. Ive also blown off the stopper from excess gas pressure from too vigorous of a gas generation, this should be avoided because it off vents hydrazoic acid into the ambient environmentif you are not using a hood. A better method is to first react the H2SO4 with nitrate salt for around 15 minutes prior to loading it into the reactor with the hydrazine inside. This method has no immediate reaction and a reaction doesnt begin until the reactor is heated to around ~100 C.

I have also had issues with bubbling of reaction mixture through the side arm into the receiver. This makes a mess. The solutions I found helpful were using a larger 125 ml flask as the reaction vessel with a longer section of hose fed into the receiver. The hose is connected to a section of 90 degree glass pipe through a one hole stopper. The stopper to the flask is much larger than the test tube stopper and squeezes in tightly with a greater surface area. It has not fired off into the air like the original set up. As of now reaction batch sizes are increased to around 5 ml H2SO4/AN with 5 ml H2O and 3 g hydrazine sulfate.

Hoses degrade from the gasses and so they are consumables in this method but very short lengths are used. I should also mention that I leave the area after the reaction begins and allow it to proceed for 30 min before returning. If I have to stay in the area next to the reactor, I put a stack of bricks in front of the glass for the unlikely hazard of detonation. For clean up I use paper towels and a waste beaker and put all of the contents into a hot fire out doors after cleaning. Im still working on optimizing this method but I thought it was pretty basic and simple. The process that is occurring isnt well understood but its believed to maybe be a breakdown of N2H4 HNO3 into HNO2 that then forms HN3. Using a mixed nitrate salt drain opener reaction mix along with simple hydrazine sulfate makes this method of azide very simple compared to other methods. Azide can be prepared quickly because the reaction is only around 15 minutes and the preparation is very minimum as there is no staging. No requirement of nitrite and hydrazine sulfate can be used direct without free basing.


edit:
I would like to know how other people clean up their equipment after making azides. I would imagine that there are some tips I could pick up because other than making a nitrite bath and dumping everything in, I'm not sure what the best way to clean up is other than rinsing everything with water and using paper towels then incinerating everything,.




[Edited on 7-1-2023 by Hey Buddy]

[Edited on 7-1-2023 by Hey Buddy]


Interesting read. I had the luxury of Sodium azide being available back when I was younger and braver- Glad you've survived learning this process (so far). Also glad you have had the foresight to barricade the process and retire, this is well into the "WHEN, not IF something will go wrong" category.

I'm not going to replicate these processes, I'm not brave enough to play with free HN3. You've no doubt read the toxicology information and the copious historical material on HN3 related accidents? Incidents like a university maintenance worker getting some fingers blown off when disassembling chemistey lab hood duct work which HN3 had been vented through, various deposits of contaminants in the duct & the rivets fastening the ductwork together having become coated with primary explosives thereby?

Years ago, I used a bit of amorphous silver azide in some small special effects charges to emulate bullets striking metal surfaces for a video. Shooting outdoors on a windy, dry, cold fall day, our crew was wearing some wool and synthetic clothing (static electricity generating). One of the scenes needing to be re shot, my partner reached into the .50 BMG mmo box where a number of these small charges were stored, individually taped to cards and (we thought) well enough separated to prevent mass explosion. On touching one of these cards, static fired the device and several others in the container- I re read the literature on ESD sensitivity of primary explosives and quit making/using silver azide.

Be careful and don't get acclimated and blase about personal protection, always proceed on the assumption that such things will explode during processing/storage- Because if you work with them often enough, eventually, they will.

Hey Buddy - 7-1-2023 at 09:42

Thanks for the words of warning.
I hope that the explosion certainty is not as absolute as you suggest. It is diluted. The first time I tried this I forgot to bung up the receiver because I was so nervous thinking about HN3. I was basically generating diluted HN3 freely in the air. Oops. I like this method but I think overall it is a little inefficient. If I can ever cause an explosion using this method I will be sure to come back and report.

[Edited on 8-1-2023 by Hey Buddy]

dave321 - 7-1-2023 at 12:30

Quote: Originally posted by Bert  
Quote: Originally posted by Hey Buddy  
I've been doing sabanejeff-oxidation derived lead azide (dextrin and cmc). I saw this demonstration set up on Astral Chemistry's video channel. This photo is the first arrangement used. I copied his set up. Sidearm test tube as reaction vessel. HN3 diluted with N2 and NO2 is generated and fed into a broke off pipette tip through a two hole stopper into lead acetate/cmc/dextrin aqueous solution. The other hole in the stopper has a short section of pipette connected to a vinyl output hose feeding into a water trap. Hydrazine sulfate and 50% concentration nitric acid are loaded into the reaction chamber, a gentle heat is applied to the reaction tube, around 30 sec to a min of heating by an electric heat gun initiates the reaction smoothly. Generating a movement of the reaction mixture and a fizzing followed by bubbling then intense bubbling then tapering off. Mixed HN3 gas is fed into the receiver chamber loaded with your solution of choice, inorganic hydroxides, acetates and nitrates are the usual solutions.
I have not attempted this with organic substrates. I have been trying this set up using OTC drain cleaner/ AN in situ nitric acid salt mix, instead of the usual diluted HNO3. It generates HN3 almost as smoothly as using HNO3.

I have had some lessons learned using this set up. Obviously, HN3 is the greatest danger presented by any method using hydrazoic acid, its very poisonous and explosive when concentrated. This method is advantageous in that its risk of detonation is minimized by small amounts of gas produced at a time as the reaction proceeds and the gas then neutralized at end point use creating azide directly. The gas is also diluted by the nitric acid presence which is definitely feeding NO and NO2 and maybe some N2 into the stream.

The gas pressure can become intense depending on the vessel and mass of reactants. Astral recommended 1.5 g N2H6SO4 for 4 cc of 50% HNO3. That ratio works smoothly. In modifying the procedure to use NO3 salt, I tried at first mixing hydrazine salt with nitrate salt in the reactor and adding H2SO4. This results in quite an immediate reaction. Ive also blown off the stopper from excess gas pressure from too vigorous of a gas generation, this should be avoided because it off vents hydrazoic acid into the ambient environmentif you are not using a hood. A better method is to first react the H2SO4 with nitrate salt for around 15 minutes prior to loading it into the reactor with the hydrazine inside. This method has no immediate reaction and a reaction doesnt begin until the reactor is heated to around ~100 C.

I have also had issues with bubbling of reaction mixture through the side arm into the receiver. This makes a mess. The solutions I found helpful were using a larger 125 ml flask as the reaction vessel with a longer section of hose fed into the receiver. The hose is connected to a section of 90 degree glass pipe through a one hole stopper. The stopper to the flask is much larger than the test tube stopper and squeezes in tightly with a greater surface area. It has not fired off into the air like the original set up. As of now reaction batch sizes are increased to around 5 ml H2SO4/AN with 5 ml H2O and 3 g hydrazine sulfate.

Hoses degrade from the gasses and so they are consumables in this method but very short lengths are used. I should also mention that I leave the area after the reaction begins and allow it to proceed for 30 min before returning. If I have to stay in the area next to the reactor, I put a stack of bricks in front of the glass for the unlikely hazard of detonation. For clean up I use paper towels and a waste beaker and put all of the contents into a hot fire out doors after cleaning. Im still working on optimizing this method but I thought it was pretty basic and simple. The process that is occurring isnt well understood but its believed to maybe be a breakdown of N2H4 HNO3 into HNO2 that then forms HN3. Using a mixed nitrate salt drain opener reaction mix along with simple hydrazine sulfate makes this method of azide very simple compared to other methods. Azide can be prepared quickly because the reaction is only around 15 minutes and the preparation is very minimum as there is no staging. No requirement of nitrite and hydrazine sulfate can be used direct without free basing.


edit:
I would like to know how other people clean up their equipment after making azides. I would imagine that there are some tips I could pick up because other than making a nitrite bath and dumping everything in, I'm not sure what the best way to clean up is other than rinsing everything with water and using paper towels then incinerating everything,.




[Edited on 7-1-2023 by Hey Buddy]

[Edited on 7-1-2023 by Hey Buddy]


Interesting read. I had the luxury of Sodium azide being available back when I was younger and braver- Glad you've survived learning this process (so far). Also glad you have had the foresight to barricade the process and retire, this is well into the "WHEN, not IF something will go wrong" category.

I'm not going to replicate these processes, I'm not brave enough to play with free HN3. You've no doubt read the toxicology information and the copious historical material on HN3 related accidents? Incidents like a university maintenance worker getting some fingers blown off when disassembling chemistey lab hood duct work which HN3 had been vented through, various deposits of contaminants in the duct & the rivets fastening the ductwork together having become coated with primary explosives thereby?

Years ago, I used a bit of amorphous silver azide in some small special effects charges to emulate bullets striking metal surfaces for a video. Shooting outdoors on a windy, dry, cold fall day, our crew was wearing some wool and synthetic clothing (static electricity generating). One of the scenes needing to be re shot, my partner reached into the .50 BMG mmo box where a number of these small charges were stored, individually taped to cards and (we thought) well enough separated to prevent mass explosion. On touching one of these cards, static fired the device and several others in the container- I re read the literature on ESD sensitivity of primary explosives and quit making/using silver azide.

Be careful and don't get acclimated and blase about personal protection, always proceed on the assumption that such things will explode during processing/storage- Because if you work with them often enough, eventually, they will.


thats an interesting comment on ESD setting off bullet hits made with amorphous silver azide. There is actually a recent patent in germany for the use of Silver azide in bullet hits.
Maybe the hits you mentioned were not shunted, and as you say the esd clothing generating would not help.

Bert - 7-1-2023 at 12:43

The hits were all shunted at the time of incident.

(Edit for long winded explanation)


I have seen some studies of incidents and accidents involving electric matches firing from static electricity even though shunted. Shunting is NOT a magic spell or silver bullet...

Shunting is a fairly effective method of mitigating RF/EMP related ignitions due to induced current flows in firing lines and ematch "leg" wires.

If you allow a very high voltage/tiny current static charge to build up on yourself or a device with an ematch attached? And handle (even shunted) ematches or their associated wires in such a fashion that a static discharge path includes the active materials of a match head? MOST PARTICULARLY, THE FIRST FIRE LAYER? Shunting doesn't help you.

In my case, the ematches involved were made with the old lead thiocyanate/chlorate first fire, now largely superseded by newer and less ESD and impact sensitive first fire mixtures (non chlorate, no heavy metal salts).

The improvised bullet hits were made by dipping finished commercial ematch heads into a slurry of nitrocellulose lacquer, amorphous silver azide and fine zirconium powder. MY OUTER COATING WAS EVEN MORE ESD SENSITIVE THAN THE FAMOUSLY SENSITIVE OLD TECH FIRST FIRE LAYER.

If anyone is thinking about copying this technique, most PARTICULARLY for ON BODY bullet hit effects? DON'T. Those commercial film industry devices are very carefully made to not throw any solid bits, such as fragments of the smalk circuit board chip, lumps of solder and bits of copper wire found at the core of a standard ematch. Those little bits are quite dangerous when thrown at high velocities- If you've seen witness plates placed near a metal cased blasting cap, you know.

Live and learn. Don't do things fast as a "field expedient" because a director/producer didn't think to ask for pyrotechnic effects a few weeks before the shoot started... If there isn't time to source well characterized (commercial!) devices, DONT SHOOT THEIR EFFECTS.

Any accident from such a hasty improvisation is on YOU. And while YOU might be willing to take risks PERSONALLY, ethics should forbid exposing unknowing others to experiments that go kaboom.

[Edited on 1-18-2023 by Bert]

[Edited on 1-18-2023 by Bert]

Hey Buddy - 8-1-2023 at 19:55

Update: I heated product from attempted Sabanejeff oxidation using the drain cleaner/NH4NO3 into lead acetate solution. No detonation. Not sure. It works with HNO3 @ 1.3 d. A reaction takes off and sustains upon gentle heating using salt acid mix exactly the same as HNO3, main difference is HNO3 is very clear in color versus tan>Orange>Red>clear with salt/acid. I will try some other metal salts/concentrations/conditions. try to figure out why product didn't undergo BTFU.

Ca(OCl)2 solution works really well for cleanup.

Raid - 17-1-2023 at 07:21

is there a synthesis of sodium azide somewhere here? need some for lead azide ;)

Bert - 17-1-2023 at 09:21

Quote: Originally posted by PINKBOII  
is there a synthesis of sodium azide somewhere here? need some for lead azide ;)


Yes, there is a sodium azide synthesis somewhere here.:P



[Edited on 1-17-2023 by Bert]

ManyInterests - 17-1-2023 at 13:32

Quote: Originally posted by PINKBOII  
is there a synthesis of sodium azide somewhere here? need some for lead azide ;)


https://youtu.be/eQ2qSBhFndY

Enjoy!

dave321 - 18-1-2023 at 06:23

has anyone here prepared silver azide by the costain process .

and if they have, what was the final product like ?
crystalline and free flowing?

DennyDevHE77 - 4-10-2023 at 21:37

Guys, as you know lead azide is made in the presence of water soluble polymers such as dextrin to get properly formed processable crystals. This is important for industry to make them friable. And as I understand it gives crystals that are not particularly large in size.

But can the solutions simply be poured together at home? Bulkiness is not particularly important, but I am afraid that with this method, along with the smallest powder, some particularly large crystals may form, and then the whole mixture becomes dangerous. It seems that crystals above 0.5 mm of lead azide detonate involuntarily.

Microtek - 7-10-2023 at 00:27

If you use a similar sort of procedure to the one I wrote about in the ETN/PETN crystallization thread you'll get the required small crystals. So, rapid stirring throughout the addition.

Sodium azide recrystallation

Sir_Gawain - 3-1-2024 at 09:32

Can sodium azide be recrystallized in water or a water/ethanol mixture? I’ve read that it hydrolyses slowly to release hydrogen azide. Would a small amount of sodium hydroxide help prevent that? I suspect my sodium azide contains some sodium nitrite/nitrate left over from when I made it, as it burns very fast and throws unburnt powder everywhere. All other homemade samples I’ve seen burned the same as mine, but commercial samples burn very differently (see Chemicalforce).

DennyDevHE77 - 6-1-2024 at 02:11

I found a technique where sodium azide was calmly dissolved in water, evaporated, crystallized on cold, and repeated the cycle many times, then washed with alcohol. So I think it's safe to dissolve...

Microtek - 6-1-2024 at 14:55

HN3 is a weak acid so when NaN3 is dissolved in water, some of the azide ions will be protonated as the equilibrium reasserts itself. Not a lot though.

Sir_Gawain - 6-1-2024 at 15:00

That’s why I suggested adding a small amount of sodium hydroxide; to push the equilibrium to the other side. I’ve noticed a lot of lead azide syntheses call for a very tiny amount of sodium hydroxide, presumably to reduce the formation of hydrogen azide.

Sir_Gawain - 9-1-2024 at 10:59

Would it be better to dissolve in a minimal amount of hot water, add hot ethanol until it starts precipitating, then chill to precipitate, or recrystallize from boiling methanol? Wikipedia lists the solubility as 2.5 g/100 mL of methanol at 25*C, and 0.22 g/100mL of ethanol at 0*C.

Microtek - 9-1-2024 at 23:10

I would suggest doing microscale experiments to see what works best. Consider using a mix of solvents such as water and methanol to do the recrystallization.

MineMan - 11-1-2024 at 04:16

What’s the point of this when we have NAP? Is this the 1950s?

I truly don’t understand 17 pages on this topic. Even the best azide. LA dextrinated can’t come close to comparing in performance or safety.

Why can’t we all just move on??

EF2000 - 11-1-2024 at 08:43

Quote: Originally posted by MineMan  
What’s the point of this when we have NAP? Is this the 1950s?

I truly don’t understand 17 pages on this topic. Even the best azide. LA dextrinated can’t come close to comparing in performance or safety.

Why can’t we all just move on??

We have NAP and ANGN, whole subforum can be officially closed. And deleted.

Sir_Gawain - 11-1-2024 at 10:23

The objective is, as always, to explore the science.

[Edited on 1-11-2024 by Sir_Gawain]

MineMan - 15-1-2024 at 01:30

Quote: Originally posted by EF2000  
Quote: Originally posted by MineMan  
What’s the point of this when we have NAP? Is this the 1950s?

I truly don’t understand 17 pages on this topic. Even the best azide. LA dextrinated can’t come close to comparing in performance or safety.

Why can’t we all just move on??

We have NAP and ANGN, whole subforum can be officially closed. And deleted.


What is ANGN?

Sir_Gawain - 15-1-2024 at 08:58

1-amino-3-nitroguanidinium nitrate.

Nemo_Tenetur - 18-1-2024 at 10:13

Quote: Originally posted by dave321  
has anyone here prepared silver azide by the costain process .

and if they have, what was the final product like ?
crystalline and free flowing?


Exactly with one year delay I´ve tried today a modified process claimed to produce superior product quality described in this patent:

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20150321922A1/en

I followed example one with half quantity of each reagent (1,51 gram silver nitrate instead 3,02 gram and so on ) and diluted the whole mixture with a little bit more distilled water to get the magnetic stirrer bar and immersed thermometer completely covered with the reaction mixture.

The precipitation starts after about 30 minutes and the photo was taken after four hours.

I´m not so happy with the consistency (looks like sludge) and the light to medium grey-colored precipitate. It´s my first attempt to synthesize silver azide, I haven´t seen this substance until yet.

Is a light to medium grey color normal? The reaction vessel was protected from sunlight, only a weak three watt LED bulb was several meters away, the reagents used were pure (silver nitrate snow white crystal, colorless reaction mixture at the beginning), so I´m a little disappointed.



Silver azide.jpg - 155kB

Sir_Gawain - 18-1-2024 at 11:07

Yeah, the slight grey color is normal. I just made some a few days ago. Be careful; it can detonate in tiny quantities without containment.

Nemo_Tenetur - 18-1-2024 at 12:33

Thank you for fast reply. I´ve just cooled the reaction mixture down and filtered the batch into two smaller portions.

Judging from the behaviour during this manipulation, my statement "like sludge" was probably a bit too hasty. With gentle manual swirling, I could easy remove it from the flask and transfer it to the filter paper. Probably the force of the magnetic stirrer bar was simply too weak to keep it in motion.

But the color is still the question. Not light grey, more a medium grey. Macroscopically, it looks like atomized aluminum (the cheap 0 - 63 micron spherical shape, I´ve used plenty amounts in the past).

Now the filter papers (washed first with distilled water, then with IPA) must dry completely before I can perform further tests.




SA washed part 2.jpg - 107kB

SA washed part 1.jpg - 121kB

Nemo_Tenetur - 19-1-2024 at 01:42

The total weight of the (almost) dry product is about 1,28 gram, that´s pretty close to the theoretical maximum 1,33 gram.

See attached pictures, 760 milligram with one eurocent-coin (16,25 mm diameter, for a rough estimation of bulk density) and 520 milligram without.

I guess the bulk density is not as good as expected (patent claimed about 1,5 gram per milliliter), but I do not want to measure it out.

The flowability is moderate, maybe it´s not completely dry.


SA dry 760 mg.jpg - 170kB SA dry part 1.jpg - 162kB

Silver azide flowability

Nemo_Tenetur - 19-1-2024 at 08:06

Anyone here with Silver azide experience? I´d like to get comments about the flowability of my sample since this is the first preparation I´ve performed.

I´m not sure if it is perfectly dry and I´ll store the sample at slightly elevated temperature for one or two additional days and repeat the test.

Sample weight is about 680 milligram.




Attachment: Silver azide flowability.mp4 (1.4MB)
This file has been downloaded 202 times

Etanol - 20-1-2024 at 22:11

Quote: Originally posted by Nemo_Tenetur  

I guess the bulk density is not as good as expected (patent claimed about 1,5 gram per milliliter), but I do not want to measure it out.

The bulk density depends on the form of the crystals. If it is low, you probably violated something in technology. Look at your product in a microscope.

Poor ignitability

Nemo_Tenetur - 8-2-2024 at 13:27

The silver azide sample prepared by the improved costain process is now completely dry, but the ignitability is poor. I think something went wrong with my first batch.

More than two seconds exposure to a blue gas flame are required to get the bang, only faint crackling (maybe microgram quantities blown away from the gas stream?) prior the final bang (which was quite powerful).




Attachment: Silver azide delay.mp4 (449kB)
This file has been downloaded 179 times




Attachment: Silver azide delay slow-motion.mp4 (574kB)
This file has been downloaded 178 times

[Edited on 8-2-2024 by Nemo_Tenetur]

Microtek - 9-2-2024 at 03:34

You should prepare a sample of AgN3 by the regular process (AgNO3 and NaN3 solutions, dropwise addition of one to the other) to compare. I think this "improved" process seems unecessarily complex, and I question the need for silver azide with better processability (unless you are preparing very large amounts of detonators).

Etanol - 9-2-2024 at 07:59

Quote: Originally posted by Nemo_Tenetur  
The silver azide sample prepared by the improved costain process is now completely dry, but the ignitability is poor.

The heat resistance of AgN3 causes unexpected effects sometimes. When you bring a burning match, it first often melts total and then explodes very powerful.
Try to explode it with hot NiCr wire.
Are you sure your reagents are free from impurities of Cl- and SO4(--)?
Try to use more diluted solutions for synthesis. This will reduce the content of soluble impurities in the product.

Quote: Originally posted by Microtek  
You should prepare a sample of AgN3 by the regular process (AgNO3 and NaN3 solutions, dropwise addition of one to the other) to compare. I think this "improved" process seems unecessarily complex, and I question the need for silver azide with better processability (unless you are preparing very large amounts of detonators).

No, ammonia does not form stable complexes with AgN3 in solid form. At least the power of the product does not decrease after recrystallization from water ammonia compared to PbN6.


[Edited on 9-2-2024 by Etanol]

Second batch seems better

Nemo_Tenetur - 9-2-2024 at 10:00

Thank you for fast reply. I´ve performed a second batch with same quantity of reagents, but - as suggested - more diluted with distilled water.

I´ve also reduced the reaction temperature from 75 degree centigrade to 55 - 60 degree and a prolonged reaction time (6 hours followed by a very slow cool-down over night).

My first impression is positive, a fine granular glistening precipitate, very light grey, almost off-white.

Hopefully the ignitability is better. See the attached pictures from the reaction mixture, the unwashed precipitate in the rbf, the still wet clumpy second batch and for comparison together with the first batch (looks like atomized aluminum).

The reagents I´ve used are from commercial lab supply and should therefore be of sufficient purity. The silver nitrate was from caelo, a pharmacy supplier in Germany.

Next week I´ll make further tests and report.

The reason for my efforts is that I want to get a granular, free-flowing product with high density. I don´t want to mess with low-density, flour-like consistency primary, which squeeze out of the casing even with moderate manual pressing.





Silver azide reaction mixture.jpg - 162kB

mixture drained off.jpg - 178kB Second batch.jpg - 129kB First and second batch comparison.jpg - 159kB

Second batch IS better

Nemo_Tenetur - 13-2-2024 at 15:17

The trick is to use lower reaction temperature, prolonged reaction time and more diluted reagents.

The yield is also better, about 1310 mg from 1510 mg silver nitrate (approx. 98 % of theory).

The ignitability is much better, first attempt ignition delay 0,5 - 0,6 s, second attempt about 0,3 s (slow-motion 8 x). I think that´s okay, silver azide explodes beyond 300 degree centigrade.

The second explosion was powerful enough to break a small red plastic piece out of the knife handle.





Attachment: Silver azide improved 1st flame test.mp4 (286kB)
This file has been downloaded 163 times

Attachment: Silver azide improved 1st flame test slow-motion.mp4 (336kB)
This file has been downloaded 164 times

Attachment: Silver azide improved 2nd flame test.mp4 (386kB)
This file has been downloaded 160 times

Attachment: Silver azide improved 2nd flame test slow-motion.mp4 (605kB)
This file has been downloaded 180 times Broken grip.jpg - 178kB

Etanol - 13-2-2024 at 15:26

Quote: Originally posted by Nemo_Tenetur  

The yield is also better, about 1310 mg from 1510 mg silver nitrate (approx. 98 % of theory).

The yield should always be quantitative. Most likely you have not neutralized the entire ammonia in first experiment.

[Edited on 13-2-2024 by Etanol]

Nemo_Tenetur - 13-2-2024 at 15:50

Well, that´s possible. It is also possible that my cheap scale from ebay is not precise enough to weigh out such small quantities accurate. A third option is that my filter paper was too coarse to retain 100 % of the precipitate.

And, by the way, even the patent does not claim 100% yield ...









[Edited on 13-2-2024 by Nemo_Tenetur]

[Edited on 14-2-2024 by Nemo_Tenetur]

pjig - 29-3-2024 at 09:31

Nemo ….quote;
“Now the filter papers (washed first with distilled water, then with IPA) must dry completely before I can perform further tests.”

If I’m not mistaken, there’s a incompatibility with the isopropyl and silver salts, Not sure if it’s just silver nitrate, but the finished agn3 may The adversely affected.

Couple questions on my end. Always found that dextrinated material to be pretty workable ,and cool conditions on manufacture helped crystalline structure.
Couldn’t a high %NC lacquer be used to bind the Agn3 to max the density and desensitize it to static, manipulation etc….. or could it have a different effect , if riced to a granular state and packed into capsule , upon pressing the nc binder causing crystal matrix to internally sheer causing a det? Guess one approach would be to put moist material in cap, and let dry w/o ricing and packing.
The only reason I inquire is I have seen NAP done this way, but not sure how to sensitivities of azides.


[Edited on 29-3-2024 by pjig]

Nemo_Tenetur - 29-3-2024 at 13:11

Hi pjig,

I´ve observed the poor ignitability only with my first batch. Maybe the concentration or reaction time was too high. I´ve always performed the final wash with IPA to speed up drying.

I know that dextrin is used in lead azide production to improve / reduce crystal size and shape (avoid long needles), but I´ve never heard this with silver azide. I think quite the opposite is desired, a coarser grain size to improve density and flowability. Even without dextrin you get an amorphous precipitate with low density and poor flowability. So why should dextrin be useful? Further particle size reduction?

Concerning NC laquer, I have no personal experience with this. But electrostatic discharge is really a serious matter with silver azide. The sensitivity to impact and friction is - according to several published papers - even somewhat higher than lead azide.

I´ve synthesized only a few gram, stored in batches below one gram and separated from each other to minimize the risk and damage. Remote handling with long clamps, thick leather or kevlar gloves and a face shield or at least safety goggles are strongly recommended. ESD is an evil!

Nickel aminoguanidine perchlorate is another topic. From what I´ve read here and within the patent, it´s ignition capability even surpasses lead azide. The patent say that three milligram NAP enclosed in a glass capillary initiate PETN, whereas about 20 milligram lead azide are required. This complex salt is definitely on my to-do-list next time.

If sensitivity is a decisive criterion for you, I would recommend NHN. It´s relatively safe to handle, but you require a much larger quantity and confinement for a reliable DDT. You also require hydrazine hydrate, which is carcinogenic and really not OTC available.

pjig - 29-3-2024 at 17:10

I believe NAP is less in initiation power, vs azide. Dextrin is important for Agn3 as is pbn3. Phlegmatizes the primary to reduce its static issue, and the friction issue. Cold temp in the preparation is important for a small particle size , flatulent material . In this form it packs in caps very well . Large crystals are not good in azides as your aware.
More my curiosity lies in a safe energetic primary, high density, highly ignitable , static free material . W/o large crystal structure.

underground - 30-3-2024 at 02:11

In my humble opinion NiCP is even better than NAP. Also Zink Carbohydrazide Perc is used commercially as inviromental friendly ad not toxic primary. ZCP could be even better than NiCP due to Ni toxicity

Edit: I really dont know why there is so much focus on primaries while there are already a lot of options. I see no interesting for new secondaries

[Edited on 30-3-2024 by underground]

dettoo456 - 30-3-2024 at 10:51

Secondaries are interesting but they’re simply restricted by price. Sure, something like TKX-50 is cool, but it’s far too expensive $/g to ever be worth making a useful amount of. Even RDX is way too cost prohibitive for amateurs. ETN and other nitrate esters or AN-based comps are the only real obtainable materials. I’d say NQ is about where the line is in terms of affordability ($35/kg) for most interested parties.

underground - 30-3-2024 at 11:50

I mean, interesting for some cheap amateur friendly secondaries. Hexamine diperchlorate is one that comes into my mind. Guanidine perchlorate too. Cocrystalized mixtues of easy to make HE or energetic fuels and oxidizers like AP and nitrogen rich fuels. Also there are a few secondaries that can be made cheaply. NTO is one that comes into my mind. There are too plenty of options

[Edited on 30-3-2024 by underground]

dettoo456 - 30-3-2024 at 12:38

I might be in the minority then, as I just look for whatever is cheapest and stores best with favorable performance, though I do think some ‘exotics’ like the co-crystals you spoke of and maybe Boron based materials could be interesting. Also core-shell based materials are rarely spoken of, when they could be very promising. Melamine encapsulated liquid/gel EMs seem attainable. Especially when a simple yet powerful EM like Hydrazine Nitrate could be utilized.

Also, though given a bad rap, I think certain peroxides, like TMDD, deserve more research as potential oxidizers to replace AN or AP (partially). I just don’t know how reactive it’d be in storage or mixed with materials prone to hydrolysis.

I wouldn’t say that something like NTO is cheap though, Semicarbazide in itself is a pain to prepare or buy.

pjig - 30-3-2024 at 18:57

Peroxide is a very effective material . Moody as hell, and always seemingly trying to disassociate decompose its self. Axe shared some cool Gels with it. But as a primary it’s most obtainable and simple to make. Back inthe day i flirted with hmtd it was an effective primary. But once bitten twice shy. In a venture to explore density and power , I bound some with nc laq from hot shotgun powder . It was ona bbq skewer dried ina blob pea sized. Retardedly I touched it off with a small torch. Well I’m sure you can imagine the shit eating look on my face when it went high order and turned the skewer into a peeled flower shape. The torch was blown out of my hand and the hand holding the skewer felt like it was just bitch slapped for steeling cookies. Nc bound materials are no joke.
I gladly steered away from these primaries
Earned much respect that day.

[Edited on 31-3-2024 by pjig]

Nemo_Tenetur - 1-4-2024 at 04:25

Quote: Originally posted by underground  
I mean, interesting for some cheap amateur friendly secondaries. Hexamine diperchlorate is one that comes into my mind. Guanidine perchlorate too. Cocrystalized mixtues of easy to make HE or energetic fuels and oxidizers like AP and nitrogen rich fuels. Also there are a few secondaries that can be made cheaply. NTO is one that comes into my mind. There are too plenty of options

[Edited on 30-3-2024 by underground]


Hmmm, are perchlorates really amateur friendly? Sodium and potassium perchlorate is regulated and highly restricted in the EU, ammonium perchlorate is classified itself as high explosive, at least here in Germany.

Perchloric acid itself is not restricted, but really expensive. I´ve bought a liter for 110 euro, ouch.

So ammonium nitrate fertilizer (the standard 27 % nitrogen grade) is the only affordable source IMHO. Less than one euro per kilogramm, the 20 percent crap (limestone) is easily removed. Although also regulated in the EU, due to the huge quantities marketed in the EU it´s not too hard to get a bag branched off which last for a long time.

underground - 1-4-2024 at 05:55

Quote: Originally posted by Nemo_Tenetur  
Quote: Originally posted by underground  
I mean, interesting for some cheap amateur friendly secondaries. Hexamine diperchlorate is one that comes into my mind. Guanidine perchlorate too. Cocrystalized mixtues of easy to make HE or energetic fuels and oxidizers like AP and nitrogen rich fuels. Also there are a few secondaries that can be made cheaply. NTO is one that comes into my mind. There are too plenty of options

[Edited on 30-3-2024 by underground]


Hmmm, are perchlorates really amateur friendly? Sodium and potassium perchlorate is regulated and highly restricted in the EU, ammonium perchlorate is classified itself as high explosive, at least here in Germany.

Perchloric acid itself is not restricted, but really expensive. I´ve bought a liter for 110 euro, ouch.

So ammonium nitrate fertilizer (the standard 27 % nitrogen grade) is the only affordable source IMHO. Less than one euro per kilogramm, the 20 percent crap (limestone) is easily removed. Although also regulated in the EU, due to the huge quantities marketed in the EU it´s not too hard to get a bag branched off which last for a long time.


It is not that hard to make perchlorates at all. Use an MMO for chlorides to chlorates and platinum bar for chlorates to perchlorates. I have made killos of kclo4 with this way with very little wear of pt bar.

[Edited on 1-4-2024 by underground]

Sir_Gawain - 1-4-2024 at 14:02

And that “platinum bar” cost how much?

dettoo456 - 1-4-2024 at 14:13

Pt or MMO electrodes aren’t absurdly expensive but they do pose a higher cost to entry for obtaining Chlorates & Perchlorates than just buying the salts directly.

I’m surprised NH4NO3 is still available in Eur even, it’s very annoying to get ahold of at a decent price in the US, unless you have a farm & business license. And I’d rather have access to cheap AN than Perchlorates.

This whole discussion has ventured off topic though.

[Edited on 1-4-2024 by dettoo456]

underground - 1-4-2024 at 22:23

Quote: Originally posted by Sir_Gawain  
And that “platinum bar” cost how much?


I guess it depends from country to country. You can google it. It may cost a bit but you will buy it once or twice ( if you want more surface area) and probably it will last a lifetime. Pt bar is not like pt anode. It is much better.

[Edited on 2-4-2024 by underground]

 Pages:  1  ..  3    5